journal article·2023-02-06Open access

DeepBreastCancerNet: A Novel Deep Learning Model for Breast Cancer Detection Using Ultrasound Images

Asaf Raza, Naeem Ullah, Javed Ali Khan, Muhammad Assam, Antonella Guzzo, Hanan Aljuaid

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 4

Abstract

Breast cancer causes hundreds of women’s deaths each year. The manual detection of breast cancer is time-consuming, complicated, and prone to inaccuracy. For Breast Cancer (BC) detection, several imaging methods are explored. However, sometimes misidentification leads to unnecessary treatment and diagnosis. Therefore, accurate detection of BC can save many people from unnecessary surgery and biopsy. Due to recent developments in the industry, deep learning’s (DL) performance in processing medical images has significantly improved. Deep Learning techniques successfully identify BC from ultrasound images due to their superior prediction ability. Transfer learning reuses knowledge representations from public models built on large-scale datasets. However, sometimes Transfer Learning leads to the problem of overfitting. The key idea of this research is to propose an efficient and robust deep-learning model for breast cancer detection and classification. Therefore, this paper presents a novel DeepBraestCancerNet DL model for breast cancer detection and classification. The proposed framework has 24 layers, including six convolutional layers, nine inception modules, and one fully connected layer. Also, the architecture uses the clipped ReLu activation function, the leaky ReLu activation function, batch normalization and cross-channel normalization as its two normalization operations. We observed that the proposed model reached the highest classification accuracy of 99.35%. We also compared the performance of the proposed DeepBraestCancerNet approach with several existing DL models, and the experiment results showed that the proposed model outperformed the state-of-the-art. Furthermore, we validated the proposed model using another standard, publicaly available dataset. The proposed DeepBraestCancerNet model reached the highest accuracy of 99.63%.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: AI in cancer detection · COVID-19 diagnosis using AI · Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Computer Engineering, Modeling Electronics and Systems Engineering, University of Calabria, 87036 Rende Cosenza, Italy

Department of Software Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Taxila 47050, Pakistan

Department of Software Engineering, University of Science and Technology, Bannu 28100, Pakistan

Department of Computer and Technology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China

Computer Sciences Department, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (PNU), P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia

Funding

Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. Prediction of benign and malignant BC using data mining techniques10.1177/1748301818756225 ↗
2. Halim, A., Ashraf, A., Andrew, A.M., Yasin, M.N.M., Rahman, M.A.A., Jusoh, M., Veeraperumal, V., Rahim, H.A., Illahi, U., and Karim, M.K.A. (2021). Existing and Emerging Breast Cancer Detection Technologies and Its Challenges: A Review. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app112210753 ↗
3. A review on recent progress in thermal imaging and DL approaches for BC detection10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3004056 ↗
4. BC detection using PCPCET and ADEWNN: A geometric invariant approach to medical X-ray image sensors10.1109/JSEN.2016.2533440 ↗
5. Ultrasound imaging technologies for BC detection and management: A review10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.09.012 ↗
6. Modern BC detection: A technological review10.1155/2009/902326 ↗
7. A Holistic Approach to Identify and Classify COVID-19 from Chest Radiographs, ECG, and CT-Scan Images Using ShuffleNet Convolutional Neural Network10.3390/diagnostics13010162 ↗
8. Naeem, U., Raza, A., Ali Khan, J., and Ali Khan, A. (2022). An Effective Approach for Automatic COVID-19 Detection from Multiple Image Sources Using Shufflenet Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Res. Sq.
9. A survey on brain tumor detection techniques for MR images10.1007/s11042-020-08898-3 ↗
10. Cascaded parsing of human-object interaction recognition10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3049156 ↗
11. Advance control strategies using image processing, UAV and AI in agriculture: A review10.1108/WJE-09-2020-0459 ↗
12. Breast mass segmentation in ultrasound with selective kernel U-Net convolutional neural network10.1016/j.bspc.2020.102027 ↗
13. An Efficient Approach for Crops Pests Recognition and Classification Based on Novel DeepPestNet Deep Learning Model10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3189676 ↗
14. A hybrid deep learning-based approach for brain tumor classification10.3390/electronics11071146 ↗
15. Gao, H., and Lin, M. (2017, January 21–26). Densely connected convolutional networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, HI, USA.
16. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016, January 27–30). Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
17. Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., Shlens, J., and Wojna, Z. (2016, January 27–30). Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.308 ↗
18. Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., and Rabinovich, A. (2015, January 7–12). Going deeper with convolutions. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Boston, MA, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298594 ↗
19. Zhang, X., Zhou, X., Lin, M., and Sun, J. (2017). ShuffleNet: An Extremely Efficient Convolutional Neural Network for Mobile Devices. arXiv.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00716 ↗
20. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Hinton, G.E. (2012, January 3–6). ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems NIPS, Lake Tahoe, NV, USA.
21. Iandola, A., and Bernstein, D. (2016). SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5 MB model size. arXiv.
22. Chollet, F. (2017, January 21–26). Xception: DL with depthwise separable convolutions. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2017.195 ↗
23. Mohammed, S.A., Darrab, S., Noaman, S.A., and Saake, G. (2020, January 11). Analysis of BC detection using different machine learning techniques. Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Mining and Big Data, Singapore.10.1007/978-981-15-7205-0_10 ↗
24. Boosting BC detection using convolutional neural network10.1155/2021/5528622 ↗
25. Hussain, L., Aziz, W., Saeed, S., Rathore, S., and Rafique, M. (2018, January 1–3). Automated BC detection using machine learning techniques by extracting different feature extracting strategies. Proceedings of the 2018 17th IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications/12th IEEE International Conference on Big Data Science and Engineering (TrustCom/BigDataSE), New York, NY, USA.10.1109/TrustCom/BigDataSE.2018.00057 ↗
26. Goyal, N., and Trivedi, M.C. (2020). BC classification and identification using machine learning approaches. Mater. Today Proc.10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.666 ↗
27. Jain, T., Verma, V.K., Agarwal, M., Yadav, A., and Jain, A. (2020, January 3–4). Supervised machine learning approach for the prediction of BC. Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on System, Computation, Automation and Networking (ICSCAN), Pondicherry, India.10.1109/ICSCAN49426.2020.9262403 ↗
28. Deep hybrid architectures for binary classification of medical BC images10.1016/j.bspc.2021.103226 ↗
29. BreastNet: A novel convolutional neural network model through histopathological images for the diagnosis of BC10.1016/j.physa.2019.123592 ↗
30. Convolutional neural network improvement for BC classification10.1016/j.eswa.2018.11.008 ↗
31. Histopathological BC image classification by deep neural network techniques guided by local clustering10.1155/2018/2362108 ↗
32. Ragb, H., Ali, R., Jera, E., and Buaossa, N. (2021). Convolutional neural network based on TL for BC screening. arXiv.
33. Bevilacqua, V., Brunetti, A., Triggiani, M., Magaletti, D., Telegrafo, M., and Moschetta, M. (2016, January 7–11). An Optimized Feed-forward Artificial Neural Network Topology to Support Radiologists in Breast Lesions Classification. Proceedings of the 2016 Genetic Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion-GECCO ’16 Companion, London, UK.10.1145/2908961.2931733 ↗
34. A novel DL based framework for the detection and classification of BC using TL10.1016/j.patrec.2019.03.022 ↗
35. Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of BC with mammography: Recent advances10.1109/TITB.2008.2009441 ↗
36. Improved Multi-Classification of BC Histopathological Images using Handcrafted Features and Deep Neural Network (Dense layer)
37. Sharma, S., and Kumar, S. (2021). The Xception model: A potential feature extractor in BC histology images classification. ICT Express.10.1016/j.icte.2021.11.010 ↗
38. Deep integrated pipeline of segmentation guided classification of BC from ultrasound images10.1016/j.bspc.2022.103553 ↗
39. A Novel Hybrid K-Means and GMM Machine Learning Model for BC Detection10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3123425 ↗
40. A novel deep-learning model for automatic detection and classification of BC using the transfer-learning technique10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3079204 ↗
41. Convolutional Neural Networks based classification of breast ultrasonography images by hybrid method with respect to benign, malignant, and normal using mRMR10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104407 ↗
42. Chowdhury, D., Das, A., Dey, A., Sarkar, S., Dwivedi, A.D., Mukkamala, R.R., and Murmu, L. (2022). ABCanDroid: A cloud integrated android app for noninvasive early breast cancer detection using transfer learning. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22030832 ↗
43. Computer-aided diagnosis of breast ultrasound images using ensemble learning from convolutional neural networks10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105361 ↗
44. Comparison of transferred deep neural networks in ultrasonic breast masses discrimination10.1155/2018/4605191 ↗
45. Mambou, S.J., Maresova, P., Krejcar, O., Selamat, A., and Kuca, K. (2018). Breast cancer detection using infrared thermal imaging and a deep learning model. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18092799 ↗
46. Dataset of breast ultrasound images10.1016/j.dib.2019.104863 ↗
47. Paulo, S.R. (2017). Breast ultrasound Image. Mendeley Data.
48. Mampitiya, L., Rathnayake, N., and De Silva, S. (2022). Efficient and Low-Cost Skin Cancer Detection System Implementation with a Comparative Study Between Traditional and CNN-Based Models. J. Comput. Cogn. Eng.10.47852/bonviewJCCE2202482 ↗
49. A Hybrid CNN for Image Denoising
50. Stud pose detection based on photometric stereo and lightweight YOLOv4
51. Masood, F., Masood, J., Zahir, H., Driss, K., Mehmood, N., and Farooq, H. (2022). Novel Approach to Evaluate Classification Algorithms and Feature Selection Filter Algorithms using Medical Data. J. Comput. Cogn. Eng.10.47852/bonviewJCCE2202238 ↗
52. Nature
53. Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects10.1126/science.aaa8415 ↗
54. A survey on TL10.1109/TKDE.2009.191 ↗
55. ImageNet large scale visual recognition challenge10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y ↗