journal article·2021-03-10Open access

An Overview of Hybrid RANS–LES Models Developed for Industrial CFD

Florian Menter, Andreas Hüppe, Alexey Matyushenko, Dmitry Kolmogorov

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 6

Abstract

An overview of scale-resolving simulation (SRS) methods used in ANSYS Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) software is provided. The main challenges, especially when computing boundary layers in large eddy simulation (LES) mode, will be discussed. The different strategies for handling wall-bound flows using combinations of RANS and LES models will be explained, along with some specific application examples. It will be demonstrated that the stress-blended eddy simulation (SBES) approach is optimal for applications with a mix of boundary layers and free shear flows due to its low cost and its ability to handle boundary layers in both RANS and wall-modeled LES (WMLES) modes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows · Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics · Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

ANSYS Germany GmbH, Staudenfeldweg 20, 83624 Warngau, Germany

Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University (SPbPU), Laboratory of Computational Aeroacoustics and Turbulence, Polytechnicheskaya, 29, 195251 St. Petersburg, Russia

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Durbin, P., and Pettersson Reif, B.A. (2003). Statistical Theory of Turbulent Flows, John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. .
2. Wilcox, D.C. (2006). Turbulence Modeling for CFD, DCW Industries Inc.. [3rd ed.].
3. Hanjalic, K., and Launder, B. (2011). Modelling Turbulence in Engineering and the Environment, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139013314 ↗
4. Bush, R.H., Chyczewski, T.S., Duraisamy, K., Eisfeld, B., Rumsey, C., and Smith, B.R. (2019, January 7–11). Recommendations for Future Efforts in RANS Modeling and Simulation. Proceedings of the AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, San Diego, CA, USA.10.2514/6.2019-0317 ↗
5. Spalart, P.R., Jou, W., Strelets, M., and Allmaras, S. (1997, January 4–8). Comments on the feasibility of LES for wings, and on a hybrid RANS/LES approach. Proceedings of the First AFOSR International Conference on DNS/LES, Ruston, LA, USA.
6. Sagaut, P. (2006). Large Eddy Simulation for Incompressible Flows, Springer.
7. Guerts, J.B. (2004). Elements of Direct and Large-Eddy Simulation, Edwards Inc.
8. Strategies for turbulence modelling and simulations10.1016/S0142-727X(00)00007-2 ↗
9. Strelets, M. (2001, January 8–11). Detached Eddy Simulation of massively separated flows. Proceedings of the 39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA.10.2514/6.2001-879 ↗
10. Friedrich, R., and Rodi, W. (2000). Physical and Numerical Upgrades in the Detached Eddy Simulation of Complex Turbulent Flows. Advances in LES of Complex Flows, Kluwer Acad.
11. The Scale-Adaptive Simulation Method for Unsteady Turbulent Flow Predictions. Part 1: Theory and Model Description10.1007/s10494-010-9264-5 ↗
12. Scale-Adaptive Simulation Method for Unsteady Flow Predictions. Part 2: Application to Aerodynamic Flows10.1007/s10494-010-9265-4 ↗
13. Partially-Averaged Navier-Stokes Method: A RANS to DNS Bridging Method10.1115/1.2151207 ↗
14. Girimaji, S., and Abdul-Hamid, K.S. (2005, January 10–13). Partially-Averaged Navier-Stokes Model for Turbulence: Implementation and Validation. Proceedings of the 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada.10.2514/6.2005-502 ↗
15. A hybrid RANS-LES approach with delayed-DES and wall-modeled LES capabilities10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2008.07.001 ↗
16. A New Version of Detached-eddy Simulation, Resistant to Ambiguous Grid Densities10.1007/s00162-006-0015-0 ↗
17. An Enhanced Version of DES with Rapid Transition from RANS to LES in Separated Flows10.1007/s10494-015-9618-0 ↗
18. Gritskevich, M.S., Garbaruk, A.V., and Menter, F.R. (2012). Sensitization of DDES and IDDES Formulations to the k-ω Shear-Stress Transport Model. J. Flow Turbul. Combust.10.1051/eucass/201305023 ↗
19. Hoarau, Y., Peng, S.H., Schwamborn, D., and Revell, A. (2018). Stress-Blended Eddy Simulation (SBES)—A New Paradigm in Hybrid RANS-LES Modeling. Progress in Hybrid RANS-LES Modelling. HRLM 2016. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-70031-1 ↗
20. Cokljat, D., Caradi, D., Link, G., Lechner, R., and Menter, F.R. (2009, January 22–24). Embedded LES Methodology for General-Purpose CFD Solvers, Turbulent Shear Flow Phenomena. Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena, Seoul, Korea.10.1615/TSFP6.1900 ↗
21. Deck, S., Gand, F., Brunet, V., and Ben Khelil, S. (2014). High-fidelity simulations of unsteady civil aircraft aerodynamics: Stakes and perspectives. Application of zonal detached eddy simulation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 372.10.1098/rsta.2013.0325 ↗
22. An Implicitly Consistent Formulation of a Dual-Mesh Hybrid LES/RANS Method10.4208/cicp.220715.150416a ↗
23. Synthetic Turbulence Generators for RANS-LES Interfaces in Zonal Simulations of Aerodynamic and Aeroacoustic Problems10.1007/s10494-014-9534-8 ↗
24. Hybrid LES/RANS methods for simulation of turbulent flows10.1016/j.paerosci.2008.05.001 ↗
25. Sagaut, P., Deck, S., and Terracol, M. (2006). Multiscale and Multiresolution Approaches in Turbulence, Imperial College Press.10.1142/9781860948978 ↗
26. The State of the Art of Hybrid RANS/LES Modeling for the Simulation of Turbulent Flows10.1007/s10494-017-9828-8 ↗
27. Menter, F.R. (2015). Best Practice: Scale-Resolving Simulations in ANSYS CFD, ANSYS Inc.. ANSYS Report.
28. Dynamic Slip Wall Model for Large-Eddy Simulation10.1017/jfm.2018.838 ↗
29. Cho, M., Park, G.I., and Moin, P. (2018). Wall-Modeled LES of a Spatially-Developing Non-Equilibrium Turbulent Boundary Laye, Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University. Annual Research Briefs.
30. Wall-modeling in large eddy simulation: Length scales, grid resolution, and accuracy10.1063/1.3678331 ↗
31. Non-equilibrium three-dimensional boundary layers at moderate Reynolds numbers
32. Ambo, K., Nagaoka, H., Philips, D.A., Ivex, C.B., Bres, G.A., and Bose, S. (2020, January 6–10). Aerodynamic Force Prediction of the Laminar to Turbulent Flow Transition around the Front Bumper of the Vehicle using Dynamic-Slip Wall Model LES. Proceedings of the AIAA-AIAA Scitech Forum, Orlando, FL, USA.10.2514/6.2020-0036 ↗
33. Lienhart, H., and Becker, S. (2003). Flow and Turbulence Structure in the Wake of a Simplified Car Model. SAE Tech. Pap. Ser.10.4271/2003-01-0656 ↗
34. On Simulating the Turbulent Flow around the Ahmed Body: A French–German Collaborative Evaluation of LES and DES10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.05.017 ↗
35. Assessment of Hybrid RANS-LES Methods for Accurate Automotive Aerodynamic Simulations10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104301 ↗
36. Pergande, M., and Abdel-Maksoud, M. (2019, January 26–30). Simulation of Propeller Flow During Stopping and Crashback Maneuvers using Hybrid RANS-LES Methods. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, smp’19, Rome, Italy.
37. Kim, B.-C., and Chang, K. (2020). Assessment of Hybrid RANS/LES Models in Heat and Fluid Flows around Staggered Pin-Fin Arrays. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13143752 ↗
38. Menter, F.R., and Kuntz, M. (2003). Adaptation of Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models to Unsteady Separated Flow Behind Vehicles. The Aerodynamics of Heavy Vehicles: Trucks, Buses, and Trains, Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-44419-0_30 ↗
39. Turbulent boundary layer to single-stream shear layer: The transition region10.1017/S0022112003006049 ↗
40. Menter, F.R., Matyushenko, A., and Lechner, R. (2020). Development of a Generalized K-ω Two-Equation Turbulence Model. New Results in Numerical and Experimental Fluid Mechanics XII, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-25253-3_10 ↗
41. Menter, F.R. (2020, November 01). Best Practice: Generalized k-ω Two-Equation Turbulence Model in ANSYS CFD (GEKO). Available online: https://www.ansys.com/-/media/ansys/corporate/resourcelibrary/technical-paper/geko-tp.pdf.
42. Zore, K., and Caridi, D. (2020, January 23–26). Automotive Aerodynamic Noise Prediction using Scale Resolved Stress-Blended Eddy Simulation. Proceedings of the INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings, Seoul, Korea.
43. Experimental Investigation of Separation Control Part 1: Baseline and Steady Suction10.2514/1.13817 ↗
44. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications10.2514/3.12149 ↗
45. Subgrid-Scale Stress Modelling Based on the Square of the Velocity Gradient Tensor10.1023/A:1009995426001 ↗
46. Turbulence Modeling in the Age of Data, Gianluca10.1146/annurev-fluid-010518-040547 ↗
47. Deep Neural network for Data-Driven LES Models10.1016/j.jcp.2019.108910 ↗