Production of Biogas and Biomethane as Renewable Energy Sources: A Review
Source abstract
Abstract
An economy based on renewable energy sources is the hallmark of responsible companies. Climate policy and energy crisis commitments have led to a search for alternative ways to produce energy. Bioenergy is considered the most consistent renewable energy source due to its economic and environmental benefits. Biogas and biomethane are promising forms of renewable energy derived from widely available evergreen raw materials. Agricultural, animal, industrial and food wastes are excellent substrates used to produce clean and sustainable energy in a circular economy context. Their conversion into biogas and biomethane through the anaerobic digestion (AD) process is an efficient solution to the treatment of waste of different origins. The production and use of biomethane favor important environmental advantages, such as the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions compared with those deriving from the use of conventional fossil fuels. This review would like to highlight modern trends and approaches to evaluate processes and strategies to control biogas and biomethane production. In particular, the use of livestock waste for the digestion process and the reuse of the by-product as fertilizer, as well as the potential development of biogas and biomethane as prospects for the improvement and optimization of renewable energy sources, are discussed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development · Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences, University of Molise, Via F. de Sanctis, IT-86100 Campobasso, Italy
Institute of Atmospheric Pollution Research, Division of Rome, c/o Ministry of Environment and Energy Security, Via Cristoforo Colombo 44, IT-00147 Rome, Italy
Funding
University of Molise and Italian National Research Council (Istituto sull’Inquinamento Atmosferico)
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Balancing carbon emission reductions and social economic development for sustainable development: Experience from 24 countries10.1007/s11769-020-1117-0 ↗
2. Fossil fuel energy consumption in European countries10.1016/j.egypro.2018.10.050 ↗
3. Effects of fossil fuel and total anthropogenic emission removal on public health and climate10.1073/pnas.1819989116 ↗
4. The effect of use of biofuels on environmental pollution—A review
5. Montt, G., Fraga, F., and Harsdorff, M. (2018). The Future of Work in a Changing Natural Environment: Climate Change, Degradation and Sustainability, International Labour Office.
6. European Union policies and their role in combating climate change over the years10.1007/s11869-022-01156-5 ↗
7. Energy systems integration: Implications for public policy10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111609 ↗
8. Exploring pathways to 100% renewable energy in European industry10.1016/j.energy.2023.126687 ↗
9. Singh, R.S., Singh, R.K., and Tripathi, N. (2022). Environmental Management in India: Waste to Wealth, Springer International Publishing. [1st ed.].
10. Biogas generation from biomass as a cleaner alternative towards a circular bioeconomy: Artificial intelligence, challenges, and future insights10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126456 ↗
11. Fortuński, B. (2020). Sustainable development and energy policy: Actual CO2 emissions in the european union in the years 1997–2017, considering trade with china and the USA. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12083363 ↗
12. D’Adamo, I., and Sassanelli, C. (2022). Biomethane community: A research agenda towards sustainability. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14084735 ↗
13. Biber-Freudenberger, L., Basukala, A., Bruckner, M., and Börner, J. (2018). Sustainability Performance of National Bio-Economies. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10082705 ↗
14. Sustainability implications of transformation pathways for the bioeconomy10.1016/j.spc.2021.10.011 ↗
15. Material flow accounting: Measuring global material use for sustainable development10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-060726 ↗
16. Biomass in biogas production: Pretreatment and codigestion10.1016/j.rser.2021.111509 ↗
17. Bhanuprakasha, P., Babua, T.H., Ramakrishnab, S., and Ramesha, A. (2023, January 24–25). Need to shift towards clean, reliable, accessible and affordable renewable energy resources for a sustainable future. Proceedings of the Pollution Control and Sustainable Environment, New Delhi, India.
18. Recent advances in mechanochemical production of chemicals and carbon materials from sustainable biomass resources10.1016/j.rser.2020.109944 ↗
19. Refining biomass residues for sustainable energy and bio-products: An assessment of technology, its importance, and strategic applications in circular bio-economy10.1016/j.rser.2020.109876 ↗
20. Biogas-A Substitute for Natural Gas
21. Renewable energy consumption, environmental degradation and economic growth: The greener the richer?10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108912 ↗
22. Biomethane production potential in Southern Italy: An empirical approach10.1016/j.rser.2022.112190 ↗
23. (2023, September 07). Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Commission Adopts EU Methane Strategy as Part of European Green Deal. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_20_1833.
24. (2023, April 20). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and Committee of the Regions Powering a Climate-Neutral Economy: An EU Strategy for Energy System Integration. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0299.
25. (2023, April 18). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and Committee of the Regions A Farm to Fork Strategy for a Fair, Healthy and Environmentally-Friendly Food System. Available online: https://food.ec.europa.eu/horizontal-topics/farm-fork-strategy_en.
26. Biogas policies and production development in Europe: A comparative analysis of eight countries10.1080/17597269.2022.2034380 ↗
27. Recent Update on anaerobic digestion of paddy straw for biogas production: Advancement, limitation and recommendations10.1016/j.envres.2022.114292 ↗
28. Techno-economic evaluation of bioenergy production from anaerobic digestion of by-products from ethanol flex plants10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122171 ↗
29. Biofuels from wastes in Marmara Region, Turkey: Potentials and constraints10.1007/s11356-021-15464-3 ↗
30. Biofuels: An alternative to conventional fuel and energy source10.1016/j.matpr.2021.08.227 ↗
31. Abomohra, A.E.-F., Elsayed, M., Qin, Z., Ji, H., and Liu, Z. (2020). Biogas—Recent Advances and Integrated Approaches, IntechOpen. [1st ed.].
32. Anaerobic co-digestion of animal manures and lignocellulosic residues as a potent approach for sustainable biogas production10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.137 ↗
33. Approach for modelling anaerobic digestion processes of fish waste10.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.108 ↗
34. (2023, June 13). Methane Emissions—Energy—European Union. Available online: https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/oil-gas-and-coal/methane-emissions_en.
35. Optimization of pilot-scale 3-stage membrane process using asymmetric polysulfone hollow fiber membranes for production of high-purity CH4 and CO2 from crude biogas10.1016/j.cej.2019.123342 ↗
36. Total methane and CO2 emissions from liquefied natural gas carrier ships: The first primary measurements10.1021/acs.est.2c01383 ↗
37. Methane emissions along biomethane and biogas supply chains are underestimated10.1016/j.oneear.2022.05.012 ↗
38. World Meteorological Association (2022). State of the Global Climate 2021, World Meteorological Association. Available online: https://policycommons.net/artifacts/2434625/1290_statement_2021_en/3456217/.
39. Pavičić, J., Novak Mavar, K., Brkić, V., and Simon, K. (2022). Biogas and Biomethane Production and Usage: Technology Development, Advantages and Challenges in Europe. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15082940 ↗
40. Effect of hydraulic retention time on biogas production from cow dung in a semi continuous anaerobic digester10.14710/ijred.7.2.93-100 ↗
41. Nwokolo, N., Mukumba, P., Obileke, K., and Enebe, M. (2020). Waste to energy: A focus on the impact of substrate type in biogas production. Processes, 8.10.3390/pr8101224 ↗
42. Biogas production from organic waste: Recent progress and perspectives10.1007/s12649-018-00546-0 ↗
43. Recent advances in anaerobic digestion of lipid-rich waste: Challenges and potential of seaweeds to mitigate the inhibitory effect10.1016/j.cej.2022.137829 ↗
44. Jiang, B., Zhang, Y., Guo, T., Zhao, H., and Jin, Y. (2018). Structural Characterization of Lignin and Lignin-Carbohydrate Complex (LCC) from Ginkgo Shells (Ginkgo biloba L.) by Comprehensive NMR Spectroscopy. Polymers, 10.10.3390/polym10070736 ↗
45. Hernández-Beltrán, J.U., Lira, I.O.H.-D., Cruz-Santos, M.M., Saucedo-Luevanos, A., Hernández-Terán, F., and Balagurusamy, N. (2019). Insight into Pretreatment Methods of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Increase Biogas Yield: Current State, Challenges, and Opportunities. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9183721 ↗
46. Anaerobic digestion of biorefinery lignin: Effect of different wet explosion pretreatment conditions10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122537 ↗
47. Evaluation of biogas production from different biomass wastes with/without hydrothermal pretreatment10.1016/j.renene.2011.05.002 ↗
48. From biogas to biomethane: A process simulation-based techno-economic comparison of different upgrading technologies in the Italian context10.1016/j.renene.2018.12.052 ↗
49. Biogas: Developments and perspectives in Europe10.1016/j.renene.2018.03.006 ↗
50. Assessment of bioenergy production from solid waste10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.108 ↗
51. Bioenergy in the era of circular economy: Anaerobic digestion technological solutions to produce biogas from lipid-rich wastes10.1016/j.renene.2020.12.034 ↗
52. Environmental sustainability of an integrate anaerobic digestion-composting treatment of food waste: Analysis of an Italian plant in the circular bioeconomy strategy10.1016/j.wasman.2021.12.042 ↗
53. Intermittent and stochastic character of renewable energy sources: Consequences, cost of intermittence and benefit of forecasting10.1016/j.rser.2018.02.007 ↗
54. The role of biogas and biogas-derived fuels in a 100% renewable energy system in Denmark10.1016/j.energy.2020.117426 ↗
55. Eyl-Mazzega, M.A., and Mathieu, C. (2019). Biogas and Biomethane in Europe: Lessons from Denmark, Germany and Italy, Institut Français des Relations Internationales; Etudes de l’Ifri (IFRI). Available online: https://policycommons.net/artifacts/1406133/biogas-and-biomethane-in-europe/2020400/.
56. Piekut, M. (2021). The consumption of renewable energy sources (RES) by the European Union households between 2004 and 2019. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14175560 ↗
57. Promoting agricultural biogas and biomethane production: Lessons from cross-country studies10.1016/j.rser.2019.109332 ↗
58. Renewable energy consumption in EU-28 countries: Policy toward pollution mitigation and economic sustainability10.1016/j.enpol.2019.06.040 ↗
59. Considerations on GHG emissions and energy balances of promising aviation biofuel pathways10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.033 ↗
60. (2023, March 20). Directive (EU) 2015/1513 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 September 2015 Amending Directive 98/70/EC Relating to the Quality of Petrol and Diesel Fuels and Amending Directive 2009/28/EC on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32015L1513.
61. Sustainable development—A ‘selling point’of the emerging EU bioeconomy policy framework?10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.157 ↗
62. (2023, March 23). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Innovating for Sustainable Growth: A Bioeconomy for Europe. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52012DC0060.
63. Clean or renewable—Hydrogen and power-to-gas in EU energy law10.1080/02646811.2020.1795382 ↗
64. (2023, February 11). Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32018L2001.
65. (2023, February 11). Directive (EU) 2019/944 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 on Common Rules for the Internal Market for Electricity and Amending Directive 2012/27/EU. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32019L0944.
66. Decarbonization of the European natural gas grid using hydrogen and methane biologically produced from organic waste: A critical overview10.1016/j.renene.2023.02.029 ↗
67. (2023, March 23). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A Policy Framework for Climate and Energy in the Period from 2020 to 2030. Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/policy-documents/com-2014-15-final.
68. (2023, March 17). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing the Framework for Achieving Climate Neutrality and Amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 (European Climate Law). Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020PC0080.
69. (2023, March 17). Amended Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Establishing the Framework for Achieving Climate Neutrality and Amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 (European Climate Law). Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020PC0563.
70. (2023, March 07). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on an EU Strategy to Reduce Methane Emissions. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0663.
71. (2023, June 20). Fit for 55-The EU’s Plan for a Green Transition. The European Council. Available online: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/green-deal/fit-for-55-the-eu-plan-for-a-green-transition/.
72. Implementing the EU Climate Law via the ‘Fit for 55’ package10.1093/ooenergy/oiab002 ↗
73. The anaerobic digestion process of biogas production from food waste: Prospects and constraints10.1016/j.biteb.2019.100310 ↗
74. Current advances on waste biomass transformation into value-added products10.1007/s00253-020-10567-2 ↗
75. Technology overview of biogas production in anaerobic digestion plants: A European evaluation of research and development10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.079 ↗
76. Promoting circular economy in the surroundings of an organic fraction of municipal solid waste anaerobic digestion treatment plant: Biogas production impact and economic factors10.1016/j.biortech.2019.03.064 ↗
77. New silica based adsorbent material from rice straw and its in-flow application to nitrate reduction in waters: Process sustainability and scale-up possibilities10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150317 ↗
78. Weinrich, S., and Nelles, M. (2021). Basics of Anaerobic Digestion: Biochemical Conversion and Process Modelling, DBFZ. DBFZ-Report, 40.
79. Multivariate insights into enhanced biogas production in thermophilic dry anaerobic co-digestion of food waste with kitchen waste or garden waste: Process properties, microbial communities and metagenomic analyses10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127684 ↗
80. A critical review of biogas production and usage with legislations framework across the globe10.1007/s13762-021-03301-6 ↗
81. Soil carbon sequestration—An interplay between soil microbial community and soil organic matter dynamics10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.152928 ↗
82. Comparative environmental and economic life cycle assessment of dry and wet anaerobic digestion for treating food waste and biogas digestate10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130674 ↗
83. Green electricity generation potential from biogas produced by anaerobic digestion of farm animal waste and agriculture residues in Iran10.1016/j.renene.2020.02.102 ↗
84. The role of biogas solutions in sustainable biorefineries10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.180 ↗
85. Detection of early imbalances in semi-continuous anaerobic co-digestion process based on instantaneous biogas production rate10.1016/j.watres.2019.115444 ↗
86. Prediction of biogas production rate from anaerobic hybrid reactor by artificial neural network and nonlinear regressions models10.1007/s10098-020-01816-z ↗
87. Enhancement of methane production in anaerobic digestion process: A review10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.243 ↗
88. Life cycle assessment of household biogas production in Egypt: Influence of digester volume, biogas leakages, and digestate valorization as biofertilizer10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125468 ↗
89. Piechota, G., and Igliński, B. (2021). Biomethane in Poland—Current status, potential, perspective and development. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14061517 ↗
90. Impurities in biogas: Analytical strategies, occurrence, effects and removal technologies10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105878 ↗
91. Valorisation of lignocellulosic biomass to value-added products: Paving the pathway towards low-carbon footprint10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122678 ↗
92. Downstream augmentation of hydrothermal carbonization with anaerobic digestion for integrated biogas and hydrochar production from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste: A circular economy concept10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135907 ↗
93. Ammonia and temperature determine potential clustering in the anaerobic digestion microbiome10.1016/j.watres.2015.02.025 ↗
94. Improving biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge with a thermal dried mixture of food waste, cheese whey and olive mill wastewater10.1016/j.wasman.2017.08.016 ↗
95. Interactions between substrate characteristics and microbial communities on biogas production yield and rate10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122934 ↗
96. Biogas potential determination and production optimisation through optimal substrate ratio feeding in co-digestion of water hyacinth, municipal solid waste and cow dung10.1080/17597269.2020.1835452 ↗
97. Chow, W.L., Chong, S., Lim, J.W., Chan, Y.J., Chong, M.F., Tiong, T.J., Chin, J.K., and Pan, G.T. (2020). Anaerobic co-digestion of wastewater sludge: A review of potential co-substrates and operating factors for improved methane yield. Processes, 8.10.3390/pr8010039 ↗
98. Benefits and drawbacks of food and dairy waste co-digestion at a high organic loading rate: A Moosburg WWTP case study10.1016/j.wasman.2019.06.008 ↗
99. Anaerobic co-digestion process for biogas production: Progress, challenges and perspectives10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.184 ↗
100. Evaluation of the methane potential of different agricultural and food processing substrates for improved biogas production in rural areas10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.040 ↗