UWB Indoor Localization Using Deep Learning LSTM Networks
Source abstract
Abstract
Localization using ultra-wide band (UWB) signals gives accurate position results for indoor localization. The penetrating characteristics of UWB pulses reduce the multipath effects and identify the user position with precise accuracy. In UWB-based localization, the localization accuracy depends on the distance estimation between anchor nodes (ANs) and the UWB tag based on the time of arrival (TOA) of UWB pulses. The TOA errors in the UWB system, reduce the distance estimation accuracy from ANs to the UWB tag and adds the localization error to the system. The position accuracy of a UWB system also depends on the line of sight (LOS) conditions between the UWB anchors and tag, and the computational complexity of localization algorithms used in the UWB system. To overcome these UWB system challenges for indoor localization, we propose a deep learning approach for UWB localization. The proposed deep learning model uses a long short-term memory (LSTM) network for predicting the user position. The proposed LSTM model receives the distance values from TOA-distance model of the UWB system and predicts the current user position. The performance of the proposed LSTM model-based UWB localization system is analyzed in terms of learning rate, optimizer, loss function, batch size, number of hidden nodes, timesteps, and we also compared the mean localization accuracy of the system with different deep learning models and conventional UWB localization approaches. The simulation results show that the proposed UWB localization approach achieved a 7 cm mean localization error as compared to conventional UWB localization approaches.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies · Speech and Audio Processing · Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Electronics Engineering, Kyungpook National University, 80 Daehak-ro, Buk-gu, Daegu 41566, Korea
Funding
Institute of Information & Communications Technology Planning & Evaluation (IITP) · Samsung Electronics’ University R&D Program
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Alarifi, A., Al-Salman, A., Alsaleh, M., Alnafessah, A., Al-Hadhrami, S., Al-Ammar, M.A., and Al-Khalifa, H.S. (2016). Ultra wideband indoor positioning technologies: Analysis and recent advances. Sensors, 16.10.3390/s16050707 ↗
2. Navarro, M., Prior, S., and Najar, M. (2006, January 25–28). In Low complexity frequency domain TOA estimation for IR-UWB communications. Proceedings of the IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1109/VTCF.2006.155 ↗
3. Chóliz, J., Eguizábal, M., Hernández-Solana, Á., and Valdovinos, A. (2011, January 15–18). Comparison of algorithms for uwb indoor location and tracking systems. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 73rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring), Yokohama, Japan.10.1109/VETECS.2011.5956174 ↗
4. Long short-term memory10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗
5. CNN-based Tx–Rx distance estimation for UWB system localisation10.1049/el.2019.1084 ↗
6. Improving indoor localization using convolutional neural networks on computationally restricted devices10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2817800 ↗
7. Deep belief networks for fingerprinting indoor localization using ultrawideband technology10.1155/2016/5840916 ↗
8. Neural Networks for Fingerprinting-Based Indoor Localization Using Ultra-Wideband10.4304/jcm.4.4.267-275 ↗
9. Poulose, A., Eyobu, O.S., Kim, M., and Han, D.S. (2019, January 2–5). Localization Error Analysis of Indoor Positioning System Based on UWB Measurements. Proceedings of the 2019 Eleventh International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN), Zagreb, Croatia.10.1109/ICUFN.2019.8806041 ↗
10. easurement and modeling of ultrawideband TOA-based ranging in indoor multipath environments10.1109/TVT.2008.926071 ↗
11. Tiemann, J., Eckermann, F., and Wietfeld, C. (2016, January 4–7). Atlas-an open-source tdoa-based ultra-wideband localization system. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN), Alcala de Henares, Spain.10.1109/IPIN.2016.7743707 ↗
12. Povalacč;, A., and SŠebesta, J.ĭ. (2010, January 20–23). Phase of arrival ranging method for UHF RFID tags using instantaneous frequency measurement. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Applied Electromagnetics and Communications, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
13. High resolution 3-D angle of arrival determination for indoor UWB multipath propagation10.1109/TWC.2008.060979 ↗
14. Joint TOA and AOA estimation for UWB localization applications10.1109/TWC.2011.042211.100966 ↗
15. Nilsson, M. (2020, February 07). Performance Comparison of Localization Algorithms for UWB Measurements with Closely Spaced Anchors. Available online: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1251202&dswid=-5043.
16. Sookyoi, T. (2020, January 20). Experimental Analysis of Indoor Positioning System Based on Ultra-Wideband Measurements. Available online: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1055816&dswid=5375.
17. An efficient machine learning approach for indoor localization10.1109/CC.2017.8233657 ↗
18. Kristensen, J.B., Ginard, M.M., Jensen, O.K., and Shen, M. (2019, January 19–22). Non-Line-of-Sight Identification for UWB Indoor Positioning Systems using Support Vector Machines. Proceedings of the IEEE MTT-S International Wireless Symposium (IWS), Guangzhou, China.10.1109/IEEE-IWS.2019.8804072 ↗
19. Kołakowski, M., and Modelski, J. (2018, January 15–17). Detection of Direct Path Component Absence in NLOS UWB Channel. Proceedings of the 22nd International Microwave and Radar Conference (MIKON), Poznan, Poland.10.23919/MIKON.2018.8405190 ↗
20. Zandian, R., and Witkowski, U. (2018, January 25–26). Differential NLOS Error Detection in UWB-based Localization Systems using Logistic Regression. Proceedings of the 15th Workshop on Positioning, Navigation and Communications (WPNC), Bremen, Germany.10.1109/WPNC.2018.8555750 ↗
21. NLOS Identification and Mitigation for Lozalization Based on UWB Experimental Data10.1109/JSAC.2010.100907 ↗
22. Niitsoo, A., Edelhäußer, T., and Mutschler, C. (2018, January 24–27). Convolutional neural networks for position estimation in tdoa-based locating systems. Proceedings of the Nternational Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN), Nantes, France.10.1109/IPIN.2018.8533766 ↗
23. Deep learning-based indoor localization using received signal strength and channel state information10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2903487 ↗
24. Empirical Based Ranging Error Mitigation in IR-UWB: A Fuzzy Approach10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2904201 ↗
25. DeepTAL: Deep Learning for TDOA-Based Asynchronous Localization Security With Measurement Error and Missing Data10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2937975 ↗
26. Khodjaev, J., Narzullaev, A., Park, Y., Jung, W., Lee, J., and Kim, S. (2007, January 22–22). Performance improvement of asynchronous UWB position location algorithm using multiple pulse transmission. Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Positioning, Navigation and Communication, Hannover, Germany.10.1109/WPNC.2007.353629 ↗
27. IEEE 802.15. 4a channel model-final report
28. Poulose, A., Kim, J., and Han, D.S. (2019). A sensor fusion framework for indoor localization using smartphone sensors and Wi-Fi RSSI measurements. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9204379 ↗
29. Poulose, A., Eyobu, O.S., and Han, D.S. (2019, January 11–13). A combined PDR and Wi-Fi trilateration algorithm for indoor localization. Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Information and Communication (ICAIIC), Okinawa, Japan.10.1109/ICAIIC.2019.8669059 ↗
30. LSTM fully convolutional networks for time series classification10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2779939 ↗
31. Zhang, J., Xiao, W., Zhang, S., and Huang, S. (2017). Device-free localization via an extreme learning machine with parameterized geometrical feature extraction. Sensors, 17.10.3390/s17040879 ↗
32. LSTM: A search space odyssey10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2582924 ↗
33. Chung, J., Gulcehre, C., Cho, K., and Bengio, Y. (2014). Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling. arXiv.
34. Zhong, Z., Tang, Z., Li, X., Yuan, T., Yang, Y., Wei, M., Zhang, Y., Sheng, R., Grant, N., and Ling, C. (2018, January 27–30). XJTLUIndoorLoc: A new fingerprinting database for indoor localization and trajectory estimation based on Wi-Fi RSS and geomagnetic field. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Computing and Networking Workshops (CANDARW), Takayama, Japan.10.1109/CANDARW.2018.00050 ↗
35. An efficient indoor localization method based on the long short-term memory recurrent neuron network10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2937831 ↗
36. Dietterich, T.G. (2000, January 21–23). Ensemble methods in machine learning, International workshop on multiple classifier systems. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Multiple Classifier Systems (MCS 2000), Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.