journal article·2019-03-13Open access

Assessing Dynamic Conditions of the Retaining Wall: Developing Two Hybrid Intelligent Models

Hui Chen, Panagiotis G. Asteris, Danial Jahed Armaghani, Behrouz Gordan, Binh Thai Pham

Applied Sciences· Volume 9· Issue 6

Abstract

The precise estimation and forecast of the safety factor (SF) in civil engineering applications is considered as an important issue to reduce engineering risk. The present research investigates new artificial intelligence (AI) techniques for the prediction of SF values of retaining walls, as important and resistant structures for ground forces. These structures have complicated performances in dynamic conditions. Consequently, more than 8000 designs of these structures were dynamically evaluated. Two AI models, namely the imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA)-artificial neural network (ANN), and the genetic algorithm (GA)-ANN were used for the forecasting of SF values. In order to design intelligent models, parameters i.e., the wall thickness, stone density, wall height, soil density, and internal soil friction angle were examined under different dynamic conditions and assigned as inputs to predict SF of retaining walls. Various models of these systems were constructed and compared with each other to obtain the best one. Results of models indicated that although both hybrid models are able to predict SF values with a high accuracy and they can be introduced as new models in the field, the retaining wall performance could be properly predicted in dynamic conditions using the ICA-ANN model. Under these conditions, a combination of engineering design and artificial intelligence techniques can be used to control and secure retaining walls in dynamic conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Geological and Mining Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830047, Xinjiang, China

Computational Mechanics Laboratory, School of Pedagogical and Technological Education, Heraklion, 14121 Athens, Greece

Centre of Tropical Geoengineering (GEOTROPIK), School of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru 81310, Johor, Malaysia

Department of Geotechnics and Transportation, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Skudai, Johor 81310, Malaysia

Institute of Research and Development, Duy Tan University, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. Mononobe, N. (November, January 30). On determination of earth pressure during earthquake. Proceedings of the World Engineering Congress, Tokyo, Japan.
2. General theory of earth pressure
3. An alternative to the Mononobe–Okabe equations for seismic earth pressures10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.01.004 ↗
4. Reexamination of Mononobe-Okabe theory of gravity retaining walls using centrifuge model tests10.3208/sandf.46.135 ↗
5. Al Atik, L., and Sitar, N. (2009). Experimental and Analytical Study of the Seismic Performance of Retaining Structures, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
6. Seismic behavior of cantilever retaining walls with liquefiable backfills10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:5(424) ↗
7. Green, R.A., and Ebeling, R.M. (2002). Seismic Analysis of Cantilever Retaining Walls, Phase I, Civil & Environmental Engineering Department University of Michigan.10.21236/ADA408335 ↗
8. Seismic earth pressures on rigid and flexible retaining walls10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.11.020 ↗
9. Seismic soil pressure for building walls: An updated approach10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.11.035 ↗
10. Wood, J.H. (1973). Earthquake-Induced Soil Pressures on Structures, California Institute of Technology.
11. A Risk-Based Technique to Analyze Flyrock Results Through Rock Engineering System10.1007/s10706-018-0459-1 ↗
12. Koopialipoor, M., Nikouei, S.S., Marto, A., Fahimifar, A., Armaghani, D.J., and Mohamad, E.T. (2018). Predicting tunnel boring machine performance through a new model based on the group method of data handling. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ.10.1007/s10064-018-1349-8 ↗
13. Liao, X., Khandelwal, M., Yang, H., Koopialipoor, M., and Murlidhar, B.R. (2019). Effects of a proper feature selection on prediction and optimization of drilling rate using intelligent techniques. Eng. Comput.10.1007/s00366-019-00711-6 ↗
14. Asteris, P.G., Nozhati, S., Nikoo, M., Cavaleri, L., and Nikoo, M. (2018). Krill herd algorithm-based neural network in structural seismic reliability evaluation. Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct.10.1080/15376494.2018.1430874 ↗
15. Anisotropic masonry failure criterion using artificial neural networks10.1007/s00521-016-2181-3 ↗
16. Asteris, P.G., Tsaris, A.K., Cavaleri, L., Repapis, C.C., Papalou, A., Di Trapani, F., and Karypidis, D.F. (2016). Prediction of the fundamental period of infilled RC frame structures using artificial neural networks. Comput. Intell. Neurosci., 20.10.1155/2016/5104907 ↗
17. Hautamäki, V., Siniscalchi, S.M., Behravan, H., Salerno, V.M., and Kukanov, I. (2015, January 6–10). Boosting universal speech attributes classification with deep neural network for foreign accent characterization. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Dresden, Germany.10.21437/Interspeech.2015-165 ↗
18. Barone, A.V.M., Helcl, J., Sennrich, R., Haddow, B., and Birch, A. (2019, March 12). Deep architectures for neural machine translation, arXiv, Available online: http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W17-4710.
19. Salerno, V.M., and Rabbeni, G. (2018). An Extreme Learning Machine Approach to Effective Energy Disaggregation. Electronics, 7.10.20944/preprints201808.0551.v1 ↗
20. Koopialipoor, M., Fahimifar, A., Ghaleini, E.N., Momenzadeh, M., and Armaghani, D.J. (2019). Development of a new hybrid ANN for solving a geotechnical problem related to tunnel boring machine performance. Eng. Comput.10.1007/s00366-019-00701-8 ↗
21. Zhou, J., Aghili, N., Ghaleini, E.N., Bui, D.T., Tahir, M.M., and Koopialipoor, M. (2019). A Monte Carlo simulation approach for effective assessment of flyrock based on intelligent system of neural network. Eng. Comput.10.1007/s00366-019-00726-z ↗
22. Risk Assessment and Prediction of Flyrock Distance by Combined Multiple Regression Analysis and Monte Carlo Simulation of Quarry Blasting10.1007/s00603-016-1015-z ↗
23. Ground vibration prediction in quarry blasting through an artificial neural network optimized by imperialist competitive algorithm10.1007/s10064-014-0657-x ↗
24. Developing a new intelligent technique to predict overbreak in tunnels using an artificial bee colony-based ANN10.1007/s12665-019-8163-x ↗
25. Prediction of seismic slope stability through combination of particle swarm optimization and neural network10.1007/s00366-015-0400-7 ↗
26. Hajihassani, M., Jahed Armaghani, D., Monjezi, M., Mohamad, E.T., and Marto, A. (2015). Blast-induced air and ground vibration prediction: A particle swarm optimization-based artificial neural network approach. Environ. Earth Sci., 74.10.1007/s12665-015-4274-1 ↗
27. Prediction of Drillability of Rocks with Strength Properties Using a Hybrid GA-ANN Technique10.1007/s10706-015-9970-9 ↗
28. Prediction of uniaxial compressive strength of rock samples using hybrid particle swarm optimization-based artificial neural networks10.1016/j.measurement.2014.09.075 ↗
29. An optimized ANN model based on genetic algorithm for predicting ripping production10.1007/s00521-016-2359-8 ↗
30. Prediction of blast-induced air overpressure: A hybrid AI-based predictive model10.1007/s10661-015-4895-6 ↗
31. Zhou, J., Nekouie, A., Arslan, C.A., Pham, B.T., and Hasanipanah, M. (2019). Novel approach for forecasting the blast-induced AOp using a hybrid fuzzy system and firefly algorithm. Eng. Comput.10.1007/s00366-019-00725-0 ↗
32. Feasibility of Stochastic Gradient Boosting Approach for Evaluating Seismic Liquefaction Potential Based on SPT and CPT Case Histories10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001292 ↗
33. Koopialipoor, M., Armaghani, D.J., Hedayat, A., Marto, A., and Gordan, B. (2018). Applying various hybrid intelligent systems to evaluate and predict slope stability under static and dynamic conditions. Soft Comput.10.1007/s00500-018-3253-3 ↗
34. Where and why artificial neural networks are applicable in civil engineering10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1994)8:2(129) ↗
35. Koopialipoor, M., Armaghani, D.J., Haghighi, M., and Ghaleini, E.N. (2017). A neuro-genetic predictive model to approximate overbreak induced by drilling and blasting operation in tunnels. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ.10.1007/s10064-017-1116-2 ↗
36. Simpson, P.K. (1990). Artificial Neural System—Foundation, Paradigm, Application and Implementations, Pergamon.
37. Koopialipoor, M., Murlidhar, B.R., Hedayat, A., Armaghani, D.J., Gordan, B., and Mohamad, E.T. (2019). The use of new intelligent techniques in designing retaining walls. Eng. Comput.10.1007/s00366-018-00700-1 ↗
38. Dreyfus, G. (2005). Neural Networks: Methodology and Applications, Springer.
39. Koopialipoor, M., Ghaleini, E.N., Haghighi, M., Kanagarajan, S., Maarefvand, P., and Mohamad, E.T. (2018). Overbreak prediction and optimization in tunnel using neural network and bee colony techniques. Eng. Comput.10.1007/s00366-018-0658-7 ↗
41. Koopialipoor, M., Fallah, A., Armaghani, D.J., Azizi, A., and Mohamad, E.T. (2018). Three hybrid intelligent models in estimating flyrock distance resulting from blasting. Eng. Comput.10.1007/s00366-018-0596-4 ↗
42. Prediction of pile bearing capacity using a hybrid genetic algorithm-based ANN10.1016/j.measurement.2014.08.007 ↗
43. Atashpaz-Gargari, E., and Lucas, C. (2007, January 25–28). Imperialist competitive algorithm: An algorithm for optimization inspired by imperialistic competition. Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC 2007, Singapore.10.1109/CEC.2007.4425083 ↗
44. Feasibility of ICA in approximating ground vibration resulting from mine blasting10.1007/s00521-016-2577-0 ↗
45. A combination of the ICA-ANN model to predict air-overpressure resulting from blasting10.1007/s00366-015-0408-z ↗
46. Ghaleini, E.N., Koopialipoor, M., Momenzadeh, M., Sarafraz, M.E., Mohamad, E.T., and Gordan, B. (2018). A combination of artificial bee colony and neural network for approximating the safety factor of retaining walls. Eng. Comput.10.1007/s00366-018-0625-3 ↗
47. Gordan, B., Koopialipoor, M., Clementking, A., Tootoonchi, H., and Mohamad, E.T. (2018). Estimating and optimizing safety factors of retaining wall through neural network and bee colony techniques. Eng. Comput.10.1007/s00366-018-0642-2 ↗
48. Zhao, Y., Noorbakhsh, A., Koopialipoor, M., Azizi, A., and Tahir, M.M. (2019). A new methodology for optimization and prediction of rate of penetration during drilling operations. Eng. Comput.10.1007/s00366-019-00715-2 ↗
49. Application of two intelligent systems in predicting environmental impacts of quarry blasting10.1007/s12517-015-1908-2 ↗
50. Kramer, S.L. (1996). Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. Prentice–Hall International Series in Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, Prentice-Hall.
51. Prediction of uniaxial compressive strength of sandstones using petrography-based models10.1016/j.enggeo.2007.10.009 ↗
52. Lee, Y., Oh, S.H., and Kim, M.W. (1991, January 8–12). The effect of initial weights on premature saturation in back-propagation learning. Proceedings of the IJCNN-91-Seattle International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Seattle, WA, USA.