journal article·2022-09-14Open access

Digestate Management and Processing Practices: A Review

Đurđica Kovačić, Zdenko Lončarić, Jurica Jović, Danijela Samac, Brigita Popović, Marina Tišma

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 18

Abstract

The implementation of sustainable agro-energy systems that integrate crop, livestock, and bioenergy production is attracting increasing interest from farmers. Livestock produces large amounts of animal manure which can serve as organic fertilizer for crops and pasture growth. However, the nutrients contained in manure can adversely affect air, water, and soil quality and pose a public health risk if not handled properly. Existing manure management practices vary widely on a global scale. Researchers are striving to identify appropriate manure management practices with the aim of environmental protection. Anaerobic digestion of manure and subsequent digestate (DG) processing technologies have been proposed to stabilize manure so that it can be safely used for land applications. DG, which represents digested substrate removed from the anaerobic reactor after recovery of biogas, is a rich source of N, P, K, and S, various micronutrients, and organic matter, the addition of which to the soil can stimulate soil microbial biomass metabolic activities thus improving soil ecosystem function. However, the optimal fertilization properties of DG can be lost if it is neither fully stabilized nor contains biodegradable materials. To overcome these problems, various processing technologies can be used to convert DG into value-added by-products. Composting has been proposed as one such preferred post-treatment that can convert DG into mature, stable, safe, humus- and nutrient-rich compost. Other processing technologies such as thermal drying, gasification, hydrothermal carbonization, pyrolysis, membrane filtration, struvite precipitation, ammonia stripping, and evaporation have also been proposed for DG processing and nutrient recovery from DG. The objective of this review paper was to provide an overview of the current state of the art in DG management regulations and practices and to provide an update on the various processes that have been developed to meet DG stabilization requirements, with a focus on composting as one of the preferred solutions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Phosphorus and nutrient management · Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production · Wastewater Treatment and Reuse

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Agrobiotechnical Sciences Osijek, J. J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, Vladimira Preloga 1, HR-31000 Osijek, Croatia

Faculty of Food Technology Osijek, J. J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, F. Kuhača 18, HR-31000 Osijek, Croatia

Funding

European Union

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Transfer of manure as fertilizer from livestock farms to crop fields: The case of Catalonia10.1016/j.compag.2020.105550 ↗
2. (2022, April 26). UN. Available online: https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/world-population-prospects-2019.html.
3. Agricultural benefits and environmental risks of soil fertilization with anaerobic digestates: A review10.1007/s13593-013-0196-z ↗
4. Influence of Organic and Mineral Fertilization on Soil Greenhouse Gas Emissions. A Review
5. Greenhouse gas emissions, energy demand and land use associated with omnivorous, pesco-vegetarian, vegetarian, and vegan diets accounting for farming practices10.1016/j.spc.2020.02.010 ↗
6. Sustainable agriculture options for production, greenhouse gasses, and pollution alleviation, and nutrient recycling in emerging and transitional nations—An overview10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118319 ↗
7. First reported quantitative microbiota in different livestock manures used as organic fertilizers in the Northeast of Thailand10.1038/s41598-020-80543-3 ↗
8. Wastes to profit: A circular economy approach to value-addition in livestock industries10.1071/AN20400 ↗
9. Digestate Application on Two Different Soils: Agricultural Benefit and Risk10.1007/s12649-020-01318-5 ↗
10. Vitti, A., Elshafie, H.S., Logozzo, G., Marzario, S., Scopa, A., Camele, I., and Nuzzaci, M. (2021). Physico-Chemical Characterization and Biological Activities of a Digestate and a More Stabilized Digestate-Derived Compost from Agro-Waste. Plants, 10.10.3390/plants10020386 ↗
11. Soil quality and barley growth as influenced by the land application of two compost types10.1016/j.biortech.2007.06.034 ↗
12. Soluble Salts in Compost and Their Effects on Soil and Plants: A Review10.1080/1065657X.2020.1772906 ↗
13. Inactivation of bacterial pathogenic load in compost against vermicompost of organic solid waste aiming to achieve sanitation goals: A review10.1016/j.wasman.2017.03.003 ↗
14. Effects of integrated biocontrol on bacterial wilt and rhizosphere bacterial community of tobacco10.1038/s41598-021-82060-3 ↗
15. Risk assessments for quality-assured, source-segregated composts and anaerobic digestates for a circular bioeconomy in the UK10.1016/j.envint.2019.03.044 ↗
16. (2022, April 26). Eip-agri-fg, Nutrient Recycling. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eip/agriculture/sites/agri-eip/files/eip-agri_fg_nutrients_recycling_final_report_2017_en.pdf.
17. Fate of micronutrients and heavy metals in digestate processing using vibrating reversed osmosis as resource recovery technology10.1016/j.seppur.2019.04.055 ↗
18. Manure management and soil biodiversity: Towards more sustainable food systems in the EU10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103251 ↗
19. Overview of Animal Manure Management for Beef, Pig, and Poultry Farms in France10.3389/fsufs.2018.00036 ↗
20. Cervelli, E., di Perta, E.S., Mautone, A., and Pindozzi, S. (2021, January 3–5). The landscape approach as support to the livestock manure management. The buffalo herds case-study in Sele plain, Campania region. Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Agriculture and Forestry (MetroAgriFor), Trento-Bolzano, Italy.10.1109/MetroAgriFor52389.2021.9628616 ↗
21. EU Nitrates Directive, from theory to practice: Environmental effectiveness and influence of regional governance on its performance10.1007/s13280-019-01197-8 ↗
22. Serebrennikov, D., Thorne, F., Kallas, Z., and McCarthy, S.N. (2020). Factors influencing adoption of sustainable farming practices in Europe: A systemic review of empirical literature. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12229719 ↗
23. (2022, April 25). EC EUROPA EU Eurostat Statistics Explained. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statisticsexplained/index.php?title=Glossary:Integrated_pollution_prevention_and_control_(IPPC).
24. Environmental Issues of Livestock Production in Developing Countries: Need for Government Intervention Using the Truck Based Approach
25. Impact of the treatment of NH3 emissions from pig farms on greenhouse gas emissions. Quantitative assessment from the literature data10.1016/j.nbt.2018.06.001 ↗
26. Wiering, M., Boezeman, D., and Crabbé, A. (2020). The Water Framework Directive and Agricultural Diffuse Pollution: Fighting a Running Battle?. Water, 12.10.3390/w12051447 ↗
27. Anaerobic digestion process: Technological aspects and recent developments10.1007/s13762-018-1682-2 ↗
28. A critical review on livestock manure biorefinery technologies: Sustainability, challanges, and future perspectives10.1016/j.rser.2020.110033 ↗
29. Erratum: Nitrogen use efficiency on dairy farms with different grazing sys-tems in northwestern Germany (2020 Environ. Res. Commun. 2 105002)10.1088/2515-7620/abccbc ↗
30. A life cycle assessment of liquid pig manure transport in line with EU regulations: A case study from Germany10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.082 ↗
31. Survey on storage, application and incorporation practices for organic fertilizers in Germany10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113380 ↗
32. Van Grinsven, H., and Bleeker, A. (2017). Evaluation of the Manure and Fertilisers Act 2016: Synthesis Report, PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
33. Nilsson, A.K. (2013). Regulating Zero Eutrophication. Swedish Law on Controlling Emissions of Nutirients to the Baltic Sea, Stockholm University.
34. Luque, R., Lin, C.S.K., Wilson, K., and Clark, J. (2016). Production of biogas via anaerobic digestion. Handbook of Biofuels Production, Woodhead Publishing.
35. Perspectives on microbial community in anaerobic digestion with emphasis on environmental parameters: A systematic review10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128618 ↗
36. Thermal Pretreatment of Harvest Residues and Their Use in Anaerobic Co-digestion with Dairy Cow Manure10.1007/s12010-017-2559-4 ↗
37. An assessment of anaerobic thermophilic co-digestion of dairy cattle manure and separated tomato greenhouse waste in lab-scale reactors
38. Electroporation of harvest residues for enhanced biogas production in anaerobic co- digestion with dairy cow manure10.1016/j.biortech.2018.11.086 ↗
39. Natural Communities of Microalgae and Cyanobacteria from Eutrophicated Waters as Potential Co-substrates for Small-scale Biogas Production10.1007/s12010-020-03382-y ↗
40. Uzinger, N., Szécsy, O., Szűcs-Vásárhelyi, N., Padra, I., Sándor, D.B., Lončarić, Z., Draskovits, E., and Rékási, M. (2021). Short-Term Decomposition and Nutrient-Supplying Ability of Sewage Sludge Digestate, Digestate Compost, and Vermicompost on Acidic Sandy and Calcareous Loamy Soils. Agronomy, 11.10.3390/agronomy11112249 ↗
41. Corn silage fungal-based solid-state pretreatment for enhanced biogas production in anaerobic co-digestion with cow manure10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.037 ↗
42. Biogas production from brewery spent grain as a mono-substrate in a two-stage process composed of solid-state anaerobic digestion and granular biomass reactors10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.197 ↗
43. Soybean Straw, Corn Stover and Sunflower Stalk as Possible Substrates for Biogas Production in Croatia: A Review10.15255/CABEQ.2016.985 ↗
44. Biogas optimisation processes and effluent quality: A review10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.105449 ↗
45. A critical review of conventional and emerging methods for improving process stability in thermophilic anaerobic digestion10.1016/j.esd.2019.11.001 ↗
46. Hatti-Kaul, R., Mamo, G., and Mattiasson, B. (2016). Biogas Production: Microbiology and Technology. Anaerobes in Biotechnology, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-45651-5 ↗
47. Stronach, S.M., Rudd, T., and Lester, J.N. (1986). Anaerobic Digestion Processes in Industrial Wastewater Treatment (Biotechnology Monographs), Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-71215-9 ↗
48. Agricultural use of biogas digestate as a replacement fertilizers
49. Digestate management for high-solid anaerobic digestion of organic wastes: A review10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122485 ↗
50. Assessing amendment and fertilizing properties of digestates from anaerobic digestion through a comparative study with digested sludge and compost10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.08.034 ↗
51. Effects of digestion time in anaerobic digestion on subsequent digestate composting10.1016/j.biortech.2018.04.098 ↗
52. Anaerobic co-digestion of recalcitrant agricultural wastes: Characterizing of biochemical parameters of digestate and its impacts on soil ecosystem10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.051 ↗
53. Performance of semi-continuous anaerobic co-digestion of poultry manure with fruit and vegetable waste and analysis of digestate quality: A bench scale study10.1016/j.wasman.2018.10.041 ↗
54. Evaluation of agronomic properties of digestate from macroalgal residues anaerobic digestion: Impact of pretreatment and co-digestion with waste activated sludge10.1016/j.wasman.2020.04.019 ↗
55. Agricultural Reuse of the Digestate from Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Organic Waste: Microbiological Contamination, Metal Hazards and Fertilizing Performance10.1007/s11270-014-2046-2 ↗
56. Evaluation of heavy metal content in digestate from batch anaerobic co-digestion of sunflower hulls and poultry manure10.1007/s10163-012-0107-4 ↗
57. Chemical and microbiological hazards associated with recycling of anaerobic digested residue intended for agricultural use10.1016/j.wasman.2011.07.025 ↗
58. Use of biogas digestates obtained by anaerobic digestion and co-digestion as fertilizers: Characterization, soil biological activity and growth dynamic of Lactuca sativa L10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.444 ↗
59. Comparative characterization of digestate versus pig slurry and cow manure—Chemical composition and effects on soil microbial activity10.1016/j.wasman.2016.12.016 ↗
60. Mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of aloe peel waste with dairy manure in the batch digester: Focusing on mixing ratios and digestate stability10.1016/j.biortech.2016.06.070 ↗
61. Statistical analysis for the quality assessment of digestates from separately collected organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) and agro-industrial feedstock. Should input feedstock to anaerobic digestion determine the legal status of digestate?10.1016/j.wasman.2019.02.040 ↗
62. Agricultural use of digestate for horticultural crop production and improvement of soil properties10.1016/j.eja.2012.06.001 ↗
63. Assessment of the fertiliser potential of digestates from farm and agroindustrial residues10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.02.018 ↗
64. Replacing inorganic fertilizer with anaerobic digestate may maintain agricultural productivity at less environmental cost10.1002/jpln.201200214 ↗
65. Głowacka, A., Szostak, B., and Klebaniuk, R. (2020). Effect of Biogas Digestate and Mineral Fertilisation on the Soil Properties and Yield and Nutritional Value of Switchgrass Forage. Agronomy, 10.10.3390/agronomy10040490 ↗
66. Kumar, S. (2012). Digestate: A New Nutrient Source—Review. Biogas, InTech.10.5772/1793 ↗
67. The Effects of Short-Term Compost Application On Soil Chemical Properties and on Nutritional Status of Maize Plant10.1080/1065657X.2007.10702330 ↗
68. Effects of anaerobic digestion on digestate nutrient availability and crop growth: A review10.1002/elsc.201100085 ↗
69. Pathogenic bacteria and mineral N in soils following the land spreading of biogas digestates and fresh manure10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.07.007 ↗
70. Wellinger, A., Murphy, J., and Baxter, D. (2013). Biogas digestate quality and utilization. The Biogas Handbook—Science, Production and Applications, Woodhead Publishing.
71. Levels of zoonotic agents in British livestock manures10.1111/j.1472-765X.2004.01564.x ↗
72. Factors controlling pathogen destruction during anaerobic digestion of biowastes10.1016/j.wasman.2005.02.010 ↗
73. Inactivation of protozoan parasites in food, water, and environmental systems10.4315/0362-028X-69.11.2786 ↗
74. Liu, X., Lendormi, T., and Lanoisellé, J.-L. (2021). Conventional and Innovative Hygienization of Feedstock for Biogas Production: Resistance of Indicator Bacteria to Thermal Pasteurization Pulsed Electric Field Treatment, and Anaerobic Digestion. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14071938 ↗
75. Seruga, P., Krzywonos, M., Paluszak, Z., Urbanowska, A., Pawlak-Kruczek, H., Niedźwiecki, Ł., and Pińkowska, H. (2020). Pathogen Reduction Potential in Anaerobic Digestion of Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste and Food Waste. Molecules, 25.10.3390/molecules25020275 ↗
76. Overview of hygienization pretreatment for pasteurization and methane potential enhancement of biowaste: Challenges, state of the art and alternative technologies10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.356 ↗
77. Hygiene and Sanitation in Biogas Plants
78. Organic micropollutants, heavy metals and pathogens in anaerobic digestate based on food waste10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114997 ↗
79. Bagge, E. (2009). Hygiene Aspects of the Biogas Process with Emphasis on Spore-Forming Bacteria. [Ph.D. Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences].
80. Evaluation of the occurrence of sporulating and nonsporulating pathogenic bacteria in manure and in digestate of five agricultural biogas plants10.1002/mbo3.872 ↗
81. Pelleting is a successful method to eliminate the presence of Clostridium spp. from the digestate of biogas plants10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.08.008 ↗
82. Heavy metals in source-separated compost and digestates10.1016/j.wasman.2014.02.007 ↗
83. Molecular characterization of particulate organic matter in full scale anaerobic digesters: An NMR spectroscopy study10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.264 ↗
84. Co-Digestion of Swine Manure and Crude Glycerine: Increasing Glycerine Ratio Results in Preferential Degradation of Labile Compounds10.1007/s11270-016-2773-7 ↗
85. Assessing amendment properties of digestate by studying the organic matter composition and the degree of biological stability during the anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of MSW10.1016/j.biortech.2009.02.012 ↗
86. Schievano, A., Adani, F., Tambone, F., D’Imporzano, G., Scaglia, B., and Genevini, P.L. (2009). What is the Digestate?. Anaerobic Digestion: Opportunities for Agriculture and Environment, Regione Lombardia.
87. Digestion of cattle manure under mesophilic conditions: Characterization of organic matter applying thermal analysis and 1H NMR10.1007/s10532-010-9436-y ↗
88. Brebbia, C.A., and Itoh, H. (2016). A review of the current digestate distribution models: Storage and transport. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, WIT Press.
89. How collection efficiency and legal constraints on digestate management can affect the effectiveness of anaerobic digestion of bio-waste: An analysis of the Italian context in a life cycle perspective10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138555 ↗
90. Assessment of the state of the art of technologies for the processing of digestate residue from anaerobic digesters10.2166/wst.2013.075 ↗
91. Nutrient removal and recovery from digestate: A review of the technology10.1080/17597269.2017.1336348 ↗
92. (2022, April 26). AgriKomp. Available online: https://agrikomp.com/plants/agrifer-plus/.
93. Solid and liquid fractionation of digestate: Mass balance, chemical characterization, and agronomic and environmental value10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.130 ↗
94. Improving composting as a post-treatment of anaerobic digestate10.1016/j.biortech.2015.11.013 ↗
95. Improving solid-liquid separation performance of anaerobic digestate from food waste by thermally activated persulfate oxidation10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122989 ↗
96. Economic assessment of different biogas digestate processing technologies: A scenario-based analysis10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120282 ↗
97. The Energy Performance of Vacuum Evaporators for Liquid Digestate Treatment in Biogas Plants10.1016/j.energy.2017.06.135 ↗
98. Management strategies for anaerobic digestate of organic fraction of municipal solid waste: Current status and future prospects10.1177/0734242X18816793 ↗
99. Biodegradation of lignin in a compost environment: A review10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00104-2 ↗
100. Composting and fermentation of biowaste—Advantages and disadvantages of processes