journal article·2021-04-09Open access

Information Security Behavior and Information Security Policy Compliance: A Systematic Literature Review for Identifying the Transformation Process from Noncompliance to Compliance

Rao Faizan Ali, P. D. D. Dominic, Syed Emad Azhar Ali, Mobashar Rehman, Abid Sohail

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 8

Abstract

A grave concern to an organization’s information security is employees’ behavior when they do not value information security policy compliance (ISPC). Most ISPC studies evaluate compliance and noncompliance behaviors separately. However, the literature lacks a comprehensive understanding of the factors that transform the employees’ behavior from noncompliance to compliance. Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature review (SLR), highlighting the studies done concerning information security behavior (ISB) towards ISPC in multiple settings: research frameworks, research designs, and research methodologies over the last decade. We found that ISPC research focused more on compliance behaviors than noncompliance behaviors. Value conflicts, security-related stress, and neutralization, among many other factors, provided significant evidence towards noncompliance. At the same time, internal/external and protection motivations proved positively significant towards compliance behaviors. Employees perceive internal and external motivations from their social circle, management behaviors, and organizational culture to adopt security-aware behaviors. Deterrence techniques, management behaviors, culture, and information security awareness play a vital role in transforming employees’ noncompliance into compliance behaviors. This SLR’s motivation is to synthesize the literature on ISPC and ISB, identifying the behavioral transformation process from noncompliance to compliance. This SLR contributes to information system security literature by providing a behavior transformation process model based on the existing ISPC literature.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Information and Cyber Security · Network Security and Intrusion Detection · Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Computer and Information Sciences, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia

Department of Management & Humanities, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia

Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Kampar 31900, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia

Department of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Lahore 54000, Pakistan

Funding

Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (UTP)

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Ali, S.E.A., Lai, F.-W., Hassan, R., and Shad, M.K. (2021). The Long-Run Impact of Information Security Breach Announcements on Investors’ Confidence: The Context of Efficient Market Hypothesis. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13031066 ↗
2. Ali, S.E.A., Lai, F.-W., and Hassan, R. (2020, January 2–3). Socio-Economic Factors On Sector-Wide Systematic Risk Of Information Security Breaches: Conceptual Framework. Proceedings of the International Economics and Business Management Conference, Melaka, Malaysia.10.15405/epsbs.2020.12.05.54 ↗
3. Ali, R.F., Dominic, P., and Ali, K. (2020). Organizational governance, social bonds and information security policy compliance: A perspective towards oil and gas employees. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12208576 ↗
4. Dong, K., Ali, R.F., Dominic, P., and Ali, S.E.A. (2021). The Effect of Organizational Information Security Climate on Information Security Policy Compliance: The Mediating Effect of Social Bonding towards Healthcare Nurses. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13052800 ↗
5. Services, S. (2014). IBM Infographic: Cyber Security Intelligence Index, IBM. Available online: http://www-935.ibm.com/services/us/en/it-services/security-services/2014-cyber-security-intelligence-index-infographic.
6. PWC (2017). UK Organisations Still Failing to Prepare Effectively for Cyber Attacks, PWC. Available online: https://www.pwc.co.uk/press-room/press-releases/global-state-information-security-survey-2018-uk.html.
7. NIST (2020, April 14). NIST Standards and Guidlines, Available online: https://www.nist.gov/topics/cybersecurity.
8. Out of fear or desire? Toward a better understanding of employees’ motivation to follow IS security policies10.1016/j.im.2011.07.002 ↗
9. Information security management standards: Problems and solutions10.1016/j.im.2008.12.007 ↗
10. Factors influencing information security management in small-and medium-sized enterprises: A case study from Turkey10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.10.006 ↗
11. Cognitive-affective drivers of employees’ daily compliance with information security policies: A multilevel, longitudinal study10.1111/isj.12173 ↗
12. Predicting employee information security policy compliance on a daily basis: The interplay of security-related stress, emotions, and neutralization
13. A review and analysis of deterrence theory in the IS security literature: Making sense of the disparate findings10.1057/ejis.2011.23 ↗
14. Understanding information systems security policy compliance: An integration of the theory of planned behavior and the protection motivation theory10.1016/j.cose.2011.10.007 ↗
15. Compliance with information security policies: An empirical investigation10.1109/MC.2010.35 ↗
16. Alfawaz, S., Nelson, K., and Mohannak, K. (2010, January 10). Information security culture: A behaviour compliance conceptual framework. Proceedings of the Eighth Australasian Conference on Information Security-Volume 105, Brisbane, Australia.
17. Determinants of early conformance with information security policies10.1016/j.im.2017.01.003 ↗
18. Protection motivation and deterrence: A framework for security policy compliance in organisations10.1057/ejis.2009.6 ↗
19. Encouraging information security behaviors in organizations: Role of penalties, pressures and perceived effectiveness10.1016/j.dss.2009.02.005 ↗
20. Understanding employee responses to stressful information security requirements: A coping perspective10.2753/MIS0742-1222310210 ↗
21. Security: Human Nature and Behaviour10.1007/978-3-030-43999-6_2 ↗
22. Motivating information security policy compliance: The critical role of supervisor-subordinate guanxi and organizational commitment10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102152 ↗
23. Examining the impact of deterrence factors and norms on resistance to information systems security10.1016/j.chb.2018.10.031 ↗
24. What do systems users have to fear? Using fear appeals to engender threats and fear that motivate protective security behaviors10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.4.5 ↗
25. The least secure places in the universe? A systematic literature review on information security management in higher education10.1016/j.cose.2019.07.003 ↗
26. Information security policies’ compliance: A perspective for higher education institutions
27. Evaluating the explanatory power of theoretical frameworks on intention to comply with information security policies in higher education10.1016/j.cose.2018.09.016 ↗
28. A meta-analysis of studies on protection motivation theory and information security behaviour10.4018/IJISP.2015010102 ↗
29. A process model collection and gold standard correspondences for process model matching10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2900174 ↗
30. Shankararaman, V. (2012). Business Enterprise, Process, and Technology Management: Models and Applications, IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-4666-0249-6 ↗
31. Shahzad, K., Shareef, K., Ali, R.F., Nawab, R.M.A., and Abid, A. (2016, January 24–26). Generating process model collection with diverse label and structural features. Proceedings of the 2016 Sixth International Conference on Innovative Computing Technology (INTECH), Dublin, Ireland.10.1109/INTECH.2016.7845083 ↗
32. Variables influencing information security policy compliance10.1108/IMCS-08-2012-0045 ↗
33. Are users competent to comply with information security policies? An analysis of professional competence models10.1108/ITP-02-2017-0052 ↗
34. A meta-analysis of deterrence theory in information security policy compliance research10.1007/s10796-019-09956-4 ↗
35. A Composite Framework for Behavioral Compliance with Information Security Policies10.4018/joeuc.2013070103 ↗
36. Taxonomy of compliant information security behavior10.1016/j.cose.2012.04.004 ↗
37. Insiders’ protection of organizational information assets: Development of a systematics-based taxonomy and theory of diversity for protection-motivated behaviors10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.4.09 ↗
38. Deterrence and punishment experience impacts on ISP compliance attitudes10.1108/ICS-11-2016-0089 ↗
39. Escalation of commitment as an antecedent to noncompliance with information security policy10.1108/ICS-09-2017-0066 ↗
40. Protective measures and security policy non-compliance intention: It vision conflict as a moderator10.4018/JOEUC.2019010101 ↗
41. The role of extra-role behaviors and social controls in information security policy effectiveness10.1287/isre.2015.0569 ↗
42. Towards a user-centric theory of value-driven information security compliance10.1108/ITP-08-2016-0194 ↗
43. User behaviour towards protective information technologies: The role of national cultural differences10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00289.x ↗
44. Information Security Behavior: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Irish and US Employees10.1080/10580530.2019.1651113 ↗
45. Information protection behaviors: Morality and organizational criticality10.1108/ICS-07-2018-0092 ↗
46. Security culture and the employment relationship as drivers of employees’ security compliance10.1108/IMCS-08-2013-0057 ↗
47. Information security conscious care behaviour formation in organizations10.1016/j.cose.2015.05.012 ↗
48. Shaping security behaviour through discipline and agility: Implications for information security management10.1108/09685221111173076 ↗
49. Managing employee compliance with information security policies: The critical role of top management and organizational culture10.1111/j.1540-5915.2012.00361.x ↗
50. Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency10.2307/2089195 ↗
51. Information security policy noncompliance: An integrative social influence model10.1111/isj.12257 ↗
52. Why not comply with information security? An empirical approach for the causes of non-compliance10.1108/OIR-11-2015-0358 ↗
53. Practicing safe computing: A multimedia empirical examination of home computer user security behavioral intentions10.2307/25750694 ↗
54. Continuance of protective security 1301 behavior: A longitudinal study10.1016/j.dss.2016.09.013 ↗
55. Nasir, A., Arshah, R.A., and Ab Hamid, M.R. (2017, January 1–3). Information Security Policy Compliance Behavior Based on Comprehensive Dimensions of Information Security Culture: A Conceptual Framework. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Information System and Data Mining, South Carolina, SC, USA.10.1145/3077584.3077593 ↗
56. Information security management needs more holistic approach: A literature review10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.11.009 ↗
57. Using grounded theory as a method for rigorously reviewing literature10.1057/ejis.2011.51 ↗
58. Booth, A., Sutton, A., and Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review, Sage.
59. Kranz, J., and Haeussinger, F. (2014, January 14–17). Why deterrence is not enough: The role of endogenous motivations on employees’ information security behavior. Proceedings of the International conference on information systems, Auckland, New Zealand.
60. Fear appeals and information security behaviors: An empirical study10.2307/25750691 ↗
61. Motivating IS security compliance: Insights from habit and protection motivation theory10.1016/j.im.2012.04.002 ↗
62. An enhanced fear appeal rhetorical framework: Leveraging threats to the human asset through sanctioning rhetoric10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.1.06 ↗
63. Examining the relationship of organizational insiders’ psychological capital with information security threat and coping appraisals10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.018 ↗
64. The quest for complete security: An empirical analysis of users’ multi-layered protection from security threats10.1007/s10796-017-9755-1 ↗
65. Costly but effective: Comparing the factors that influence employee anti-malware behaviours10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.023 ↗
66. Factors influencing the information security behaviour of IT employees
67. Alanazi, S.T., Anbar, M., Ebad, S.A., Karuppayah, S., and Al-Ani, H.A. (2020). Theory-Based Model and Prediction Analysis of Information Security Compliance Behavior in the Saudi Healthcare Sector. Symmetry, 12.10.3390/sym12091544 ↗
68. Pahnila, S., Karjalainen, M., and Siponen, M.T. (2013, January 18–22). Information Security Behavior: Towards Multi-Stage Models. Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Jeju Island, Korea.
69. Understanding computer security behavioral intention in the workplace: An empirical study of Korean firms10.1108/ITP-12-2012-0147 ↗
70. Exploratory factor analysis of user’s compliance behaviour towards health information system’s security10.4172/2157-7420.1000123 ↗
71. The Moderating effect of working experience on health information system security policies compliance behaviour
72. Privilege or procedure: Evaluating the effect of employee status on intent to comply with socially interactive information security threats and controls10.1016/j.cose.2017.02.006 ↗
73. An integrative model of information security policy compliance with psychological contract: Examining a bilateral perspective10.1016/j.cose.2016.12.016 ↗
74. Do employees in a “good” company comply better with information security policy? A corporate social responsibility perspective10.1108/ITP-09-2017-0298 ↗
75. Security monitoring and information security assurance behaviour among employees: An empirical analysis10.1108/ICS-10-2017-0073 ↗
76. Do I really belong? Impact of employment status on information security policy compliance10.1016/j.cose.2018.09.005 ↗
77. Critical impact of organizational and individual inertia in explaining non-compliant security behavior in the Shadow IT context10.1016/j.cose.2018.09.012 ↗
78. Information Security Policy Compliance: Leadership, Trust, Role Values, and Awareness
79. FORGE: A fake online repository generation engine for cyber deception10.1109/TDSC.2019.2898661 ↗
80. Han, Q., Molinaro, C., Picariello, A., Sperli, G., Subrahmanian, V.S., and Xiong, Y. (2021). Generating Fake Documents using Probabilistic Logic Graphs. IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput., 1–15.
81. Naseer, S., Faizan Ali, R., Dominic, P., and Saleem, Y. (2020). Learning Representations of Network Traffic Using Deep Neural Networks for Network Anomaly Detection: A Perspective towards Oil and Gas IT Infrastructures. Symmetry, 12.10.3390/sym12111882 ↗
82. Information systems security policy compliance: An empirical study of the effects of socialisation, influence, and cognition10.1016/j.im.2013.10.001 ↗
83. Bridging the divide: A qualitative comparison of information security thought patterns between information security professionals and ordinary organizational insiders10.1016/j.im.2014.03.009 ↗
84. Employees’ information security policy compliance: A norm activation perspective10.1016/j.dss.2016.09.009 ↗
85. Information security policy compliance model in organizations10.1016/j.cose.2015.10.006 ↗
86. Motivation and opportunity based model to reduce information security insider threats in organisations
87. Understanding commitment and apathy in is security extra-role behavior from a person-organization fit perspective10.1080/0144929X.2018.1539520 ↗
88. Peers matter: The moderating role of social influence on information security policy compliance10.1111/isj.12271 ↗
89. Organizational climate and individual factors effects on information security compliance behaviour
90. Information systems user security: A structured model of the knowing—Doing gap10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.003 ↗
91. Dysfunctional information system behaviors are not all created the same: Challenges to the generalizability of security-based research10.1016/j.im.2015.07.008 ↗
92. Explaining the misuse of information systems resources in the workplace: A dual-process approach10.1007/s10551-014-2250-4 ↗
93. Safa, N.S., Maple, C., Furnell, S., Azad, M.A., Perera, C., Dabbagh, M., and Sookhak, M. Deterrence and prevention-based model to mitigate information security insider threats in organisations. Future Gener. Comput. Syst., 2019 97, 587–597.10.1016/j.future.2019.03.024 ↗
94. Neutralization: New insights into the problem of employee information systems 1407 security policy violations10.2307/25750688 ↗
95. An integrative behavioral model of information security policy compliance
96. Examining employee computer abuse intentions: Insights from justice, deterrence and neutralization perspectives10.1111/isj.12129 ↗
97. Toward a unified model of information security policy compliance10.25300/MISQ/2018/13853 ↗
98. Technostress and its influence on employee information security policy compliance
99. Effects of sanctions, moral beliefs, and neutralization on information security policy violations across cultures10.1016/j.im.2019.103212 ↗
100. It ain’t my business: A coping perspective on employee effortful security behavior10.1108/JEIM-10-2018-0229 ↗