Life Cycle Assessment of an NMC Battery for Application to Electric Light-Duty Commercial Vehicles and Comparison with a Sodium-Nickel-Chloride Battery
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents the results of an environmental assessment of a Nickel-Manganese-Cobalt (NMC) Lithium-ion traction battery for Battery Electric Light-Duty Commercial Vehicles (BEV-LDCV) used for urban and regional freight haulage. A cradle-to-grave Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) of NMC111 is provided, operation and end-of-life stages are included, and insight is also given into a Life Cycle Assessment of different NMC chemistries. The environmental impacts of the manufacturing stages of the NMC111 battery are then compared with those of a Sodium-Nickel-Chloride (ZEBRA) battery. In the second part of the work, two electric-battery LDCVs (powered with NMC111 and ZEBRA batteries, respectively) and a diesel urban LDCV are analysed, considering a wide set of environmental impact categories. The results show that the NMC111 battery has the highest impacts from production in most of the impact categories. Active cathode material, Aluminium, Copper, and energy use for battery production are the main contributors to the environmental impact. However, when vehicle application is investigated, NMC111-BEV shows lower environmental impacts, in all the impact categories, than ZEBRA-BEV. This is mainly due to the greater efficiency of the NMC111 battery during vehicle operation. Finally, when comparing BEVs to a diesel LDCV, the electric powertrains show advantages over the diesel one as far as global warming, abiotic depletion potential-fossil fuels, photochemical oxidation, and ozone layer depletion are concerned. However, the diesel LDCV performs better in almost all the other investigated impact categories.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advancements in Battery Materials · Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Dipartimento Energia “Galileo Ferraris”, CARS@Polito—Center for Automotive Research and Sustainable Mobility, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy
Dipartimento di Chimica, Materiali e Ingegneria Chimica “Giulio Natta”, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. Contribution of Li-ion batteries to the environmental impact of electric vehicles10.1021/es903729a ↗
2. Iclodean, C., Varga, B., Burnete, N., Cimerdean, D., and Jurchiş, B. (2017). Comparison of Different Battery Types for Electric Vehicles. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 252.10.1088/1757-899X/252/1/012058 ↗
3. Automotive Li-Ion Batteries: Current Status and Future Perspectives10.1007/s41918-018-0022-z ↗
4. Ou, D. (2017). State of the Art of Life Cycle Inventory Data for Electric Vehicle Batteries. [Master’s Thesis, Degree Project in Environmental Engineering, School of Architecture and the Built Environment, KTH Royal Institute of Technology]. Available online: https://kth.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1163424/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
5. Velázquez-Martínez, O., Valio, J., Santasalo-Aarnio, A., Reuter, M., and Serna-Guerrero, R. (2019). A critical review of lithium-ion battery recycling processes from a circular economy perspective. Batteries, 5.10.3390/batteries5040068 ↗
6. International Energy Agency (2020, November 15). Innovation in Batteries and Electricity Storage. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/innovation-in-batteries-and-electricity-storage.
7. Evolution of Structure and Lithium Dynamics in LiNi0.8Mn0.1Co0.1O2 (NMC811) Cathodes during Electrochemical Cycling10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b00140 ↗
8. Electric commercial vehicles: Practical perspectives and future research directions
9. The significance of Li-ion batteries in electric vehicle life-cycle energy and emissions and recycling’s role in its reduction10.1039/C4EE03029J ↗
10. Identifying key assumptions and differences in life cycle assessment studies of lithium-ion traction batteries with focus on greenhouse gas emissions10.1016/j.trd.2017.06.028 ↗
11. Environmental life cycle assessment of the production in China of lithium-ion batteries with nickel-cobalt-manganese cathodes utilising novel electrode chemistries10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120067 ↗
12. Kelly, J.C., Dai, Q., and Wang, M. (2019). Globally regional life cycle analysis of automotive lithium-ion nickel manganese cobalt batteries. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang.10.1007/s11027-019-09869-2 ↗
13. Wentker, M., Greenwood, M., and Leker, J. (2019). A bottom-up approach to lithium-ion battery cost modeling with a focus on cathode active materials. Energies, 12.10.3390/en12030504 ↗
14. Miao, Y., Hynan, P., von Jouanne, A., and Yokochi, A. (2019). Current li-ion battery technologies in electric vehicles and opportunities for advancements. Energies, 12.10.3390/en12061074 ↗
15. Cost and energy demand of producing nickel manganese cobalt cathode material for lithium ion batteries10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.069 ↗
16. Chemical stability and long-term cell performance of low-cobalt, Ni-Rich cathodes prepared by aqueous processing for high-energy Li-Ion batteries10.1016/j.ensm.2019.08.020 ↗
17. Battery University (2020, January 10). Learning the Basics about Batteries—Types of Lithium-ion. Available online: https://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/types_of_lithium_ion#:~:text=Nickel-based-systems-have-higher,-and-higher-to-boost-capacity.
18. Life Cycle Assessment of a Lithium-Ion Battery Vehicle Pack10.1111/jiec.12072 ↗
19. Hao, H., Mu, Z., Jiang, S., Liu, Z., and Zhao, F. (2017). GHG Emissions from the production of lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles in China. Sustainability, 9.10.3390/su9040504 ↗
20. Comparative Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional and Electric Vehicles10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00532.x ↗
21. Dai, Q., Kelly, J.C., Gaines, L., and Wang, M. (2019). Life cycle analysis of lithium-ion batteries for automotive applications. Batteries, 5.10.3390/batteries5020048 ↗
22. Life Cycle Environmental Assessment of Lithium-Ion and Nickel Metal Hydride Batteries for Plug-In Hybrid and Battery Electric Vehicles10.1021/es103607c ↗
23. Dai, Q., Spangenberger, J., Ahmed, S., Gaines, L., Kelly, J.C., and Wang, M. (2019). EverBatt: A Closed-loop Battery Recycling Cost and Environmental Impacts Model Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Lab. (ANL).10.2172/1530874 ↗
24. Yang, L., Hao, C., and Chai, Y. (2018). Life cycle assessment of commercial delivery trucks: Diesel, plug-in electric, and battery-swap electric. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10124547 ↗
25. Nordelöf, A., Poulikidou, S., Chordia, M., de Oliveira, F.B., Tivander, J., and Arvidsson, R. (2019). Methodological approaches to end-of-life modelling in life cycle assessments of lithium-ion batteries. Batteries, 5.10.3390/batteries5030051 ↗
26. Recharge (2020). PEFCR—Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules for High Specific Energy Rechargeable Batteries for Mobile Applications, European Commission.
27. Energy Agency (2020). World Energy Outlook 2020, IEA.
28. Battery electric propulsion: An option for heavy-duty vehicles? Results from a Swiss case-study10.1016/j.trc.2018.01.013 ↗
29. Teoh, T., Kunze, O., Teo, C.C., and Wong, Y.D. (2018). Decarbonisation of urban freight transport using electric vehicles and opportunity charging. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10093258 ↗
30. Electric urban delivery trucks: Energy use, greenhouse gas emissions, and cost-effectiveness10.1021/es400179w ↗
31. Ricardo (2020). Determining the Environmental Impacts of Conventional and Alternatively Fuelled Vehicles through LCA—Interim Report, Directorate-General for Climate Action (European Commission), Ricardo Energy & Environment.
32. Nigro, N. (2020, December 10). Lifecycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Different Light-Duty Vehicle and Fuel Pathways: A Synthesis of Recent Research. Available online: https://www.c2es.org/document/lifecycle-greenhouse-gas-emissions-from-different-light-duty-vehicle-and-fuel-pathways-a-synthesis-of-recent-research/.
33. Argonne National Laboratory (2016). Cradle-to-Grave Lifecycle Analysis of U.S. Light-Duty Vehicle-Fuel Pathways: A Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Economic Assessment of Current (2015) and Future (2025–2030) Technologies, Argonne National Lab. (ANL).
34. Amarakoon, S., Smith, J., and Segal, B. (2020, September 02). Application of Life-Cycle Assessment to Nanoscale Technology: Lithium-ion Batteries for Electric Vehicles, Available online: http://www.epa.gov/dfe/pubs/projects/lbnp/final-li-ion-battery-lca-report.pdf.
35. The transport of goods in the urban environment: A comparative life cycle assessment of electric, compressed natural gas and diesel light-duty vehicles10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114236 ↗
36. European Commission—Joint Research Centre—Institute for Environment and Sustainability (2010). International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook—General guide for Life Cycle Assessment—Detailed Guidance, Publications Office of the European Union. [1st ed.]. EUR 24708 EN.
37. Life cycle assessment of lithium-ion batteries for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles-Critical issues10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.06.004 ↗
38. Dai, Q., Kelly, C.J., Dunn, J., and Benavides, T.P. (2020, August 31). Update of Bill-of-materials and Cathode Materials Production for Lithium-ion Batteries in the GREET Model. U.S. Dep. Energy, Available online: https://greet.es.anl.gov/publication-update_bom_cm.
39. The search for an appropriate end-of-life formula for the purpose of the European Commission Environmental Footprint initiative10.1007/s11367-016-1244-0 ↗
40. Automotive battery pack manufacturing—A review of battery to tab joining10.1016/j.jajp.2020.100017 ↗
41. Bennett, L.M.S. (2020, November 25). Who Wants to Be in Charge? IEA. Available online: https://www.iea.org/commentaries/who-wants-to-be-in-charge.
42. Dunn, J.K.J., James, C., Gaines, L., Gallagher, K., and Dai, Q. (2015). Material and Energy Flows in the Production of Cathode and Anode Materials for Lithium Ion Batteries, Argonne National Lab. (ANL).10.2172/1224963 ↗
43. Energy and environmental assessment of a traction lithium-ion battery pack for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.056 ↗
44. Gorner, M. (2019). The Global EV Outlook 2019—Life-Cycle Analysis the Clean Energy Ministerial Electric Vehicles Initiative, IEA International Energy Agency, ITF Workshop “LCA of urban Transport Business Models”. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2019#abstract.
45. Toward a cell-chemistry specific life cycle assessment of lithium-ion battery recycling processes10.1111/jiec.13021 ↗
46. Life cycle assessment of storage systems: The case study of a sodium/nickel chloride battery10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.004 ↗
47. Goedkoop, M., Oele, M., Leijting, J., Ponsioen, T., and Meijer, E. (2020, August 31). Introduction to LCA with SimaPro; PRé, Report Version 5.2. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305444131_Introduction_to_LCA_with_SimaPro.
48. Newkirk, M.S., Smith, L.R., and Merritt, P.M. (1993). Heavy-duty diesel hydrocarbon speciation: Key issues and technological challenges. SAE Tech. Pap.10.4271/932853 ↗
49. Bohac, S.V., Han, M., Jacobs, T.J., López, A.J., Assanis, D.N., and Szymkowicz, P.G. (2006). Speciated hydrocarbon emissions from an automotive diesel engine and DOC utilizing conventional and PCI combustion. SAE Tech. Pap., 2006.10.4271/2006-01-0201 ↗
50. Hydrocarbon emissions speciation in diesel and biodiesel exhausts10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.11.029 ↗
51. Cradle-to-gate greenhouse gas emissions of battery electric and internal combustion engine vehicles in China10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.041 ↗
52. Argonne National Laboratory (2020, February 03). GREET® Model the Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Use in Technologies Mode, Available online: https://greet.es.anl.gov/.
53. Emilsson, E., and Dahllöf, L. (2019). Lithium-Ion Vehicle Battery Production. Status 2019 on Energy Use, CO2 Emissions, Use of Metals, Products Environmental Footprint, and Recycling, IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute. No. C 444.
54. Xiong, S., Ji, J., and Ma, X. (2019). Comparative life cycle energy and GHG emission analysis for BEVs and PHEVs: A case study in China. Energies, 12.10.3390/en12050834 ↗
55. On the number of Monte Carlo runs in comparative probabilistic LCA10.1007/s11367-019-01698-4 ↗
56. Raynolds, M., Checkel, M.D., and Fraser, R.A. (1999). Application of Monte Carlo analysis to life cycle assessment. SAE Tech. Pap.10.4271/1999-01-0011 ↗