journal article·2020-12-23Open access

Advantages and Limitations of Current Microgravity Platforms for Space Biology Research

Francesca Ferranti, Marta Del Bianco, Claudia Pacelli

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 1

Abstract

Human Space exploration has created new challenges and new opportunities for science. Reaching beyond the Earth’s surface has raised the issue of the importance of gravity for the development and the physiology of biological systems, while giving scientists the tools to study the mechanisms of response and adaptation to the microgravity environment. As life has evolved under the constant influence of gravity, gravity affects biological systems at a very fundamental level. Owing to limited access to spaceflight platforms, scientists rely heavily on on-ground facilities that reproduce, to a different extent, microgravity or its effects. However, the technical constraints of counterbalancing the gravitational force on Earth add complexity to data interpretation. In-flight experiments are also not without their challenges, including additional stressors, such as cosmic radiation and lack of convection. It is thus extremely important in Space biology to design experiments in a way that maximizes the scientific return and takes into consideration all the variables of the chosen setup, both on-ground or on orbit. This review provides a critical analysis of current ground-based and spaceflight facilities. In particular, the focus was given to experimental design to offer the reader the tools to select the appropriate setup and to appropriately interpret the results.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Spaceflight effects on biology · Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life · Space Exploration and Technology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Italian Space Agency, Via del Politecnico snc, 00133 Rome, Italy

References (84)

Show source-provided references
1. Survival of lichens and bacteria exposed to outer space conditions—Results of the Lithopanspermia experiments10.1016/j.icarus.2010.03.010 ↗
2. Tardigrades survive exposure to space in low Earth orbit10.1016/j.cub.2008.06.048 ↗
3. Limits of Life and the Habitability of Mars: The ESA Space Experiment BIOMEX on the ISS10.1089/ast.2018.1897 ↗
4. Responses of Bacillus subtilis spores to space environment: Results from experiments in space10.1007/BF01581989 ↗
5. Space Microbiology10.1128/MMBR.00016-09 ↗
6. Survival, DNA, and Ultrastructural Integrity of a Cryptoendolithic Antarctic Fungus in Mars and Lunar Rock Analogs Exposed Outside the International Space Station10.1089/ast.2017.1728 ↗
7. Directional gravity sensing in gravitropism10.1146/annurev.arplant.043008.092042 ↗
8. Lang, T., Van Loon, J.J.W.A., Bloomfield, S., Vico, L., Chopard, A., Rittweger, J., Kyparos, A., Blottner, D., Vuori, I., and Gerzer, R. (2017). Towards human exploration of space: The THESEUS review series on muscle and bone research priorities. NPJ Microgravity, 3.10.1038/s41526-017-0013-0 ↗
9. The impact of microgravity on bone in humans10.1016/j.bone.2015.12.057 ↗
10. Towards human exploration of space: The THESEUS review series on cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal research priorities10.1038/npjmgrav.2016.31 ↗
11. Human pathophysiological adaptations to the space environment10.3389/fphys.2017.00547 ↗
12. Towards human exploration of space: The THESEUS review series on immunology research priorities10.1038/npjmgrav.2016.40 ↗
13. Immune system dysregulation during spaceflight: Potential countermeasures for deep space exploration missions10.3389/fimmu.2018.01437 ↗
14. Cerebrovascular autoregulation: Lessons learned from spaceflight research10.1007/s00421-012-2539-x ↗
15. Towards human exploration of space: The THESEUS review series on neurophysiology research priorities10.1038/npjmgrav.2016.23 ↗
16. Prolonged microgravity affects human brain structure and function
17. Towards human exploration of space: The THESEUS review series on nutrition and metabolism research priorities10.1038/npjmgrav.2016.29 ↗
18. Locomotor function after long-duration space flight: Effects and motor learning during recovery10.1007/s00221-010-2171-0 ↗
19. Über orthotrope und plagiotrope Pflanzenteile
20. The Physical Basis of Gravity Stimulus Nullification by Clinostat Rotation10.1104/pp.47.6.756 ↗
21. The fast rotating clinostat: A history of its use in gravitational biology and a comparison of ground-based and flight experiment results
22. Thresholds for Georesponse to Acceleration in Gravity-Compensated Avena Seedlings10.1104/pp.43.3.338 ↗
23. Gravitropism in Phycomyces: Threshold determination on a clinostat centrifuge10.1078/0176-1617-01082 ↗
24. Determination of the threshold acceleration for the gravitropic stimulation of cress roots and hypocotyls10.1016/S0273-1177(97)00636-4 ↗
25. Inclination not force is sensed by plants during shoot gravitropism10.1038/srep35431 ↗
26. Comparison of Microgravity Analogs to Spaceflight in Studies of Plant Growth and Development10.3389/fpls.2019.01577 ↗
27. Some history and use of the random positioning machine, RPM, in gravity related research10.1016/j.asr.2007.02.016 ↗
28. Ground-based facilities for simulation of microgravity: Organism-specific recommendations for their use, and recommended terminology10.1089/ast.2012.0876 ↗
29. Facilities for Simulation of Microgravity in the ESA Ground-Based Facility Programme10.1007/s12217-015-9471-8 ↗
30. Simulated Microgravity: Critical Review on the Use of Random Positioning Machines for Mammalian Cell Culture10.1155/2015/971474 ↗
31. Wuest, S.L., Stern, P., Casartelli, E., and Egli, M. (2017). Fluid dynamics appearing during simulated microgravity using Random Positioning Machines. PLoS ONE, 12.10.1371/journal.pone.0170826 ↗
32. Fluid motion for microgravity simulations in a random positioning machine
33. Growing tissues in microgravity10.1038/nm0898-901 ↗
34. Growing tissues in real and simulated microgravity: New methods for tissue engineering10.1089/ten.teb.2013.0704 ↗
35. Technology and developments for the random positioning machine, RPM10.1007/s12217-008-9043-2 ↗
36. Microgravity simulation by diamagnetic levitation: Effects of a strong gradient magnetic field on the transcriptional profile of Drosophila melanogaster10.1186/1471-2164-13-52 ↗
37. Magnetic levitation-based Martian and Lunar gravity simulator10.1016/j.asr.2005.01.081 ↗
38. Magnetic-field-induced vertigo: A theoretical and experimental investigation10.1002/bem.20316 ↗
39. Maret, G., and Dransfeld, K. (1985). Biomolecules and Polymers in High Steady Magnetic Fields. Strong and Ultrastrong Magnetic Fields and Their Applications, Springer.10.1007/3-540-13504-9_10 ↗
40. Influence of nonuniform magnetic fields on orientation of plant seedlings in microgravity conditions10.1016/S0273-1177(01)00372-6 ↗
41. How a High-Gradient Magnetic Field Could Affect Cell Life10.1038/srep37407 ↗
42. Evaluating countermeasures in spaceflight analogs10.1152/japplphysiol.00860.2015 ↗
43. Cardiovascular responses to orthostatic tests after a 42-day head-down bed-rest10.1007/s004210050299 ↗
44. Nicogossian, A.E., Huntoon, C., and Pool, S. (1994). Space Physiology and Medicine, Lea and Febiger.
45. Apoplast as the site of response to environmental signals10.1007/BF02507163 ↗
46. New aspects of gravity responses in plant cells10.1016/S0074-7696(03)29005-7 ↗
47. Long-term dry immersion: Review and prospects10.1007/s00421-010-1750-x ↗
48. Dry immersion as a ground-based model of microgravity physiological effects10.3389/fphys.2019.00284 ↗
49. Leach-Huntoon, C., Grigoriev, A., and Natochin, Y. (1998). Fluid and Electrolyte Regulation in Spaceflight, American Astronautical Society.
50. Unilateral lower limb suspension: From subject selection to “omic” responses10.1152/japplphysiol.01052.2015 ↗
51. Hindlimb unloading: Rodent analog for microgravity10.1152/japplphysiol.00997.2015 ↗
52. Models of sarcopenia: Short review10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.03.152 ↗
53. COSMOS 2044 mission. Overview10.1152/jappl.1992.73.2.S1 ↗
54. Comparison of hypergravity and microgravity effects on rat physiology: An overview
55. Muscle sarcomere lesions and thrombosis after spaceflight and suspension unloading10.1152/jappl.1992.73.2.S33 ↗
56. Hindlimb unloading rodent model: Technical aspects10.1152/japplphysiol.00969.2001 ↗
57. Muscle unloading: A comparison between spaceflight and ground-based models10.1111/apha.13431 ↗
58. (2020, October 23). 4 Drop Tower—European Space Agency. Available online: http://wsn.spaceflight.esa.int/docs/EUG2LGPr3/EUG2LGPr3-4-DropTower.pdf.
59. From the Bremen Drop Tower to the international space station ISS—Ways to weightlessness in the German Space Life Sciences Program10.1002/sita.200600108 ↗
60. (2020, October 23). 5 Parabolic Flights—European Space Agency. Available online: http://wsn.spaceflight.esa.int/docs/EUG2LGPr3/EUG2LGPr3-5-ParabolicFlights.pdf.
61. Parabolic flight as a spaceflight analog10.1152/japplphysiol.01046.2015 ↗
62. (2020, October 23). 6 Sounding Rockets—European Space Agency. Available online: http://wsn.spaceflight.esa.int/docs/EUG2LGPr3/EUG2LGPr3-6-SoundingRockets.pdf.
63. (2020, October 29). NASA Sounding Rocket Program Overview, Available online: https://rscience.gsfc.nasa.gov/srrov.html.
64. Santoni, F., Gugliermetti, L., Piras, G., De Pascale, S., Pannico, A., Piergentili, F., Marzioli, P., Frezza, L., Amadio, D., and Gianfermo, A. (2020, January 22–24). GreenCube: Microgreens cultivation and growth monitoring on-board a 3U CubeSat. Proceedings of the Conference: 2020 IEEE 7th International Workshop on Metrology for AeroSpace, Pisa, Italy.10.1109/MetroAeroSpace48742.2020.9160063 ↗
65. Meneghin, A., Brucato, J.R., Poggiali, G., Nascetti, A., Anfossi, L., and Mirasoli, M. (2019, January 3–6). Astrobio Cubesat: A Mini Laboratory Payload for Space Environment Astrobiology Experiments. Proceedings of the EANA 2019—19th EANA Astrobiology Conference, Orléans, France.
66. The O/OREOS mission: First science data from the Space Environment Survivability of Living Organisms (SESLO) payload10.1089/ast.2011.0714 ↗
67. Ricco, A.J., Hanel, R., Bhattacharya, S., Boone, T., Tan, M., Mousavi, A., Padgen, M., Gentry, D., Rademacher, A., and Schooley, A. (2016, January 5–9). The biosentinel bioanalytical microsystem: Characterizing DNA radiation damage in living organisms beyond earth orbit. Proceedings of the Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems Workshop Hilton Head Island, Hilton Head Island, SC, USA.10.31438/trf.hh2016.95 ↗
68. Survey, Statistical Analysis and Classification of Launched CubeSat Missions with Emphasis on the Attitude Control Method
69. Propulsion for CubeSats10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.01.048 ↗
70. Marinan, A., Nicholas, A., and Cahoy, K. (2013, January 2–9). Ad hoc CubeSat constellations: Secondary launch coverage and distribution. Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings, Big Sky, MT, USA.10.1109/AERO.2013.6497174 ↗
71. Schoolcraft, J., Klesh, A., and Werne, T. (2016). MarCO: Interplanetary mission development on a cubesat scale. AIAA, 1–8.10.2514/6.2016-2491 ↗
72. (2020, October 23). The Global Exploration Roadmap 2018. Available online: https://www.globalspaceexploration.org/wordpress/wp-content/isecg/GER_2018_small_mobile.pdf.
73. (2020, October 23). ISS Benefits for Humanity—3rd Edition NASA, Available online: https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/news/b4h-3rd-ed-book/.
74. Impact shocked rocks as protective habitats on an anoxic early Earth10.1017/S1473550414000123 ↗
75. The affect of the space environment on the survival of Halorubrum chaoviator and Synechococcus (Nägeli): Data from the Space Experiment OSMO on EXPOSE-R10.1017/S147355041400055X ↗
76. Survival of spores of trichoderma longibrachiatum in space: Data from the Space Experiment SPORES on EXPOSE-R10.1017/S1473550414000408 ↗
77. The SPORES experiment of the EXPOSE-R mission: Bacillus subtilis spores in artificial meteorites10.1017/S1473550414000251 ↗
78. (2020, October 26). Annual Highlights of Results from the International Space Station (1 October 2018–1 October 2019), Available online: https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/np-2019-11-010-jsciss_annual_highlights_2019_screen_12-11-19.pdf.
79. Spaceflight exploration in plant gravitational biology10.1007/978-1-4939-2697-8_20 ↗
80. Development of new experimental platform ‘MARS’-Multiple Artificial-gravity Research System-to elucidate the impacts of micro/partial gravity on mice10.1038/s41598-017-10998-4 ↗
81. Centrifuges and their application for biological experiments in space10.1007/s12217-012-9300-2 ↗
82. Space, the final frontier: A critical review of recent experiments performed in microgravity10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.11.004 ↗
83. Gravitropism of hypocotyls of wild-type and starch-deficient Arabidopsis seedlings in spaceflight studies10.1007/s004250050610 ↗
84. (2020, October 23). Global Exploration Roadmap Supplement 2020. Available online: https://www.globalspaceexploration.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/GER_2020_supplement.pdf.