Crop Classification for Agricultural Applications in Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Images
Source abstract
Abstract
Hyperspectral imaging (HSI), measuring the reflectance over visible (VIS), near-infrared (NIR), and shortwave infrared wavelengths (SWIR), has empowered the task of classification and can be useful in a variety of application areas like agriculture, even at a minor level. Band selection (BS) refers to the process of selecting the most relevant bands from a hyperspectral image, which is a necessary and important step for classification in HSI. Though numerous successful methods are available for selecting informative bands, reflectance properties are not taken into account, which is crucial for application-specific BS. The present paper aims at crop mapping for agriculture, where physical properties of light and biological conditions of plants are considered for BS. Initially, bands were partitioned according to their wavelength boundaries in visible, near-infrared, and shortwave infrared regions. Then, bands were quantized and selected via metrics like entropy, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and Modified Normalized Difference Water Index (MNDWI) from each region, respectively. A Convolutional Neural Network was designed with the finer generated sub-cube to map the selective crops. Experiments were conducted on two standard HSI datasets, Indian Pines and Salinas, to classify different types of crops from Corn, Soya, Fallow, and Romaine Lettuce classes. Quantitatively, overall accuracy between 95.97% and 99.35% was achieved for Corn and Soya classes from Indian Pines; between 94.53% and 100% was achieved for Fallow and Romaine Lettuce classes from Salinas. The effectiveness of the proposed band selection with Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) can be seen from the resulted classification maps and ablation study.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Remote Sensing in Agriculture · Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses · Remote-Sensing Image Classification
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Information Technology Engineering (SITE), Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India
Department of Information Technology, Velagapudi Ramakrishna Siddhartha Engineering College, Vijayawada 520007, India
Electrical Engineering Department, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 16278, Saudi Arabia
Funding
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. Swain, P.H., and Davis, S.M. (1978). Biological and physical considerations in applying computer-aided analysis techniques to remote sensor data. Remote Sensing: The Quantitative Approach, McGraw-Hill Book Company.
2. Karlovska, A., Grinfelde, I., Alsina, I., Priedītis, G., and Roze, D. (2015, January 19–20). Plant Reflected Spectra Depending on Biological Characteristics and Growth Conditions. Proceedings of the 7th International Scientific Conference Rural Development 2015, Kaunas, Lithuania.10.15544/RD.2015.045 ↗
3. Three-dimensional discrete cosine transform-based feature extraction for hyperspectral image classification10.1117/1.JRS.12.046010 ↗
4. Band Fusion Based Hyper Spectral Image Classification
5. A hybrid optimization approach for hyperspectral band selection based on wind driven optimization and modified cuckoo search optimization10.1007/s11042-020-09705-9 ↗
6. Band clustering using expectation–maximization algorithm and weighted average fusion-based feature extraction for hyperspectral image classification10.1117/1.JRS.12.046015 ↗
7. A review on graph-based semi-supervised learning methods for hyperspectral image classification
8. Hyperspectral band selection based on metaheuristic optimization approach10.1016/j.infrared.2020.103295 ↗
9. New framework for hyperspectral band selection using modified wind-driven optimization algorithm10.1080/01431161.2019.1607609 ↗
10. Band selection strategies for hyperspectral image classification based on machine learning and artificial intelligent techniques—Survey10.1007/s12517-021-06984-w ↗
11. Makantasis, K., Karantzalos, K., Doulamis, A., and Doulamis, N. (2015, January 26–31). Deep supervised learning for hyperspectral data classification through convolutional neural networks. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Milan, Italy.10.1109/IGARSS.2015.7326945 ↗
12. Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition10.1109/TPAMI.2015.2389824 ↗
13. Discrimination of sugarcane varieties in Southeastern Brazil with EO-1 Hyperion data10.1016/j.rse.2004.11.012 ↗
14. Research on method for extracting vegetation information based on hyperspectral remote sensing data
15. Bhojaraja, B.E., and Hegde, G. (2015, January 12–14). Mapping agewise discrimination of are canut crop water requirement using hyperspectral remotesensing. Proceedings of the International Conference on Water Resources, Coastal and Ocean Engineering, Mangalore, India.10.1016/j.aqpro.2015.02.186 ↗
16. (2021, December 17). Vegetation Analysis: Using Vegetation Indices in ENVI. Available online: https://www.l3harrisgeospatial.com/Learn/Whitepapers/Whitepaper-Detail/ArtMID/17811/ArticleID/16162/Vegetation-Analysis-Using-Vegetation-Indices-in-ENVI.
17. SVM- and MRF-Based Method for Accurate Classification of Hyperspectral Images10.1109/LGRS.2010.2047711 ↗
18. Wei, L., Yu, M., Zhong, Y., Zhao, J., Liang, Y., and Hu, X. (2019). Spatial–Spectral Fusion Based on Conditional Random Fields for the Fine Classification of Crops in UAV-Borne Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Imagery. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11070780 ↗
19. Study on Classification of Agricultural Crop by Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Data
20. Wei, L., Yu, M., Liang, Y., Yuan, Z., Huang, C., Li, R., and Yu, Y. (2019). Precise Crop Classification Using Spectral-Spatial-Location Fusion Based on Conditional Random Fields for UAV-Borne Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Imagery. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11172011 ↗
21. A Spatial–Contextual Support Vector Machine for Remotely Sensed Image Classification10.1109/TGRS.2011.2162246 ↗
22. Zhao, C., Luo, G., Wang, Y., Chen, C., and Wu, Z. (2021). UAV Recognition Based on Micro-Doppler Dynamic Attribute-Guided Augmentation Algorithm. Remote Sens., 13.10.3390/rs13061205 ↗
23. Singh, J., Mahapatra, A., Basu, S., and Banerjee, B. (August, January 28). Assessment of Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 Satellite Imagery for Crop Classification in Indian Region During Kharif and Rabi Crop Cycles. Proceedings of the IGARSS 2019—2019 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Yokohama, Japan.10.1109/IGARSS.2019.8900491 ↗
24. Wei, L., Wang, K., Lu, Q., Liang, Y., Li, H., Wang, Z., Wang, R., and Cao, L. (2021). Crops Fine Classification in Airborne Hyperspectral Imagery Based on Multi-Feature Fusion and Deep Learning. Remote Sens., 13.10.3390/rs13152917 ↗
25. A joint bandprioritization and band-decorrelation approach to band selection forhyperspectral image classification10.1109/36.803411 ↗
26. Clustering-based hyperspectral band selection using information measures IEEE Trans10.1109/TGRS.2007.904951 ↗
27. Bandselection algorithm based on information entropy for hyperspectralimage classification10.1117/1.JRS.11.026018 ↗
28. Selecting band combinations from multi spectral data
29. Optimal Clustering Framework for Hyperspectral Band Selection
30. Unsupervised band selection based on weighted information entropy and 3D discrete cosine transform for hyperspectral image classification10.1080/01431161.2019.1711242 ↗
31. Hyperspectral Vegetation Indices and Their Relationships with Agricultural Crop Characteristics10.1016/S0034-4257(99)00067-X ↗
32. Du, Y., Zhang, Y., Ling, F., Wang, Q., Li, W., and Li, X. (2016). Water Bodies’ Mapping from Sentinel-2 Imagery with Modified Normalized Difference Water Index at 10-m Spatial Resolution Produced by Sharpening the SWIR Band. Remote Sens., 8.10.3390/rs8040354 ↗
33. (2021, December 14). Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Scenes. Available online: http://www.ehu.eus/ccwintco/index.php/Hyperspectral_Remote_Sensing_Scenes.
34. Improved whale optimization based band selection for hyperspectral remote sensing image classification10.1016/j.infrared.2021.103948 ↗
35. Hyperspectral image classification using fuzzy-embedded hyperbolic sigmoid nonlinear principal component and weighted least squares approach
36. A new framework for hyperspectral image classification using Gabor embedded patch based convolution neural network10.1016/j.infrared.2020.103455 ↗
37. Whale optimization-based band selection technique for hyperspectral image classification10.1080/01431161.2021.1906979 ↗
38. Boggavarapu, L.N.P.K., and Manoharan, P. (2017, January 15–16). Survey on classification methods for hyper spectral remote sensing imagery. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICICCS), Madurai, India.10.1109/ICCONS.2017.8250520 ↗
39. Boggavarapu, L.N.P.K., and Manoharan, P. (2018, January 6–8). Classification of Hyper Spectral Remote Sensing Imagery Using Intrinsic Parameter Estimation. Proceedings of the ISDA 2018: International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, Vellore, India.10.1007/978-3-030-16660-1_83 ↗
40. Hyperspectral image classification using CNN with spectral and spatial features integration10.1016/j.infrared.2020.103296 ↗
41. CNN based hyperspectral image classification using unsupervised band selection and structure-preserving spatial features10.1016/j.infrared.2020.103457 ↗
42. Hyperspectral remote sensing image classification using combinatorial optimisation based un-supervised band selection and CNN10.1049/iet-ipr.2020.0728 ↗
43. Two-Level Band Selection Framework for Hyperspectral Image Classification10.1007/s12524-020-01262-w ↗
44. Vaddi, R., and Manoharan, P. (2019, January 15–17). Comparative study of feature extraction techniques for hyper spectral remote sensing image classification: A survey. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICICCS-17), Madurai, India.10.1109/ICCONS.2017.8250521 ↗
45. Probabilistic PCA Based Hyper Spectral Image Classification for Remote Sensing Applications
46. Wavelet enabled ranking and clustering-based band selection and three-dimensional spatial feature extraction for hyperspectral remote sensing image classification10.1117/1.JRS.15.044506 ↗
47. 220 Band AVIRIS Hyperspectral Image Data Set: 12 June 1992 Indian Pine Test Site 3
48. Roy, S.K., Kar, P., Hong, D., Wu, X., Plaza, A., and Chanussot, J. (2021). Revisiting Deep Hyperspectral Feature Extraction Networks via Gradient Centralized Convolution. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 60.10.1109/TGRS.2021.3120198 ↗
49. Lightweight Heterogeneous Kernel Convolution for Hyperspectral Image Classification with Noisy Labels10.1109/LGRS.2021.3112755 ↗
50. A probabilistic neighbourhood pooling-based attention network for hyperspectral image classification10.1080/2150704X.2021.1992034 ↗
51. Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines10.1109/TGRS.2004.831865 ↗
52. Integration of 3-dimensional discrete wavelet transform and Markov random field for hyperspectral image classification10.1016/j.neucom.2016.11.034 ↗
53. Gao, Q., Lim, S., and Jia, X. (2018). Hyperspectral Image Classification Using Convolutional Neural Networks and Multiple Feature Learning. Remote Sens., 10.10.3390/rs10020299 ↗
54. Spectral–Spatial Exploration for Hyperspectral Image Classification via the Fusion of Fully Convolutional Networks10.1109/JSTARS.2020.2968179 ↗
55. A survey of band selection techniques for hyperspectral image classification10.1255/jsi.2020.a5 ↗
56. Pan, E., Ma, Y., Fan, F., Mei, X., and Huang, J. (2021). Hyperspectral Image Classification across Different Datasets: A Generalization to Unseen Categories. Remote Sens., 13.10.3390/rs13091672 ↗
57. Felegari, S., Sharifi, A., Moravej, K., Amin, M., Golchin, A., Muzirafuti, A., Tariq, A., and Zhao, N. (2021). Integration of Sentinel 1 and Sentinel 2 Satellite Images for Crop Mapping. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app112110104 ↗
58. WHU-Hi: UAV-borne hyperspectral with high spatial resolution (H2) benchmark datasets and classifier for precise crop identification based on deep convolutional neural network with CRF10.1016/j.rse.2020.112012 ↗
59. Mini-UAV-Borne Hyperspectral Remote Sensing: From Observation and Processing to Applications10.1109/MGRS.2018.2867592 ↗