journal article·2019-03-21Open access

An Integrated FTA-FMEA Model for Risk Analysis of Engineering Systems: A Case Study of Subsea Blowout Preventers

Mahmood Shafiee, Evenye Enjema, Athanasios Kolios

Applied Sciences· Volume 9· Issue 6

Abstract

Engineering systems such as energy production facilities, aviation systems, maritime vessels, etc. continue to grow in size and complexity. This growth has made the identification, quantification and mitigation of risks associated with the failure of such systems so complicated. To solve this problem, several advanced techniques such as Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), Reliability-Block Diagram (RBD), Reliability-Centered Maintenance (RCM), Monte-Carlo Simulation (MCS), Markov Analysis (MA) and Bayesian Networks (BN) have been developed in the literature. In order to improve the strengths and eliminate the drawbacks of classical techniques, some hybrid models have been recently developed. In this paper, an integrated FTA and FMEA model is proposed for risk analysis of safety-critical systems. Minimal cut sets derived from the fault trees are weighted based on Birnbaum’s measure of importance and then the weights are used to revise Risk Priority Numbers (RPNs) obtained from the use of traditional FMEA techniques. The proposed model is applied to a Blowout Preventer (BOP) system operating under erratic and extreme conditions in a subsea oil and gas field. Though those failures caused by kill valves and hydraulic lines remain among the top risks in the BOP system, significant differences are revealed in risk rankings when the results from the hybrid approach are compared with those obtained from the classical risk analysis methods.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Risk and Safety Analysis · Occupational Health and Safety Research · Technology Assessment and Management

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Energy and Power, Cranfield University, College Road, Bedfordshire MK 43 0AL, UK

Department of Naval Architecture, Ocean & Marine Engineering, University of Strathclyde, 100 Montrose Street, Glasgow G4 0LZ, UK

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Kolowrocki, K. (2014). Reliability of Large and Complex Systems, Elsevier. [2nd ed.].10.1016/B978-0-08-099949-4.00010-6 ↗
2. Moubray, J. (1999). Reliability-Centered Maintenance, Butterworth-Heinemann. [2nd ed.].
3. Investigation of Bayesian network for reliability analysis and fault diagnosis of complex systems with real case applications10.1177/1687814017728853 ↗
4. Decision support methods and applications in the upstream oil and gas sector10.1016/j.petrol.2018.10.050 ↗
5. Safety analysis of combined FMEA and FTA with computer software assistance—take Photovoltaic plant for example10.3182/20130619-3-RU-3018.00370 ↗
6. Hong, Z., and Binbin, L. (2009, January 25–26). Integrated analysis of software FMEA and FTA. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Technology and Computer Science, Kiev, Ukraine.10.1109/ITCS.2009.254 ↗
7. Lutz, R.R., and Woodhouse, R.M. (March, January 28). Bi-directional analysis for certification of safety-critical software. Proceedings of the International Software Assurance Certification Conference (ISACC), Chantilly, VA, USA.
8. Multiple failure modes analysis and weighted risk priority number evaluation in FMEA10.1016/j.engfailanal.2011.02.004 ↗
9. Han, X., and Zhang, J. (2013, January 13–15). A combined analysis method of FMEA and FTA for improving the safety analysis quality of safety-critical software. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing, Beijing, China.10.1109/GrC.2013.6740435 ↗
10. Improving efficiency in qualitative fault tree10.1002/(SICI)1099-1638(199709/10)13:5<293::AID-QRE110>3.0.CO;2-Y ↗
11. An FMEA-based risk assessment approach for wind turbine systems: A comparative study of onshore and offshore10.3390/en7020619 ↗
12. A fuzzy-FMEA risk assessment approach for offshore wind turbines
13. A new approach for evaluation of risk priorities of failure modes in FMEA10.1080/00207540110056162 ↗
14. Applying DEA to enhance assessment capability of FMEA10.1108/02656710910966165 ↗
15. A new FMEA method by integrating fuzzy belief structure and TOPSIS to improve risk evaluation process10.1007/s00170-014-6466-3 ↗
16. Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review10.1016/j.eswa.2012.08.010 ↗
17. Modelling failure modes and effect analysis10.1108/02656719310040105 ↗
18. Failure Mode and Effect Analysis, and Fault Tree Analysis of Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.007 ↗
19. An effective method for the identification of potential failure modes of a system by integrating FTA and FMEA10.1007/978-3-319-03107-1_74 ↗
20. Bluvband, Z., Polak, R., and Grabov, P. (2005, January 24–27). Bouncing failure analysis (BFA): The unified FTA-FMEA methodology. Proceedings of the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, Alexandria, VA, USA.
21. A method of multi-objective reliability tolerance design for electronic circuits10.1016/j.cja.2012.12.005 ↗
22. Relationships of Fussell–Vesely and Birnbaum importance to structural importance in coherent systems10.1016/S0951-8320(99)00043-5 ↗
23. Pickard, K., Müller, P., and Bertsche, B. (2005, January 24–27). Multiple failure mode and effects analysis—An approach to risk assessment of multiple failures with FMEA. Proceedings of the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, Alexandria, VA, USA.
24. Performance evaluation of subsea blowout preventer systems with common-cause failures10.1016/j.petrol.2012.04.007 ↗
25. Reliability of subsea BOP systems10.1016/0143-8174(87)90058-8 ↗
26. Holand, P., and Awan, H. (2018, August 18). Reliability of Deepwater Subsea BOP Systems and Well. Report No. ES 201252/02, Available online: www.bsee.gov.
27. Enjema, E., Shafiee, M., and Kolios, A. (2017). A study on the reliability of oil and gas Blowout Preventer (BOP) technologies under deep-water erratic conditions. Safety and Reliability—Theory and Applications, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.10.1201/9781315210469-302 ↗
28. Enjema, E. (2018). Reliability Performance Analysis of Complex Teachnical Systems under Extreme Loading Conditions with Application to Subsea Blowout Preventer. [Ph.D. Thesis, Cranfield University].
29. System safety analysis of well-control equipment10.2118/26844-PA ↗
30. Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) (2018, August 18). Blowout Preventer (BOP) Failure Mode Effect Criticality Analysis (FMECA), 2013, Available online: www.bsee.gov.
31. Enjema, E., Shafiee, M., and Kolios, A. (2018). An integrated framework for Blowout preventer configuration selection in deep and ultra-deep water offshore fields. Safety and Reliability—Safe Societies in a Changing World, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.10.1201/9781351174664-252 ↗
32. International Electrotechnical Commission (2018, August 18). IEC 61508: Functional Safety of Electrical/Electronic/Programmable Electronic Safety-Related Systems. Available online: https://www.iec.ch/functionalsafety/standards/page2.htm.
33. Isograph’s Fault Tree Analysis Software (2018, August 18). FaultTree+. Available online: https://www.isograph.com/software/reliability-workbench/fault-tree-analysis-software/?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIuJfmq6jt4AIV-SCtBh04xAGvEAAYASAAEgLWy_D_BwE.
34. Pinker, R. (2012). Improved Method for Reliability Assessment of Safety-Critical Systems: An Application Example of BOP Systems. [Master’s Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology].
35. On the rapid discharge of subsea accumulators: Remarks on the normed design method and proposal of improvement10.1002/ese3.203 ↗