Spatial Prediction of Landslide Susceptibility Using GIS-Based Data Mining Techniques of ANFIS with Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA) and Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO)
Source abstract
Abstract
The most dangerous landslide disasters always cause serious economic losses and human deaths. The contribution of this work is to present an integrated landslide modelling framework, in which an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) is combined with the two optimization algorithms of whale optimization algorithm (WOA) and grey wolf optimizer (GWO) at Anyuan County, China. It means that WOA and GWO are used as two meta-heuristic algorithms to improve the prediction performance of the ANFIS-based methods. In addition, the step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) method is used to obtain the initial weight of each class of landslide influencing factors. To validate the effectiveness of the proposed framework, 315 landslide events in history were selected for our experiments and were randomly divided into the training and verification sets. To perform landslide susceptibility mapping, fifteen geological, hydrological, geomorphological, land cover, and other factors are considered for the modelling construction. The landslide susceptibility maps by SWARA, SWARA-ANFIS, SWARA-ANFIS-PSO, SWARA-ANFIS-WOA, and SWARA-ANFIS-GWO models are assessed using the measures of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and root-mean-square error (RMSE). The experiments demonstrated that the obtained results of modelling process from the SWARA to the SAWRA-ANFIS-GWO model were more accurate and that the proposed methods have satisfactory prediction ability. Specifically, prediction accuracy by area under the curve (AUC) of SWARA, SWARA-ANFIS, SWARA-ANFIS-PSO, SWARA-ANFIS-GWO, and SWARA-ANFIS-WOA models were 0.831, 0.831, 0.850, 0.856, and 0.869, respectively. Due to adaptability and usability, the proposed prediction methods can be applied to other areas for landslide management and mitigation as well as prevention throughout the world.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Landslides and related hazards · Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Cryospheric studies and observations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Geology and Environment, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
Key Laboratory of Mine Geological Hazard Mechanism and Control, Shaanxi Institute of Geo-Environment Monitoring, Xi’an 710054, China
Key Laboratory of Coal Resources Exploration and Comprehensive Utilization, Ministry of Land and Resources, Xi’an 710021, China
Key Laboratory of Virtual Geographic Environment, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China
State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base of Geographical Environment Evolution (Jiangsu Province), Nanjing 210023, China
Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographic Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjing 210023, China
Geoscience Platform Research Division, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM), 124, Gwahak-ro Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34132, Korea
Department of Geomorphology, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj 66177-15175, Iran
Institute of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
Department of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj 66177-15175, Iran
Department of Surveying and Geoinformatics, Faculty of Geosciences and Environmental Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Xipu Campus, Chengdu 611756, China
Department of GIS, Faculty of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran 19967-15433, Iran
School of Engineering, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
Young Researchers and Elites Club, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran 19585-466, Iran
State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China
Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Agricultural Research, Education, and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran 13185-116, Iran
Institute of Research and Development, Duy Tan University, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam
Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Johor Bahru 81310, Malaysia
Funding
International Partnership Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) based on Research University Grant
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Landslide monitoring for risk mitigation by using corner reflector and satellite sar interferometry: The large landslide of Carlantino (Italy)10.1016/j.catena.2016.12.006 ↗
2. Statistical landslide susceptibility assessment of the mansehra and torghar districts, khyber pakhtunkhwa province, pakistan10.1007/s11069-017-2992-2 ↗
3. A nation-wide system for landslide mapping and risk management in italy: The second not-ordinary plan of environmental remote sensing
4. A proposed cell model for multiple-occurrence regional landslide events: Implications for landslide susceptibility mapping10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.07.032 ↗
5. A novel hybrid integration model using support vector machines and random subspace for weather-triggered landslide susceptibility assessment in the Wuning area (China)10.1007/s12665-017-6981-2 ↗
6. The role of human activities on sediment connectivity of shallow landslides10.1016/j.catena.2017.09.025 ↗
7. Plugs or Flood-Makers? The Unstable Landslide Dams of Eastern Oregon10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.06.040 ↗
8. A study of landslide deformation fields with a digital correlation method10.1007/s11069-017-2997-x ↗
9. Characterizing the spatial variations and correlations of large rainstorms for landslide study10.5194/hess-21-4573-2017 ↗
10. Characterization and quantification of path dependency in landslide susceptibility10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.04.039 ↗
11. A new approach to temporal modelling for landslide hazard assessment using an extreme rainfall induced-landslide index10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.10.006 ↗
12. Rainfall thresholds for possible landslide occurrence in Italy10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.03.031 ↗
13. Landslide zoning analysis in zhouqu under different rainfall warning levels10.1007/s12665-017-6932-y ↗
14. An expert knowledge-based approach to landslide susceptibility mapping using gis and fuzzy logic10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.02.003 ↗
15. A comparative study of an expert knowledge-based model and two data-driven models for landslide susceptibility mapping10.1016/j.catena.2018.04.003 ↗
16. A comparative analysis of pixel-and object-based detection of landslides from very high-resolution images
17. GIS-based landslide susceptibility modelling: A comparative assessment of kernel logistic regression, Naïve-Bayes tree, and alternating decision tree models10.1080/19475705.2017.1289250 ↗
18. Landslide susceptibility mapping & prediction using support vector machine for Mandakini river basin, Garhwal Himalaya, India10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.06.013 ↗
19. Landslide susceptibility assessment in the hoa binh province of vietnam: A comparison of the levenberg-marquardt and bayesian regularized neural networks
20. Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, artificial neural networks and their comparison: A case study from kat landslides (Tokat-Turkey)10.1016/j.cageo.2008.08.007 ↗
21. Hybrid integration of multilayer perceptron neural networks and machine learning ensembles for landslide susceptibility assessment at Himalayan area (India) using gis10.1016/j.catena.2016.09.007 ↗
22. Landslide Detection and Susceptibility Mapping Using Lidar and an Artificial Neural Network Approach: A Case Study in the Cuyahoga Valley National Park, Ohio10.1007/s10346-015-0587-0 ↗
23. Oh, H.-J., and Lee, S. (2017). Shallow landslide susceptibility modeling using the data mining models artificial neural network and boosted tree. Appl. Sci., 7.10.3390/app7101000 ↗
24. Pascale, S., Parisi, S., Mancini, A., Schiattarella, M., Conforti, M., Sole, A., Murgante, B., and Sdao, F. (2013). Landslide susceptibility mapping using artificial neural network in the urban area of senise and San Costantino Albanese (Basilicata, Southern Italy). Computational Science and Its Applications, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, 24–27 June 2013, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-39649-6_34 ↗
25. Landslide susceptibility mapping at central Zab Basin, Iran: A comparison between analytical hierarchy process, frequency ratio and logistic regression models10.1016/j.catena.2013.11.014 ↗
26. Landslide susceptibility mapping based on support vector machine: A case study on natural slopes of Hong Kong, China10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.02.011 ↗
27. Landslide susceptibility mapping using gis-based multi-criteria decision analysis, support vector machines, and logistic regression10.1007/s10346-013-0391-7 ↗
28. A comparative study of sequential minimal optimization-based support vector machines, vote feature intervals, and logistic regression in landslide susceptibility assessment using gis10.1007/s12665-017-6689-3 ↗
29. Comparison of four kernel functions used in support vector machines for landslide susceptibility mapping: A case study at Suichuan area (China)10.1080/19475705.2016.1250112 ↗
30. Pham, B.T., Jaafari, A., Prakash, I., and Bui, D.T. (2018). A novel hybrid intelligent model of support vector machines and the multiboost ensemble for landslide susceptibility modeling. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ.10.1007/s10064-018-1281-y ↗
31. Bagging based support vector machines for spatial prediction of landslides10.1007/s12665-018-7268-y ↗
32. A novel relevance vector machine classifier with cuckoo search optimization for spatial prediction of landslides10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000557 ↗
33. Spatial prediction of rainfall-induced shallow landslides using hybrid integration approach of least squares support vector machines and differential evolution optimization: A Case Study in Central Vietnam10.1080/17538947.2016.1169561 ↗
34. Spatial prediction of rainfall-induced landslides for the Lao Cai area (Vietnam) using a novel hybrid intelligent approach of least squares support vector machines inference model and artificial bee colony optimization10.1007/s10346-016-0711-9 ↗
35. Landslide susceptibility mapping using random forest, boosted regression tree, classification and regression tree, and general linear models and comparison of their performance at Wadi Tayyah Basin, Asir Region, Saudi Arabia10.1007/s10346-015-0614-1 ↗
36. A tool for classification and regression using random forest methodology: Applications to landslide susceptibility mapping and soil thickness modeling10.1007/s10666-016-9538-y ↗
37. Landslide susceptibility mapping using a modified decision tree classifier in the Xanthi Perfection, Greece10.1007/s10346-015-0565-6 ↗
38. Landslide susceptibility mapping using random forest and boosted tree models in Pyeong-Chang, Korea10.1080/10106049.2017.1323964 ↗
39. Landslide susceptibility mapping using j48 decision tree with adaboost, bagging and rotation forest ensembles in the Guangchang Area (China)10.1016/j.catena.2018.01.005 ↗
40. Truong, X., Mitamura, M., Kono, Y., Raghavan, V., Yonezawa, G., Do, T., Tien Bui, D., and Lee, S. (2018). Enhancing prediction performance of landslide susceptibility model using hybrid machine learning approach of bagging ensemble and logistic model tree. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8071046 ↗
41. Dang, V.-H., Dieu, T.B., Tran, X.-L., and Hoang, N.-D. (2018). Enhancing the accuracy of rainfall-induced landslide prediction along mountain roads with a gis-based random forest classifier. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ.10.1007/s10064-018-1273-y ↗
42. Trigila, A., Iadanza, C., Esposito, C., and Scarascia-Mugnozza, G. (2015). Comparison of logistic regression and random forests techniques for shallow landslide susceptibility assessment in Giampilieri (ne Sicily, Italy). Geomorphology.10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.06.001 ↗
43. Spatial prediction of rainfall-induced shallow landslides using gene expression programming integrated with gis: A case study in Vietnam10.1007/s11069-018-3286-z ↗
44. A novel fuzzy k-nearest neighbor inference model with differential evolution for spatial prediction of rainfall-induced shallow landslides in a tropical hilly area using gis10.1007/s10346-016-0708-4 ↗
45. Spatial prediction of landslide hazard using fuzzy k-means and dempster-shafer theory10.1111/j.1467-9671.2005.00229.x ↗
46. Assessment of landslide susceptibility for a landslide-prone area (North of Yenice, NW Turkey) by fuzzy approach10.1007/s00254-001-0454-2 ↗
47. Assessment of rainfall-generated shallow landslide/debris-flow susceptibility and runout using a gis-based approach: Application to Western Southern Alps of New Zealand10.1007/s10346-014-0533-6 ↗
48. Landslide susceptibility mapping at Hoa Binh Province (Vietnam) using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and gis10.1016/j.cageo.2011.10.031 ↗
49. Landslide susceptibility mapping by neuro-fuzzy approach in a landslide-prone area (Cameron Highlands, Malaysia)10.1109/TGRS.2010.2050328 ↗
50. Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (anfis) modeling for landslide susceptibility assessment in a Mediterranean hilly area10.1007/s10064-017-1125-1 ↗
51. Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system combined with frequency ratio, generalized additive model, and support vector machine techniques10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.09.007 ↗
52. Landslide susceptibility assessment using a novel hybrid model of statistical bivariate methods (fr and woe) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (anfis) at Southern Zagros Mountains in Iran10.1007/s12665-017-6558-0 ↗
53. Performance evaluation of gis-based new ensemble data mining techniques of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (anfis) with genetic algorithm (ga), differential evolution (de), and particle swarm optimization (pso) for landslide spatial modelling10.1016/j.catena.2017.05.034 ↗
54. Spatial prediction models for shallow landslide hazards: A comparative assessment of the efficacy of support vector machines, artificial neural networks, kernel logistic regression, and logistic model tree10.1007/s10346-015-0557-6 ↗
55. Flood susceptibility mapping in dingnan county (China) using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system with biogeography based optimization and imperialistic competitive algorithm10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.102 ↗
56. A comparative assessment of flood susceptibility modeling using multi-criteria decision-making analysis and machine learning methods10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.073 ↗
57. Flood susceptibility modelling using novel hybrid approach of reduced-error pruning trees with bagging and random subspace ensembles10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.089 ↗
58. Tien Bui, D., Khosravi, K., Shahabi, H., Daggupati, P., Adamowski, J.F., M Melesse, A., Thai Pham, B., Pourghasemi, H.R., Mahmoudi, M., and Bahrami, S. (2019). Flood spatial modeling in Northern Iran using remote sensing and gis: A comparison between evidential belief functions and its ensemble with a multivariate logistic regression model. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11131589 ↗
59. Tien Bui, D., Shahabi, H., Shirzadi, A., Chapi, K., Hoang, N.-D., Pham, B., Bui, Q.-T., Tran, C.-T., Panahi, M., and Bin Ahamd, B. (2018). A novel integrated approach of relevance vector machine optimized by imperialist competitive algorithm for spatial modeling of shallow landslides. Remote Sens., 10.10.3390/rs10101538 ↗
60. Tien Bui, D., Khosravi, K., Li, S., Shahabi, H., Panahi, M., Singh, V., Chapi, K., Shirzadi, A., Panahi, S., and Chen, W. (2018). New hybrids of anfis with several optimization algorithms for flood susceptibility modeling. Water, 10.10.3390/w10091210 ↗
61. Novel forecasting approaches using combination of machine learning and statistical models for flood susceptibility mapping10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.089 ↗
62. A novel hybrid artificial intelligence approach for flood susceptibility assessment10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.012 ↗
63. A comparative assessment of decision trees algorithms for flash flood susceptibility modeling at Haraz Watershed, Northern Iran10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.266 ↗
64. Alizadeh, M., Alizadeh, E., Asadollahpour Kotenaee, S., Shahabi, H., Beiranvand Pour, A., Panahi, M., Bin Ahmad, B., and Saro, L. (2018). Social vulnerability assessment using artificial neural network (ann) model for earthquake hazard in Tabriz City, Iran. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10103376 ↗
65. Lee, S., Panahi, M., Pourghasemi, H.R., Shahabi, H., Alizadeh, M., Shirzadi, A., Khosravi, K., Melesse, A.M., Yekrangnia, M., and Rezaie, F. (2019). Sevucas: A novel gis-based machine learning software for seismic vulnerability assessment. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9173495 ↗
66. Hybrid artificial intelligence models based on a neuro-fuzzy system and metaheuristic optimization algorithms for spatial prediction of wildfire probability10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.12.015 ↗
67. Taheri, K., Shahabi, H., Chapi, K., Shirzadi, A., Gutiérrez, F., and Khosravi, K. (2019). Sinkhole susceptibility mapping: A comparison between bayes-based machine learning algorithms. Land Degrad. Dev.10.1002/ldr.3255 ↗
68. Drought sensitivity mapping using two one-class support vector machine algorithms10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.04.017 ↗
69. Modelling Gully-Erosion Susceptibility in a Semi-Arid Region, Iran: Investigation of Applicability of Certainty Factor and Maximum Entropy Models10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.235 ↗
70. Tien Bui, D., Shirzadi, A., Shahabi, H., Chapi, K., Omidavr, E., Pham, B.T., Talebpour Asl, D., Khaledian, H., Pradhan, B., and Panahi, M. (2019). A novel ensemble artificial intelligence approach for gully erosion mapping in a semi-arid watershed (Iran). Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19112444 ↗
71. Mapping groundwater potential using a novel hybrid intelligence approach10.1007/s11269-018-2102-6 ↗
72. Groundwater spring potential modelling: Comprising the capability and robustness of three different modeling approaches10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.08.027 ↗
73. Predicting uncertainty of machine learning models for modelling nitrate pollution of groundwater using quantile regression and uneec methods10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.320 ↗
74. Chen, W., Pradhan, B., Li, S., Shahabi, H., Rizeei, H.M., Hou, E., and Wang, S. (2019). Novel hybrid integration approach of bagging-based fisher’s linear discriminant function for groundwater potential analysis. Nat. Resour. Res., 1–20.10.1007/s11053-019-09465-w ↗
75. Tien Bui, D., Shahabi, H., Shirzadi, A., Chapi, K., Alizadeh, M., Chen, W., Mohammadi, A., Ahmad, B., Panahi, M., and Hong, H. (2018). Landslide detection and susceptibility mapping by airsar data using support vector machine and index of entropy models in Cameron Highlands, Malaysia. Remote Sens., 10.10.3390/rs10101527 ↗
76. Developing robust arsenic awareness prediction models using machine learning algorithms10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.01.044 ↗
77. Landslide susceptibility modelling using gis-based machine learning techniques for Chongren County, Jiangxi Province, China10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.124 ↗
78. Spatial prediction of landslides using a hybrid machine learning approach based on random subspace and classification and regression trees10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.12.008 ↗
79. Landslide susceptibility modeling using reduced error pruning trees and different ensemble techniques: Hybrid machine learning approaches10.1016/j.catena.2018.12.018 ↗
80. Shallow landslide susceptibility assessment using a novel hybrid intelligence approach10.1007/s12665-016-6374-y ↗
81. A novel hybrid approach of landslide susceptibility modeling using rotation forest ensemble and different base classifiers
82. A comparative study on the predictive ability of the decision tree, support vector machine and neuro-fuzzy models in landslide susceptibility mapping using gis10.1016/j.cageo.2012.08.023 ↗
83. Landslide spatial modelling using novel bivariate statistical based naïve bayes, rbf classifier, and rbf network machine learning algorithms10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.329 ↗
84. Meta optimization of an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system with grey wolf optimizer and biogeography-based optimization algorithms for spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility10.1016/j.catena.2018.12.033 ↗
85. Landslide susceptibility assessment at the Wuning area, China: A comparison between multi-criteria decision making, bivariate statistical and machine learning methods10.1007/s11069-018-3536-0 ↗
86. Big data in geohazard; pattern mining and large scale analysis of landslides in Iran10.1007/s12145-018-0354-6 ↗
87. Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility by combining evidential belief function, logistic regression and logistic model tree10.1080/10106049.2019.1588393 ↗
88. Nguyen, V.V., Pham, B.T., Vu, B.T., Prakash, I., Jha, S., Shahabi, H., Shirzadi, A., Ba, D.N., Kumar, R., and Chatterjee, J.M. (2019). Hybrid machine learning approaches for landslide susceptibility modeling. Forests, 10.10.3390/f10020157 ↗
89. Nguyen, P.T., Tuyen, T.T., Shirzadi, A., Pham, B.T., Shahabi, H., Omidvar, E., Amini, A., Entezami, H., Prakash, I., and Phong, T.V. (2019). Development of a novel hybrid intelligence approach for landslide spatial prediction. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9142824 ↗
90. Tien Bui, D., Shahabi, H., Omidvar, E., Shirzadi, A., Geertsema, M., Clague, J.J., Khosravi, K., Pradhan, B., Pham, B.T., and Chapi, K. (2019). Shallow landslide prediction using a novel hybrid functional machine learning algorithm. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11080931 ↗
91. Performance evaluation of the gis-based data mining techniques of best-first decision tree, random forest, and naïve bayes tree for landslide susceptibility modeling10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.389 ↗
92. A novel ensemble approach of bivariate statistical-based logistic model tree classifier for landslide susceptibility assessment10.1080/10106049.2018.1425738 ↗
93. Chen, W., Shahabi, H., Zhang, S., Khosravi, K., Shirzadi, A., Chapi, K., Pham, B., Zhang, T., Zhang, L., and Chai, H. (2018). Landslide susceptibility modeling based on gis and novel bagging-based kernel logistic regression. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8122540 ↗
94. Zhang, T., Han, L., Chen, W., and Shahabi, H. (2018). Hybrid integration approach of entropy with logistic regression and support vector machine for landslide susceptibility modeling. Entropy, 20.10.3390/e20110884 ↗
95. Abedini, M., Ghasemian, B., Shirzadi, A., Shahabi, H., Chapi, K., Pham, B.T., Bin Ahmad, B., and Tien Bui, D. (2018). A novel hybrid approach of bayesian logistic regression and its ensembles for landslide susceptibility assessment. Geocarto Int.10.1080/10106049.2018.1499820 ↗
96. Gis-based landslide susceptibility evaluation using a novel hybrid integration approach of bivariate statistical based random forest method10.1016/j.catena.2018.01.012 ↗
97. Novel hybrid artificial intelligence approach of bivariate statistical-methods-based kernel logistic regression classifier for landslide susceptibility modeling10.1007/s10064-018-1401-8 ↗
98. Shirzadi, A., Soliamani, K., Habibnejhad, M., Kavian, A., Chapi, K., Shahabi, H., Chen, W., Khosravi, K., Thai Pham, B., and Pradhan, B. (2018). Novel gis based machine learning algorithms for shallow landslide susceptibility mapping. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18113777 ↗
99. A novel hybrid artificial intelligence approach based on the rotation forest ensemble and naïve bayes tree classifiers for a landslide susceptibility assessment in Langao County, China10.1080/19475705.2017.1401560 ↗
100. A comparative study between popular statistical and machine learning methods for simulating volume of landslides10.1016/j.catena.2017.05.016 ↗