Effect of Process Parameters on the Generated Surface Roughness of Down-Facing Surfaces in Selective Laser Melting
Source abstract
Abstract
Additive manufacturing provides a number of benefits in terms of infinite freedom to design complex parts and reduced lead-times while globally reducing the size of supply chains as it brings all production processes under one roof. However, additive manufacturing (AM) lags far behind conventional manufacturing in terms of surface quality. This proves a hindrance for many companies considering investment in AM. The aim of this work is to investigate the effect of varying process parameters on the resultant roughness of the down-facing surfaces in selective laser melting (SLM). A systematic experimental study was carried out and the effects of the interaction of the different parameters and their effect on the surface roughness (Sa) were analyzed. It was found that the interaction and interdependency between parameters were of greatest significance to the obtainable surface roughness, though their effects vary greatly depending on the applied levels. This behavior was mainly attributed to the difference in energy absorbed by the powder. Predictive process models for optimization of process parameters for minimizing the obtained Sa in 45° and 35° down-facing surface, individually, were achieved with average error percentages of 5% and 6.3%, respectively, however further investigation is still warranted.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute for Automation and Applied Informatics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
Faculty of Engineering, Port Said University, Port Fuad 42526, Egypt
Direct Metal Printing Engineering, 3D Systems, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
Karlsruhe Nano Micro Facility, Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
Funding
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Industrial Additive Manufacturing: A manufacturing systems perspective10.1016/j.compind.2017.08.002 ↗
2. 3-D printing: The new industrial revolution10.1016/j.bushor.2011.11.003 ↗
3. 3D Printing, A Maturing Technology10.3182/20130522-3-BR-4036.00112 ↗
4. Wimpenny, D.I., Pandey, P.M., and Kumar, L.J. (2017). A Review on Status of Research in Metal Additive Manufacturing. Advances in 3D Printing & Additive Manufacturing Technologies, Springer.10.1007/978-981-10-0812-2 ↗
5. Selective laser melting of high aspect ratio 3D nickel–titanium structures two way trained for MEMS applications10.1007/s10999-007-9032-4 ↗
6. New applications of rapid prototyping and rapid manufacturing (RP/RM) technologies for space instrumentation10.1016/j.actaastro.2007.01.004 ↗
7. Additive manufacturing: Technology, applications and research needs10.1007/s11465-013-0248-8 ↗
8. Materials for additive manufacturing10.1016/j.cirp.2017.05.009 ↗
9. A study of the microstructural evaluation during selective laser melting of Ti-6Al-4V10.1016/j.actamat.2010.02.004 ↗
10. Surface texture measurement for additive manufacturing10.1088/2051-672X/3/2/024002 ↗
11. The Effect of Layer Thickness at Selective Laser Melting10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.179 ↗
12. Build Height Effect on the Inconel 718 Parts Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting10.1016/j.promfg.2016.08.089 ↗
13. Optimisation of process parameters to address fundamental challenges during selective laser melting of Ti-6Al-4V: A review10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2018.01.003 ↗
14. Elkaseer, A., Mueller, T., Charles, A., and Scholz, S. (, January 18–20). Digital Detection and Correction of Errors in As-built Parts: A Step Towards Automated Quality Control of Additive Manufacturing. Proceedings of the World Congress on Micro and Nano Manufacturing (WCMNM), Portorož, Slovenia.
15. Influences of processing parameters on surface roughness of Hastelloy X produced by selective laser melting
16. Determination of the effect of scan strategy on residual stress in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
17. Assessing and comparing influencing factors of residual stresses in selective laser melting using a novel analysis method10.1177/0954405412437085 ↗
18. Effect of process parameters on the surface roughness of overhanging structures in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.347 ↗
19. Charles, A., Elkaseer, A., Mueller, T., Thijs, L., Torge, M., Hagenmeyer, V., and Scholz, S. (, January 18–20). A Study of the Factors Influencing Generated Surface Roughness of Downfacing Surfaces in Selective Laser Melting. Proceedings of the World Congress on Micro and Nano Manufacturing (WCMNM), Portorož, Slovenia.
20. The effect of SLM process parameters on density, hardness, tensile strength and surface quality of Ti-6Al-4V
21. Parameter optimization for Ti-47Al-2Cr-2Nb in selective laser melting based on geometric characteristics of single scan tracks10.1016/j.optlastec.2016.11.002 ↗