LSTM and Bat-Based RUSBoost Approach for Electricity Theft Detection
Source abstract
Abstract
The electrical losses in power systems are divided into non-technical losses (NTLs) and technical losses (TLs). NTL is more harmful than TL because it includes electricity theft, faulty meters and billing errors. It is one of the major concerns in the power system worldwide and incurs a huge revenue loss for utility companies. Electricity theft detection (ETD) is the mechanism used by industry and academia to detect electricity theft. However, due to imbalanced data, overfitting issues and the handling of high-dimensional data, the ETD cannot be applied efficiently. Therefore, this paper proposes a solution to address the above limitations. A long short-term memory (LSTM) technique is applied to detect abnormal patterns in electricity consumption data along with the bat-based random under-sampling boosting (RUSBoost) technique for parameter optimization. Our proposed system model uses the normalization and interpolation methods to pre-process the electricity data. Afterwards, the pre-processed data are fed into the LSTM module for feature extraction. Finally, the selected features are passed to the RUSBoost module for classification. The simulation results show that the proposed solution resolves the issues of data imbalancing, overfitting and the handling of massive time series data. Additionally, the proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art techniques; i.e., support vector machine (SVM), convolutional neural network (CNN) and logistic regression (LR). Moreover, the F1-score, precision, recall and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve metrics are used for the comparative analysis.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electricity Theft Detection Techniques · Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques · Water Systems and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
Department of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
Department of Computer Science, University of Engineering & Technology, New Campus, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Bannu 28100, Pakistan
Department of Information and Communication Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Korea
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Non-linear dynamics of electric power losses, electricity consumption, and GDP in Jamaica10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104530 ↗
2. Northeast Group LLC (2020, February 22). Electricity Theft and Non-Technical Losses: Global Markets, Solutions, and Vendors. Available online: http://www.northeast-group.com.
3. Methods and Techniques of Electricity Thieving in Pakistan10.4236/jpee.2016.49001 ↗
4. Meira, J.A., Glauner, P., State, R., Valtchev, P., Dolberg, L., Bettinger, F., and Duarte, D. (2017, January 23–24). Distilling provider-independent data for general detection of non-technical losses. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Power and Energy Conference at Illinois (PECI), Champaign, IL, USA.10.1109/PECI.2017.7935765 ↗
5. Costly ‘Throw-Ups’: Electricity Theft and Power Disruptions10.1016/j.tej.2015.07.009 ↗
6. Bashkari, S., Sami, A., and Rastegar, M. (2020). Outage Cause Detection in Power Distribution Systems based on Data Mining. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf.10.1109/TII.2020.2966505 ↗
7. Review of non-technical loss detection methods10.1016/j.epsr.2018.01.005 ↗
8. Gul, H., Javaid, N., Ullah, I., Qamar, A.M., Afzal, M.K., and Joshi, G.P. (2020). Detection of Non-Technical Losses using SOSTLink and Bidirectional Gated Recurrent Unit to Secure Smart Meters. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10093151 ↗
9. Abid, S., Alghamdi, T.A., Haseeb, A., Wadud, Z., Ahmed, A., and Javaid, N. (2019). An Economical Energy Management Strategy for Viable Microgrid Modes. Electronics, 8.10.3390/electronics8121442 ↗
10. ESAENARX and DE-RELM: Novel Schemes for Big Data Predictive Analytics of Electricity Load and Price10.1016/j.scs.2019.101642 ↗
11. Adil, M., Javaid, N., Ullah, Z., Maqsood, M., Ali, S., and Daud, M.A. (2020, January 1–3). Electricity Theft Detection using Machine Learning Techniques to Secure Smart Grid. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive System (CISIS‘20), Lodz, Poland.10.1007/978-3-030-50454-0_22 ↗
12. (2020, February 22). State Grid Corporation of China. Available online: https://www.sgcc.com.cn.
13. Electricity theft detection in AMI using customers’ consumption patterns10.1109/TSG.2015.2425222 ↗
14. Detecting and locating non-technical losses in modern distribution networks10.1109/TSG.2016.2574714 ↗
15. Wei, L., Sundararajan, A., Sarwat, A.I., Biswas, S., and Ibrahim, E. (2017, January 18–22). A distributed intelligent framework for electricity theft detection using benford’s law and stackelberg game. Proceedings of the 2017 Resilience Week (RWS), Wilmington, DE, USA.10.1109/RWEEK.2017.8088640 ↗
16. Jamil, A., Alghamdi, T.A., Khan, Z.A., Javaid, S., Haseeb, A., Wadud, Z., and Javaid, N. (2019). An Innovative Home Energy Management Model with Coordination among Appliances using Game Theory. Sustainability, 11.10.3390/su11226287 ↗
17. Big data analytics: An aid to detection of non-technical losses in power utilities10.1007/s10287-018-0325-x ↗
18. Lu, X., Zhou, Y., Wang, Z., Yi, Y., Feng, L., and Wang, F. (2019). Knowledge Embedded Semi-Supervised Deep Learning for Detecting Non-Technical Losses in the Smart Grid. Energies, 12.10.3390/en12183452 ↗
19. Toma, R.N., Hasan, M.N., Nahid, A.A., and Li, B. (2019, January 3–5). Electricity Theft Detection to Reduce Non-Technical Loss using Support Vector Machine in Smart Grid. Proceedings of the 2019 1st International Conference on Advances in Science, Engineering and Robotics Technology (ICASERT), Dhaka, Bangladesh.10.1109/ICASERT.2019.8934601 ↗
20. Detection of non-technical losses using smart meter data and supervised learning10.1109/TSG.2018.2807925 ↗
21. NTL detection in electric distribution systems using the maximal overlap discrete wavelet-packet transform and random under sampling boosting10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2853162 ↗
22. Decision tree and SVM-based data analytics for theft detection in smart grid10.1109/TII.2016.2543145 ↗
23. Hybrid deep neural networks for detection of non-technical losses in electricity smart meters
24. Wide and deep convolutional neural networks for electricity-theft detection to secure smart grids10.1109/TII.2017.2785963 ↗
25. Hasan, M., Toma, R.N., Nahid, A.A., Islam, M.M., and Kim, J.M. (2019). Electricity Theft Detection in Smart Grid Systems: A CNN-LSTM Based Approach. Energies, 12.10.3390/en12173310 ↗
26. Electricity Theft Detection in Power Grids with Deep Learning and Random Forests
27. Analytical investigation of autoencoder-based methods for unsupervised anomaly detection in building energy data10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.005 ↗
28. Real-time anomaly detection based on long short-Term memory and Gaussian Mixture Model10.1016/j.compeleceng.2019.106458 ↗
29. A new selection operator for the discrete empirical interpolation method—Improved a priori error bound and extensions10.1137/15M1019271 ↗
30. Xu, L., Skoularidou, M., Cuesta-Infante, A., and Veeramachaneni, K. (2019). Modeling tabular data using conditional gan. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS, Vancouver Convention Centre.
31. Short-term residential load forecasting based on LSTM recurrent neural network10.1109/TSG.2017.2753802 ↗
32. A Survey on Hyperparameters Optimization Algorithms of Forecasting Models in Smart Grid10.1016/j.scs.2020.102275 ↗
33. Bat algorithm implementation on economic dispatch optimization problem10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.175 ↗
34. Yang, X.S. (2010). A new metaheuristic bat-inspired algorithm. Nature Inspired Cooperative Strategies for Optimization (NICSO 2010), Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-12538-6_6 ↗
35. RUSBoost: A hybrid approach to alleviating class imbalance10.1109/TSMCA.2009.2029559 ↗
36. Abadi, M., Agarwal, A., Barham, P., Brevdo, E., Chen, Z., Citro, C., Corrado, G.S., Davis, A., Dean, J., and Devin, M. (2016). Tensorflow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems. arXiv.
37. A note on using the F-measure for evaluating record linkage algorithms10.1007/s11222-017-9746-6 ↗
38. Classification of Imbalanced Data Based on MTS-CBPSO Method: A Case Study of Financial Distress Prediction
39. Douzas, G., Bacao, F., Fonseca, J., and Khudinyan, M. (2019). Imbalanced Learning in Land Cover Classification: Improving Minority Classes’ Prediction Accuracy Using the Geometric SMOTE Algorithm. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11243040 ↗
40. Deviation from Perfect Performance measures the diagnostic utility of eyewitness lineups but partial Area Under the ROC Curve does not10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.09.003 ↗