journal article·2019-03-16Open access

Prediction of Compressive Strength of Geopolymer Concrete Using Entirely Steel Slag Aggregates: Novel Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Approaches

Dong Van Dao, Son Hoang Trinh, Hai-Bang Ly, Binh Thai Pham

Applied Sciences· Volume 9· Issue 6

Abstract

Geopolymer concrete (GPC) is applied successfully in the construction of civil engineering structures. This outcome confirmed that GPC can be used as an alternative material to conventional ordinary Portland cement concrete (OPC). Recent investigations were attempted to incorporate recycled aggregates into GPC to reduce the use of natural materials such as stone and sand. However, traditional methodology used to predict compressive strength and to find out an optimum mix for GPC is yet to be formulated, especially in cases of GPC using by-products as aggregates. In this study, we propose novel hybrid artificial intelligence (AI) approaches, namely a particle swarm optimization (PSO)-based adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (PSOANFIS) and a genetic algorithm (GA)-based adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (GAANFIS) to predict the 28-day compressive strength of GPC containing 100% waste slag aggregates. To construct and validate these models, 21 different mixes with 210 specimens were casted and tested. Three input parameters were used to predict the tested compressive strength of GPC, i.e., the sodium solution (NaOH) concentration (varied from 10 to 14 M), the mass ratio of alkaline activation solution to fly ash (AAS/FA), ranging from 0.4 to 0.5, and the mass ratio of sodium silicate (Na2SiO3) to sodium hydroxide solution (SS/SH) which was varied from 2 to 3. The compressive strength of the fabricated GPC was used as output parameter for the prediction models. Validation of the models was done using several statistical criteria such as mean absolute error (MAE), root-mean-square error (RMSE), and correlation coefficient (R). The results show that the PSOANFIS and GAANFIS models have strong potential for predicting the 28-day compressive strength of GPC, but the PSOANFIS (MAE = 1.847 MPa, RMSE = 2.251 MPa, and R = 0.934) was slightly better than the GAANFIS (MAE = 2.115 MPa, RMSE = 2.531 MPa, and R = 0.927). This study will help in reducing the time and cost for the implementation of laboratory experiments in designing the optimum proportions of GPC.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

University of Transport Technology, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam

References (63)

Show source-provided references
1. Geopolymers: Inorganic polymeric new materials10.1007/BF01912193 ↗
2. Acid corrosion resistance of different cementing materials10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00234-9 ↗
3. Alkali-aggregate behaviour of alkali-activated slag mortars: Effect of aggregate type10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.02.008 ↗
4. Alkali–aggregate reaction in activated fly ash systems10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.11.002 ↗
5. Chloride diffusion in ordinary, blended, and alkali-activated cement pastes and its relation to other properties10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00406-3 ↗
6. Influence of activated fly ash on corrosion-resistance and strength of concrete10.1016/S0958-9465(02)00068-9 ↗
7. Preparation and thermal properties of fire resistant metakaolin-based geopolymer-type coatings10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.09.063 ↗
8. Factors affecting the performance of metakaolin geopolymers exposed to elevated temperatures10.1007/s10853-007-2205-6 ↗
9. Properties of alkali-activated fly ash: High performance to lightweight10.1080/19397038.2010.487162 ↗
10. Preparation of geopolymer from fluidized bed combustion bottom ash10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.09.008 ↗
11. Influence of sodium carbonate addition on the thermal reactivity of tungsten mine waste mud based binders10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.08.018 ↗
12. Material and structural characterization of alkali activated low-calcium brown coal fly ash10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.02.089 ↗
13. An Overview of Utilization of Steel Slag10.1016/j.proenv.2012.10.108 ↗
14. Drying Shrinkage of Slag Blended Fly Ash Geopolymer Concrete Cured at Room Temperature10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.066 ↗
15. Effect of Local Steel Slag as a Coarse Aggregate on Properties of Fly Ash Based-Geopolymer Concrete
16. Lloyd, N., and Rangan, V. (2010, January 28). Geopolymer concrete with fly ash. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies, Ancona, Italy.
17. Lloyd, N.A., and Rangan, B.V. (2010, January 25–27). Geopolymer concrete: A review of development and opportunities. Proceedings of the 35th Conference on Our World in Concrete & Structures, Singapore.
18. Rangan, B.V. (2008). Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete, Curtin University of Technology.10.1201/9781420007657.ch26 ↗
19. Design and manufacture of flyash-based geopolymer concrete
20. Ferdous, M.W., Kayali, O., and Khennane, A. (2013, January 11–13). A detailed procedure of mix design for fly ash based geopolymer concrete. Proceedings of the Fourth Asia-Pacific Conference on FRP in Structures (APFIS 2013), Melbourne, Australia.
21. Genetic algorithm in structural damage detection10.1016/S0045-7949(01)00027-X ↗
22. Concrete strength prediction by means of neural network10.1016/S0950-0618(97)00007-X ↗
23. Predicting the shear strength of reinforced concrete beams using artificial neural networks10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.01.011 ↗
24. Prediction of compressive strength of SCC and HPC with high volume fly ash using ANN10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.01.014 ↗
25. Prediction of compressive strength of concrete containing fly ash using artificial neural networks and fuzzy logic10.1016/j.commatsci.2007.04.009 ↗
26. Artificial neural network for predicting drying shrinkage of concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.08.043 ↗
27. Artificial neural network for predicting creep and shrinkage of high performance concrete10.3151/jact.6.135 ↗
28. Predicting the compressive strength of ground granulated blast furnace slag concrete using artificial neural network10.1016/j.advengsoft.2008.05.005 ↗
29. The knowledge modeling system of ready-mixed concrete enterprise and artificial intelligence with ANN-GA for manufacturing production10.1007/s10845-014-0923-6 ↗
30. Using neural networks to predict workability of concrete incorporating metakaolin and fly ash10.1016/S0965-9978(03)00102-9 ↗
31. Chine, W.-H., Chen, L., Hsu, H.-H., Wang, T.-S., and Chiu, C.-H. (2010, January 23–24). Modeling slump of concrete using the artificial neural networks. Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computational Intelligence (AICI), Sanya, China.10.1109/AICI.2010.287 ↗
32. Modeling slump of ready mix concrete using genetic algorithms assisted training of Artificial Neural Networks10.1016/j.eswa.2014.08.048 ↗
33. Artificial neural networks in prediction of mechanical behavior of concrete at high temperature10.1016/S0029-5493(97)00152-0 ↗
34. Prediction of fracture parameters of concrete by artificial neural networks10.1016/j.engfracmech.2003.12.004 ↗
35. Artificial intelligence techniques for prediction of the capacity of RC beams strengthened in shear with external FRP reinforcement10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.10.027 ↗
36. Neural network model for asphalt concrete permeability10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2005)17:1(19) ↗
37. Comparison of artificial neural network and fuzzy logic models for prediction of long-term compressive strength of silica fume concrete10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.01.005 ↗
38. Forecasting energy consumption using ensemble ARIMA–ANFIS hybrid algorithm10.1016/j.ijepes.2016.03.012 ↗
39. Performance evaluation of GIS-based new ensemble data mining techniques of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) with genetic algorithm (GA), differential evolution (DE), and particle swarm optimization (PSO) for landslide spatial modelling10.1016/j.catena.2017.05.034 ↗
40. Hybrid ANFIS–PSO approach for predicting optimum parameters of a protective spur dike10.1016/j.asoc.2015.02.011 ↗
41. Karaboga, D., and Kaya, E. (2018). Adaptive network based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) training approaches: A comprehensive survey. Artif. Intell. Rev., 1–31.10.1007/s10462-017-9610-2 ↗
42. Kennedy, J., and Eberhart, R. (December, January 27). Particle Swarm Optimization. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks (ICNN’95), Perth, Australia.
43. Multiobjective control of power plants using particle swarm optimization techniques10.1109/TEC.2005.858078 ↗
44. Effect of utilization of discrete wavelet components on flood forecasting performance of wavelet based ANFIS models10.1007/s11269-014-0584-4 ↗
45. Integration of artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm to predict electrical energy consumption10.1016/j.amc.2006.08.093 ↗
46. Genetic algorithm based model for optimizing bank lending decisions10.1016/j.eswa.2017.03.021 ↗
47. Sivanandam, S.N., and Deepa, S.N. (2008). Genetic algorithm optimization problems. Introduction to Genetic Algorithms, Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-73190-0_7 ↗
48. Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance10.3354/cr030079 ↗
49. Interpretation of the correlation coefficient: A basic review10.1177/875647939000600106 ↗
50. Machine learning of molecular electronic properties in chemical compound space10.1088/1367-2630/15/9/095003 ↗
51. Effect of silicate activator pH on the leaching and material characteristics of waste-based inorganic polymers10.1016/S0892-6875(01)00002-4 ↗
52. The geopolymerisation of alumino-silicate minerals10.1016/S0301-7516(99)00074-5 ↗
53. Effect of alkali metals on the preferential geopolymerization of stilbite/kaolinite mixtures10.1021/ie010042b ↗
54. Engineering properties of alkali-activated fly ash concrete
55. Alkali-activated fly ashes: A cement for the future10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00243-9 ↗
56. Hardening mechanisms of an alkaline-activated class F fly ash10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00571-3 ↗
57. Chemical stability of cementitious materials based on metakaolin10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00074-5 ↗
58. Hardjito, D., and Rangan, B.V. (2005). Development and Properties of Low-Calcium Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete, Curtin Research Publications.10.1080/13287982.2005.11464946 ↗
59. Sarker, R.A. (2018). Agent-Based Evolutionary Search, Springer.
60. Hybrid artificial intelligence approach based on neural fuzzy inference model and metaheuristic optimization for flood susceptibilitgy modeling in a high-frequency tropical cyclone area using GIS10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.027 ↗
61. Fracture Properties of Geopolymer Concrete Based on Metakaolin, Fly Ash and Rice Rusk Ash10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2016-0974 ↗
62. Chiang, S.-W., Chao-Chen, H.S.U., Chien, K.-L., Lin, K.-M., and Chung, J.-C. (2017). Environmentally Friendly Cement and Production Method Thereof. (US 2,0170,260,090A1), U.S. Patent.
63. Hassan, R., Cohanim, B., De Weck, O., and Venter, G. (2005, January 18–21). A comparison of particle swarm optimization and the genetic algorithm. Proceedings of the 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Austin, TX, USA.10.2514/6.2005-1897 ↗