Hybrid Metal/Polymer Filaments for Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) to Print Metal Parts
Source abstract
Abstract
The exploitation of mechanical properties and customization possibilities of 3D printed metal parts usually come at the cost of complex and expensive equipment. To address this issue, hybrid metal/polymer composite filaments have been studied allowing the printing of metal parts by using the standard Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) approach. The resulting hybrid metal/polymer part, the so called “green”, can then be transformed into a dense metal part using debinding and sintering cycles. In this work, we investigated the manufacturing and characterization of green and sintered parts obtained by FFF of two commercial hybrid metal/polymer filaments, i.e., the Ultrafuse 316L by BASF and the 17-4 PH by Markforged. The Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectrometry (EDS) analyses of the mesostructure highlighted incomplete raster bonding and voids like those observed in conventional FFF-printed polymeric structures despite the sintering cycle. A significant role in the tensile properties was played by the building orientation, with samples printed flatwise featuring the highest mechanical properties, though lower than those achievable with standard metal additive manufacturing techniques.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Catania, Viale Andrea Doria 6, 95125 Catania, Italy
Department of Chemical Engineering Materials Environment, Sapienza—Università di Roma and UdR INSTM, Via Eudossiana 18, 00184 Roma, Italy
Funding
Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Metal additive manufacturing: A review10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z ↗
2. Liaw, C.Y., and Guvendiren, M. (2017). Current and emerging applications of 3D printing in medicine. Biofabrication, 9.10.1088/1758-5090/aa7279 ↗
3. Effects of expandable graphite and modified ammonium polyphosphate on the flame-retardant and mechanical properties of wood flour-polypropylene composites
4. Additive manufacturing of metallic components—Process, structure and properties10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001 ↗
5. Agarwala, M.K., Van Weeren, R., Bandyopadhyayl, A., Whalen, P.J., Safari, A., and Danforth, S.C. (1996, January 12–14). Fused Deposition of Ceramics and Metals: An Overview. Proceedings of the Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TX, USA.
6. Agarwala, M.K., Van Weeren, R., Bandyopadhyay, A., Safari, A., Danforth, S.C., and Priedeman, W.R. (1996, January 12–14). Filament Feed Materials for Fused Deposition Processing of Ceramics and Metals. Proceedings of the Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TX, USA.
7. Wu, G., Langrana, N., Rangarajan, S., Sadangi, R., Safari, A., and Danforth, S.C. (1998, January 10–12). Feasibility of Fabricating Metal Parts from 17-4PH Stainless Steel Powder. Proceedings of the Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TX, USA.
8. Kurose, T., Abe, Y., Santos, M.V.A., Kanaya, Y., Ishigami, A., Tanaka, S., and Ito, H. (2020). Influence of the layer directions on the properties of 316l stainless steel parts fabricated through fused deposition of metals. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13112493 ↗
9. Comparison of Stainless Steel 316L Parts Made by FDM- and SLM-Based Additive Manufacturing Processes10.1007/s11837-018-3207-3 ↗
10. Fused filament fabrication, debinding and sintering as a low cost additive manufacturing method of 316L stainless steel
11. 3D printing conditions determination for feedstock used in fused filament fabrication (FFF) of 17-4PH stainless steel parts
12. Tensile properties of sintered 17-4PH stainless steel fabricated by material extrusion additive manufacturing10.1016/j.matlet.2019.04.024 ↗
13. Godec, D., Cano, S., and Holzer, C. (2020). Optimization of the-3D printing parameters for tensile properties of specimens produced by fused filament fabrication of 174PH stainless steel. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13030774 ↗
14. Galati, M., and Minetola, P. (2019). Analysis of density, roughness, and accuracy of the atomic diffusion additive manufacturing (ADAM) process for metal parts. Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12244122 ↗
15. (2020, December 24). Basf User Guidelines Ultrafuse 316L. Available online: https://forward-am.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/User-Guidelines.pdf.
16. Patti, A., Acierno, D., Latteri, A., Tosto, C., Pergolizzi, E., Recca, G., Cristaudo, M., and Cicala, G. (2020). Influence of the processing conditions on the mechanical performance of sustainable bio-based PLA compounds. Polymers, 12.10.3390/polym12102197 ↗
17. The effects of voids on structural properties of fused deposition modelled parts: A probabilistic approach10.1007/s00170-018-2148-x ↗
18. Tosto, C., Saitta, L., Pergolizzi, E., Blanco, I., Celano, G., and Cicala, G. (2020). Methods for the Characterization of Polyetherimide Based Materials Processed by Fused Deposition Modelling. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10093195 ↗
19. Cicala, G., Ognibene, G., Portuesi, S., Blanco, I., Rapisarda, M., Pergolizzi, E., and Recca, G. (2018). Comparison of Ultem 9085 used in fused deposition modelling (FDM) with polytherimide blends. Materials, 11.10.3390/ma11020285 ↗
20. Fracture and load-carrying capacity of 3D-printed cracked components10.1016/j.eml.2020.100692 ↗
21. (2021, January 02). Eos TDS SS316L. Available online: https://www.eos.info/03_system-related-assets/material-related-contents/metal-materials-and-examples/metal-material-datasheet/stainlesssteel/ss-316l_9011-0032_m100_material_data_sheet_flexline_12-17_en.pdf.
22. Mechanical and thermal properties of stainless steel parts, manufactured by various technologies, in relation to their microstructure10.1016/j.ijengsci.2020.103398 ↗
23. Correlation between process parameters, microstructure and properties of 316 L stainless steel processed by selective laser melting10.1016/j.msea.2018.01.103 ↗
24. (2021, January 02). Optimim TDS MIM 316L. Available online: https://www.optimim.com/metal-injection-molding-mim/material-options/stainless-steel/mim-316l.
25. (2021, January 02). General Electric TDS 316L. Available online: https://www.ge.com/additive/sites/default/files/2019-11/316L-M2beide.pdf.
26. (2021, January 02). General Electric TDS 17-4 PH. Available online: https://www.ge.com/additive/sites/default/files/2019-11/17-4%20PH-M2beide.pdf.
27. Cost estimation for rapid manufacturing—Laser sintering production for low to medium volumes10.1243/09544054JEM517 ↗
28. On the environmental impacts of 3D printing technology10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100689 ↗
29. Giudice, F., Barbagallo, R., and Fargione, G. (2020). A Design for Additive Manufacturing approach based on process energy efficiency: Electron beam melted components. J. Clean. Prod., 125185.10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125185 ↗