Show source-provided references
2. Oberti, I. (2014). Prodotti Edilizi per Edifici Ecocompatibili. Uno Strumento per Orientare la Scelta, Maggioli.
4. Building energy-consumption status worldwide and the state-of-the-art technologies for zero-energy buildings during the past decade
10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.06.089 ↗9. Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy
10. Circular economy in construction: Current awareness, challenges and enablers
11. Osobajo, O.A., Oke, A., Omotayo, T., and Obi, L.I. (2020). A systematic review of circular economy research in the construction industry. SASBE.
10.1108/SASBE-04-2020-0034 ↗12. Kanters, J. (2018). Design for Deconstruction in the Design Process: State of the Art. Buildings, 8.
10.3390/buildings8110150 ↗13. Durmisevic, E., and Brouwer, J. (2002). Design aspects of decomposable building structures. Design for Deconstruction and Materials Reuse, CIB Publication 272.
14. Jackson, M., and Livingston, D. (2001). Building A Deconstruction Company: A Training Guide for Facilitators and Entrepreneurs, Institute for Local Self-Reliance.
15. Bohne, R.A., and Wærner, E. (2014). Barriers for Deconstruction and Reuse/Recycling of Construction Materials in Norway, CIB Publication.
18. Heinrich, M., and Lang, W. (2019). Materials Passports—Best Practice. Innovative Solutions for a Transition to a Circular Economy in the Built Environment, Technische Universität München.
19. Gepts, B., Meex, E., Nuyts, E., Knapen, E., and Verbeeck, G. (2019). Existing databases as means to explore the potential of the building stock as material bank. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., 225.
10.1088/1755-1315/225/1/012002 ↗20. Anticipating and Responding to Deconstruction through Building Design
21. Bertino, G., Fischer, T., Puhr, G., Langergraber, G., and Österreicher, D. (2019). Framework Conditions and Strategies for Pop-up Envi-ronments in Urban Planning. Sustainability, 11.
10.3390/su11247204 ↗22. Pasca, M. (2012). Il Costruito Italiano: Tipologie, Problematiche, Interventi pre e Post Sisma, Sapienza University of Rome.
23. Construction Challenges of Adaptive Reuse of Historical Buildings in Europe
24. De Lachenal, L. (1995). Spolia—Uso e Reimpiego dell’Antico dal III al XIV Secolo, Longanesi.
25. Coarelli, F. (1974). Guida Archeologica di Roma, Illustrati. Arte e Costume, Mondadori.
27. Adinolfi, R. (1976). Monumenti Cristiani Antichi nei Campi Flegrei, Editore Massimo.
28. Middleton, R., and Watkin, D. (1987). Neoclassical and 19th Century Architecture, Faber.
29. Greenhalgh, M. (1990). The Survival of Roman Antiquities in the Middle Ages, Duckworth.
31. Pompili, T. (2006). Networks Within Cities and Among Cities: A Paradigm for Urban Development and Governance, ERSA. ERSA Conference Papers.
32. European Commission (2014). Resource Efficiency Opportunities in the Building Sector, European Commission. EUR-Lex COM/2014/445.
33. European Commission (2015). Closing the Loop—An EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy, European Commission. EUR-Lex COM/2015/614.
34. European Commission (2020, October 08). EU Circular Economy Action Plan: A new Circular Economy Action Plan for a Cleaner and More Competitive Europe. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/circular-economy/.
35. European Commission (2020). A New Circular Economy Action Plan, European Commission. EUR-Lex COM/2020/98.
36. Partnership for Advancing Technology in Housing (2001). A Report on the Feasibility of Deconstruction: An Investigation of Decon-Struction Activity in Four Cities.
37. Ellen MacArthur Foundation, and Google (2020, June 26). Accelerating the Circular Economy through Commercial Deconstruction and Reuse. Available online: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/google-deconstruction-and-reuse.pdf.
39. Design for deconstruction and material reuse
40. Elias-Özkan, S.T. (2002). An Overview of Demolition, Recovery, Reuse and Recycling practices in Turkey. Design for Deconstruction and Materials Reuse, CIB Publication.
41. Design for Disassembly-Themes and Principles
42. Sustainable Building Material for Green Building Construction, Conservation and Refurbishing
44. Crowther, P. (2002). Design for Buildability and the Deconstruction Consequences. Design for Deconstruction and Materials Reuse, CIB Publication.
45. Seemann, A., Schultmann, F., and Rentz, O. (2002). Cost-effective deconstruction by a combination of dismantling, sorting and recycling processes. Design for Deconstruction and Materials Reuse, CIB Publication.
46. Reinhold, M., and Mueller, A. (2002). Lightweight aggregate produced from fine fractions of construction and demolition waste. Design for Deconstruction and Materials Reuse, CIB Publication.
47. Mueller, A., and Stark, U. (2002). Recycling of clay brick. Design for Deconstruction and Materials Reuse, CIB Publication.
48. Schultmann, F., and Renz, O. (2003). Resource-constraint project scheduling for deconstruction projects. Design for Deconstruction and Materials Reuse, CIB Publication.
49. Giglio, F. (2002). Controlling environmental impacts in the dismantling phase. Design for Deconstruction and Materials Reuse, CIB Publication.
50. Bart, J.t.D., and Kowalczyk, T. (2002). Design for recycling. Design for Deconstruction and Materials Reuse, CIB Publication.
51. Macozoma, D.S. (2002). Understanding the Concept of Flexibility in Design for Deconstruction. Design for Deconstruction and Materials Reuse, CIB Publication.
52. Enhancing the circular economy with nature-based solutions in the built urban environment: Green building materials, systems and sites
10.2166/bgs.2019.928 ↗54. Carpinteri, A. (1997). Structural Mechanics: A Unified Approach, CRC Press.
55. Waddell, J. (1916). Bridge Engineering, John Wiley & Sons.
56. Fascia, F., and Iovino, R. (2008). La Struttura in Cemento Armato per l’Architettura. Tecnica e Tecnologia, Aracne.
57. De Sivo, B., Iovino, R., and Cito, G. (1995). Appunti di Architettura Tecnica, Cuen. [5th ed.].
58. Aveta, A. (1990). Materiali e Tecniche Tradizionali nel Napoletano: Note per il Restauro Architettonico, Arte Tipografica.
60. Amati, C. (1829). Dell’architettura di Marco Vitruvio Pollione, Giacomo Pirola.
64. Study and Analysis of Types of Foundation and Design Construction
65. A review and case studies of factors affecting the stability of wooden foundation piles in urban envi-ronments exposed to construction work
10.1016/j.ibiod.2020.104913 ↗66. Smith, R.E. (2011). Prefab Achitecture. A Guide for Architects and Construction Professionals, John Wiley & Sons.
68. Estévez, B., Aguado, A., and Josa, A. (2003). Environmental impact of concrete recycling, coming from CDW. Design for Deconstruction and Materials Reuse, CIB Publication.
69. Chadha, B. (2015). Off-site manufacturing—A way towards lean construction. J. Civ. Eng. Environ. Technol., 2, ISSN 2349879X.
72. Bonfanti, C., Carabellese, A., and Toniolo, G. (2008). Strutture Prefabbricate-Catalogo delle Tipologie Esistenti, Assobeton.
74. Shumaker, D. (2020, June 30). Materials and Design for Deconstruction. Available online: https://soa.utexas.edu/sites/default/disk/analytic\_tools/analytic\_tools/09\_02\_su\_shumaker\_daniel\_paper\_ml.pdf(25/3/2019).
75. Zaman, A., Arnott, J., Mclntyre, K., and Hannon, J. (2018). Resource Harvesting through a Systematic Deconstruction of the Residential House: A Case Study of the ‘Whole House Reuse’ Project in Christchurch, New Zealand. Sustainability, 10.
10.20944/preprints201809.0037.v1 ↗76. Passivhaus Institut (2020, July 14). Passivhaus Institut. Available online: https://passiv.de/.
77. Passive House Institute (2020, June 29). Passive House Institute. Available online: https://passivehouse.com/.
78. Foster, J., Sharpe, T., Poston, A., Morgan, C., and Musau, F. (2016). Scottish Passive House: Insights into Environmental Conditions in Monitored Passive Houses. Sustainability, 8.
10.3390/su8050412 ↗79. Circl (2020, November 11). The Making of Circl. Available online: https://circl.nl/themakingof/en/.
80. Design of non-structural elements for buildings: A review of codal provisions
81. Johnson, C. (2007). Strategies for the Reuse of Temporary Housing. Urban Transformation—Holcim Forum, Ruby Press.
83. Mohammed, B. (2018). Behavior of the Dry Bed Joint in the Mortarless Interlocking Masonry System: An Overview. Civ. Eng. Res. J., 4.
10.19080/CERJ.2018.04.555639 ↗84. Collins, J.A., Busby, H.R., and Staab, G.H. (2010). Mechanical Design of Machine Elements and Machines: A Failure Prevention Perspective, Wiley. [2nd ed.].
86. Durmisevic, E., and Noort, N. (2003). Re-use potential of steel in building construction. Design for Deconstruction and Materials Reuse, CIB Publication.
87. Madanayake, U. (2016, January 20–22). Sustainable implications of building reuse and adaption. Proceedings of the Third World Construction Symposium 2014: Sustainability and Development in Built Environment, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
89. Addis, W., and Schouton, J. (2004). Principles of Design for Deconstruction to Facilitate Reuse and Recycling, CIRIA.
90. Lassandro, P. (2003). Deconstruction case study in southern Italy: Economic and environmental assessment. Design for Deconstruction and Materials Reuse, CIB Publication.