Interoperability between Building Information Modelling (BIM) and Building Energy Model (BEM)
Source abstract
Abstract
Building information modelling (BIM) is the first step towards the implementation of the industrial revolution 4.0, in which virtual reality and digital twins are key elements. At present, buildings are responsible for 40% of the energy consumption in Europe and, so, there is a growing interest in reducing their energy use. In this context, proper interoperability between BIM and building energy model (BEM) is paramount for integrating the digital world into the construction sector and, therefore, increasing competitiveness by saving costs. This paper evaluates whether there is an automated or semi-automated BIM to BEM workflow that could improve the building design process. For this purpose, a residential building and a warehouse are constructed using the same BIM authoring tool (Revit), where two open schemas were used: green building extensible markup language (gbXML) and industry foundation classes (IFC). These transfer files were imported into software compatible with the EnergyPlus engine—Design Builder, Open Studio, and CYPETHERM HE—in which simulations were performed. Our results showed that the energy models were built up to 7.50% smaller than in the BIM and with missing elements in their thermal envelope. Nevertheless, the materials were properly transferred to gbXML and IFC formats. Moreover, the simulation results revealed a huge difference in values between the models generated by the open schemas, in the range of 6 to 900 times. Overall, we conclude that there exists a semi-automated workflow from BIM to BEM which does not work well for big and complex buildings, as they present major problems when creating the energy model. Furthermore, most of the issues encountered in BEM were errors in the transfer of BIM data to gbXML and IFC files. Therefore, we emphasise the need to improve compatibility between BIM and model exchange formats by their developers, in order to promote BIM–BEM interoperability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: BIM and Construction Integration · 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Architecture, University of Navarra, 31009 Pamplona, Spain
Funding
Gobierno de Navarra
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Genetic algorithm for building envelope calibration10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.075 ↗
2. The 2nd recast of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD)
3. Directive 2018/844 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 amending Directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings and Directive 2012/27/EU on energy efficiency
4. Review of building energy performance certification schemes towards future improvement10.1016/j.rser.2019.109244 ↗
5. Dynamic life cycle assessment modelling of a NZEB building10.1016/j.energy.2019.116489 ↗
6. González, V.G., Ruiz, G.R., Segarra, E.L., Gordillo, G.C., and Bandera, C.F. (2019, January 2–4). Characterization of building foundation in building energy models. Proceedings of the Building Simulation, Rome, Italy.
7. Elagiry, M., Dugue, A., Costa, A., and Decorme, R. (2020). Digitalization Tools for Energy-Efficient Renovations. Proceedings, 65.10.3390/proceedings2020065009 ↗
8. Elagiry, M., Marino, V., Lasarte, N., Elguezabal, P., and Messervey, T. (2019). BIM4Ren: Barriers to BIM implementation in renovation processes in the Italian market. Buildings, 9.10.3390/buildings9090200 ↗
9. Bergonzoni, G., Marino, V., Elagiry, M., and Costa, A. (2021). Assessing Residential Buildings Compliance with Sustainability Rating Systems through a BIM-Based Approach. Proceedings, 65.10.3390/proceedings2020065022 ↗
10. Ullah, K., Lill, I., and Witt, E. (2019, January 7–8). An overview of BIM adoption in the construction industry: Benefits and barriers. Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Construction Economics and Organization, Tallinn, Estonia.10.1108/S2516-285320190000002052 ↗
11. Maskuriy, R., Selamat, A., Ali, K.N., Maresova, P., and Krejcar, O. (2019). Industry 4.0 for the construction industry how ready is the industry?. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9142819 ↗
12. De Lange, P., Bähre, B., Finetti-Imhof, C., Klamma, R., Koch, A., and Oppermann, L. (2017, January 13). Socio-technical Challenges in the Digital Gap between Building Information Modeling and Industry 4.0. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Socio-Technical Perspective in IS Development (STPIS@ CAiSE), Essen, Germany.
13. González, V.G., Colmenares, L.Á., Fidalgo, J.F.L., Ruiz, G.R., and Bandera, C.F. (2019). Uncertainy’s Indices Assessment for Calibrated Energy Models. Energies, 12.10.3390/en12112096 ↗
14. Fernández Bandera, C., and Ramos Ruiz, G. (2017). Towards a new generation of building envelope calibration. Energies, 10.10.3390/en10122102 ↗
15. Statistical analysis of neural networks as applied to building energy prediction10.1115/1.1637640 ↗
16. Quality of grey-box models and identified parameters as function of the accuracy of input and observation signals10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.07.025 ↗
17. Ramos Ruiz, G., Lucas Segarra, E., and Fernández Bandera, C. (2019). Model predictive control optimization via genetic algorithm using a detailed building energy model. Energies, 12.10.3390/en12010034 ↗
18. Gutiérrez González, V., Ramos Ruiz, G., and Fernández Bandera, C. (2020). Empirical and Comparative Validation for a Building Energy Model Calibration Methodology. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20175003 ↗
19. Development of openBIM-based energy analysis software to improve the interoperability of energy performance assessment10.1016/j.autcon.2016.07.004 ↗
20. An investigation of the impact of building orientation on energy consumption in a domestic building using emerging BIM (Building Information Modelling)10.1016/j.energy.2015.12.135 ↗
21. Segarra, E.L., Ruiz, G.R., González, V.G., Peppas, A., and Bandera, C.F. (2020). Impact Assessment for Building Energy Models Using Observed vs. Third-Party Weather Data Sets. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12176788 ↗
22. Application of BEM and using BIM database for BEM: A review10.1016/j.jobe.2019.01.021 ↗
23. BIM-BEM support tools for early stages of zero-energy building design10.1088/1757-899X/609/7/072075 ↗
24. Review of using Building Information Modeling for building energy modeling during the design process10.1016/j.jobe.2019.01.029 ↗
25. Aranda, J., Martin-Dorta, N., Naya, F., Conesa-Pastor, J., and Contero, M. (2020). Sustainability and Interoperability: An Economic Study on BIM Implementation by a Small Civil Engineering Firm. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12229581 ↗
26. MVD based information exchange between BIM and building energy performance simulation10.1016/j.autcon.2018.02.009 ↗
27. Gerrish, T., Ruikar, K., Cook, M., Johnson, M., and Phillip, M. (2017). Using BIM capabilities to improve existing building energy modelling practices. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag.10.1108/ECAM-11-2015-0181 ↗
28. Hijazi, M., Kensek, K., and Konis, K. (2015). Bridging the gap: Supporting data transparency from BIM to BEM. Archit. Res., 150.
29. Building information modeling for energy retrofitting—A review10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.064 ↗
30. Review of BIM’s application in energy simulation: Tools, issues, and solutions10.1016/j.autcon.2018.11.008 ↗
31. Akbarieh, A. (2018). Systematic Investigation of Interoperability Issues between Building Information Modelling and Building Energy Modelling-BIM-Based BEM Information Exchange Issues. [Master’s Thesis, NTNU].
32. Dimitriou, V., Firth, S.K., Hassan, T.M., and Fouchal, F. (2016, January 12–14). BIM enabled building energy modelling: Development and verification of a GBXML to IDF conversion method. Proceedings of the 3rd IBPSA-England Conference BSO, Newcastle, UK.
33. IBPSA Project 1: BIM/GIS and Modelica framework for building and community energy system design and operation–ongoing developments, lessons learned and challenges
34. Elagiry, M., Charbel, N., Bourreau, P., Di Angelis, E., and Costa, A. (2020, January 23–25). IFC to Building Energy Performance Simulation: A Systematic Review of the Main Adopted Tools and Approaches. Proceedings of the BauSIM 2020-8th Conference of IBPSA Germany and Austria, Graz, Austria.
35. Gumbarević, S., Burcar Dunović, I., Milovanović, B., and Gaši, M. (2020). Method for Building Information Modeling Supported Project Control of Nearly Zero-Energy Building Delivery. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13205519 ↗
36. Building information modelling based building energy modelling: A review10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.032 ↗
37. Osello, A., Cangialosi, G., Dalmasso, D., Di Paolo, A., Turco, M.L., Piumatti, P., and Vozzola, M. (2011, January 14–16). Architecture data and energy efficiency simulations: BIM and interoperability standards. Proceedings of the Building Simulation, Sydney, Australia.
38. EnergyPlus: Creating a new-generation building energy simulation program10.1016/S0378-7788(00)00114-6 ↗
39. Simulation analysis of built environment based on design builder software10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.580-583.3134 ↗
40. Guglielmetti, R., Macumber, D., and Long, N. (2011). OpenStudio: An Open Source Integrated Analysis Platform, National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL). Technical Report.
41. CYPE Ingenieros (2021, January 31). Software Para Ingenieria, Arquitectura y Construccion. Available online: http://www.cype.es.
42. Van Treeck, C., Wimmer, R., and Maile, T. (2018). BIM for energy analysis. Building Information Modeling, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-92862-3_20 ↗
43. Alsharif, R. (2021, February 12). A Review on the Challenges of BIM-Based BEM Automated Application in AEC Industry. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337888446_A_review_on_the_challenges_of_BIM-based_BEM_automated_application_in_AEC_industry.
44. Moretti, N., Xie, X., Merino, J., Brazauskas, J., and Parlikad, A.K. (2020). An openBIM Approach to IoT Integration with Incomplete As-Built Data. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10228287 ↗