Recent Updates on the Use of Agro-Food Waste for Biogas Production
Source abstract
Abstract
The production of biogas from anaerobic digestion (AD) of residual agro-food biomasses represents an opportunity for alternative production of energy from renewable sources, according to the European Union legislation on renewable energy. This review provides an overview of the various aspects involved in this process with a focus on the best process conditions to be used for AD-based biogas production from residual agro-food biomasses. After a schematic description of the AD phases, the biogas plants with advanced technologies were described, pointing out the strengths and the weaknesses of the different digester technologies and indicating the main parameters and operating conditions to be monitored. Subsequently, a brief analysis of the factors affecting methane yield from manure AD was conducted and the AD of fruit and vegetables waste was examined. Particular attention was given to studies on co-digestion and pre-treatments as strategies to improve biogas yield. Finally, the selection of specific microorganisms and the genetic manipulation of anaerobic bacteria to speed up the AD process was illustrated. The open challenges concern the achievement of the highest renewable energy yields reusing agro-food waste with the lowest environmental impact and an increment of competitiveness of the agricultural sector in the perspective of a circular economy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production · Biofuel production and bioconversion · Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Scuola di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali, Alimentari ed Ambientali, Università degli Studi della Basilicata, 85100 Potenza, Italy
Funding
Basilicata Regional authority
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. (2009). Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources and Amending and Subsequently Repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC, European Commission.
2. Olivier, J.G.J., Schure, K.M., and Peters, J.A.H.W. (2017). Trends in Global CO2 and Total Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Report (2017), PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. PBL Publication Number: 2674.
3. Biogas Energy use in Nigeria: Current status. Future Prospects and Policy Implication10.1016/S1364-0321(00)00005-8 ↗
4. Impact of uncertainties on greenhouse gas mitigation potential of biogas production from agricultural resources10.1016/j.renene.2011.06.030 ↗
5. Kaza, S., Yao, L.C., Bhada-Tata, P., and Van Woerden, F. (2018). What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050. Urban Development Series, World Bank. License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0 IGO.10.1596/978-1-4648-1329-0 ↗
6. Biomasse vegetali: I possibili processi di conversione energetica
7. Biogas production: Current state and perspectives10.1007/s00253-009-2246-7 ↗
8. Anaerobic co-digestion technology in solid wastes treatment for biomethane generation
9. Hydrolysis and microbial community analyses in two-stage anaerobic digestion of energy crops10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03270.x ↗
10. Anaerobic digestion and co-digestion processes of vegetable and fruit residues: Process and microbial ecology10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.068 ↗
11. Archaeal community dynamics and abiotic characteristics in a mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion process treating fruit and vegetable processing waste sludge with chopped fresh artichoke waste10.1016/j.biortech.2013.02.058 ↗
12. Co-composting of green waste and food waste at low C/N ratio10.1016/j.wasman.2009.11.023 ↗
13. Brewer’s spent grain: A valuable feedstock for industrial applications10.1002/jsfa.6486 ↗
14. Characterisation of fruit and vegetable waste for maximizing the biogas yield
15. Anaerobic bioconversion of food Wastes into energy: A critical review10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.145 ↗
16. Biogas: Developments and perspectives in Europe10.1016/j.renene.2018.03.006 ↗
17. Deremince, B., and Königsberger, S. (2017). Statistical Report, European Biogas Association.
18. Solid anaerobic digestion: State-of-art, scientific and technological hurdles
19. Dry anaerobic digestion of cow manure and agricultural products in a full-scale plant: Efficiency and comparison with wet fermentation10.1016/j.wasman.2017.03.046 ↗
20. Effects of solid retention time on anaerobic digestion of dewatered-sewage sludge in mesophiic and termophilic conditions10.1016/j.renene.2010.02.022 ↗
21. Pilot scale comparison of single and double-stage thermophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.080 ↗
22. Review on research achievements of biogas from anaerobic digestion10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.032 ↗
23. Recent updates on biogas production—A review
24. Membrane bioreactors—A review on recent developments in energy reduction, fouling control, novel configurations, LCA and market prospects10.1016/j.memsci.2016.12.010 ↗
25. Searching for possibilities to improve the performance of full scale agricultural biogas plants10.1016/j.renene.2017.09.087 ↗
26. Instrumentation in anaerobic treatment–research and practice10.2166/wst.2006.111 ↗
27. Monitoring of anaerobic digestion processes: A review perspective10.1016/j.rser.2011.04.026 ↗
28. Early warning indicators for monitoring the process failure of anaerobic digestion system of food waste10.1016/j.biortech.2014.08.089 ↗
29. Study on indicators for on-line monitoring and diagnosis of anaerobic digestion process of piggery wastewater10.1016/j.eti.2017.09.008 ↗
30. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) for a real time monitoring of the biogas process10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.173 ↗
31. Automatic process control in anaerobic digestion technology: A critical review10.1016/j.biortech.2015.06.080 ↗
32. Technology overview of biogas production in anaerobic digestion plants: A European evaluation of research and development10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.079 ↗
33. Bauer, F., Hulteberg, C., Persson, T., and Tamm, D. (2013). Biogas Upgrading– Review of Commercial Technologies, SGC. SGC Rapport.
34. IRENA (2013). Road Transport: The Cost of Renewable Solutions. Preliminay Findings, International Renewable Energy Agency.
35. How Can We Improve Biomethane Production Per Unit of Feedstock in Biogas Plant10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.12.036 ↗
36. Evaluating greenhouse gas emissions from dairy manure management practices using survey data and lifecycle tools10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.133 ↗
37. Dairy buffalo life cycle assessment as affected by heifer rearing system10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.158 ↗
38. Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Castel, V., Rosales, M., and de Haan, C. (November, January 30). Livestock’s Long Shadow Environmental Issues and Options. Proceedings of the Methane to Markets Partnership Expo, Beijing, China.
39. Nitrogen losses from dairy manure estimated through nitrogen mass balance and chemical markers10.2134/jeq2009.0057 ↗
40. Methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions during storage and after application of dairy cattle slurry and influence of slurry treatment10.1016/j.agee.2005.08.030 ↗
41. Effects of management and co-digestion on life cycle emissions and energy from anaerobic digestion10.1002/ghg.1506 ↗
42. European Commission (2019, March 21). Council Directive Concerning the Protection of Waters Against Pollution Caused by Nitrates from Agricultural Sources (91/676/EEC). Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-nitrates/index_en.html.
43. Al Seadi, T., Rutz, D., Prassl, H., Köttner, M., Finsterwalder, T., Volk, S., and Janssen, R. (2008). Biogas Handbook, University of Southern Denmark Esbjerg.
44. Sommer, S.G., and Christensen, K.V. (2008). Environmental Technology for Treatment and Management of Bio-Waste, Syddansk Universitet. University of Southern Denmark, Faculty of Engineering, Institute of Chemical Engineering, Biotechnology and Environmental Engineering & Lars Stoumann Jensen, University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Life Science, Plant and Soil Science Laboratory, Department of Agricultural Sciences, Thorvaldsensvej 40, 1871 Frederiksberg C, DENMARK.
45. Biogas production from maize and dairy cattle manure: Influence of biomass composition on the methane yield
46. Biochemical methane potential of microalgae: Influence of substrate to inoculum ratio, biomass concentration and pretreatment10.1016/j.biortech.2012.06.113 ↗
47. Comparison of anaerobic digestion characteristics and kinetics of four livestock manures with different substrate concentrations10.1016/j.biortech.2015.08.151 ↗
48. Transformation of dissolved organic matters in swine, cow and chicken manures during composting10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.129 ↗
49. Comparative studies on biogas production using six different animal dungs
50. Matovic, M.D. (2013). Characteristics of Animal Slurry as a Key Biomass for Biogas Production in Denmark. Biomass Now—Sustainable Growth and Use, InTech—Open Access Publisher.10.5772/2583 ↗
51. Maximal methane potential of different animal manures collected in northwest region of China
52. Buratti, Biogas production from different substrates in an experimental Continuously Stirred Tank Reactor anaerobic digester10.1016/j.biortech.2009.06.013 ↗
53. Validation and recommendation of methods to measure biogas production potential of animal manure10.5713/ajas.2012.12623 ↗
54. Biogas production from ruminant and monogastric animal manure co-digested with manipueira
55. Comparison on batch anaerobic digestion of five different livestock manures and prediction of biochemical methane potential (BMP) using different statistical models10.1016/j.wasman.2015.10.021 ↗
56. Increasing Biogas Production Rate from Cattle Manure Using Rumen Fluid as Inoculums
57. Effect of cow rumen fluid concentration on biogas production from goat manure
58. Effect of inoculum to substrate ratio on biogas production of sheep paunch manure10.17221/30/2014-RAE ↗
59. Investigation of the methane potential of horse manure
60. Yohaness, M.T. (2010). Biogas Potential from Cow Manure: Influence of Diet. Second Cycle, A2E, SLU, Department of Microbiology.
61. Characterisation of solid and liquid fractions of dairy manure with regard to their component distribution and methane production10.1016/j.biortech.2006.04.032 ↗
62. Prospective application of farm cattle manure for bioenergy production in Portugal10.1016/j.renene.2010.08.035 ↗
63. Potentials of biogas production from super young bulls manure fed with different diets
64. Biodigestão anaeróbia dos dejetos da bovinocultura de corte: Influência do período, do genótipo e da dieta10.1590/S1516-35982012000600030 ↗
65. A highly concentrated diet increases biogas production and the agronomic value of young bull’s manure10.1016/j.wasman.2015.09.038 ↗
66. Biogas production from dairy cattle manure, under organic and conventional production systems10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v37n6p1081-1090/2017 ↗
67. Angelidaki, I., and Ellegaard, L. (2003). Co-Digestion of Manure and Organic Wastes in Centralized Biogas Plant: Status and Future Trend, Environment and Resources, Technical University of Denmark.10.1385/ABAB:109:1-3:95 ↗
68. Effects of co-substrate on biogas production from cattle manure: A review10.1007/s13762-016-1069-1 ↗
69. Abbasi, T., Tauseef, S., and Abbasi, S.A. (2011). Biogas Energy, Vol 2, Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-1-4614-1040-9 ↗
70. Effect of low initial C/N ratio on aerobic composting of swine manure with rice straw10.1016/j.biortech.2005.12.003 ↗
71. Anaerobic digestion of horse dung mixed with different bedding materials in an upflow solid-state (UASS) reactor at mesophilic conditions10.1016/j.biortech.2014.02.034 ↗
72. Anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass: Challenges and opportunities10.1016/j.biortech.2014.09.103 ↗
73. Solid-state anaerobic digestion of spent wheat straw from horse stall10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.062 ↗
74. Methane production from horse manure and stall waste with softwood bedding10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.012 ↗
75. Enhanced biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of pig slurry and horse manure with mechanical pre-treatment
76. High solid anaerobic digestion of chicken manure10.1006/jaer.2000.0529 ↗
77. Biomethanation of poultry litter leachate in UASB reactor coupled with ammonia stripper for enhancement of overall performance10.1016/j.biortech.2008.04.016 ↗
78. Anaerobic digestion of swine manure: Inhibition by ammonia10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00201-7 ↗
79. Inhibitory effects of ammonia on methanogen mcrA transcripts in anaerobic digester sludge10.1111/1574-6941.12229 ↗
80. Microbial community shifts and biogas conversion computation during steady, inhibited and recovered stages of thermophilic methane fermentation on chicken manure with a wide variation of ammonia10.1016/j.biortech.2013.07.038 ↗
81. Optimizing feeding composition and carbon–nitrogen ratios for improved methane yield during anaerobic co-digestion of dairy, chicken manure and wheat straw10.1016/j.biortech.2012.06.058 ↗
82. Anaerobic co-digestion of swine and poultry manure with municipal sewage sludge10.1016/j.wasman.2013.10.022 ↗
83. Evaluating the co-digestion effects on chicken manure and rotten potatoes in batch experiments10.12692/ijb/10.6.150-159 ↗
84. Mono-fermentation of chicken manure: Ammonia inhibition and recirculation of the digestate10.1016/j.biortech.2014.09.029 ↗
85. Praes, M.F.M., de Lucas, J., Hermes, R., Sorbara, J.O.B., Ferreira, M.S., and Cardoso, P.B.C.S. (2013, January 23–27). Effect of a broiler diet containing probiotic and exogenous enzymes on the manure used for biogas production. Proceedings of the Conference on Sustainable Agriculture through ICT Innovation, Torino, Italy.
86. Enhancing biogas plant production using pig manure and corn silage by adding wheat straw processed with liquid hot water and steam explosion10.1186/s13068-017-0922-x ↗
87. Anaerobic Co-digestion of Swine Manure with Energy Crop Residues10.1007/s12257-011-0117-4 ↗
88. Hamilton, D.W. (2014). Anaerobic Digestion of Animal Manure: Understanding the Basic Processes. Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service BAE-1747, Division of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Oklahoma State University.
89. (2003). Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on Additives for Use in Animal Nutrition, European Commission.
90. Effect of antibiotics on psychrophilic anaerobic digestion of swine manure slurry in sequencing batch reactors10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00046-8 ↗
91. The survival of cefazolin resistant bacteria in mesophilic co-digestion of dairy manure and waste milk10.1177/0734242X13477717 ↗
92. The effect and fate of antibiotics during the anaerobic digestion of pig manure10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.075 ↗
93. Effect of antibiotics on methane arising from anaerobic digestion of pig manure10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.033 ↗
94. The effect of cefazolin on biogas production from thermophilic and mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of dairy manure and waste milk10.4038/jnsfsr.v43i4.7971 ↗
95. The effects of the antibiotics ampicillin, florfenicol, sulfamethazine, and tylosin on biogas production and their degradation efficiency during anaerobic digestion10.1016/j.biortech.2013.09.048 ↗
96. Effect of copper ions on pig manure anaerobic digestion
97. Cumulative inhibition of heavy metals to anaerobic digestion of piggery wastewater
98. A Review of the Anaerobic Digestion of Fruit and Vegetable Waste10.1007/s12010-017-2472-x ↗
99. FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2014). FAO Statistical Yearbook 2014: Latin America and the Carubbean Food and Agriculture, FAO.
100. Bioreactor performance in anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable waste10.1016/j.procbio.2004.03.007 ↗