Skin Lesion Segmentation Based on Vision Transformers and Convolutional Neural Networks—A Comparative Study
Source abstract
Abstract
Melanoma skin cancer is considered as one of the most common diseases in the world. Detecting such diseases at early stage is important to saving lives. During medical examinations, it is not an easy task to visually inspect such lesions, as there are similarities between lesions. Technological advances in the form of deep learning methods have been used for diagnosing skin lesions. Over the last decade, deep learning, especially CNN (convolutional neural networks), has been found one of the promising methods to achieve state-of-art results in a variety of medical imaging applications. However, ConvNets’ capabilities are considered limited due to the lack of understanding of long-range spatial relations in images. The recently proposed Vision Transformer (ViT) for image classification employs a purely self-attention-based model that learns long-range spatial relations to focus on the image’s relevant parts. To achieve better performance, existing transformer-based network architectures require large-scale datasets. However, because medical imaging datasets are small, applying pure transformers to medical image analysis is difficult. ViT emphasizes the low-resolution features, claiming that the successive downsampling results in a lack of detailed localization information, rendering it unsuitable for skin lesion image classification. To improve the recovery of detailed localization information, several ViT-based image segmentation methods have recently been combined with ConvNets in the natural image domain. This study provides a comprehensive comparative study of U-Net and attention-based methods for skin lesion image segmentation, which will assist in the diagnosis of skin lesions. The results show that the hybrid TransUNet, with an accuracy of 92.11% and dice coefficient of 89.84%, outperforms other benchmarking methods.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management · AI in cancer detection · Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Management Information Systems, College of Business Administration, King Faisal University, Hofuf 31982, Saudi Arabia
Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Jeddah 23955, Saudi Arabia
Funding
Deanship of Scientific Research, Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. WHO (2022, April 05). Key Facts about Cancer. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer.
2. Metastatic Malignant Melanoma: A Case Study
3. Colorectal Cancer Statistics, 202010.3322/caac.21601 ↗
4. Dermatologist-Level Classification of Skin Cancer with Deep Neural Networks10.1038/nature21056 ↗
5. Mobile Teledermatology for Skin Tumour Screening: Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical and Dermoscopic Image Tele-evaluation Using Cellular Phones10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10208.x ↗
6. Alves, J., Moreira, D., Alves, P., Rosado, L., and Vasconcelos, M.J.M. (2019). Automatic Focus Assessment on Dermoscopic Images Acquired with Smartphones. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19224957 ↗
7. Fighting Melanoma with Smartphones: A Snapshot of Where We Are a Decade after App Stores Opened Their Doors10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.08.004 ↗
8. In Vivo Epiluminescence Microscopy of Pigmented Skin Lesions. I. Pattern Analysis of Pigmented Skin Lesions10.1016/S0190-9622(87)70239-4 ↗
9. ABCD Rule of Dermatoscopy: A New Practical Method for Early Recognition of Malignant Melanoma
10. Epiluminescence Microscopy for the Diagnosis of Doubtful Melanocytic Skin Lesions: Comparison of the ABCD Rule of Dermatoscopy and a New 7-Point Checklist Based on Pattern Analysis10.1001/archderm.134.12.1563 ↗
11. Automated Melanoma Recognition in Dermoscopy Images via Very Deep Residual Networks10.1109/TMI.2016.2642839 ↗
12. Automatic Skin Lesion Classification Based on Mid-Level Feature Learning10.1016/j.compmedimag.2020.101765 ↗
13. Codella, N., Rotemberg, V., Tschandl, P., Celebi, M.E., Dusza, S., Gutman, D., Helba, B., Kalloo, A., Liopyris, K., and Marchetti, M. (2019). Skin Lesion Analysis toward Melanoma Detection 2018: A Challenge Hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (Isic). arXiv.
14. Li, Y., and Shen, L. (2018). Skin Lesion Analysis towards Melanoma Detection Using Deep Learning Network. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18020556 ↗
15. FCA-Net: Adversarial Learning for Skin Lesion Segmentation Based on Multi-Scale Features and Factorized Channel Attention10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2940418 ↗
16. Yang, X., Zeng, Z., Yeo, S.Y., Tan, C., Tey, H.L., and Su, Y. (2017). A Novel Multi-Task Deep Learning Model for Skin Lesion Segmentation and Classification. arXiv.
17. A Mutual Bootstrapping Model for Automated Skin Lesion Segmentation and Classification10.1109/TMI.2020.2972964 ↗
18. Liu, L., Tsui, Y.Y., and Mandal, M. (2021). Skin Lesion Segmentation Using Deep Learning with Auxiliary Task. J. Imaging, 7.10.3390/jimaging7040067 ↗
19. Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Dehghani, M., Minderer, M., Heigold, G., and Gelly, S. (2021). An Image Is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale. arXiv.
20. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., and Brox, T. (2015, January 5–9). U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Munich, Germany.10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 ↗
21. Berseth, M. (2017). ISIC 2017-Skin Lesion Analysis towards Melanoma Detection. arXiv.
22. Chang, H. (2017). Skin Cancer Reorganization and Classification with Deep Neural Network. arXiv.
23. Liu, L., Mou, L., Zhu, X.X., and Mandal, M. (2019, January 5–8). Skin Lesion Segmentation Based on Improved U-Net. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Canadian Conference of Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE), Edmonton, AB, Canada.10.1109/CCECE.2019.8861848 ↗
24. Abhishek, K., Hamarneh, G., and Drew, M.S. (2020, January 14–19). Illumination-Based Transformations Improve Skin Lesion Segmentation in Dermoscopic Images. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, Seattle, WA, USA.
25. An Improved Strategy for Skin Lesion Detection and Classification Using Uniform Segmentation and Feature Selection Based Approach10.1002/jemt.23009 ↗
26. Microscopic Skin Laceration Segmentation and Classification: A Framework of Statistical Normal Distribution and Optimal Feature Selection10.1002/jemt.23301 ↗
27. Damian, F.A., Moldovanu, S., Dey, N., Ashour, A.S., and Moraru, L. (2020). Feature Selection of Non-Dermoscopic Skin Lesion Images for Nevus and Melanoma Classification. Computation, 8.10.3390/computation8020041 ↗
28. Khan, S.A., Gulzar, Y., Turaev, S., and Peng, Y.S. (2021). A Modified HSIFT Descriptor for Medical Image Classification of Anatomy Objects. Symmetry, 13.10.3390/sym13111987 ↗
29. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016, January 27–30). Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
30. Huang, G., Liu, Z., Van Der Maaten, L., and Weinberger, K.Q. (2017, January 21–26). Densely Connected Convolutional Networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2017.243 ↗
31. Maninis, K.-K., Caelles, S., Pont-Tuset, J., and Van Gool, L. (2018, January 18–23). Deep Extreme Cut: From Extreme Points to Object Segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00071 ↗
32. Javed Awan, M., Mohd Rahim, M.S., Salim, N., Mohammed, M.A., Garcia-Zapirain, B., and Abdulkareem, K.H. (2021). Efficient Detection of Knee Anterior Cruciate Ligament from Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Deep Learning Approach. Diagnostics, 11.10.3390/diagnostics11010105 ↗
33. Jafari, M.H., Karimi, N., Nasr-Esfahani, E., Samavi, S., Soroushmehr, S.M.R., Ward, K., and Najarian, K. (2016, January 4–8). Skin Lesion Segmentation in Clinical Images Using Deep Learning. Proceedings of the 2016 23rd International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), IEEE, Cancun, Mexico.10.1109/ICPR.2016.7899656 ↗
34. Guided Image Filtering10.1109/TPAMI.2012.213 ↗
35. Yuan, Y. (2017). Automatic Skin Lesion Segmentation with Fully Convolutional-Deconvolutional Networks. arXiv.10.1109/TMI.2017.2695227 ↗
36. Skin Lesion Segmentation in Dermoscopy Images via Deep Full Resolution Convolutional Networks10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.05.027 ↗
37. Step-Wise Integration of Deep Class-Specific Learning for Dermoscopic Image Segmentation10.1016/j.patcog.2018.08.001 ↗
38. Sarker, M., Kamal, M., Rashwan, H.A., Akram, F., Banu, S.F., Saleh, A., Singh, V.K., Chowdhury, F.U.H., Abdulwahab, S., and Romani, S. (2018, January 16–20). SLSDeep: Skin Lesion Segmentation Based on Dilated Residual and Pyramid Pooling Networks. Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Granada, Spain.10.1007/978-3-030-00934-2_3 ↗
39. Milletari, F., Navab, N., and Ahmadi, S.-A. (2016, January 25–28). V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentation. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on 3D Vision, 3DV 2016, Stanford, CA, USA.10.1109/3DV.2016.79 ↗
40. Oktay, O., Schlemper, J., le Folgoc, L., Lee, M., Heinrich, M., Misawa, K., Mori, K., McDonagh, S., Hammerla, N.Y., and Kainz, B. (2018). Attention U-Net: Learning Where to Look for the Pancreas. arXiv.
41. Chen, J., Lu, Y., Yu, Q., Luo, X., Adeli, E., Wang, Y., Lu, L., Yuille, A.L., and Zhou, Y. (2021). Transunet: Transformers Make Strong Encoders for Medical Image Segmentation. arXiv.
42. Cao, H., Wang, Y., Chen, J., Jiang, D., Zhang, X., Tian, Q., and Wang, M. (2021). Swin-Unet: Unet-like Pure Transformer for Medical Image Segmentation. arXiv.