Landslide Susceptibility Prediction Using Particle-Swarm-Optimized Multilayer Perceptron: Comparisons with Multilayer-Perceptron-Only, BP Neural Network, and Information Value Models
Source abstract
Abstract
Landslides are one type of serious geological hazard which cause immense losses of local life and property. Landslide susceptibility prediction (LSP) can be used to determine the spatial probability of landslide occurrence in a certain area. It is important to implement LSP for landslide hazard prevention and reduction. This study developed a particle-swarm-optimized multilayer perceptron (PSO-MLP) model for LSP implementation to overcome the drawbacks of the conventional gradient descent algorithm and to determine the optimal structural parameters of MLP. Shicheng County in Jiangxi Province of China was used as the study area. In total, 369 landslides, randomly selected non-landslides, and 14 landslide-related predisposing factors were used to train and test the present PSO-MLP model and three other comparative models (an MLP-only model with the gradient descent algorithm, a back-propagation neural network (BPNN), and an information value (IV) model). The results showed that the PSO-MLP model had the most accurate prediction performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.822 and frequency ratio (FR) accuracy of 0.856) compared with the MLP-only (0.791 and 0.829), BPNN (0.800 and 0.840), and IV (0.788 and 0.824) models. It can be concluded that the proposed PSO-MLP model addresses the drawbacks of the MLP-only model well and performs better than conventional artificial neural networks (ANNs) and statistical models. The spatial probability distribution law of landslide occurrence in Shicheng County was well revealed by the landslide susceptibility map produced using the PSO-MLP model. Furthermore, the present PSO-MLP model may have higher prediction and classification performances in some other fields compared with conventional ANNs and statistical models.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Landslides and related hazards · Tree Root and Stability Studies · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
References (65)
Show source-provided references
1. Landslide catastrophes and disaster risk reduction: A GIS framework for landslide prevention and management10.3390/rs2092259 ↗
2. Object-oriented change detection and damage assessment using high-resolution remote sensing images, Tangjiao Landslide, Three Gorges Reservoir, China10.1007/s12665-018-7334-5 ↗
3. Regional rainfall warning system for landslides with creep deformation in three gorges using a statistical black box model10.1038/s41598-019-45403-9 ↗
4. Nguyen, P.T., Tuyen, T.T., Shirzadi, A., Pham, B.T., Shahabi, H., Omidvar, E., Amini, A., Entezami, H., Prakash, I., and Phong, T.V. (2019). Development of a novel hybrid intelligence approach for landslide spatial prediction. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9142824 ↗
5. A comparison of information value and logistic regression models in landslide susceptibility mapping by using GIS10.1007/s12665-016-5317-y ↗
6. Quantitative assessment of landslide susceptibility using high-resolution remote sensing data and a generalized additive model10.1080/01431160701227661 ↗
7. Chen, W., Shahabi, H., Zhang, S., Khosravi, K., Shirzadi, A., Chapi, K., Pham, B.T., Zhang, T., Zhang, L., and Chai, H. (2018). Landslide susceptibility modeling based on GIS and novel bagging-based kernel logistic regression. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8122540 ↗
8. A comparative assessment of prediction capabilities of modified analytical hierarchy process (M-AHP) and Mamdani fuzzy logic models using Netcad-GIS for forest fire susceptibility mapping10.1080/19475705.2014.984247 ↗
9. A novel ensemble bivariate statistical evidential belief function with knowledge-based analytical hierarchy process and multivariate statistical logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping10.1016/j.catena.2013.10.011 ↗
10. Nguyen, T.T.N., and Liu, C.-C. (2019). A new approach using ahp to generate landslide susceptibility maps in the chen-yu-lan watershed, taiwan. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19030505 ↗
11. A hybrid fuzzy weight of evidence method in landslide susceptibility analysis on the Wuyuan area, China10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.04.002 ↗
12. Wang, Q., Wang, Y., Niu, R., and Peng, L. (2017). Integration of information theory, K-means cluster analysis and the logistic regression model for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Three Gorges Area, China. Remote Sens., 9.10.3390/rs9090938 ↗
13. Landslide susceptibility assessment in the Nantian area of china: A comparison of frequency ratio model and support vector machine10.1080/19475705.2018.1482963 ↗
14. Landslide susceptibility assessment and factor effect analysis: Backpropagation artificial neural networks and their comparison with frequency ratio and bivariate logistic regression modelling10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.10.016 ↗
15. Djeddaoui, F., Chadli, M., and Gloaguen, R. (2017). Desertification susceptibility mapping using logistic regression analysis in the Djelfa Area, Algeria. Remote Sens., 9.10.3390/rs9101031 ↗
16. Long, N.T., and De Smedt, F. (2018). Analysis and mapping of rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility in a Luoi District, Thua Thien Hue province, Vietnam. Water, 11.10.3390/w11010051 ↗
17. Truong, X.L., Mitamura, M., Kono, Y., Raghavan, V., Yonezawa, G., Truong, X.Q., Do, T.H., Tien Bui, D., and Lee, S. (2018). Enhancing prediction performance of landslide susceptibility model using hybrid machine learning approach of bagging ensemble and logistic model tree. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8071046 ↗
18. Park, S., and Kim, J. (2019). Landslide susceptibility mapping based on random forest and boosted regression tree models, and a comparison of their performance. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9050942 ↗
19. Park, S.-J., Lee, C.-W., Lee, S., and Lee, M.-J. (2018). Landslide susceptibility mapping and comparison using decision tree models: A case study of Jumunjin Area, Korea. Remote Sens., 10.10.3390/rs10101545 ↗
20. Oh, H.-J., and Lee, S. (2017). Shallow landslide susceptibility modeling using the data mining models artificial neural network and boosted tree. Appl. Sci., 7.10.3390/app7101000 ↗
21. Nsengiyumva, J.B., Luo, G., Nahayo, L., Huang, X., and Cai, P. (2018). Landslide susceptibility assessment using spatial multi-criteria evaluation model in Rwanda. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 15.10.3390/ijerph15020243 ↗
22. Xiao, L., Zhang, Y., and Peng, G. (2018). Landslide susceptibility assessment using integrated deep learning algorithm along the China-Nepal Highway. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18124436 ↗
23. Huang, F., Zhang, J., Zhou, C., Wang, Y., Huang, J., and Zhu, L. (2019). A deep learning algorithm using a fully connected sparse autoencoder neural network for landslide susceptibility prediction. Landslides.10.1007/s10346-019-01274-9 ↗
24. Landslide displacement prediction using discrete wavelet transform and extreme learning machine based on chaos theory10.1007/s12665-016-6133-0 ↗
25. Shao, X., Ma, S., Xu, C., Zhang, P., Wen, B., Tian, Y., Zhou, Q., and Cui, Y. (2019). Planet image-based inventorying and machine learning-based susceptibility mapping for the landslides triggered by the 2018 Mw6.6 Tomakomai, Japan Earthquake. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11080978 ↗
26. Tien Bui, D., Shahabi, H., Shirzadi, A., Chapi, K., Alizadeh, M., Chen, W., Mohammadi, A., Ahmad, B.B., Panahi, M., and Hong, H. (2018). Landslide detection and susceptibility mapping by airsar data using support vector machine and index of entropy models in Cameron Highlands, Malaysia. Remote Sens., 10.10.3390/rs10101527 ↗
27. Influencing factor analysis and displacement prediction in reservoir landslides—A case study of Three Gorges Reservoir (China)
28. Landslide susceptibility mapping at Hoa Binh province (Vietnam) using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and GIS10.1016/j.cageo.2011.10.031 ↗
29. Tien Bui, D., Shahabi, H., Shirzadi, A., Chapi, K., Hoang, N.-D., Pham, B.T., Bui, Q.-T., Tran, C.-T., Panahi, M., and Bin Ahmad, B. (2018). A novel integrated approach of relevance vector machine optimized by imperialist competitive algorithm for spatial modeling of shallow landslides. Remote Sens., 10.10.3390/rs10101538 ↗
30. Landslide susceptibility mapping at zonouz plain, iran using genetic programming and comparison with frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models10.1007/s11069-013-0932-3 ↗
31. Wang, P., Bai, X., Wu, X., Yu, H., Hao, Y., and Hu, B.X. (2018). GIS-based random forest weight for rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility assessment at a humid region in Southern China. Water, 10.10.3390/w10081019 ↗
32. Rainfall prediction methodology with binary multilayer perceptron neural networks10.1007/s00382-018-4252-x ↗
33. Hybrid integration of multilayer perceptron neural networks and machine learning ensembles for landslide susceptibility assessment at Himalayan Area (India) using GIS10.1016/j.catena.2016.09.007 ↗
34. Research on regional landslide susceptibility assessment based on multiple layer perceptron—Taking the hilly area in Sichuan as example
35. Landslide susceptibility mapping at VAZ Watershed (Iran) using an artificial neural network model: A comparison between multilayer perceptron (MLP) and radial basic function (RBF) algorithms10.1007/s12517-012-0610-x ↗
36. Wang, J., Chang, Q., Chang, Q., Liu, Y., and Pal, N.R. (2018). Weight noise injection-based MLPS with group lasso penalty: Asymptotic convergence and application to node pruning. IEEE Trans. Cybern., 1–19.
37. An optimized second order stochastic learning algorithm for neural network training10.1016/j.neucom.2015.12.076 ↗
38. Hybrid biogeography based optimization—multilayer perceptron for application in intelligent medical diagnosis
39. Ethyl alcohol production optimization by coupling genetic algorithm and multilayer perceptron neural network10.1385/ABAB:132:1:969 ↗
40. Mini-batch algorithms with Barzilai-Borwein update step10.1016/j.neucom.2018.06.002 ↗
41. A hybrid particle swarm optimization and multi-layer perceptron;algorithm for bivariate fractal analysis of rock fractures roughness10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.12.028 ↗
42. The Varnes classification of landslide types, an update10.1007/s10346-013-0436-y ↗
43. Landslide susceptibility modelling using GIS-based machine learning techniques for Chongren County, Jiangxi province, China10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.124 ↗
44. GIS-based landslide spatial modeling in Ganzhou City, China10.1007/s12517-015-2094-y ↗
45. Landslide susceptibility assessment using SVM machine learning algorithm10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.09.006 ↗
46. A GIS-based landslide susceptibility evaluation using bivariate and multivariate statistical analyses10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.10.001 ↗
47. Estimating landslide susceptibility through a artificial neural network classifier10.1007/s11069-014-1245-x ↗
48. Spatial prediction of landslide hazards in Hoa Binh province (Vietnam): A comparative assessment of the efficacy of evidential belief functions and fuzzy logic models10.1016/j.catena.2012.04.001 ↗
49. Application of kernel-based fisher discriminant analysis to map landslide susceptibility in the Qinggan River Delta, Three Gorges, China10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.04.024 ↗
50. Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system combined with frequency ratio, generalized additive model, and support vector machine techniques10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.09.007 ↗
51. A web-based GPS system for displacement monitoring and failure mechanism analysis of reservoir landslide10.1038/s41598-017-17507-7 ↗
52. Modelling of spatial variability of soil undrained shear strength by conditional random fields for slope reliability analysis10.1016/j.apm.2018.06.030 ↗
53. Liu, W., Luo, X., Huang, F., and Fu, M. (2017). Uncertainty of the soil–water characteristic curve and its effects on slope seepage and stability analysis under conditions of rainfall using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method. Water, 9.10.3390/w9100758 ↗
54. Impact of predicted climate change on landslide reactivation: Case study of Mam Tor, UK10.1007/s10346-006-0071-y ↗
55. Rainfall-triggered large landslides on 15 December 2005 in Van Canh district, Binh Dinh province, Vietnam10.1007/s10346-012-0362-4 ↗
56. A comparative study of logistic model tree, random forest, and classification and regression tree models for spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility10.1016/j.catena.2016.11.032 ↗
57. Comparison of multiple-layer perceptrons and least squares support vector machines for remote-sensed characterization of in-field Lai patterns—A case study with potato10.1080/07038992.2014.928182 ↗
58. Landslide displacement prediction based on multivariate chaotic model and extreme learning machine10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.01.016 ↗
59. Huang, F., Luo, X., and Liu, W. (2017). Stability analysis of hydrodynamic pressure landslides with different permeability coefficients affected by reservoir water level fluctuations and rainstorms. Water, 9.10.3390/w9070450 ↗
60. Theoretical and numerical analysis of learning dynamics near singularity in multilayer perceptrons10.1016/j.neucom.2014.09.026 ↗
61. Eberhart, R.C., and Kennedy, J. (1995, January 4–6). A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science, Nagoya, Japan.
62. Prediction of groundwater levels using evidence of chaos and support vector machine10.2166/hydro.2017.102 ↗
63. Landslide susceptibility mapping based on self-organizing-map network and extreme learning machine10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.04.013 ↗
64. Regional landslide susceptibility analysis using back-propagation neural network model at Cameron Highland, Malaysia10.1007/s10346-009-0183-2 ↗
65. Development and application of Shannon’s entropy integrated information value model for landslide susceptibility assessment and zonation in Sikkim Himalayas in India10.1007/s11069-014-1378-y ↗