journal article·2023-07-22Open access

Current Options and Future Perspectives on Bone Graft and Biomaterials Substitutes for Bone Repair, from Clinical Needs to Advanced Biomaterials Research

Vlad Al. Georgeanu, Oana Gingu, Iulian V. Antoniac, Horia O. Manolea

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 14

Abstract

The ideal biomaterials substitute for bone repair should possess the following characteristics: provide osteogenic, osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties; stimulate the neo-angiogenesis process; absence of antigenic, teratogenic or carcinogenic reactions; avoid the systemic toxicity complications; assure satisfactory support and stability from mechanical properties point of view; hydrophilic nature of the surface properties and good interface with human bone; good handling in clinical condition and ability to be easy sterilized; and able to be supplied in sufficient quantities with reduced costs. Despite years of effort, the perfect bone reconstruction material has not yet been developed; further effort is required to make this objective feasible. The aim of this article is to provide a contemporary and comprehensive overview of the grafting materials that can be applied for the treatment of bone defects by the clinicians from orthopedics surgery, neurosurgery and dentistry, discussing their properties, advantages and disadvantages, and illuminating present and future perspectives in the field of bone graft and biomaterials substitutes for bone repair, from clinical needs to advanced biomaterials research.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of General Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Eroilor Sanitari No. 8, 050474 Bucharest, Romania

Department of Engineering and Management of Technological Systems, Faculty of Mechanics, University of Craiova, 200512 Craiova, Romania

Faculty of Materials Science and Engineering, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania

Department of Dental Materials, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200638 Craiova, Romania

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures10.1302/0301-620X.84B8.0841093 ↗
2. The role of stem cells in fracture healing and nonunion
3. Recent developments in the biology of fracture repair10.5435/00124635-200811000-00001 ↗
4. Georgeanu, V.A., Mamuleanu, M., Ghiea, S., and Selișteanu, D. (2022). Malignant bone tumors diagnosis using magnetic resonance imaging based on deep learning algorithms. Medicina, 58.10.3390/medicina58050636 ↗
5. Reconsidering Osteoconduction in the Era of Additive Manufacturing10.1089/ten.teb.2019.0047 ↗
6. The biology of bone grafting10.5435/00124635-200501000-00010 ↗
7. Impaction bone grafting for revision hip arthroplasty: Biology and clinical applications10.5435/00124635-200610000-00004 ↗
8. Getz, C.L., Buzzell, J.E., and Krishnan, S.G. (2011). OKU 10: Orthopaedic Knowledge Update, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
9. The use of osteoconductive bone graft substitutes in orthopaedic trauma10.5435/00124635-200709000-00003 ↗
10. Free Vascularized Fibula Grafting: Principles, Techniques, and Applications in Pediatric Orthopaedics
11. Cultured Bone on Biomaterial Substrates
12. (2022, June 20). Trabecular MetalTM Technology|Zimmer Biomet. Available online: https://www.zimmerbiomet.com/en/products-and-solutions/specialties/hip/trabecular-metal-technology.html.
13. Bone grafting materials in dentoalveolar reconstruction: A comprehensive review10.1016/j.jdsr.2018.09.003 ↗
14. Osteoinduction of bone grafting materials for bone repair and regeneration10.1016/j.bone.2015.07.007 ↗
15. Battafarano, G., Rossi, M., De Martino, V., Marampon, F., Borro, L., Secinaro, A., and Del Fattore, A. (2021). Strategies for Bone Regeneration: From Graft to Tissue Engineering. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 22.10.3390/ijms22031128 ↗
16. Bone physiology as inspiration for tissue regenerative therapies10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.09.028 ↗
17. Lu, H., Liu, Y., Guo, J., Wu, H., Wang, J., and Wu, G. (2016). Biomaterials with antibacterial and osteoinductive properties to repair infected bone defects. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 17.10.3390/ijms17030334 ↗
18. Biophysical stimuli as the fourth pillar of bone tissue engineering10.3389/fcell.2021.790050 ↗
19. Review of bone graft and implant survival rate: A comparison between autogenous bone block versus guided bone regeneration10.1016/j.jormas.2021.04.009 ↗
20. Bernardi, S., Macchiarelli, G., and Bianchi, S. (2020). Autologous materials in regenerative dentistry: Harvested bone, platelet concentrates and dentin derivates. Molecules, 25.10.3390/molecules25225330 ↗
21. Location, intensity, and experience of pain after intra-oral versus extra-oral bone graft harvesting for dental implants10.1016/j.jdent.2018.10.011 ↗
22. Harvesting of Autogenous Bone Graft from the Ascending Mandibular Ramus Compared with the Chin Region: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Focusing on Complications and Donor Site Morbidity
23. Sánchez-Sánchez, J., Pickert, F.N., Sánchez-Labrador, L., Tresguerres, F.G.F., Martínez-González, J.M., and Meniz-García, C. (2021). Horizontal ridge augmentation: A comparison between khoury and urban technique. Biology, 10.10.3390/biology10080749 ↗
24. Autogenous bone grafts and titanium mesh-guided alveolar ridge augmentation for dental implantation10.1016/j.jds.2020.06.012 ↗
25. Alveolar ridge augmentation with maxillary sinus elevation and split crest: Comparison of 2 surgical procedures10.1097/MD.0000000000011029 ↗
26. Management of critical-sized bone defects in the treatment of fracture-related infection: A systematic review and pooled analysis10.1007/s00402-020-03525-0 ↗
27. Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: A review10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.05.007 ↗
28. Outcomes and complications of the reamer irrigator aspirator versus traditional iliac crest bone graft harvesting: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1186/s10195-021-00612-9 ↗
29. Autograft, Allograft, and Bone Graft Substitutes: Clinical Evidence and Indications for Use in the Setting of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery10.1097/BOT.0000000000001420 ↗
30. The Fate of Lateral Ridge Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.11607/jomi.6290 ↗
31. Patient experience following iliac crest-derived alveolar bone grafting and implant placement10.1186/s40729-019-0200-8 ↗
32. Bone Graft Substitute: Allograft and Xenograft10.1016/j.cpm.2014.09.011 ↗
33. Use of Allografts in Orthopaedic Surgery: Safety, Procurement, Storage, and Outcomes
34. Fresh osteochondral grafting in the United States: The current status of tissue banking processing10.1007/s10561-019-09768-5 ↗
35. The Mechanical Stability of allografts after a cleaning process: Comparison of two preparation Modes10.1016/j.arth.2014.03.028 ↗
36. Radiation sterilization of tissue allografts: A review10.4329/wjr.v8.i4.355 ↗
37. A review of biomaterials in bone defect healing, remaining shortcomings and future opportunities for bone tissue engineering: The unsolved challenge10.1302/2046-3758.73.BJR-2017-0270.R1 ↗
38. The choice between allograft or demineralized bone matrix is not unambiguous in trauma surgery10.1016/j.injury.2020.11.013 ↗
39. Success rate of implants placed in autogenous bone blocks versus allogenic bone blocks: A systematic literature review10.4103/2231-0746.186143 ↗
40. Sinus floor augmentation using mixture of mineralized cortical bone and cancellous bone allografts: Radiographic and histomorphometric evaluation10.1016/j.jds.2020.06.004 ↗
41. Demineralized Bone Matrix Carriers and their Clinical Applications: An Overview10.1111/os.12509 ↗
42. Natural Sources and Applications of Demineralized Bone Matrix in the Field of Bone and Cartilage Tissue Engineering10.1007/978-981-15-3258-0_1 ↗
43. Periodontal Regeneration—Intrabony Defects: A Systematic Review from the AAP Regeneration Workshop10.1902/jop.2015.130685 ↗
44. An overview of periodontal regenerative procedures for the general dental practitioner10.1016/j.sdentj.2017.11.001 ↗
45. Effect of guided bone regeneration on bone quality surrounding dental implants10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.08.011 ↗
46. Laser-assisted regenerative surgical therapy for peri-implantitis: A randomized controlled clinical trial10.1002/JPER.20-0040 ↗
47. Bone augmentation around a dental implant using demineralized bone sheet containing biologically active substances10.4012/dmj.2016-026 ↗
48. Maxillofacial Bone Grafting Materials: 2021 Update10.1016/j.cden.2020.09.012 ↗
49. Mandibular dental implant placement using demineralized bone matrix (DBM)
50. Biomaterial selection for bone augmentation in implant dentistry: A systematic review10.4103/japtr.JAPTR_327_18 ↗
51. Relative performance of various biomaterials used for maxillary sinus augmentation: A Bayesian network meta-analysis10.1111/clr.13690 ↗
52. What Is the Most Effective Rehabilitation Method for Posterior Maxillas With 4 to 8 mm of Residual Alveolar Bone Height Below the Maxillary Sinus with Implant-Supported Prostheses? A Frequentist Network Meta-Analysis10.1016/j.joms.2018.08.009 ↗
53. New bone formation comparison in sinuses grafted with anorganic bovine bone and β-TCP10.1111/clr.438_13509 ↗
54. Anorganic bovine bone (ABB) vs. autologous bone (AB) plus ABB in maxillary sinus grafting. A prospective non-randomized clinical and histomorphometrical trial10.1111/clr.12396 ↗
55. Simultaneous and delayed direct sinus lift versus conventional implants: Retrospective study with 5-years minimum follow-up
56. Histological evaluation of two different anorganic bovine bone matrixes in lateral wall sinus elevation procedure: A retrospective study10.4103/njms.NJMS_81_19 ↗
57. Physicochemical characterization of porcine bone-derived grafting material and comparison with bovine xenografts for dental applications10.5051/jpis.2017.47.6.388 ↗
58. Comparison of two anorganic bovine bone in maxillary sinus lift: A split-mouth study with clinical, radiographical, and histomorphometrical analysis10.1186/s40729-020-00214-w ↗
59. Retrospective analysis of 10,000 implants from insertion up to 20 years—Analysis of implantations using augmentative procedures10.1186/s40729-016-0061-3 ↗
60. Aguilar, A., Zein, N., Harmouch, E., Hafdi, B., Bornert, F., Offner, D., Clauss, F., Fioretti, F., Huck, O., and Benkirane-Jessel, N. (2019). Application of chitosan in bone and dental engineering. Molecules, 24.10.3390/molecules24163009 ↗
61. Zhao, R., Yang, R., Cooper, P.R., Khurshid, Z., Shavandi, A., and Ratnayake, J. (2021). Bone grafts and substitutes in dentistry: A review of current trends and developments. Molecules, 26.10.3390/molecules26103007 ↗
62. Plants and Their Bioactive Constituents in Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Based Periodontal Regeneration: A Novel Prospective10.1155/2018/7571363 ↗
63. Is there a role of coral bone substitutes in bone repair?10.1016/j.injury.2016.10.025 ↗
64. Comparative Evaluation of Bioactive Synthetic NovaBone Putty and Calcified Algae-derived Porous Hydroxyapatite Bone Grafts for the Treatment of Intrabony Defects10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1379 ↗
65. Autogenous demineralized dentin matrix from extracted tooth for the augmentation of alveolar bone defect: A prospective randomized clinical trial in comparison with anorganic bovine bone10.1111/clr.12885 ↗
66. Clinical performance of tooth root blocks for alveolar ridge reconstruction10.1016/j.ijom.2021.08.019 ↗
67. Clinical efficacy of tooth-bone graft: A systematic review and risk of bias analysis of randomized control trials and observational studies10.1097/ID.0000000000000687 ↗
68. Minetti, E., Giacometti, E., Gambardella, H., Contessi, M., Ballini, A., Marenzi, G., Celko, M., and Mastrangelo, F. (2020). Alveolar socket preservation with different autologous graft materials: Preliminary results of a multicenter pilot study in human. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13051153 ↗
69. Human tooth-derived biomaterial as a graft substitute for hard tissue regeneration10.2217/rme-2016-0147 ↗
70. Kim, S.-Y., Kim, Y.-K., Park, Y.-H., Park, J.-C., Ku, J.-K., Um, I.-M., and Kim, J.-Y. (2017). Evaluation of the healing potential of demineralized dentin matrix fixed with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in bone grafts. Materials, 10.10.3390/ma10091049 ↗
71. Clinical application of autogenous partially demineralized dentin matrix prepared immediately after extraction for alveolar bone regeneration in implant dentistry: A pilot study10.1016/j.ijom.2017.02.1279 ↗
72. Histological Review of Demineralized Dentin Matrix as a Carrier of rhBMP-210.1089/ten.teb.2019.0291 ↗
73. Demineralized dentin matrix scaffolds for alveolar bone engineering10.4103/jips.jips_62_17 ↗
74. The use of hydroxyapatite bone substitute grafting for alveolar ridge preservation, sinus augmentation, and periodontal bone defect: A systematic review10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00884 ↗
75. National Center for Biotechnology Information (2023, May 10). PubChem Compound Summary for CID 14781, Hydroxyapatite, Available online: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Hydroxyapatite.
76. Prediction of mechanical properties of composites of HDPE/HA/EAA10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.12.008 ↗
77. Role of synthetic hydroxyapatite-in socket preservation: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2616 ↗
78. Dinda, S., Bhagavatam, A., Alrehaili, H., and Dinda, G.P. (2020). Mechanochemical synthesis of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite from Ca(H2PO4)2·H2O, CaO, Ca(OH)2, and P2O5 mixtures. Nanomaterials, 10.10.3390/nano10112232 ↗
79. Friction and wear of hydroxyapatite reinforced high density polyethylene against the stainless steel counterface10.1023/A:1015139213211 ↗
80. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of synthetic nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite bone graft (Ostim®) and synthetic microcrystalline hydroxyapatite bone graft (Osteogen®) in the treatment of human periodontal intrabony defects: A clinical and denta scan study10.4103/0972-124X.184036 ↗
81. Mechanical, rheological, and bioactivity properties of ultra high-molecular-weight polyethylene bioactive composites containing polyethylene glycol and hydroxyapatite10.1100/2012/474851 ↗
82. Impact behavior of hydroxyapatite reinforced polyethylene composites10.1023/A:1021553504549 ↗
83. Evaluation of the osteoconductivity of α-tricalcium phosphate, β-tricalcium phosphate, and hydroxyapatite combined with or without simvastatin in rat calvarial defect10.1002/jbm.a.33117 ↗
84. Hydoxyapatite/beta-tricalcium phosphate biphasic ceramics as regenerative material for the repair of complex bone defects10.1002/jbm.b.34049 ↗
85. Recent Advances of Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Bioceramics for Bone Tissue Regeneration10.1007/978-981-15-3262-7_12 ↗
86. Bisphosphosphonate-calcium phosphate cement composite and its properties
87. Calcium phosphate cements for bone engineering and their biological properties10.1038/boneres.2017.56 ↗
88. Fabrication and properties of carbon nanotube-reinforced hydroxyapatite composites by a double in situ synthesis process10.1016/j.carbon.2016.01.086 ↗
89. Kinetic study on nonisothermal dehydrogenation of TiH2 powders10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.01.095 ↗
90. Microstructure, stability and biocompatibility of hydroxyapatite-titania nanocomposites formed by two-step sintering process10.1016/j.arabjc.2017.01.019 ↗
91. Structural analysis of PM hydroxyapatite-based biocomposites elaborated by two-step sintering
92. The influence of the foaming agent on the mechanical properties of the PM hydroxyapatite-based biocomposites processed by two-step sintering route
93. Bulk titanium for structural and biomedical applications obtaining by spark plasma sintering (SPS) from titanium hydride powder10.1007/s10973-012-2824-2 ↗
94. Dudas, L. (2010). Engineering the Future, IntechOpen.10.5772/291 ↗
95. The chemisorption-release and antibacterial potential studies of gentamicin from hydroxyapatite-based implants10.46939/J.Sci.Arts-20.3-b04 ↗
96. The chemisorption-release and antibacterial potential studies of ciprofloxacin from hydroxyapatite-based implants10.46939/J.Sci.Arts-20.3-b04 ↗
97. In vitro characterization of hydroxyapatite-based biomaterials, using mesenchymal stem cell cultures from human bone marrow10.46939/J.Sci.Arts-20.4-b02 ↗
98. Calcium fructoborate coating of titanium–hydroxyapatite implants by chemisorption deposition improves implant osseointegration in the femur of new zealand white rabbit experimental model10.47162/RJME.61.4.25 ↗
99. In vitro characterization of novel nanostructured collagen-hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds doped with magnesium with improved biodegradation rate for hard tissue regeneration10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.02.030 ↗
100. Synthesis and characterization of biocompatible polymer-ceramic film structures as favorable interface in guided bone regeneration10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.07.098 ↗