journal article·2021-01-20Open access

Fundamentals of Building Deconstruction as a Circular Economy Strategy for the Reuse of Construction Materials

Gaetano Bertino, Johannes Kisser, Julia Zeilinger, Guenter Langergraber, Tatjana Fischer, Doris Österreicher

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 3

Abstract

The construction industry is one of the most environmentally detrimental industries in the world, impacting directly the use of raw materials, their determination of use involving the whole lifecycle, as well as all their surrounding environment. However, within the building sector, the transition from a linear to a circular economy is still at an early stage. Business models need to be reconsidered to include new and improved methods and innovative services that could lead to a net reduction in the use of resources and minimizing the waste disposed on landfills. In this context, an important role in buildings’ circularity is “deconstruction”, which is understood as a well-considered selective dismantlement of building components, in prevision of a future reuse, repurposing, or recycling. It represents a sustainable alternative to common demolition, which tends to be an arbitrary and destructive process, and although faster and cheaper, it typically creates a substantial amount of waste. The purpose of this article is to analyze the deconstruction potential of buildings and the strategies to apply in order to keep the impacts on the urban environment low. The article aims to facilitate the implementation of circular economy strategies for buildings by proposing common principles for deconstruction as a sustainable alternative to demolition and defining the key points to be applied during the design and planning process regardless of the type of construction system or material used.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Sustainable Supply Chain Management · Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance · Sustainable Building Design and Assessment

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Alchemia-Nova GmbH, Institute for Innovative Phytochemistry & Closed Loop Processes, A-1140 Vienna, Austria

Department of Water, Atmosphere and Environment, Institute of Waste Management, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), A-1190 Vienna, Austria

Department of Water, Atmosphere and Environment, Institute of Sanitary Engineering and Water Pollution Control, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), A-1190 Vienna, Austria

Department of Landscape, Spatial and Infrastructure Sciences, Institute of Spatial Planning, Environmental Planning and Land Rearrangement, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), A-1190 Vienna, Austria

Funding

Vienna Science and Technology Fund

References (90)

Show source-provided references
1. The global construction market: A cross-sectional analysis10.1080/014461900407428 ↗
2. Oberti, I. (2014). Prodotti Edilizi per Edifici Ecocompatibili. Uno Strumento per Orientare la Scelta, Maggioli.
3. Circular economy in the construction industry: A systematic literature review10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121046 ↗
4. Building energy-consumption status worldwide and the state-of-the-art technologies for zero-energy buildings during the past decade10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.06.089 ↗
5. Life cycle carbon dioxide assessment tool for buildings in the schematic design phase10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.01.025 ↗
6. A Spanish model for quantification and management of construction waste10.1016/j.wasman.2009.05.009 ↗
7. Barriers and drivers in a circular economy: The case of the built environment10.1016/j.procir.2018.12.015 ↗
8. Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041 ↗
9. Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy
10. Circular economy in construction: Current awareness, challenges and enablers
11. Osobajo, O.A., Oke, A., Omotayo, T., and Obi, L.I. (2020). A systematic review of circular economy research in the construction industry. SASBE.10.1108/SASBE-04-2020-0034 ↗
12. Kanters, J. (2018). Design for Deconstruction in the Design Process: State of the Art. Buildings, 8.10.3390/buildings8110150 ↗
13. Durmisevic, E., and Brouwer, J. (2002). Design aspects of decomposable building structures. Design for Deconstruction and Materials Reuse, CIB Publication 272.
14. Jackson, M., and Livingston, D. (2001). Building A Deconstruction Company: A Training Guide for Facilitators and Entrepreneurs, Institute for Local Self-Reliance.
15. Bohne, R.A., and Wærner, E. (2014). Barriers for Deconstruction and Reuse/Recycling of Construction Materials in Norway, CIB Publication.
16. Waste minimisation through deconstruction: A BIM based Deconstructability Assessment Score (BIM-DAS)10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.10.018 ↗
17. Design for Deconstruction (DfD): Critical success factors for diverting end-of-life waste from landfills10.1016/j.wasman.2016.08.017 ↗
18. Heinrich, M., and Lang, W. (2019). Materials Passports—Best Practice. Innovative Solutions for a Transition to a Circular Economy in the Built Environment, Technische Universität München.
19. Gepts, B., Meex, E., Nuyts, E., Knapen, E., and Verbeeck, G. (2019). Existing databases as means to explore the potential of the building stock as material bank. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., 225.10.1088/1755-1315/225/1/012002 ↗
20. Anticipating and Responding to Deconstruction through Building Design
21. Bertino, G., Fischer, T., Puhr, G., Langergraber, G., and Österreicher, D. (2019). Framework Conditions and Strategies for Pop-up Envi-ronments in Urban Planning. Sustainability, 11.10.3390/su11247204 ↗
22. Pasca, M. (2012). Il Costruito Italiano: Tipologie, Problematiche, Interventi pre e Post Sisma, Sapienza University of Rome.
23. Construction Challenges of Adaptive Reuse of Historical Buildings in Europe
24. De Lachenal, L. (1995). Spolia—Uso e Reimpiego dell’Antico dal III al XIV Secolo, Longanesi.
25. Coarelli, F. (1974). Guida Archeologica di Roma, Illustrati. Arte e Costume, Mondadori.
26. The Return of the Fall of Rome10.1080/07075332.2007.9641121 ↗
27. Adinolfi, R. (1976). Monumenti Cristiani Antichi nei Campi Flegrei, Editore Massimo.
28. Middleton, R., and Watkin, D. (1987). Neoclassical and 19th Century Architecture, Faber.
29. Greenhalgh, M. (1990). The Survival of Roman Antiquities in the Middle Ages, Duckworth.
30. Deconstruction, demolition and destruction10.1080/09613218.2011.585785 ↗
31. Pompili, T. (2006). Networks Within Cities and Among Cities: A Paradigm for Urban Development and Governance, ERSA. ERSA Conference Papers.
32. European Commission (2014). Resource Efficiency Opportunities in the Building Sector, European Commission. EUR-Lex COM/2014/445.
33. European Commission (2015). Closing the Loop—An EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy, European Commission. EUR-Lex COM/2015/614.
34. European Commission (2020, October 08). EU Circular Economy Action Plan: A new Circular Economy Action Plan for a Cleaner and More Competitive Europe. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/circular-economy/.
35. European Commission (2020). A New Circular Economy Action Plan, European Commission. EUR-Lex COM/2020/98.
36. Partnership for Advancing Technology in Housing (2001). A Report on the Feasibility of Deconstruction: An Investigation of Decon-Struction Activity in Four Cities.
37. Ellen MacArthur Foundation, and Google (2020, June 26). Accelerating the Circular Economy through Commercial Deconstruction and Reuse. Available online: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/google-deconstruction-and-reuse.pdf.
38. Assessing buildings’ absolute environmental sustainability performance using LCA focusing on climate change impacts10.1088/1755-1315/352/1/012058 ↗
39. Design for deconstruction and material reuse
40. Elias-Özkan, S.T. (2002). An Overview of Demolition, Recovery, Reuse and Recycling practices in Turkey. Design for Deconstruction and Materials Reuse, CIB Publication.
41. Design for Disassembly-Themes and Principles
42. Sustainable Building Material for Green Building Construction, Conservation and Refurbishing
43. Emergy analysis of building manufacturing, maintenance and use: Em-building indices to evaluate housing sustainability10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.10.004 ↗
44. Crowther, P. (2002). Design for Buildability and the Deconstruction Consequences. Design for Deconstruction and Materials Reuse, CIB Publication.
45. Seemann, A., Schultmann, F., and Rentz, O. (2002). Cost-effective deconstruction by a combination of dismantling, sorting and recycling processes. Design for Deconstruction and Materials Reuse, CIB Publication.
46. Reinhold, M., and Mueller, A. (2002). Lightweight aggregate produced from fine fractions of construction and demolition waste. Design for Deconstruction and Materials Reuse, CIB Publication.
47. Mueller, A., and Stark, U. (2002). Recycling of clay brick. Design for Deconstruction and Materials Reuse, CIB Publication.
48. Schultmann, F., and Renz, O. (2003). Resource-constraint project scheduling for deconstruction projects. Design for Deconstruction and Materials Reuse, CIB Publication.
49. Giglio, F. (2002). Controlling environmental impacts in the dismantling phase. Design for Deconstruction and Materials Reuse, CIB Publication.
50. Bart, J.t.D., and Kowalczyk, T. (2002). Design for recycling. Design for Deconstruction and Materials Reuse, CIB Publication.
51. Macozoma, D.S. (2002). Understanding the Concept of Flexibility in Design for Deconstruction. Design for Deconstruction and Materials Reuse, CIB Publication.
52. Enhancing the circular economy with nature-based solutions in the built urban environment: Green building materials, systems and sites10.2166/bgs.2019.928 ↗
53. Reuse and recycle potentials of the temporary houses after occupancy: Example of Duzce, Turkey10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.01.051 ↗
54. Carpinteri, A. (1997). Structural Mechanics: A Unified Approach, CRC Press.
55. Waddell, J. (1916). Bridge Engineering, John Wiley & Sons.
56. Fascia, F., and Iovino, R. (2008). La Struttura in Cemento Armato per l’Architettura. Tecnica e Tecnologia, Aracne.
57. De Sivo, B., Iovino, R., and Cito, G. (1995). Appunti di Architettura Tecnica, Cuen. [5th ed.].
58. Aveta, A. (1990). Materiali e Tecniche Tradizionali nel Napoletano: Note per il Restauro Architettonico, Arte Tipografica.
59. Constructive systems, load-bearing and enclosing structures of high-rise buildings10.1051/e3sconf/20183301043 ↗
60. Amati, C. (1829). Dell’architettura di Marco Vitruvio Pollione, Giacomo Pirola.
61. Pollio, V. (1999). Vitruvius: Ten Books on Architecture, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511840951 ↗
62. Models for Prediction of 28-Day Concrete Compressive Strength10.1520/JTE20140139 ↗
63. Experimental studies on steel frame structures of traditional-style buildings10.12989/scs.2016.22.2.235 ↗
64. Study and Analysis of Types of Foundation and Design Construction
65. A review and case studies of factors affecting the stability of wooden foundation piles in urban envi-ronments exposed to construction work10.1016/j.ibiod.2020.104913 ↗
66. Smith, R.E. (2011). Prefab Achitecture. A Guide for Architects and Construction Professionals, John Wiley & Sons.
67. Re-engineering through pre-assembly: Client expectations and drivers10.1080/09613210302000 ↗
68. Estévez, B., Aguado, A., and Josa, A. (2003). Environmental impact of concrete recycling, coming from CDW. Design for Deconstruction and Materials Reuse, CIB Publication.
69. Chadha, B. (2015). Off-site manufacturing—A way towards lean construction. J. Civ. Eng. Environ. Technol., 2, ISSN 2349879X.
70. Assessing the integrity of glued-laminated timber elements10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.06.064 ↗
71. Towards adoption of prefabrication in construction10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.10.003 ↗
72. Bonfanti, C., Carabellese, A., and Toniolo, G. (2008). Strutture Prefabbricate-Catalogo delle Tipologie Esistenti, Assobeton.
73. Impacts of prefabricated temporary housing after disasters: 1999 earthquakes in Turkey10.1016/j.habitatint.2006.03.002 ↗
74. Shumaker, D. (2020, June 30). Materials and Design for Deconstruction. Available online: https://soa.utexas.edu/sites/default/disk/analytic\_tools/analytic\_tools/09\_02\_su\_shumaker\_daniel\_paper\_ml.pdf(25/3/2019).
75. Zaman, A., Arnott, J., Mclntyre, K., and Hannon, J. (2018). Resource Harvesting through a Systematic Deconstruction of the Residential House: A Case Study of the ‘Whole House Reuse’ Project in Christchurch, New Zealand. Sustainability, 10.10.20944/preprints201809.0037.v1 ↗
76. Passivhaus Institut (2020, July 14). Passivhaus Institut. Available online: https://passiv.de/.
77. Passive House Institute (2020, June 29). Passive House Institute. Available online: https://passivehouse.com/.
78. Foster, J., Sharpe, T., Poston, A., Morgan, C., and Musau, F. (2016). Scottish Passive House: Insights into Environmental Conditions in Monitored Passive Houses. Sustainability, 8.10.3390/su8050412 ↗
79. Circl (2020, November 11). The Making of Circl. Available online: https://circl.nl/themakingof/en/.
80. Design of non-structural elements for buildings: A review of codal provisions
81. Johnson, C. (2007). Strategies for the Reuse of Temporary Housing. Urban Transformation—Holcim Forum, Ruby Press.
82. Upgrading construction and demolition waste management from downcycling to recycling in the Netherlands10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121718 ↗
83. Mohammed, B. (2018). Behavior of the Dry Bed Joint in the Mortarless Interlocking Masonry System: An Overview. Civ. Eng. Res. J., 4.10.19080/CERJ.2018.04.555639 ↗
84. Collins, J.A., Busby, H.R., and Staab, G.H. (2010). Mechanical Design of Machine Elements and Machines: A Failure Prevention Perspective, Wiley. [2nd ed.].
85. Design of concrete buildings for disassembly: An explorative review10.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.03.005 ↗
86. Durmisevic, E., and Noort, N. (2003). Re-use potential of steel in building construction. Design for Deconstruction and Materials Reuse, CIB Publication.
87. Madanayake, U. (2016, January 20–22). Sustainable implications of building reuse and adaption. Proceedings of the Third World Construction Symposium 2014: Sustainability and Development in Built Environment, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
88. Measuring reuse potential and waste creation of wooden façades10.1088/1755-1315/225/1/012017 ↗
89. Addis, W., and Schouton, J. (2004). Principles of Design for Deconstruction to Facilitate Reuse and Recycling, CIRIA.
90. Lassandro, P. (2003). Deconstruction case study in southern Italy: Economic and environmental assessment. Design for Deconstruction and Materials Reuse, CIB Publication.