journal article·2020-01-07Open access

Groundwater Spring Potential Mapping Using Artificial Intelligence Approach Based on Kernel Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and Alternating Decision Tree Models

Wei Chen, Yang Li, Paraskevas Tsangaratos, Himan Shahabi, Ioanna Ilia, Weifeng Xue, Huiyuan Bian

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 2

Abstract

This study presents a methodology for constructing groundwater spring potential maps by kernel logistic regression, (KLR), random forest (RF), and alternating decision tree (ADTree) models. The analysis was based on data concerning groundwater springs and fourteen explanatory factors (elevation, slope, aspect, plan curvature, profile curvature, stream power index, sediment transport index, topographic wetness index, distance to streams, distance to roads, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), lithology, soil, and land use), which were divided into training and validation datasets. Ningtiaota region in the northern territory of Shaanxi Province, China, was considered as a test site. Frequency Ratio method was applied to provide to each factor’s class a coefficient weight, whereas the linear support vector machine method was used as a feature selection method to determine the optimal set of factors. The Receiver Operating Characteristic curve and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the performance of each model using the training dataset, with the RF model providing the highest AUC value (0.909) followed by the KLR (0.877) and ADTree (0.812) models. The same performance pattern was estimated based on the validation dataset, with the RF model providing the highest AUC value (0.811) followed by the KLR (0.797) and ADTree (0.773) models. This study highlights that the artificial intelligence approach could be considered as a valid and accurate approach for groundwater spring potential zoning.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Groundwater and Watershed Analysis · Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies · Automated Road and Building Extraction

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Geology & Environment, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China

Key Laboratory of Coal Resources Exploration and Comprehensive Utilization, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xi’an 710021, China

Zografou Campus: Heroon Polytechniou 9, Laboratory of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, Department of Geological Sciences, National Technical University of Athens, School of Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, 15780 Zografou, Greece

Departments of Geomorphology, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj 66177-15175, Iran

Shaanxi Coal and Chemical Technology Institute Co Ltd., Xi’an 710065, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi · China Postdoctoral Science Foundation · Project funded by Shaanxi Province Postdoctoral Science Foundation · National Major Science and Technology Project

References (86)

Show source-provided references
1. Disasters and risk reduction in groundwater: Zagros mountain southwest Iran using geoinformatics techniques
2. Estimating groundwater vulnerability to pollution using a modified drastic model in the Kerman agricultural area, Iran10.1007/s12665-013-2690-7 ↗
3. The global volume and distribution of modern groundwater10.1038/ngeo2590 ↗
4. Groundwater spring potential modelling: Comprising the capability and robustness of three different modeling approaches10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.08.027 ↗
5. Groundwater recharge: An overview of processes and challenges10.1007/s10040-001-0171-7 ↗
7. Global water demand and supply projections: Part 2. Results and prospects to 202510.1080/02508060208686990 ↗
8. Water footprint scenarios for 2050: A global analysis10.1016/j.envint.2013.11.019 ↗
9. The world’s road to water scarcity: Shortage and stress in the 20th century and pathways towards sustainability10.1038/srep38495 ↗
10. Kaushal, S., Gold, A., and Mayer, P. (2017). Land Use, Climate, and Water Resources—Global Stages of Interaction, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.10.3390/w9100815 ↗
11. Completing the picture: The challenges of bringing “consumption” into the population–environment equation10.1007/s11111-004-0837-x ↗
12. Evaluation of four supervised learning methods for groundwater spring potential mapping in Khalkhal region (Iran) using GIS-based features10.1007/s10040-016-1466-z ↗
13. Gis mapping of regional probabilistic groundwater potential in the area of Pohang city, Korea10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.12.027 ↗
14. China’s water situation; the supply of water and the pattern of its usage10.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.10.001 ↗
15. Spatial prediction of groundwater potentiality using anfis ensembled with teaching-learning-based and biogeography-based optimization10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.013 ↗
16. Groundwater spring potential mapping using population-based evolutionary algorithms and data mining methods10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.312 ↗
17. Groundwater spring potential mapping using bivariate statistical model and GIS in the Taleghan watershed, Iran10.1007/s12517-013-1161-5 ↗
18. Weight of evidence and artificial neural networks for potential groundwater spring mapping: An application to the Mt. Modino area (Northern Apennines, Italy)10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.03.015 ↗
19. A comparative assessment between three machine learning models and their performance comparison by bivariate and multivariate statistical methods in groundwater potential mapping10.1007/s11269-015-1114-8 ↗
20. Integrated remote sensing and GIS-based approach for assessing groundwater potential in west Medinipur district, west Bengal, India10.1080/01431160802270131 ↗
21. Jha, M.K., Bongane, G.M., and Chowdary, V. (2009). Groundwater potential zoning by remote sensing, GIS and mcdm techniques: A case study of eastern India. Hydroinformatics in Hydrology, Hydrogeology and Water Resources, Proceedings of the Symposium JS. 4 at the Joint Convention of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences (IAHS) and the International Association of Hydrogeologists (IAH) held in Hyderabad, Hyderabad, India, 6–12 September 2009, IAHS Press.
22. Groundwater prospects zonation based on RS and GIS using fuzzy algebra in Khoh river watershed, Pauri-Garhwal district, Uttarakhand, India
23. GIS-based groundwater spring potential assessment and mapping in the Birjand Township, Southern Khorasan province, Iran10.1007/s10040-013-1089-6 ↗
24. Assessment of groundwater potential in a semi-arid region of India using remote sensing, GIS and MCDM techniques10.1007/s11269-010-9749-y ↗
25. Assessing the accuracy of GIS-based elementary multi criteria decision analysis as a spatial prediction tool—A case of predicting potential zones of sustainable groundwater resources10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.03.028 ↗
26. Groundwater potential mapping at Kurdistan region of Iran using analytic hierarchy process and GIS10.1007/s12517-014-1668-4 ↗
27. Delineation of groundwater potential zone in hard rock terrain of India using remote sensing, geographical information system (GIS) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) techniques10.1080/10106049.2014.894584 ↗
28. Application of a weights-of-evidence method and GIS to regional groundwater productivity potential mapping10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.09.016 ↗
29. Groundwater potential mapping at northeastern Wasit and Missan governorates, Iraq using a data-driven weights of evidence technique in framework of GIS10.1007/s12665-015-4097-0 ↗
30. Application of GIS based data driven evidential belief function model to predict groundwater potential zonation10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.02.053 ↗
31. Application of GIS-based evidential belief function model to regional groundwater recharge potential zones mapping in Hardrock geologic terrain10.1007/s40710-016-0126-6 ↗
32. Spatial analysis of groundwater potential using weights-of-evidence and evidential belief function models and remote sensing10.1007/s12517-015-2166-z ↗
33. Groundwater potential mapping using a novel data-mining ensemble model10.1007/s10040-018-1848-5 ↗
34. Assessment of ground subsidence hazard near an abandoned underground coal mine using GIS10.1007/s00254-006-0290-5 ↗
35. Using a binary logistic regression method and GIS for evaluating and mapping the groundwater spring potential in the sultan mountains (Aksehir, Turkey)10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.05.015 ↗
36. GIS-based groundwater potential mapping using boosted regression tree, classification and regression tree, and random forest machine learning models in Iran10.1007/s10661-015-5049-6 ↗
37. GIS-based multivariate adaptive regression spline and random forest models for groundwater potential mapping in Iran10.1007/s12665-016-5424-9 ↗
38. Regional groundwater productivity potential mapping using a geographic information system (GIS) based artificial neural network model10.1007/s10040-012-0894-7 ↗
39. Groundwater productivity potential mapping using frequency ratio and evidential belief function and artificial neural network models: Focus on topographic factors10.2166/hydro.2018.120 ↗
40. GIS-based groundwater potential mapping using artificial neural network and support vector machine models: The case of Boryeong city in Korea10.1080/10106049.2017.1303091 ↗
41. Groundwater quality assessment using data clustering based on hybrid Bayesian networks10.1007/s00477-012-0676-8 ↗
42. A comparison between ten advanced and soft computing models for groundwater qanat potential assessment in Iran using R and GIS10.1007/s00704-016-2022-4 ↗
43. GIS-based groundwater potential analysis using novel ensemble weights-of-evidence with logistic regression and functional tree models10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.055 ↗
44. Spatial prediction of groundwater spring potential mapping based on an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and metaheuristic optimization10.5194/hess-22-4771-2018 ↗
45. National Soil Survey Office (1995). Chinese Soil Types, China Agricultural Press.
46. Gain ratio based fuzzy weighted association rule mining classifier for medical diagnostic interface10.1007/s12046-013-0198-1 ↗
47. Spatial prediction of rainfall-induced landslides for the Lao Cai area (Vietnam) using a hybrid intelligent approach of least squares support vector machines inference model and artificial bee colony optimization10.1007/s10346-016-0711-9 ↗
48. Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines10.1023/A:1012487302797 ↗
49. Landslide susceptibility assesssment in the Uttarakhand area (India) using GIS: A comparison study of prediction capability of naïve bayes, multilayer perceptron neural networks, and functional trees methods
50. A comparative study of logistic model tree, random forest, and classification and regression tree models for spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility10.1016/j.catena.2016.11.032 ↗
51. Tanaka, K., Kurita, T., and Kawabe, T. (2007, January 12–17). Selection of import vectors via binary particle swarm optimization and cross-validation for kernel logistic regression. Proceedings of the 2007 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Orlando, FL, USA.10.1109/IJCNN.2007.4371101 ↗
52. Mercer, J. (1909). Functions of Positive and Negative Type, and Their Connection with the Theory of Integral Equations, Royal Society of London Philosophical Transactions.
53. Spatial prediction models for shallow landslide hazards: A comparative assessment of the efficacy of support vector machines, artificial neural networks, kernel logistic regression, and logistic model tree10.1007/s10346-015-0557-6 ↗
54. Improving protein fold recognition by random forest10.1186/1471-2105-15-S11-S14 ↗
55. Semantic segmentation of images exploiting dct based features and random forest
57. Freund, Y., and Mason, L. (1999, January 27–30). The alternating decision tree learning algorithm. Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Machine Learning Conference, Bled, Slovenia.
58. Learning classification trees10.1007/BF01889584 ↗
59. Kohavi, R., and Kunz, C. (1998, January 24–27). Option decision trees with majority votes. Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Machine Learning Conference (ICML 1998), Madison, MI, USA.
60. Alternating decision tree algorithm for assessing protein interaction reliability10.1007/s40595-014-0018-5 ↗
61. Gully headcut susceptibility modeling using functional trees, naïve bayes tree, and random forest models10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.01.050 ↗
62. Chen, W., Hong, H., Panahi, M., Shahabi, H., Wang, Y., Shirzadi, A., Pirasteh, S., Alesheikh, A.A., Khosravi, K., and Panahi, S. (2019). Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using GIS-based data mining techniques of anfis with whale optimization algorithm (WOA) and grey wolf optimizer (GWO). Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9183755 ↗
63. Modeling flood susceptibility using data-driven approaches of naïve bayes tree, alternating decision tree, and random forest methods10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134979 ↗
64. Chen, W., Fan, L., Li, C., and Pham, B.T. (2020). Spatial prediction of landslides using hybrid integration of artificial intelligence algorithms with frequency ratio and index of entropy in Nanzheng county, China. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10010029 ↗
65. Zhao, X., and Chen, W. (2020). GIS-based evaluation of landslide susceptibility models using certainty factors and functional trees-based ensemble techniques. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10010016 ↗
66. Landslide susceptibility mapping: A comparison of logistic regression and neural networks methods in a medium scale study, Hendek region (Turkey)10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.02.002 ↗
67. Chen, W., Shahabi, H., Zhang, S., Khosravi, K., Shirzadi, A., Chapi, K., Pham, B., Zhang, T., Zhang, L., and Chai, H. (2018). Landslide susceptibility modeling based on GIS and novel bagging-based kernel logistic regression. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8122540 ↗
68. Chen, W., Sun, Z., and Han, J. (2019). Landslide susceptibility modeling using integrated ensemble weights of evidence with logistic regression and random forest models. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9010171 ↗
69. ESRI (2015). ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.3.1, Environmental Systems Research Institute.
70. A global review on ambient Limestone-Precipitating Springs (LPS): Hydrogeological setting, ecology, and conservation10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.105 ↗
71. A comparative study on groundwater spring potential analysis based on statistical index, index of entropy and certainty factors models10.1080/10106049.2017.1299801 ↗
72. The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.06.010 ↗
73. Application of GIS-based data-driven models for groundwater potential mapping in Kuhdasht region of Iran
74. GIS-based landslide susceptibility modelling: A comparative assessment of kernel logistic regression, naïve-bayes tree, and alternating decision tree models10.1080/19475705.2017.1289250 ↗
75. Prioritization of landslide conditioning factors and its spatial modeling in Shangnan county, China using GIS-based data mining algorithms10.1007/s10064-017-1004-9 ↗
76. Williams, G. (2011). Data Mining with Rattle and R: The Art of Excavating Data for Knowledge Discovery, Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-1-4419-9890-3 ↗
77. Flood susceptibility modelling using novel hybrid approach of reduced-error pruning trees with bagging and random subspace ensembles10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.089 ↗
78. Li, Y., and Chen, W. (2020). Landslide susceptibility evaluation using hybrid integration of evidential belief function and machine learning techniques. Water, 12.10.3390/w12010113 ↗
79. Assessment of groundwater potential zones using GIS technique10.1007/s12524-009-0012-z ↗
80. Ballukraya, P., and Kalimuthu, R. (2010). Quantitative hydrogeological and geomorphological analyses for groundwater potential assessment in hard rock terrains. Curr. Sci., 253–259.
81. Novel hybrid integration approach of bagging-based fisher’s linear discriminant function for groundwater potential analysis10.1007/s11053-019-09465-w ↗
82. Role of remote sensing and GIS techniques for generation of groundwater prospect zones towards rural development—An approach10.1080/01431160210144543 ↗
83. Groundwater favorability map using GIS multicriteria data analysis on crystalline terrain, Sao Paulo state, Brazil10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.03.026 ↗
84. Groundwater assessment through an integrated approach using remote sensing, GIS and resistivity techniques: A case study from a hard rock terrain10.1080/01431160600554983 ↗
85. Use of the distributed hydrology soil vegetation model to study road effects on hydrological processes in Pang Khum Experimental Watershed, northern Thailand10.1016/j.foreco.2005.12.009 ↗
86. Groundwater potential mapping using c5.0, random forest, and multivariate adaptive regression spline models in GIS10.1007/s10661-018-6507-8 ↗