Landslide Susceptibility Assessment by Using Convolutional Neural Network
Source abstract
Abstract
This study performs a GIS-based landslide susceptibility assessment using a convolutional neural network, CNN, in a study area of the Gorzineh-khil region, northeastern Iran. For this assessment, a 15-layered CNN was programmed in the Python high-level language for susceptibility mapping. In this regard, as far as the landside triggering factors are concerned, it was concluded that the geomorphologic/topographic parameters (i.e., slope curvature, topographical elevation, slope aspect, and weathering) and water condition parameters (hydrological gradient, drainage pattern, and flow gradient) are the main triggering factors. These factors provided the landside dataset, which was input to the CNN. We used 80% of the dataset for training and the remaining 20% for testing to prepare the landslide susceptibility map of the study area. In order to cross-validate the resulting map, a loss function, and common classifiers were considered: support vector machines, SVM, k-nearest neighbor, k-NN, and decision tree, DT. An evaluation of the results of the susceptibility assessment revealed that the CNN led the other classes in terms of 79.0% accuracy, 73.0% precision, 75.0% recall, and 77.0% f1-score, and, hence, provided better accuracy and the least computational error when compared to the other models.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Landslides and related hazards · Fire effects on ecosystems · Tree Root and Stability Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Geology, University of Yazd, Yazd 8915818411, Iran
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 5166616471, Iran
Department of Geological Engineering, Middle East Technical University (METU), 06800 Ankara, Turkey
Department of Geology, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman 7616913439, Iran
Department of Earth Sciences, Utrecht University, 3584CB Utrecht, The Netherlands
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Fuzzy-based multiple decision method for landslide susceptibility and hazard assessment: A case study of Tabriz, Iran
2. Rashidi, A., Khatib, M.M., and Derakhshani, R. (2022). Structural Characteristics and Formation Mechanism of the Earth Fissures as a Geohazard in Birjand, Iran. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12094144 ↗
3. Deep learning-based landslide susceptibility mapping10.1038/s41598-021-03585-1 ↗
4. A comparison of landslide susceptibility maps produced by logistic regression, multi-criteria decision, and likelihood ratio methods: A case study at İzmir, Turkey10.1007/s10346-011-0283-7 ↗
5. Monitoring of Maskun landslide and determining its quantitative relationship to different climatic conditions using D-InSAR and PSI techniques10.1080/19475705.2022.2065939 ↗
6. Assessment of landslide susceptibility for a landslide-prone area (north of Yenice, NW Turkey) by fuzzy approach10.1007/s00254-001-0454-2 ↗
7. Use of fuzzy relations to produce landslide susceptibility map of a landslide prone area (West Black Sea Region, Turkey)10.1016/j.enggeo.2004.06.001 ↗
8. Landslide susceptibility mapping for a landslide-prone area (Findikli, NE of Turkey) by likelihood-frequency ratio and weighted linear combination models10.1007/s00254-007-0882-8 ↗
9. Qualitative landslide susceptibility assessment by multicriteria analysis: A case study from San Antonio del Sur, Guantánamo, Cuba10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.10.038 ↗
10. Arabameri, A., Pradhan, B., Rezaei, K., and Lee, C.-W. (2019). Assessment of landslide susceptibility using statistical-and artificial intelligence-based FR–RF integrated model and multiresolution DEMs. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11090999 ↗
11. An ensemble model for landslide susceptibility mapping in a forested area10.1080/10106049.2019.1585484 ↗
12. GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using numerical risk factor bivariate model and its ensemble with linear multivariate regression and boosted regression tree algorithms10.1007/s11629-018-5168-y ↗
13. Application of logistic regression for landslide susceptibility zoning of Cekmece Area, Istanbul, Turkey10.1007/s00254-006-0322-1 ↗
14. Landslide susceptibility mapping for a part of tectonic Kelkit Valley (Eastern Black Sea region of Turkey)10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.10.036 ↗
15. Landslide susceptibility analysis with a heuristic approach in the Eastern Alps (Vorarlberg, Austria)10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.10.032 ↗
16. Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, artificial neural networks and their comparison: A case study from Kat landslides (Tokat—Turkey)10.1016/j.cageo.2008.08.007 ↗
17. GIS based multi-criteria decision making for landslide hazard zonation10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.126 ↗
18. GIS-based statistical analysis of the spatial distribution of earthquake-induced landslides in the island of Lefkada, Ionian Islands, Greece10.1007/s10346-012-0357-1 ↗
19. Discontinuous rock slope stability analysis under blocky structural sliding by fuzzy key-block analysis method10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03907 ↗
20. Discontinuous rock slope stability analysis by limit equilibrium approaches–a review10.1080/17538947.2021.1988163 ↗
21. Application of artificial neural network and logistic regression methods to landslide susceptibility mapping and comparison of the results for the ulus district, bartin
22. Evaluation and comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping methods: A case study for the Ulus district, Bartın, northern Turkey10.1080/13658816.2014.953164 ↗
23. A comparative study of an expert knowledge-based model and two data-driven models for landslide susceptibility mapping10.1016/j.catena.2018.04.003 ↗
24. A comparative study of least square support vector machines and multiclass alternating decision trees for spatial prediction of rainfall-induced landslides in a tropical cyclones area10.1007/s10706-016-9990-0 ↗
25. Landslide susceptibility assessment in Lianhua County (China): A comparison between a random forest data mining technique and bivariate and multivariate statistical models10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.02.012 ↗
26. Mikos, M., Tiwari, B., Yin, Y., and Sassa, K. (2017). Comparing the Performance of a Logistic Regression and a Random Forest Model in Landslide Susceptibility Assessments. The Case of Wuyaun Area, China. Advancing Culture of Living with Landslides, Springer. Workshop on World Landslide, Forum.
27. A comparative study of landslide susceptibility maps produced using support vector machine with different kernel functions and entropy data mining models in China10.1007/s10064-017-1010-y ↗
28. A GIS-based comparative study of Dempster-Shafer, logistic regression and artificial neural network models for landslide susceptibility mapping10.1080/10106049.2016.1140824 ↗
29. Adnan, M.S.G., Rahman, M.S., Ahmed, N., Ahmed, B., Rabbi, M., and Rahman, R.M. (2020). Improving spatial agreement in machine learning-based landslide susceptibility mapping. Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12203347 ↗
30. Optimal landslide susceptibility zonation based on multiple forecasts10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.06.020 ↗
31. Estimating the quality of landslide susceptibility models10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.04.007 ↗
32. Iran Meteorological Organization (2019, June 06). Climatological Data from Mazandaran Station. Available online: https://www.irimo.ir.
33. Aghanabati, A. (2004). Geology of Iran, Geological Survey of Iran.
34. Geological Survey of Iran (GSI) (2009). Geological Map of Mazandaran–Scales: 1:250,000 and 1:100,000, Geological Survey of Iran Press.
35. Rashidi, A., and Derakhshani, R. (2022). Strain and Moment- Rates from GPS and Seismological Data in Northern Iran: Implications for an Evaluation of Stress Trajectories and Probabilistic Fault Rupture Hazard. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14092219 ↗
36. Short-term seismicity patterns along the most active faults in Iran10.1007/s41513-020-00133-0 ↗
37. Highland, L., and Bobrowsky, P.T. (2008). The Landslide Handbook: A Guide to Understanding Landslides, US Geological Survey.10.3133/cir1325 ↗
38. US Geological Survey (USGS) (2019, June 06). Landsat Series of Earth Observation Satellites. Earth Explorer: US Geological Survey, Available online: https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov.
39. Li, Z., Zhu, C., and Gold, C. (2004). Digital Terrain Modeling: Principles and Methodology, CRC Press.10.1201/9780203357132 ↗
40. Alaska Satellite Facility (2019, June 06). Digital Elevation Data (DEM) for Savadkooh County, Southern Mazandaran, Alaska Satellite Facility Distributed Active Archive Centre (ASF DAAC). Available online: https://search.asf.alaska.edu.
41. (2019, June 06). ArcGIS Software, version 10.4; International Supplier of Geographic Information System Software, Web GIS and Geodatabase Management Applications; ESRI: Redlands, CA, USA, 2018. Available online: https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/products/arcgis-online/overview.
42. Aggarwal, C.C. (2018). Neural Networks and Deep Learning, Springer. A Textbook.10.1007/978-3-319-94463-0 ↗
43. Comparison of convolutional neural networks for landslide susceptibility mapping in Yanshan County, China10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.263 ↗
44. Chollet, F. (2021). Deep Learning with Python, Simon and Schuster.
45. Albelwi, S., and Mahmood, A. (2017). A framework for designing the architectures of deep convolutional neural networks. Entropy, 19.10.3390/e19060242 ↗
46. Landslide susceptibility modelling using GIS-based machine learning techniques for Chongren County, Jiangxi Province, China10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.124 ↗
47. Kalantar, B., Ueda, N., Saeidi, V., Ahmadi, K., Halin, A.A., and Shabani, F. (2020). Landslide susceptibility mapping: Machine and ensemble learning based on remote sensing big data. Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12111737 ↗
48. GIS-based evaluation of landslide susceptibility using hybrid computational intelligence models10.1016/j.catena.2020.104777 ↗