journal article·2020-01-27Open access

A Combination of Feature Selection and Random Forest Techniques to Solve a Problem Related to Blast-Induced Ground Vibration

Hong Zhang, Jian Zhou, Danial Jahed Armaghani, M. M. Tahir, Binh Thai Pham, Van Van Huynh

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 3

Abstract

In mining and civil engineering applications, a reliable and proper analysis of ground vibration due to quarry blasting is an extremely important task. While advances in machine learning led to numerous powerful regression models, the usefulness of these models for modeling the peak particle velocity (PPV) remains largely unexplored. Using an extensive database comprising quarry site datasets enriched with vibration variables, this article compares the predictive performance of five selected machine learning classifiers, including classification and regression trees (CART), chi-squared automatic interaction detection (CHAID), random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), and support vector machine (SVM) for PPV analysis. Before conducting these model developments, feature selection was applied in order to select the most important input parameters for PPV. The results of this study show that RF performed substantially better than any of the other investigated regression models, including the frequently used SVM and ANN models. The results and process analysis of this study can be utilized by other researchers/designers in similar fields.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Tunneling and Rock Mechanics · Landslides and related hazards

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China

College of Economics & Management, Changsha University, Changsha 410022, China

State Key Laboratory of Safety and Health for Metal Mines, Maanshan 243000, China

Modeling Evolutionary Algorithms Simulation and Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Electrical & Electronics Engineering, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 758307, Vietnam

UTM Construction Research Centre, Institute for Smart, Infrastructure and Innovative Construction (ISIIC), School of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai 81310, Johor, Malaysia

Institute of Research and Development, Duy Tan University, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Application of soft computing to predict blast-induced ground vibration10.1007/s00366-009-0157-y ↗
2. Prediction and optimization of back-break and rock fragmentation using an artificial neural network and a bee colony algorithm10.1007/s10064-015-0720-2 ↗
3. Prediction of blast-induced ground vibrations via genetic programming10.1016/j.ijmst.2015.09.020 ↗
4. Blasting-induced flyrock and ground vibration prediction through an expert artificial neural network based on particle swarm optimization10.1007/s12517-013-1174-0 ↗
5. Prediction of airblast-overpressure induced by blasting using a hybrid artificial neural network and particle swarm optimization10.1016/j.apacoust.2014.01.005 ↗
6. Neuro-fuzzy technique to predict air-overpressure induced by blasting10.1007/s12517-015-1984-3 ↗
7. Simulation of blasting-induced air overpressure by means of Artificial Neural Networks
8. Prediction of flyrock in boulder blasting using artificial neural network
9. Prediction of blast-induced ground vibration using artificial neural network10.1016/j.ijrmms.2009.03.004 ↗
10. Prediction of an environmental issue of mine blasting: An imperialistic competitive algorithm-based fuzzy system10.1007/s13762-017-1395-y ↗
11. Predicting blast-induced ground vibration using various types of neural networks10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.05.005 ↗
12. Feasibility of ANFIS model for prediction of ground vibrations resulting from quarry blasting10.1007/s12665-015-4305-y ↗
13. An intelligent approach to prediction and control ground vibration in mines10.1007/s10706-004-7068-x ↗
14. Analysis of the environmental effects of ground vibrations produced by blasting in quarries10.1080/13895260500512117 ↗
15. The analysis of ground vibrations induced by bench blasting at Akyol quarry and practical blasting charts10.1007/s00254-007-0859-7 ↗
16. Simultaneous investigation of blast induced ground vibration and airblast effects on safety level of structures and human in surface blasting10.1016/j.ijmst.2014.07.006 ↗
17. Duvall, W.I., and Petkof, B. (1959). Spherical Propagation of Explosion-Generated Strain Pulses in Rock.
18. Suggested Method for Blast Vibration Monitoring10.1016/0148-9062(92)92124-U ↗
19. Indian Standard (1973). Criteria for Safety and Design of Structures Subjected to under Ground Blast.
20. Analysis of ground vibrations caused by bench blasting at can open-pit lignite mine in Turkey10.1007/s00254-001-0446-2 ↗
21. Ambraseys, N.N., and Hendron, A.J. (1968). Dynamic Behaviour of Rock Masses, John Wiley & Sons.
22. Ground vibration from shallow sub-surface blasts
23. Langefors, U., and Kihlstrom, B. (1963). The Modern Technique of Rock Blasting, Wiley.
24. Putting ground vibration predictions into practice
25. Evaluation of blast-induced ground vibration predictors10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.06.004 ↗
26. Intelligent systems for ground vibration measurement: A comparative study10.1007/s00366-010-0193-7 ↗
27. A neuro-fuzzy approach for prediction of longitudinal wave velocity10.1007/s00521-012-0817-5 ↗
28. Application of multivariate analysis for prediction of blast-induced ground vibrations10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.08.002 ↗
29. Ground vibration prediction in quarry blasting through an artificial neural network optimized by imperialist competitive algorithm10.1007/s10064-014-0657-x ↗
30. Modification and prediction of blast-induced ground vibrations based on both empirical and computational techniques10.1007/s00366-016-0448-z ↗
31. Performance of fuzzy logic and artificial neural network in prediction of ground and air vibrations10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.04.016 ↗
32. Xu, H., Zhou, J., Asteris, P.G., Jahed Armaghani, D., and Tahir, M.M. (2019). Supervised Machine Learning Techniques to the Prediction of Tunnel Boring Machine Penetration Rate. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9183715 ↗
33. Compressive strength of natural hydraulic lime mortars using soft computing techniques10.1016/j.prostr.2019.08.122 ↗
34. Prediction of seismic slope stability through combination of particle swarm optimization and neural network10.1007/s00366-015-0400-7 ↗
35. Zhou, J., Aghili, N., Ghaleini, E.N., Bui, D.T., Tahir, M.M., and Koopialipoor, M. (2019). A Monte Carlo simulation approach for effective assessment of flyrock based on intelligent system of neural network. Eng. Comput.10.1007/s00366-019-00726-z ↗
36. Zhou, J., Koopialipoor, M., Murlidhar, B.R., Fatemi, S.A., Tahir, M.M., Armaghani, D.J., and Li, C. (2019). Use of Intelligent Methods to Design Effective Pattern Parameters of Mine Blasting to Minimize Flyrock Distance. Nat. Resour. Res.10.1007/s11053-019-09519-z ↗
37. The use of new intelligent techniques in designing retaining walls10.1007/s00366-018-00700-1 ↗
38. Guo, H., Zhou, J., Koopialipoor, M., Armaghani, D.J., and Tahir, M.M. (2019). Deep neural network and whale optimization algorithm to assess flyrock induced by blasting. Eng. Comput.10.1007/s00366-019-00816-y ↗
39. Application of several optimization techniques for estimating TBM advance rate in granitic rocks10.1016/j.jrmge.2019.01.002 ↗
40. Harandizadeh, H., Armaghani, D.J., and Khari, M. (2019). A new development of ANFIS–GMDH optimized by PSO to predict pile bearing capacity based on experimental datasets. Eng. Comput.10.1007/s00366-019-00849-3 ↗
41. Computational estimation of lateral pile displacement in layered sand using experimental data10.1016/j.measurement.2019.04.081 ↗
42. Estimating the Friction Angle of Black Shale Core Specimens with Hybrid-ANN Approaches10.1016/j.measurement.2019.06.007 ↗
43. Chen, W., Sarir, P., Bui, X.-N., Nguyen, H., Tahir, M.M., and Armaghani, D.J. (2019). Neuro-genetic, neuro-imperialism and genetic programing models in predicting ultimate bearing capacity of pile. Eng. Comput.10.1007/s00366-019-00752-x ↗
44. Hajihassani, M., Abdullah, S.S., Asteris, P.G., and Armaghani, D.J. (2019). A Gene Expression Programming Model for Predicting Tunnel Convergence. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9214650 ↗
45. Evaluation method of rockburst: State-of-the-art literature review10.1016/j.tust.2018.08.029 ↗
46. Slope stability prediction for circular mode failure using gradient boosting machine approach based on an updated database of case histories10.1016/j.ssci.2019.05.046 ↗
47. Multi-planar detection optimization algorithm for the interval charging structure of large-diameter longhole blasting design based on rock fragmentation aspects10.1080/0305215X.2018.1439943 ↗
48. Zhou, J., Li, E., Wei, H., Li, C., Qiao, Q., and Armaghani, D.J. (2019). Random Forests and Cubist Algorithms for Predicting Shear Strengths of Rockfill Materials. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9081621 ↗
49. Feasibility of Stochastic Gradient Boosting Approach for Evaluating Seismic Liquefaction Potential Based on SPT and CPT Case Histories10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001292 ↗
50. Asteris, P.G., and Mokos, V.G. (2019). Concrete compressive strength using artificial neural networks. Neural Comput. Appl.10.1007/s00521-019-04663-2 ↗
51. Huang, L., Asteris, P.G., Koopialipoor, M., Armaghani, D.J., and Tahir, M.M. (2019). Invasive Weed Optimization Technique-Based ANN to the Prediction of Rock Tensile Strength. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9245372 ↗
52. Apostolopoulour, M., Douvika, M.G., Kanellopoulos, I.N., Moropoulou, A., and Asteris, P.G. (2018, January 10–13). Prediction of Compressive Strength of Mortars using Artificial Neural Networks. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference TMM_CH, Transdisciplinary Multispectral Modelling and Cooperation for the Preservation of Cultural Heritage, Athens, Greece.
53. Long-term prediction model of rockburst in underground openings using heuristic algorithms and support vector machines10.1016/j.ssci.2011.08.065 ↗
54. Classification of rockburst in underground projects: Comparison of ten supervised learning methods10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000553 ↗
55. Sarir, P., Chen, J., Asteris, P.G., Armaghani, D.J., and Tahir, M.M. (2019). Developing GEP tree-based, neuro-swarm, and whale optimization models for evaluation of bearing capacity of concrete-filled steel tube columns. Eng. Comput.10.1007/s00366-019-00808-y ↗
56. Model test on the entrainment phenomenon and energy conversion mechanism of flow-like landslides10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.03.023 ↗
57. Analysis of the excavation damaged zone around a tunnel accounting for geostress and unloading10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.03.003 ↗
58. Liu, B., Yang, H., and Karekal, S. (2019). Effect of Water Content on Argillization of Mudstone During the Tunnelling process. Rock Mech. Rock Eng.10.1007/s00603-019-01947-w ↗
59. Investigation on the cracking character of jointed rock mass beneath TBM disc cutter10.1007/s00603-017-1395-8 ↗
60. Effects of joints on the cutting behavior of disc cutter running on the jointed rock mass10.1016/j.tust.2018.07.023 ↗
61. Soft computing-based techniques for concrete beams shear strength10.1016/j.prostr.2019.08.123 ↗
62. Chen, H., Asteris, P.G., Jahed Armaghani, D., Gordan, B., and Pham, B.T. (2019). Assessing Dynamic Conditions of the Retaining Wall: Developing Two Hybrid Intelligent Models. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9061042 ↗
63. Artificial bee colony-based neural network for the prediction of the fundamental period of infilled frame structures10.1007/s00521-018-03965-1 ↗
64. Krill herd algorithm-based neural network in structural seismic reliability evaluation10.1080/15376494.2018.1430874 ↗
65. Asteris, P., Roussis, P., and Douvika, M. (2017). Feed-forward neural network prediction of the mechanical properties of sandcrete materials. Sensors, 17.10.3390/s17061344 ↗
66. Cavaleri, L., Asteris, P.G., Psyllaki, P.P., Douvika, M.G., Skentou, A.D., and Vaxevanidis, N.M. (2019). Prediction of Surface Treatment Effects on the Tribological Performance of Tool Steels Using Artificial Neural Networks. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9142788 ↗
67. Prediction of blast induced ground vibrations and frequency in opencast mine: A neural network approach10.1016/j.jsv.2005.02.044 ↗
68. Prediction of blast-induced ground vibration using artificial neural networks10.1016/j.tust.2010.05.002 ↗
69. Prediction of environmental impacts of quarry blasting operation using fuzzy logic10.1007/s10661-010-1470-z ↗
70. Prediction of ground vibrations resulting from the blasting operations in an open-pit mine by adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system10.1007/s00254-007-1143-6 ↗
71. Comparison of intelligence science techniques and empirical methods for prediction of blasting vibrations10.1016/j.tust.2011.12.001 ↗
72. Prediction of blast-induced ground vibration using support vector machine by tunnel excavation
73. Development of a fuzzy model for predicting ground vibration caused by rock blasting in surface mining10.1177/1077546312437002 ↗
74. Evaluation and prediction of blast-induced ground vibration at Shur River Dam, Iran, by artificial neural network10.1007/s00521-012-0856-y ↗
75. Feasibility of indirect determination of blast induced ground vibration based on support vector machine10.1016/j.measurement.2015.07.019 ↗
76. Peak particle velocity prediction using support vector machines: A surface blasting case study10.17159/2411-9717/2015/v115n7a10 ↗
77. Blast-induced air and ground vibration prediction: A particle swarm optimization-based artificial neural network approach10.1007/s12665-015-4274-1 ↗
78. Forecasting blast-induced ground vibration developing a CART model10.1007/s00366-016-0475-9 ↗
79. Feasibility of ICA in approximating ground vibration resulting from mine blasting10.1007/s00521-016-2577-0 ↗
80. Prediction of ground vibration due to quarry blasting based on gene expression programming: A new model for peak particle velocity prediction10.1007/s13762-016-0979-2 ↗
81. A new developed approach for the prediction of ground vibration using a hybrid PSO-optimized ANFIS-based model10.1007/s12665-017-6864-6 ↗
82. Estimation of ground vibration produced by blasting operations through intelligent and empirical models10.1007/s12665-016-5961-2 ↗
83. Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth Int
84. An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data
85. Brown, G. (2010). Ensemble Learning. Encyclopedia of Machine Learning, Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-30164-8_252 ↗
86. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
87. Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function10.1007/BF02551274 ↗
88. Vapnik, V., and Vapnik, V. (1998). Statistical Learning Theory, Wiley.
89. Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis, support vector machines, and logistic regression10.1007/s10346-013-0391-7 ↗
90. Prediction of air-overpressure caused by mine blasting using a new hybrid PSO–SVR model10.1007/s00366-016-0453-2 ↗
91. Support-vector networks10.1007/BF00994018 ↗
92. Comparison of four kernel functions used in support vector machines for landslide susceptibility mapping: A case study at Suichuan area (China)10.1080/19475705.2016.1250112 ↗
93. Assessment of the effects of training data selection on the landslide susceptibility mapping: A comparison between support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR) and artificial neural networks (ANN)10.1080/19475705.2017.1407368 ↗
94. Prediction of shear capacity of channel shear connectors using the ANFIS model10.12989/scs.2014.17.5.623 ↗
95. Application of artificial neural networks for the prediction of the compressive strength of cement-based mortars
96. Khari, M., Armaghani, D.J., and Dehghanbanadaki, A. (2019). Prediction of Lateral Deflection of Small-Scale Piles Using Hybrid PSO–ANN Model. Arab. J. Sci. Eng.10.1007/s13369-019-04134-9 ↗
97. Prediction of the fundamental period of infilled RC frame structures using artificial neural networks10.1155/2016/5104907 ↗
98. A novel Hybrid Model for predicting Blast-induced Ground Vibration Based on k-nearest neighbors and particle Swarm optimization10.1038/s41598-019-50262-5 ↗
99. Measures of diversity in classifier ensembles and their relationship with the ensemble accuracy10.1023/A:1022859003006 ↗
100. An introduction to variable and feature selection