journal article·2018-08-14Open access

Spatial Modelling of Gully Erosion Using GIS and R Programing: A Comparison among Three Data Mining Algorithms

Alireza Arabameri, Biswajeet Pradhan, Hamid Reza Pourghasemi, Khalil Rezaei, Norman Kerle

Applied Sciences· Volume 8· Issue 8

Abstract

Gully erosion triggers land degradation and restricts the use of land. This study assesses the spatial relationship between gully erosion (GE) and geo-environmental variables (GEVs) using Weights-of-Evidence (WoE) Bayes theory, and then applies three data mining methods—Random Forest (RF), boosted regression tree (BRT), and multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS)—for gully erosion susceptibility mapping (GESM) in the Shahroud watershed, Iran. Gully locations were identified by extensive field surveys, and a total of 172 GE locations were mapped. Twelve gully-related GEVs: Elevation, slope degree, slope aspect, plan curvature, convergence index, topographic wetness index (TWI), lithology, land use/land cover (LU/LC), distance from rivers, distance from roads, drainage density, and NDVI were selected to model GE. The results of variables importance by RF and BRT models indicated that distance from road, elevation, and lithology had the highest effect on GE occurrence. The area under the curve (AUC) and seed cell area index (SCAI) methods were used to validate the three GE maps. The results showed that AUC for the three models varies from 0.911 to 0.927, whereas the RF model had a prediction accuracy of 0.927 as per SCAI values, when compared to the other models. The findings will be of help for planning and developing the studied region.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Soil erosion and sediment transport · Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Land Use and Ecosystem Services

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Geomorphology, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran 36581-17994, Iran

Centre for Advanced Modelling and Geospatial Information Systems (CAMGIS), Faculty of Engineering and IT, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia

Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Engineering, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz 71441-65186, Iran

Faculty of Earth Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran 14911-15719, Iran

Department of Earth Systems Analysis (ESA), Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, 7522 Enschede, The Netherlands

Funding

University of Technology Sydney

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. Assessing the susceptibility to water-induced soil erosion using a geomorphological, bivariate statistics-based approach10.1007/s12665-012-1634-y ↗
2. UNEP (2018, January 13). The Emissions Gap Report. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Available online: www.unenvironment.org/resources/emissions-gap-report.
3. Comprehensive assessment of soil erosion risk for better land use planning in river basins: Case study of the Upper Blue Nile River10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.019 ↗
4. Nampak, H., Pradhan, B., Mojaddadi Rizeei, H., and Park, H.-J. (2018). Assessment of Land Cover and Land Use Change Impact on Soil Loss in a Tropical Catchment by Using Multi-Temporal SPOT-5 Satellite Images and RUSLE model. Land Degrad. Dev.10.1002/ldr.3112 ↗
5. Soil erosion prediction based on land cover dynamics at the Semenyih watershed in Malaysia using LTM and USLE models10.1080/10106049.2015.1120354 ↗
6. The contribution of gully erosion to total sediment production in a small watershed in Southwest China10.1080/02723646.2017.1356114 ↗
7. An Investigation of Efficiency of Outlet Runoff Assessment10.3923/jas.2009.105.112 ↗
8. Spatial modelling of gully erosion in Mazandaran Province, northern Iran10.1016/j.catena.2017.10.010 ↗
9. Gully processes and gully dynamics10.1002/esp.1866 ↗
10. Spatial variation of bed roughness in eroding rills and gullies10.1016/j.catena.2011.10.004 ↗
11. Timing and causes of gully erosion in the riparian zone of the semi-arid tropical Victoria River, Australia: Management implications10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.05.009 ↗
12. Evaluating the influence of geo-environmental factors on gully erosion in a semi-arid region of Iran: An integrated framework10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.176 ↗
13. Potential of weight of evidence modelling for gully erosion hazard assessment in Mbire District–Zimbabwe10.1016/j.pce.2014.02.002 ↗
14. An integrated assessment of soil erosion dynamics with special emphasis on gully erosion in the Mazayjan basin, southwestern Iran10.1007/s11069-015-1700-3 ↗
15. Integrated universal soil loss equation (USLE) and Geographical Information System (GIS) for soil erosion estimation in A Sap basin: Central Vietnam10.1016/j.iswcr.2018.01.001 ↗
16. Spatial prediction of soil erosion susceptibility: An evaluation of the maximum entropy model10.1007/s12145-018-0338-6 ↗
17. A novel ensemble bivariate statistical evidential belief function with knowledge-based analytical hierarchy process and multivariate statistical logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping10.1016/j.catena.2013.10.011 ↗
18. The European Soil Erosion Model (EUROSEM): A dynamic approach for predicting sediment transport from fields and small catchments10.1002/(SICI)1096-9837(199806)23:6<527::AID-ESP868>3.0.CO;2-5 ↗
19. Ephemeral gully erosion from agricultural regions in the Pacific Northwest, USA10.2478/v10060-008-0061-y ↗
20. GLEAMS: Groundwater loading effects of agricultural management systems10.13031/2013.30578 ↗
21. Liaw, A., and Breiman, W.M. (2018, April 01). Cutler’s Random Forests for Classification and Regression. Available online: https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/randomForest.
22. Mapping erosion susceptibility by a multivariate statistical method: A case study from the Ayvalık region, NW Turkey10.1016/j.cageo.2010.09.006 ↗
23. Gully erosion susceptibility assessment by means of GIS-based logistic regression: A case of Sicily (Italy)10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.08.021 ↗
24. Geomorphology and GIS analysis for mapping gully erosion susceptibility in the Turbolo stream catchment (Northern Calabria, Italy)10.1007/s11069-010-9598-2 ↗
25. Comparison of GIS-based gullying susceptibility mapping using bivariate and multivariate statistics: Northern Calabria, South Italy10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.07.006 ↗
26. Prediction of existing gully erosion in vineyard parcels of the NE Spain: A logistic modelling approach10.1016/S0167-1987(99)00020-3 ↗
27. Incorporating uncertainty in gully erosion calculations using the random forests modelling approach10.1002/env.999 ↗
28. Gully erosion susceptibility mapping: The role of GIS-based bivariate statistical models and their comparison10.1007/s11069-016-2239-7 ↗
29. Predicting gully initiation: Comparing data mining techniques, analytical hierarchy processes and the topographic threshold10.1002/esp.2273 ↗
30. Prediction of Gully erosion susceptibilities using detailed terrain analysis and maximum entropy modeling: A case study in the Mazayejan Plain, Southwest Iran
31. Performance assessment of individual and ensemble data-mining techniques for gully erosion modeling10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.198 ↗
32. (2017, October 12). I.R. of Iran Meteorological Organization. Available online: http://www.mazan daranmet.ir/.
33. (2017, October 12). Geological Survey Department of Iran (GSDI). Available online: http://www.mazan daranmet.ir/.
34. Application of an evidential belief function model in landslide susceptibility mapping10.1016/j.cageo.2012.03.003 ↗
35. Surface runoff prediction regarding LULC and climate dynamics using coupled LTM, optimized ARIMA, and GIS-based SCS-CN models in tropical region10.1007/s12517-018-3397-6 ↗
36. A comparative study of logistic model tree, random forest, and classification and regression tree models for spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility10.1016/j.catena.2016.11.032 ↗
37. Flood susceptibility assessment using GIS-based support vector machine model with different kernel types10.1016/j.catena.2014.10.017 ↗
38. Informational entropy of fractal river networks10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03092-2 ↗
39. Aal-Shamkhi, A.D.S., Mojaddadi, H., Pradhan, B., and Abdullahi, S. (2017). Extraction and modeling of urban sprawl development in Karbala City using VHR satellite imagery. Spatial Modeling and Assessment of Urban Form, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-54217-1_12 ↗
40. City compactness: Assessing the influence of the growth of residential land use10.1080/10630732.2017.1390299 ↗
41. Oil palm counting and age estimation from WorldView-3 imagery and LiDAR data using an integrated OBIA height model and regression analysis10.1155/2018/2536327 ↗
42. A comparative study of landslide susceptibility mapping using weight of evidence, logistic regression and support vector machine and evaluated by SBAS-InSAR monitoring: Zhouqu to Wudu segment in Bailong River Basin, China10.1007/s12665-017-6640-7 ↗
43. Spatial prediction of flood susceptibility using random-forest and boosted-tree models in Seoul metropolitan city, Korea10.1080/19475705.2017.1308971 ↗
44. Random forests for classification in ecology10.1890/07-0539.1 ↗
45. Simpson, G.L., and Birks, H.J.B. (2012). Statistical learning in palaeolimnology. Tracking Environmental Change Using Lake Sediments, Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-2745-8_9 ↗
46. Letter to the editor: On the stability and ranking of predictors from random forest variable importance measures10.1093/bib/bbr016 ↗
47. A hybrid artificial intelligence approach using GIS-based neural-fuzzy inference system and particle swarm optimization for forest fire susceptibility modeling at a tropical area10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.11.002 ↗
48. A working guide to boosted regression trees10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01390.x ↗
49. Application of frequency ratio, statistical index, and weights-of-evidence models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping in Central Nepal Himalaya10.1007/s12517-012-0807-z ↗
50. Comparison and ranking of different modelling techniques for prediction of site index in Mediterranean mountain forests10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.01.007 ↗
51. Heart disease prediction system using data mining techniques and intelligent fuzzy approach: A review
52. Application of a neuro-fuzzy model to landslide-susceptibility mapping for shallow landslides in a tropical hilly area10.1016/j.cageo.2010.10.012 ↗
53. Torgo, L. (2016). Data Mining with R: Learning with Case Studies, Chapman and Hall/CRC.
54. Earthquake induced landslide susceptibility mapping using an integrated ensemble frequency ratio and logistic regression models in West Sumatera Province, Indonesia10.1016/j.catena.2014.02.005 ↗
55. Ensemble machine-learning-based geospatial approach for flood risk assessment using multi-sensor remote-sensing data and GIS10.1080/19475705.2017.1294113 ↗
56. A comparative assessment of prediction capabilities of modified analytical hierarchy process (M-AHP) and Mamdani fuzzy logic models using Netcad-GIS for forest fire susceptibility mapping10.1080/19475705.2014.984247 ↗
57. A comparative assessment between linear and quadratic discriminant analyses (LDA-QDA) with frequency ratio and weights-of-evidence models for forest fire susceptibility mapping in China10.1007/s12517-017-2905-4 ↗
58. Mezaal, M.R., Pradhan, B., Shafri, H., Mojaddadi, H., and Yusoff, Z. (2017). Optimized Hierarchical Rule-Based Classification for Differentiating Shallow and Deep-Seated Landslide Using High-Resolution LiDAR Data. Global Civil Engineering Conference, Springer.
59. Rizeei, H.M., Pradhan, B., and Saharkhiz, M.A. (2018). An integrated fluvial and flash pluvial model using 2D high-resolution sub-grid and particle swarm optimization-based random forest approaches in GIS. Complex Intell. Syst., 1–20.10.1007/s40747-018-0078-8 ↗
60. Kantardzic, M. (2011). Data mining: Concepts, Models, Methods, and Algorithms, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118029145 ↗
61. A comparative study of different machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility assessment: A case study of Uttarakhand area (India)10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.07.005 ↗
62. Lai, C., Chen, X., Wang, Z., Xu, C.-Y., and Yang, B. (2017). Rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility assessment using random forest weight at basin scale. Hydrol. Res., nh2017044.10.2166/nh.2017.044 ↗