journal article·2020-04-30Open access

Machine-Learning Based Hybrid-Feature Analysis for Liver Cancer Classification Using Fused (MR and CT) Images

Samreen Naeem, Aqib Ali, Salman Qadri, Wali Khan Mashwani, Nasser Tairan, Habib Shah, Muhammad Fayaz, Farrukh Jamal, Christophe Chesneau, Sania Anam

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 9

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to demonstrate the ability of machine-learning (ML) methods for liver cancer classification using a fused dataset of two-dimensional (2D) computed tomography (CT) scans and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Datasets of benign (hepatocellular adenoma, hemangioma, cyst) and malignant (hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatoblastoma, metastasis) liver cancer were acquired at Bahawal Victoria Hospital (BVH), Bahawalpur, Pakistan. The final dataset was generated by fusion of 1200 (100 × 6 × 2) MR and CT-scan images, 200 (100 MRI and 100 CT-scan) images size 512 × 512 for each class of cancer. The acquired dataset was preprocessed by employing the Gabor filters to reduce the noise and taking an automated region of interest (ROIs) using an Otsu thresholding-based segmentation approach. The preprocessed dataset was used to acquire 254 hybrid-feature data for each ROI, which is the combination of the histogram, wavelet, co-occurrence, and run-length features, while 10 optimized hybrid features were selected by employing (probability of error plus average correlation) feature selection technique. For classification, we deployed this optimized hybrid-feature dataset to four ML classifiers: multilayer perceptron (MLP), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and J48, using a ten fold cross-validation method. MLP showed an overall accuracy of (95.78% on MRI and 97.44% on CT). Unfortunately, the obtained results were not promising, and there were some limitations due to the different modalities of the dataset. Thereafter, a fusion of MRI and CT-scan datasets generated the fused optimized hybrid-feature dataset. The MLP has shown a promising accuracy of 99% among all the deployed classifiers.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment · Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis · Brain Tumor Detection and Classification

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Computer Science & IT, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur 63100, Pakistan

Institute of Numerical Sciences, Kohat University of Science & Technology, Kohat 26000, Pakistan

College of Computer Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha Kingdom 61321, Saudi Arabia

School of Arts and Sciences, University of Central Asia, Naryn 722919, Kyrgyzstan

Department of Statistics, Govt S.A Post Graduate College Dera Nawab Sahib, Bahawalpur 63351, Pakistan

Department of Mathematics, Université de Caen, LMNO, Campus II, Science 3, 14032 Caen, France

Department of Computer Science, Govt Degree College for Women Ahmadpur East, Bahawalpur 63350, Pakistan

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Liver diseases and herbal drugs:—A review
2. Ntomi, V., Paspala, A., and Schizas, D. (2018). Novel Techniques in the Surgical Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Liver Cancer, 77.10.5772/intechopen.79982 ↗
3. World Cancer Research Fund International Continuous Update Project Panel. The use and interpretation of anthropometric measures in cancer epidemiology: A perspective from the World Cancer Research Fund international continuous update project10.1002/ijc.30248 ↗
4. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods10.1002/ijc.31937 ↗
5. Update on adrenal tumours in 2017 World Health Organization (WHO) of endocrine tumours10.1007/s12022-017-9484-5 ↗
6. Liver cancer: Approaching a personalized care10.1016/j.jhep.2015.02.007 ↗
7. Russ, J.C., Rindel, J., and Lord, P. (2016). Forensic Uses of Digital Imaging, CRC Press.10.1201/b19159 ↗
8. Medical big data: Neurological diseases diagnosis through medical data analysis10.1007/s41019-016-0011-3 ↗
9. Tadeusiewicz, R., and Ogiela, M.R. (2004). Medical Image Understanding Technology, Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-40997-7 ↗
10. Mohri, M., Rostamizadeh, A., and Talwalkar, A. (2018). Foundations of Machine Learning, MIT Press.
11. Improving liver lesion characterisation using retrospective fusion of FDG PET/CT and MRI10.1016/j.clinimag.2019.01.018 ↗
12. Diagnosis of focal liver lesions from ultrasound using deep learning10.1016/j.diii.2019.02.009 ↗
13. Mariëlle, J.A., Kuijf, H.J., Veldhuis, W.B., Wessels, F.J., Viergever, M.A., and Pluim, J.W. (2019). Automatic classification of focal liver lesions based on MRI and risk factors. PLoS ONE, 14.10.1371/journal.pone.0217053 ↗
14. Focal liver lesions: Computer-aided diagnosis by using contrast-enhanced US cine recordings10.1148/radiol.2017170365 ↗
15. Prototype system for feature extraction, classification and study of medical images10.1016/j.eswa.2016.07.008 ↗
16. Wu, W., Zhou, Z., Wu, S., and Zhang, Y. (2016). Automatic liver segmentation on volumetric CT images using supervoxel-based graph cuts. Comput. Math. Methods Med., 2016.10.1155/2016/9093721 ↗
17. Wu, W., Wu, S., Zhou, Z., Zhang, R., and Zhang, Y. (2017). 3D liver tumor segmentation in CT images using improved fuzzy C-means and graph cuts. BioMed Res. Int., 2017.10.1155/2017/5207685 ↗
18. Boss, R., Chandra, S., Thangavel, K., and Daniel, D.A.P. (2012, January 21–23). Mammogram image segmentation using fuzzy clustering. Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Informatics and Medical Engineering, Tamilnadu, India.10.1109/ICPRIME.2012.6208360 ↗
19. Computer-aided diagnosis of focal liver lesions using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with perflubutane microbubbles10.1109/TMI.2017.2659734 ↗
20. Quaid-e-Azam Medical College (2018, December 05). Bahawal Victoria Hospital—Quaid-e-Azam Medical College. Available online: https://www.qamc.edu.pk/bahawalvictoriahospital/.
21. Multi-source data fusion for aspect-level sentiment classification10.1016/j.knosys.2019.07.002 ↗
22. Pitfalls and problems to be solved in the diagnostic CT/MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS)10.1007/s00330-018-5641-6 ↗
23. Ginneken, V.B., Frangi, A.F., Staal, J.J., Romeny, B.M.H., and Viergever, M.A. (2001, January 9–10). A non-linear gray-level appearance model improves active shape model segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis, Kauai, HI, USA.
24. Darvishnezhad, M., Ghassemian, H., and Imani, M. (2019). Local binary graph feature reduction for three-Dimensional gabor filter based hyperspectral image classification. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing & Spatial Information Sciences, Copernicus Publications.10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W18-285-2019 ↗
25. An objective comparison of detection and segmentation algorithms for artefacts in clinical endoscopy
26. Bhandari, K.A., Kumar, I.V., and Srinivas, K. (2019). Cuttlefish algorithm based multilevel 3D Otsu function for color image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas.10.1109/TIM.2019.2922516 ↗
27. Separability of histogram-based features for optical performance monitoring: An investigation using t-SNE technique10.1109/JPHOT.2019.2913687 ↗
28. Abbas, Z., Rehman, M., Najam, S., and Rizvi, S.M.D. (2019, January 4–6). An efficient gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) based approach towards classification of skin lesion. Proceedings of the 2019 Amity International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AICAI), Dubai, UAE.10.1109/AICAI.2019.8701374 ↗
29. Prasetyo, H., and Simatupang, J.W. (2019, January 20–22). Batik Image Retrieval Using Maximum Run Length LBP and Sine-Cosine Optimizer. Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Sustainable Engineering and Creative Computing (ICSECC), Bandung, Indonesia.10.1109/ICSECC.2019.8907190 ↗
30. Pancholi, S., and Joshi, A.M. (2019). Improved Classification Scheme using Fused Wavelet Packet Transform based Features for Intelligent Myoelectric Prostheses. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.10.1109/TIE.2019.2946536 ↗
31. A new fusion of grey wolf optimizer algorithm with a two-phase mutation for feature selection10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112824 ↗
32. Sarker, H.I., Abushark, Y.B., and Khan, A.I. (2020). ContextPCA: Predicting Context-Aware Smartphone Apps Usage Based on Machine Learning Techniques. Symmetry, 4.10.3390/sym12040499 ↗
33. Taguchi, Y.H. (2020). Applications of PCA Based Unsupervised FE to Bioinformatics. Unsupervised Feature Extraction Applied to Bioinformatics, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-22456-1 ↗
34. Qadri, S., Khan, D.M., Qadri, S.F., Razzaq, A., Ahmad, N., Jamil, M., Shah, A.N., Muhammad, S.S., Saleem, K., and Awan, S.A. (2017). Multisource data fusion framework for land use/land cover classification using machine vision. J. Sens., 2017.10.1155/2017/3515418 ↗
35. Pathak, S., and Kumar, B. (2016). A robust automated cataract detection algorithm using diagnostic opinion-based parameter thresholding for telemedicine application. Electronics, 3.10.3390/electronics5030057 ↗
36. Effectiveness analysis of machine learning classification models for predicting personalized context-aware smartphone usage10.1186/s40537-019-0219-y ↗
37. Remote sensing tree classification with a multilayer perceptron10.7717/peerj.6101 ↗
38. A survey of data fusion in smart city applications10.1016/j.inffus.2019.05.004 ↗
39. Information needs and information-seeking behaviour of faculty members at the Islamia University of Bahawalpur
40. (2019, August 05). Radiopaedia. Available online: https://radiopaedia.org/.