Show source-provided references
1. Hamamoto, R., Suvarna, K., Yamada, M., Kobayashi, K., Shinkai, N., Miyake, M., Takahashi, M., Jinnai, S., Shimoyama, R., and Sakai, A. (2020). Application of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Oncology: Towards the Establishment of Precision Medicine. Cancers, 12.
10.3390/cancers12123532 ↗4. Racial differences by gestational age in neonatal deaths attributable to congenital heart defects—United States, 2003–2006
6. Outcome of congenital heart defects—A population-based study
7. Prenatal diagnosis of critical congenital heart disease reduces risk of death from cardiovascular compromise prior to planned neonatal cardiac surgery: A meta-analysis
10.1002/uog.14882 ↗9. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (2013). AIUM practice guideline for the performance of fetal echocardiography. J. Ultrasound Med., 32, 1067–1082.
10.7863/jum.2013.32.6.1067 ↗10. Prenatal detection of heart defects in a non-selected population of 30,149 fetuses—Detection rates and outcome
10.1002/uog.2710 ↗11. Trends in prenatal diagnosis of critical cardiac defects in an integrated obstetric and pediatric cardiac imaging center
10.1038/sj.jp.7211168 ↗12. Huang, W., Bridge, C.P., Noble, J.A., and Zisserman, A. (2017). Temporal HeartNet: Towards human-level automatic analysis of fetal cardiac screening video. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Springer.
10.1007/978-3-319-66185-8_39 ↗14. Arnaout, R., Curran, L., Zhao, Y., Levine, J., Chinn, E., and Moon-Grady, A. (2020). Expert-level prenatal detection of complex congenital heart disease from screening ultrasound using deep learning. medRxiv.
10.1101/2020.06.22.20137786 ↗15. Dozen, A., Komatsu, M., Sakai, A., Komatsu, R., Shozu, K., Machino, H., Yasutomi, S., Arakaki, T., Asada, K., and Kaneko, S. (2020). Image Segmentation of the Ventricular Septum in Fetal Cardiac Ultrasound Videos Based on Deep Learning Using Time-Series Information. Biomolecules, 10.
10.3390/biom10111526 ↗17. American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists (2009). ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 101: Ultrasonography in pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol., 113, 451–461.
10.1097/AOG.0b013e31819930b0 ↗18. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): Sonographic screening examination of the fetal heart
10.1002/uog.12403 ↗19. Redmon, J., and Farhadi, A. (2017, January 21–26). YOLO9000: Better, faster, stronger. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, HI, USA.
10.1109/CVPR.2017.690 ↗21. Hasan, M., Choi, J., Neumann, J., Roy-Chowdhury, A.K., and Davis, L.S. (2016, January 27–30). Learning temporal regularity in video sequences. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
10.1109/CVPR.2016.86 ↗23. Schlegl, T., Seeböck, P., Waldstein, S.M., Schmidt-Erfurth, U., and Langs, G. (2017). Unsupervised anomaly detection with generative adversarial networks to guide marker discovery. International Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging, Springer.
10.1007/978-3-319-59050-9_12 ↗25. Prenatal screening for congenital heart disease with four-chamber and outflow-tract views: A multicenter study
10.1002/uog.3830 ↗27. Prediction of Pulmonary to Systemic Flow Ratio in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease Using Deep Learning-Based Analysis of Chest Radiographs
10.1001/jamacardio.2019.5620 ↗28. Artificial intelligence in medical imaging: Threat or opportunity? Radiologists again at the forefront of innovation in medicine
10.1186/s41747-018-0061-6 ↗29. Impact of Data Presentation on Physician Performance Utilizing Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Diagnosis and Decision Support Systems
10.1007/s10278-018-0132-5 ↗