journal article·2019-01-10Open access

Interpretive Structural Modeling and MICMAC Analysis for Identifying and Benchmarking Significant Factors of Seismic Soil Liquefaction

Mahmood Ahmad, Xiao-Wei Tang, Jiang-Nan Qiu, Feezan Ahmad

Applied Sciences· Volume 9· Issue 2

Abstract

Seismic soil liquefaction is considered as one of the most complex geotechnical earthquake engineering problems owing to the uncertainty and complexity involved in soil parameters, seismic parameters, and site condition factors. Each one of these parameters contains a variety of factors that trigger liquefaction and have varying degrees of importance. However, estimating accurate and reliable liquefaction-induced hazards requires identification and benchmarking of the most influential factors that control soil liquefaction. Seismic soil liquefaction factors were identified by Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach and analyzed through Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and the Cross-Impact Matrix Multiplication Applied to Classification (MICMAC) methodologies. The ISM model presented the relationships between fifteen seismic soil liquefaction factors and their benchmarking position from higher to lower-level significant factors in hierarchy. MICMAC is used to examine the strength of the relationship between seismic soil liquefaction significant factors based on their driving and dependence power. This research characterizes the identification and benchmarking of the seismic soil liquefaction factors and their relationships. The results show that the factors—duration of earthquake, peak ground acceleration, drainage condition, and standard penetration test (SPT) blow counts—influence seismic soil liquefaction directly and soil type is the governing factor that forms the base of the ISM hierarchy and consequently triggers seismic soil liquefaction. The results provide a more accurate way of selecting significant factors for establishment of seismic soil liquefaction potential and liquefaction-induced hazards risk assessment models.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China

Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar (Bannu Campus), Bannu 28100, Pakistan

Faculty of Management and Economics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China

China–Pakistan Economic Corridor Project, LIMAK–JV–ZKB, Pindigheb, Attock 43260, Pakistan

Funding

Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China · National Key Research and Development Plan of China

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. Definitions of Terms Related to Liquefaction10.1061/AJGEB6.0000688 ↗
2. CPT-Based Liquefaction Triggering Procedure10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001388 ↗
3. Boulanger, R.W., and Idriss, I.M. (2014). CPT and SPT Based Liquefaction Triggering, Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California Davis. Report No. UCD/CGM-14/01.
4. Fundamental Factors Affecting Liquefaction Susceptibility of Sands10.1139/t00-040 ↗
5. Predicting Seismic Liquefaction Potentialof Sands by Optimum Seeking Method10.1016/S0267-7261(98)00004-9 ↗
6. Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential Using Neural-Networks and CPT Results10.1016/S0267-7261(03)00068-X ↗
7. Support Vector Machine for Evaluating Seismic-Liquefaction Potential Using Shear Wave Velocity10.1016/j.jappgeo.2010.10.005 ↗
8. A Genetic Algorithm Approach for Assessing Soil Liquefaction Potential Based on Reliability Method10.1007/s12040-012-0137-2 ↗
9. Seismic Liquefaction Potential Assessed by Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method10.1007/s11069-013-0997-z ↗
10. Entropy Analysis for Identifying Significant Parameters for Seismic Soil Liquefaction10.1080/17486025.2013.805255 ↗
11. Influence Factor Weights Analysis of Rock and Soil Earthquake Damages: A Case Study from Sand Liquefaction
12. Statistical Analysis of Factors Causing Liquefaction of Sand during Tangshan Earthquake
13. Identifying Significant Influence Factors of Seismic Soil Liquefaction and Analyzing Their Structural Relationship10.1007/s12205-016-0339-2 ↗
14. Okoli, C., and Schabram, K. (2018, November 11). A Guide to Conducting a Systematic Literature Review of Information Systems Research. Available online: http://sprouts.aisnet.org/10-26.
15. Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review10.1111/1467-8551.00375 ↗
16. Olsen, S.A. (1982). Interpretive Structural Modeling. Group Planning and Problem Solving Methods in Engineering Management, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
17. Interpreting the Interpretive Structural Model10.1007/s40171-012-0008-3 ↗
18. Analysis of Barriers to Development in Landfill Communities Using Interpretive Structural Modeling10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.09.005 ↗
19. Impact of Indirect Relationships in Classification of Variables—A MICMAC Analysis for Energy Conservation10.1002/sres.3850070404 ↗
20. Identification of Flexible Manufacturing System Dimensions and Their Interrelationship Using Total Interpretive Structural Modelling and Fuzzy MICMAC Analysis10.1007/s40171-014-0058-9 ↗
21. Fink, A. (2005). Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper, Sage Publications. [2nd ed.].
22. Kitchenham, B., and Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering, Keele University. Technical Report No. EBSE-2007-01.
23. Seed, H.B., and Idriss, I.M. (1982). Ground Motions and Soil Liquefaction during Earthquakes, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Monograph.
24. Green, R., and Bommer, J. (2018). Smallest Earthquake Magnitude That Can Trigger Liquefaction, Virginia Tech Center for Geotechnical Practice and Research 200 Patton Hall Blacksburg. CGPR # 92.
25. Magnitude scaling factors in liquefaction triggering procedures10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.01.004 ↗
26. Tesfamariam, S., and Liu, Z. (2013). Seismic Risk Analysis Using Bayesian Belief Networks. Handbook of Seismic Risk Analysis, Woodhead Publishing Limited.10.1533/9780857098986.2.175 ↗
27. Liquefaction Resistance using CPT and Field Case Histories10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1995)121:12(856) ↗
28. Ahmad, M., Tang, X.-W., Ahmad, F., and Jamal, A. (2018). Assessment of Soil Liquefaction Potential in Kamra, Pakistan. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10114223 ↗
29. Magnitude-Distance Relations for Liquefaction in Soil from Earthquakes
30. Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF Workshops on Evaluation10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:10(817) ↗
31. Idriss, I.M. (1991, January 11–15). Earthquake Ground Motions at Soft Soil Sites. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, Rolla, MO, USA.
32. Seismic parameters from liquefaction evidence10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:8(1345) ↗
33. Monkul, M.M. (2012). On some of the factors influencing the fines’ role on liquefaction of silty sands. GeoCongress 2012: State of the Art and Practice in Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE.10.1061/9780784412121.083 ↗
34. Liquefaction resistance of sands containing plastic fines with different plasticity10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000806 ↗
35. Fines content effects on liquefaction potential evaluation for sites liquefied during Chi-Chi earthquake, 199910.1080/02533839.2002.9670728 ↗
36. Assessment of Liquefaction-Induced Hazards Using Bayesian Networks Based on Standard Penetration Test Data10.5194/nhess-18-1451-2018 ↗
37. Charactersitics of Liquefied Sands during Mino-Owari, Tohnankai and Fukui Earthquakes10.3208/sandf1960.9.75 ↗
38. Effects of Sand Compaction on Liquefaction during Tokachioki Earthquake10.3208/sandf1960.10.2_112 ↗
39. Laboratory Liquefaction Test of Sand Based on Grain Size and Relative Density10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2016.48.3.7 ↗
40. Cetin, K.O., Seed, R.B., Moss, R.E.S., Der, K.A., Tokimatsu, K., Harder, L.F., and Kayen, R.E. (2000). Field Case Histories for SPT-Based In Situ Liquefaction Potential Evaluation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, California University. Geotechnical Engineering Research Report No. UCB/GT-2000109.
41. Igwe, O., Sassa, K., and Fukuoka, H. (2004). Liquefaction Potential of Granular Materials Using Differently Graded Sandy Soils. Annuals of Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, No. 47 B, Kyoto University.
42. (2007). Geotechnical Design Procedure, Liquefaction Potential of Cohesionless Soils.
43. Evaluation of Soil Liquefaction Potentials in Partially Drained Conditions10.3208/sandf1972.25.2_57 ↗
44. Liquefaction of over-Consolidated Sand: A Centrifuge Investigation10.1080/13632460509350582 ↗
45. Emprical Correlation of Soil Liquefaction Based on SPT N-Value and Fines Content10.3208/sandf1972.23.4_56 ↗
46. Lo Presti, D., Stacul, S., Meisina, C., Bordoni, M., and Bittelli, M. (2018). Preliminary Validation of a Novel Method for the Assessment of Effective Stress State in Partially Saturated Soils by Cone Penetration Tests. Geosciences, 8.10.3390/geosciences8010030 ↗
47. Hannich, D., Hoetzl, H., and Ehret, D. (2007, January 4–6). Liquefaction Probability in Bucharest and Influencing Factors. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Strong Vrancea Earthquake and Risk Mitigation, Bucharest, Romania.
48. Fioravante, V., Giretti, D., Abate, G., Aversa, S., Boldini, D., Capilleri, P.P., Cavallaro, A., Chamlagain, D., Crespellani, T., and Dezi, F. (May, January 29). Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering Aspects: The 2012 Emilia Romagna Earthquake (Italy). Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering, Wheeling, IL, USA.
49. Florin, V.A., and Ivanov, P.L. (1961, January 17–22). Liquefaction of Saturated Sandy Soils. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Paris, France.
50. Moustafa, A. (2012). Review on liquefaction hazard assessment. Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering—Soil Liquefaction and Seismic Safety of Dams and Monuments, InTech.10.5772/2459 ↗
51. Subsidence of Building Foundation Resting upon Liquefied Subsoil: Case Studies and Assessment10.3208/sandf.41.6_111 ↗