Printability Study of Bioprinted Tubular Structures Using Liquid Hydrogel Precursors in a Support Bath
Source abstract
Abstract
Microextrusion-based bioprinting within a support bath material is an emerging additive manufacturing paradigm for complex three-dimensional (3D) tissue construct fabrication. Although a support bath medium enables arbitrary in-process geometries to be printed, a significant challenge lies in preserving the shape fidelity upon the extraction of the support bath material. Based on the bioprinting in a support bath paradigm, this paper advances quantitative analyses to systematically determine the printability of cell-laden liquid hydrogel precursors towards filament-based tissue constructs. First, a yield stress nanoclay material is judiciously selected as the support bath medium owing to its insensitivity to temperature and ionic variations that are considered in the context of the current gelatin-alginate bio-ink material formulation. Furthermore, phenomenological observations for the rheology-mediated print outcomes enable the compositions for the bio-ink material (10% gelatin, 3% alginate), in tandem with the support bath medium (4% nanoclay, 0.5% CaCl2), to be identified. To systematically evaluate the performance outcomes for bioprinting within a support bath, this paper advances an experimental parametric study to optimize the 3D structural shape fidelity by varying parameters such as the layer height, extrusion flowrate, printing temperature, and printhead speed, towards fabricating complex 3D structures with the stabilization of the desired shape outcome. Specifically, it is found that the layer height and printhead speed are determinant parameters for the extent of successive layer fusion. Moreover, maintenance of an optimal bath temperature is identified as a key parameter for establishing the printability for the hydrogel bio-ink. Studying this effect is enabled by the custom design of a PID temperature control system with integration with the bioprinter for real-time precision control of the support bath temperature. In order to qualify the printed construct, a surface irregularity metric, defined as the average height difference between consecutive local maximum and minimum points of the binary image contour for the printed structure, is advanced to evaluate the quality of the printed constructs. Complex one-to-four bifurcating tubular structure prints demonstrate the applicability of the optimized bioprinting parameter space to create exemplar 3D human vessel-like structures. Finally, a cell viability assay and perfusion test for a printed cell-laden tubular element demonstrates high cell survival rates and leakage-free flow, respectively.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Rapid prototyping of tissue-engineering constructs, using photopolymerizable hydrogels and stereolithography10.1089/ten.2004.10.1316 ↗
2. A global sustainability perspective on 3D printing technologies10.1016/j.enpol.2014.08.033 ↗
3. Rapid prototyping or rapid production? 3D printing processes move industry towards the latter10.1108/01445150310501190 ↗
4. Gibson, I., Rosen, D., and Stucker, B. (2015). Additive Manufacturing Technologies: 3D Printing, Rapid Prototyping, and Direct Digital Manufacturing, Springer. [2nd ed.].10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3 ↗
5. Three-dimensional bioprinting of thick vascularized tissues10.1073/pnas.1521342113 ↗
6. 3D bioprinting of skin: A state-of-the-art review on modelling, materials, and processes10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/032001 ↗
7. Skin Bioprinting: Impending Reality or Fantasy?10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.04.006 ↗
8. Ringeisen, B.R., Spargo, B.J., and Wu, P.K. (2010). Cell and Organ Printing, Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-90-481-9145-1 ↗
9. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs10.1038/nbt.2958 ↗
10. Biofunctional rapid prototyping for tissue-engineering applications: 3D bioplotting versus 3D printing10.1002/pola.10807 ↗
11. 3D printed complex tissue construct using stem cell-laden decellularized extracellular matrix bioinks for cardiac repair10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.10.026 ↗
12. Printing three-dimensional tissue analogues with decellularized extracellular matrix bioink10.1038/ncomms4935 ↗
13. Three-dimensional bioprinting of complex cell laden alginate hydrogel structures10.1088/1758-5090/7/4/045012 ↗
14. Printability study of hydrogel solution extrusion in nanoclay yield-stress bath during printing-then-gelation biofabrication10.1016/j.msec.2017.05.144 ↗
15. Functional Nanoclay Suspension for Printing-Then-Solidification of Liquid Materials10.1021/acsami.7b02398 ↗
16. Hinton, T.J., Jallerat, Q., Palchesko, R.N., Park, J.H., Grodzicki, M.S., Shue, H.-J., Ramadan, M.H., Hudson, A.R., and Feinberg, A.W. (2015). Three-dimensional printing of complex biological structures by freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels. Sci. Adv., 1.10.1126/sciadv.1500758 ↗
17. 3D Printing PDMS Elastomer in a Hydrophilic Support Bath via Freeform Reversible Embedding10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00170 ↗
18. Thermal Inkjet Printing in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine10.2174/187221112800672949 ↗
19. Bioprinting Toward Organ Fabrication: Challenges and Future Trends10.1109/TBME.2013.2243912 ↗
20. A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity10.1038/nbt.3413 ↗
21. The 3D printing of gelatin methacrylamide cell-laden tissue-engineered constructs with high cell viability10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.078 ↗
22. Starly, B., and Shirwaiker, R. (2015). 3D Bioprinting Techniques BT—3D Bioprinting and Nanotechnology in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-824552-1.00020-7 ↗
23. Three-dimensional printing of stem cell-laden hydrogels submerged in a hydrophobic high-density fluid10.1088/1758-5082/5/1/015003 ↗
24. Direct 3D Printing of Shear-Thinning Hydrogels into Self-Healing Hydrogels10.1002/adma.201501234 ↗
25. 3D Bioprinting of Vascularized, Heterogeneous Cell-Laden Tissue Constructs10.1002/adma.201305506 ↗
26. A highly printable and biocompatible hydrogel composite for direct printing of soft and perfusable vasculature-like structures10.1038/s41598-017-17198-0 ↗
27. Extrusion Bioprinting of Shear-Thinning Gelatin Methacryloyl Bioinks10.1002/adhm.201601451 ↗
28. Surface Tension-Viscosity Relation for Liquids10.1021/je60030a031 ↗