Comparison of Spray Deposition, Control Efficacy on Wheat Aphids and Working Efficiency in the Wheat Field of the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle with Boom Sprayer and Two Conventional Knapsack Sprayers
Source abstract
Abstract
As a new low volume application technology, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) application is developing quickly in China. The aim of this study was to compare the droplet deposition, control efficacy and working efficiency of a six-rotor UAV with a self-propelled boom sprayer and two conventional knapsack sprayers on the wheat crop. The total deposition of UAV and other sprayers were not statistically significant, but significantly lower for run-off. The deposition uniformity and droplets penetrability of the UAV were poor. The deposition variation coefficient of the UAV was 87.2%, which was higher than the boom sprayer of 31.2%. The deposition on the third top leaf was only 50.0% compared to the boom sprayer. The area of coverage of the UAV was 2.2% under the spray volume of 10 L/ha. The control efficacy on wheat aphids of UAV was 70.9%, which was comparable to other sprayers. The working efficiency of UAV was 4.11 ha/h, which was roughly 1.7–20.0 times higher than the three other sprayers. Comparable control efficacy results suggest that UAV application could be a viable strategy to control pests with higher efficiency. Further improvement on deposition uniformity and penetrability are needed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Plant Surface Properties and Treatments
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Center for International Collaboration Research on Precision Agricultural Aviation Pesticides Spraying Technology (NPAAC), South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Disease and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
Funding
The National Key Research and Development Plan: High Efficient Ground and Aerial Spraying Technology and Intelligent Equipment · Key science and technology plan of Guangdong Province
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. The application of unmanned aircraft systems to plant protection in China10.1007/s11119-017-9516-7 ↗
2. Zhang, X., Zhao, W., Jing, R., Wheeler, K., Smith, G.A., Stallones, L., and Xiang, H. (2011). Work-related pesticide poisoning among farmers in two villages of Southern China: A cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health, 11.10.1186/1471-2458-11-429 ↗
3. Visual determination of potential dermal and inhalation exposure using allura red as an environmentally friendly pesticide surrogate10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b03050 ↗
4. Ergonomics evaluation of a lever-operated knapsack sprayer10.1016/0003-6870(91)90227-9 ↗
5. Comparative spray deposits by manually pulled trolley sprayer and a spray gun in greenhouse tomato crops10.1016/j.cropro.2011.10.007 ↗
6. Recent development of unmanned aerial vehicle for plant protection in East Asia
7. Droplet deposition and control effect of insecticides sprayed with an unmanned aerial vehicle against plant hoppers10.1016/j.cropro.2016.03.018 ↗
8. Develop an unmanned aerial vehicle based automatic aerial spraying system10.1016/j.compag.2016.07.022 ↗
9. Performances evaluation of four typical unmanned aerial vehicles used for pesticide application in China
10. Effects of citrus tree-shape and spraying height of small unmanned aerial vehicle on droplet distribution
11. Giles, D., and Billing, R. (2014, January 6–10). Deployment and performance of an unmanned aerial vehicle for spraying of specialty crops. Proceedings of the International Conference of Agricultural Engineering, Zurich, Switzerland.
12. Embedded-electrode electrostatic-induction spray-charging nozzle: Theoretical and engineering design10.13031/2013.35448 ↗
13. The application of small unmanned aerial systems for precision agriculture: A review10.1007/s11119-012-9274-5 ↗
14. Development of a spray system for an unmanned aerial vehicle platform10.13031/2013.29229 ↗
15. Meteorological effects on deposition and drift of aerially applied sprays10.13031/2013.22038 ↗
16. Evaluation of the AgDISP aerial spray algorithms in the AgDRIFT model10.1002/etc.5620210328 ↗
17. Spray drift characteristics of fuel powered single-rotor UAV for plant protection
18. Effect of wind field below unmanned helicopter on droplet deposition distribution of aerial spraying
19. Drift and deposition of ultra-low altitude and low volume application in paddy field
20. Effects of sprayers and nozzles on spray drift and terminal residues of imidacloprid on wheat10.1016/j.cropro.2014.02.009 ↗
21. Field experiment on spray drift: Deposition and airborne drift during application to a winter wheat crop10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.06.060 ↗
22. The research of water soluble dyes of Allura Red and Ponceau-G as tracers for determing pesticide spray distribution
23. A portable scanning system for evaluation of spray deposit distribution10.1016/j.compag.2011.01.003 ↗
24. Deposit structure and efficacy of pesticide application. 2: Trichoplusia ni control on cabbage with fipronil10.1002/(SICI)1096-9063(199908)55:8<793::AID-PS14>3.0.CO;2-0 ↗
25. Assessment of the influence of working pressure and application rate on pesticide spray application with a hand-held spray gun on greenhouse pepper crops10.1016/j.cropro.2017.01.006 ↗
26. Field evaluation of a self-propelled sprayer and effects of the application rate on spray deposition and losses to the ground in greenhouse tomato crops10.1002/ps.2135 ↗
27. (2015). Agricultural and Forestry Machinery–Inspection of Sprayers in Use–Part 2: Horizontal Boom Sprayers, International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO/TC 23/SC 6. ISO 16122-2:2015.
28. Effects of droplet distribution on insecticide toxicity to asian corn borers (Ostrinia furnaealis) and spiders (Xysticus ephippiatus)10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60507-9 ↗
29. Flight attitudes and spray patterns of a roll-balanced agricultural unmanned helicopter
30. Experimental air-assisted spraying of a maturing cereal crop under controlled conditions10.1016/0261-2194(95)91107-Q ↗
31. Spray penetration into peanut canopies with hydraulic nozzle tips10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2003.11.012 ↗
32. Assessing the deposition and canopy penetration of nozzles with different spray qualities in an oat (Avena sativa L.) canopy10.1016/j.cropro.2015.11.013 ↗
33. Rotary atomiser design requirements for optimum pesticide application efficiency10.1016/j.cropro.2014.08.012 ↗
34. Droplet evaporation and spread on waxy and hairy leaves associated with type and concentration of adjuvants10.1002/ps.2122 ↗
35. Effects of adjuvants on deposition efficiency of fenhexamid sprays applied to Chardonnay grapevine foliage10.1016/j.cropro.2010.04.017 ↗
36. Aerial electrostatic-charged sprays for deposition and efficacy against sweet potato whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) on cotton10.1002/ps.1748 ↗
37. Design and test of a six-rotor unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) electrostatic spraying system for crop protection
38. Deposit structure and efficacy of pesticide application. 1: Interactions between deposit size, toxicant concentration and deposit number10.1002/(SICI)1096-9063(199908)55:8<783::AID-PS973>3.0.CO;2-D ↗
39. Droplet size and density effects of bacillus thuringiensis kurstaki on gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) Larvae10.1093/jee/88.5.1376 ↗
40. Relationship between the spray droplet density of two protectant fungicides and the germination of mycosphaerella fijiensis ascospores on banana leaf surfaces10.1002/(SICI)1096-9063(199707)50:3<233::AID-PS562>3.0.CO;2-V ↗
41. Current status and future trends of precision agricultural aviation technologies