journal article·2022-02-08Open access

Slope Stability Classification under Seismic Conditions Using Several Tree-Based Intelligent Techniques

Panagiotis G. Asteris, Fariz Iskandar Mohd Rizal, Mohammadreza Koopialipoor, Panayiotis C. Roussis, Maria Ferentinou, Danial Jahed Armaghani, Behrouz Gordan

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 3

Abstract

Slope stability analysis allows engineers to pinpoint risky areas, study trigger mechanisms for slope failures, and design slopes with optimal safety and reliability. Before the widespread usage of computers, slope stability analysis was conducted through semi analytical methods, or stability charts. Presently, engineers have developed many computational tools to perform slope stability analysis more efficiently. The challenge associated with furthering slope stability methods is to create a reliable design solution to perform reliable estimations involving a number of geometric and mechanical variables. The objective of this study was to investigate the application of tree-based models, including decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and AdaBoost, in slope stability classification under seismic loading conditions. The input variables used in the modelling were slope height, slope inclination, cohesion, friction angle, and peak ground acceleration to classify safe slopes and unsafe slopes. The training data for the developed computational intelligence models resulted from a series of slope stability analyses performed using a standard geotechnical engineering software commonly used in geotechnical engineering practice. Upon construction of the tree-based models, the model assessment was performed through the use and calculation of accuracy, F1-score, recall, and precision indices. All tree-based models could efficiently classify the slope stability status, with the AdaBoost model providing the highest performance for the classification of slope stability for both model development and model assessment parts. The proposed AdaBoost model can be used as a screening tool during the stage of feasibility studies of related infrastructure projects, to classify slopes according to their expected status of stability under seismic loading conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Landslides and related hazards · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Computational Mechanics Laboratory, School of Pedagogical and Technological Equation, 15122 Maroussi, Greece

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia

Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran 15914, Iran

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Cyprus, Nicosia 1678, Cyprus

School of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK

Department of Urban Planning, Engineering Networks and Systems, Institute of Architecture and Construction, South Ural State University, 76, Lenin Prospect, 454080 Chelyabinsk, Russia

Department of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Varamin Pishva Branch, Tehran 15914, Iran

References (77)

Show source-provided references
1. Review on Dynamic Behaviour of Earth Dam and Embankment During an Earthquake10.1007/s10706-021-01919-4 ↗
2. Applications of Particle Swarm Optimization in Geotechnical Engineering: A Comprehensive Review10.1007/s10706-017-0356-z ↗
3. Prediction of slope failure in open-pit mines using a novel hybrid artificial intelligence model based on decision tree and evolution algorithm10.1038/s41598-020-66904-y ↗
4. Applying various hybrid intelligent systems to evaluate and predict slope stability under static and dynamic conditions10.1007/s00500-018-3253-3 ↗
5. Cai, M., Koopialipoor, M., Armaghani, D.J., and Thai Pham, B. (2020). Evaluating Slope Deformation of Earth Dams due to Earthquake Shaking using MARS and GMDH Techniques. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10041486 ↗
6. A New Model for Determining Slope Stability Based on Seismic Motion Performance10.1007/s11204-016-9409-1 ↗
7. Classification of slopes and prediction of factor of safety using differential evolution neural networks10.1007/s12665-010-0839-1 ↗
8. Hoek, E., and Bray, J.D. (1981). Rock Slope Engineering, CRC Press.10.1201/9781482267099 ↗
9. Hammah, R. (Proceedings of the 58th Canadian Geotechnical and 6th Joint IAH-CNC and CGS Groundwater Specialty Conferences–GeoSask 2005, 2005). A Comparison of Finite Element Slope Stability Analysis With Conventional Limit-Equilibrium Investigation, Proceedings of the 58th Canadian Geotechnical and 6th Joint IAH-CNC and CGS Groundwater Specialty Conferences–GeoSask 2005.
10. Stability prediction of Himalayan residual soil slope using artificial neural network10.1007/s11069-020-04141-2 ↗
11. The use of neural networks for the prediction of the critical factor of safety of an artificial slope subjected to earthquake forces10.1016/j.scient.2012.02.008 ↗
12. Chakraborty, A., and Goswami, D. (2018). Prediction of critical safety factor of slopes using multiple regression and neural network. J. Geo-Eng. Sci., 1–10.10.3233/JGS-170047 ↗
13. A Monte Carlo technique in safety assessment of slope under seismic condition10.1007/s00366-016-0499-1 ↗
14. Prediction of cement-based mortars compressive strength using machine learning techniques10.1007/s00521-021-06004-8 ↗
15. TBM performance prediction developing a hybrid ANFIS-PNN predictive model optimized by imperialism competitive algorithm10.1007/s00521-021-06217-x ↗
16. Zhao, J., Nguyen, H., Nguyen-Thoi, T., Asteris, P.G., and Zhou, J. (2021). Improved Levenberg–Marquardt backpropagation neural network by particle swarm and whale optimization algorithms to predict the deflection of RC beams. Eng. Comput.10.1007/s00366-020-01267-6 ↗
17. Zhang, H., Nguyen, H., Bui, X.-N., Pradhan, B., Asteris, P.G., Costache, R., and Aryal, J. (2021). A generalized artificial intelligence model for estimating the friction angle of clays in evaluating slope stability using a deep neural network and Harris Hawks optimization algorithm. Eng. Comput., 1–14.10.1007/s00366-020-01272-9 ↗
18. Predicting concrete compressive strength using hybrid ensembling of surrogate machine learning models10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106449 ↗
19. Surrogate models for the compressive strength mapping of cement mortar materials10.1007/s00500-021-05626-3 ↗
20. Predicting the unconfined compressive strength of granite using only two non-destructive test indexes
21. Improving the efficiency of microseismic source locating using a heuristic algorithm-based virtual field optimization method10.1007/s40948-021-00285-y ↗
22. Developing a hybrid model of Jaya algorithm-based extreme gradient boosting machine to estimate blast-induced ground vibrations10.1016/j.ijrmms.2021.104856 ↗
23. Classification of rockburst in underground projects: Comparison of ten supervised learning methods10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000553 ↗
24. Proposing a novel comprehensive evaluation model for the coal burst liability in underground coal mines considering uncertainty factors10.1016/j.ijmst.2021.07.011 ↗
25. Effects of joints on the cutting behavior of disc cutter running on the jointed rock mass10.1016/j.tust.2018.07.023 ↗
26. Analysis on the damage behavior of mixed ground during TBM cutting process10.1016/j.tust.2016.02.014 ↗
27. Effect of Water Content on Argillization of Mudstone During the Tunnelling process10.1007/s00603-019-01947-w ↗
28. Yang, H., Wang, Z., and Song, K. (2020). A new hybrid grey wolf optimizer-feature weighted-multiple kernel-support vector regression technique to predict TBM performance. Eng. Comput., 1–17.10.1007/s00366-020-01217-2 ↗
29. Kardani, N., Bardhan, A., Samui, P., Nazem, M., Zhou, A., and Armaghani, D.J. (2021). A novel technique based on the improved firefly algorithm coupled with extreme learning machine (ELM-IFF) for predicting the thermal conductivity of soil. Eng. Comput., 1–20.10.1007/s00366-021-01329-3 ↗
30. Tensile strength prediction of rock material using non-destructive tests: A comparative intelligent study10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100652 ↗
31. Mahmood, W., Mohammed, A.S., Asteris, P.G., Kurda, R., and Armaghani, D.J. (2022). Modeling Flexural and Compressive Strengths Behaviour of Cement-Grouted Sands Modified with Water Reducer Polymer. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12031016 ↗
32. Revealing the nature of metakaolin-based concrete materials using artificial intelligence techniques10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126500 ↗
33. Prediction of minimum factor of safety against slope failure in clayey soils using artificial neural network10.1007/s12665-014-3800-x ↗
34. A hybrid FEM–ANN approach for slope instability prediction
35. Support vector classifier analysis of slope10.1080/19475705.2012.684725 ↗
36. A study of slope stability prediction using neural networks10.1007/s10706-004-8680-5 ↗
37. Computational intelligence tools for the prediction of slope performance10.1016/j.compgeo.2007.06.004 ↗
38. Application of fuzzy set theory to evaluate the stability of slopes10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.580-583.566 ↗
39. The contribution of particle swarm optimization to three-dimensional slope stability analysis10.1155/2014/973093 ↗
40. Artificial neural networks and grey systems for the prediction of slope stability10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000007168.00673.27 ↗
41. Slope stability analysis: A support vector machine approach10.1007/s00254-007-1161-4 ↗
42. Landslide susceptibility assessment in vietnam using support vector machines, decision tree, and Naive Bayes Models10.1155/2012/974638 ↗
43. Shape Quantization and Recognition with Randomized Trees10.1162/neco.1997.9.7.1545 ↗
44. Slope failure prediction using a decision tree: A case of engineered slopes in South Korea10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.09.004 ↗
45. Assessing the factor of safety using an artificial neural network: Case studies on landslides in Giresun, Turkey10.1007/s12665-015-4027-1 ↗
46. Application of Support Vector Machine for Prediction of Slope Stability Coefficient Considering the Influence of Rainfall and Water Level10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.851.840 ↗
47. Prediction of slope stability using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system based on clustering methods
48. Slope stability prediction using integrated metaheuristic and machine learning approaches: A comparative study10.1016/j.cie.2018.02.028 ↗
49. Application of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) for slope and pillar stability assessment10.1088/1755-1315/413/1/012003 ↗
50. Developing a hybrid adoptive neuro-fuzzy inference system in predicting safety of factors of slopes subjected to surface eco-protection techniques10.1007/s00366-019-00768-3 ↗
51. Random Forest and Bayesian Network Techniques for Probabilistic Prediction of Flyrock Induced by Blasting in Quarry Sites10.1007/s11053-019-09611-4 ↗
52. Prediction of ground vibration induced by blasting operations through the use of the Bayesian Network and random forest models10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106390 ↗
53. Li, D., Moghaddam, M.R., Monjezi, M., Jahed Armaghani, D., and Mehrdanesh, A. (2020). Development of a Group Method of Data Handling Technique to Forecast Iron Ore Price. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10072364 ↗
54. Rock strength assessment based on regression tree technique10.1007/s00366-015-0429-7 ↗
55. Effects of earthquakes on dams and embankments10.1680/geot.1965.15.2.139 ↗
56. Earthquake-induced ground displacements10.1002/eqe.4290160704 ↗
57. Critical acceleration versus static factor of safety in stability analysis of earth dams and embankments10.1680/geot.1974.24.4.661 ↗
58. Abramson, L.W., Lee, T.S., Sharma, S., and Boyce, G.M. (2001). Slope Stability and Stabilization Methods, John Wiley & Sons.
59. Generalised framework of limit equilibrium methods for slope stability analysis10.1680/geot.2003.53.4.377 ↗
60. Utilization of a least square support vector machine (LSSVM) for slope stability analysis10.1016/j.scient.2011.03.007 ↗
61. The prediction of the critical factor of safety of homogeneous finite slopes using neural networks and multiple regressions10.1016/j.cageo.2012.09.003 ↗
62. An introduction to decision tree modeling
63. Jopp, F., Reuter, H., and Breckling, B. (2011). Modelling Complex Ecological Dynamics: An Introduction into Ecological Modelling for Students, Teachers & Scientists, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-05029-9 ↗
64. Automatic construction of decision trees from data: A multi-disciplinary survey10.1023/A:1009744630224 ↗
65. Spatial soil zinc content distribution from terrain parameters: A GIS-based decision-tree model in Lebanon10.1016/j.envpol.2009.08.009 ↗
66. Predicting electricity energy consumption: A comparison of regression analysis, decision tree and neural networks10.1016/j.energy.2006.11.010 ↗
67. Comparison of decision tree methods for finding active objects10.1016/j.asr.2007.07.020 ↗
68. Random decision forests10.1109/ICDAR.1995.598994 ↗
69. Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Slope Failures in Uttarkashi, Uttarakhand (India)
70. Role of data analytics in infrastructure asset management: Overcoming data size and quality problems10.1061/JPEODX.0000175 ↗
71. Overview of random forest methodology and practical guidance with emphasis on computational biology and bioinformatics10.1002/widm.1072 ↗
72. Kégl, B. (2014). The return of ADABOOST.MH: Multi-class Hamming trees. arXiv.
73. Development of a Stope Stability Prediction Model Using Ensemble Learning Techniques—A Case Study10.4314/gm.v20i2.3 ↗
74. Landslide identification using machine learning10.1016/j.gsf.2020.02.012 ↗
75. A novel approach for classification of soils based on laboratory tests using Adaboost, Tree and ANN modeling10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100508 ↗
76. Rojas, R. (2016, April 11). AdaBoost and the Super Bowl of Classifiers a Tutorial Introduction to Adaptive Boosting. Writing, Computer Science Department, Freie Universitat, Berlin, Germany. Available online: http://www.inf.fu-berlin.de/inst/ag-ki/adaboost4.pdf.
77. Prediction of uniaxial compressive strength of sandstones using petrography-based models10.1016/j.enggeo.2007.10.009 ↗