Future of IoT Networks: A Survey
Source abstract
Abstract
The introduction of mobile devices has changed our daily lives. They enable users to obtain information even in a nomadic environment and provide information without limitations. A decade after the introduction of this technology, we are now facing the next innovation that will change our daily lives. With the introduction of the Internet of Things (IoT), our communication ability will not be restricted to only mobile devices. Rather, it will expand to all things with which we coexist. Many studies have discussed IoT-related services and platforms. However, there are only limited discussions about the IoT network. In this paper, we will thoroughly analyze the technical details about the IoT network. Based on our survey of papers, we will provide insight about the future IoT network and the crucial components that will enable it.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: IoT and Edge/Fog Computing · Caching and Content Delivery · Software-Defined Networks and 5G
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
LG Electronics Inc., Seoul 06772, Korea
School of Electrical Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea · Unmanned Vehicles Advanced Core Technology Research and Development Program through the Unmanned Vehicle Advanced Research Center (UVARC)
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Key technologies for 5G, the next generation of mobile networks and services10.1002/dac.3226 ↗
2. Zhao, M. (2015). Discrete Control in the Internet of things and Smart Environments through a Shared Infrastructure. [Ph.D. Thesis, Université Grenoble Alpes].
3. Robustness, Security and Privacy in Location-Based Services for Future IoT: A Survey10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2695525 ↗
4. Create Your Own Internet of Things: A survey of IoT platforms10.1109/MCE.2016.2640718 ↗
5. Data Fusion and IoT for Smart Ubiquitous Environments: A Survey10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2697839 ↗
6. A Survey on Network Methodologies for Real-Time Analytics of Massive IoT Data and Open Research Issues10.1109/COMST.2017.2694469 ↗
7. IoT middleware: A survey on issues and enabling technologies
8. Thoma, M., Meyer, S., Sperner, K., Meissner, S., and Braun, T. (2012, January 20–23). On iot-services: Survey, classification and enterprise integration. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Conference on Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom), Besancon, France.10.1109/GreenCom.2012.47 ↗
9. De, S., Barnaghi, P., Bauer, M., and Meissner, S. (2011, January 18–21). Service modelling for the Internet of Things. Proceedings of the 2011 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), Szczecin, Poland.
10. An Open Semantic Framework for the Industrial Internet of Things10.1109/MIS.2017.9 ↗
11. Dziak, D., Jachimczyk, B., and Kulesza, W.J. (2017). IoT-Based Information System for Healthcare Application: Design Methodology Approach. Appl. Sci., 7.10.3390/app7060596 ↗
12. The internet of things
13. Cha, S., Ruiz, M.P., Wachowicz, M., Tran, L.H., Cao, H., and Maduako, I. (2016, January 12–14). The role of an IoT platform in the design of real-time recommender systems. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 3rd World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT), Reston, VA, USA.10.1109/WF-IoT.2016.7845469 ↗
14. Qualcomm Connected Experiences, Inc. (2014). A Common Language for the Internet of Everything, Qualcomm Connected Experiences, Inc.
15. AllSeen Alliance (2014). Open Source IoT to advance the Internet of Everything, AllSeen Alliance.
16. (2017, October 14). OpenIoT Project. Available online: http://openiot.eu/.
17. Blackstock, M., Kaviani, N., Lea, R., and Friday, A. (December, January 29). MAGIC Broker 2: An open and extensible platform for the Internet of Things. Proceedings of the 2010 Internet of Things (IOT), Tokyo, Japan.10.1109/IOT.2010.5678443 ↗
18. Meeting IoT platform requirements with open pub/sub solutions10.1007/s12243-016-0537-4 ↗
19. Using CoAP Protocol for Resource Observation in IoT
20. Levis, P., Madden, S., Polastre, J., Szewczyk, R., Whitehouse, K., Woo, A., Gay, D., Hill, J., Welsh, M., and Brewer, E. (2005). TinyOS: An operating system for sensor networks. Ambient intelligence, Springer.10.1007/3-540-27139-2_7 ↗
21. Samie, F., Bauer, L., and Henkel, J. (2016, January 2–7). IoT technologies for embedded computing: A survey. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Hardware/Software Codesign and System Synthesis (CODES+ ISSS), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.10.1145/2968456.2974004 ↗
22. McKinsey & Company (2013). Ten IT-Enabled Business Trends for the Decade Ahead, McKinsey Company.
23. Niyato, D., Alsheikh, M.A., Wang, P., Kim, D.I., and Han, Z. (2016, January 22–27). Market model and optimal pricing scheme of big data and Internet of things (IoT). Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.10.1109/ICC.2016.7510922 ↗
24. Chang, Y.C.P., Chen, S., Wang, T.J., and Lee, Y. (2016, January 15–17). Fog Computing Node System Software Architecture and Potential Applications for NB-IoT Industry. Proceedings of the 2016 International Computer Symposium (ICS), Chiayi, Taiwan.10.1109/ICS.2016.0150 ↗
25. Lee, I. (2017). An Exploratory Study of the Impact of the Internet of Things (IoT) on Business Model Innovation: Building Smart Enterprises at Fortune 500 Companies. The Internet of Things: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice, IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-5225-1832-7.ch020 ↗
26. Vermesan, O., Friess, P., Guillemin, P., Gusmeroli, S., Sundmaeker, H., Bassi, A., Jubert, I.S., Mazura, M., Harrison, M., and Eisenhauer, M. (2011). Internet of Things Strategic Research Roadmap, River Publishers.
27. Commission of the European Communities (2011). Specific programme implementing horizon 2020: The framework programme for research and innovation (2014–2020). Off. J. Eur. Union, 811, 965–1041.
28. (2017, October 14). Horizon 2020: Two Years on. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/news/horizon-2020-two-years.
29. European Commission (2010). Seventh Framework Programme. European Research Cluster on the Internet of Things, European Commission.
30. Coetzee, L., and Eksteen, J. (2011, January 11–13). The Internet of Things-promise for the future: An introduction. Proceedings of the 2011 IST-Africa Conference, Gaborone, Botswana.
31. Council, N. (2008). Disruptive Civil Technologies: Six Technologies with Potential Impacts on Us Interests Out to 2025, National Intelligence Council. Conference Report.
32. (2017, October 14). Small Business Technology Transfer Program Phase I, Available online: https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2016/nsf16600/nsf16600.htm/.
33. KPMG (2011). China’s 12th Five-Year Plan: Overview, KPMG China.
34. Hogan Lovells (2013). Internet of Things: Innovation with Chinese Characteristics, Hogan Lovells.
35. (2017, October 14). Internet Plus, Available online: http://english.gov.cn/2016special/internetplus/.
36. Headquarters, I.S. (2009). I-Japan Strategy 2015, National Intelligence Council.
37. European Commission—DG INFSO (2013). ICT-EU Japan Coordinated Call: Objective ICT-2013.10.1, European Commission—DG INFSO.
38. (2017, October 14). The Research Project for ICT System Architecture in the Era of IoT, Available online: http://www.mext.go.jp/.
39. Smart identifier network: A collaborative architecture for the future internet10.1109/MNET.2016.7474343 ↗
40. European Commission (2014). Future Internet Research and Experimentation (FIRE+), European Commission.
41. (2017, October 14). Future Internet Research and Experimentation (FIRE). Available online: https://www.ict-fire.eu/.
42. Mobilityfirst: A robust and trustworthy mobility-centric architecture for the future internet10.1145/2412096.2412098 ↗
43. Anderson, T., Birman, K., Broberg, R., Caesar, M., Comer, D., Cotton, C., Freedman, M.J., Haeberlen, A., Ives, Z.G., and Krishnamurthy, A. (2013). The Nebula Future Internet Architecture, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-38082-2_2 ↗
44. XIA: Architecting a more trustworthy and evolvable internet10.1145/2656877.2656885 ↗
45. Future Internet of things architecture: Like mankind neural system or social organization framework10.1109/LCOMM.2011.022411.110120 ↗
46. Castellani, A.P., Bui, N., Casari, P., Rossi, M., Shelby, Z., and Zorzi, M. (April, January 29). Architecture and protocols for the internet of things: A case study. Proceedings of the 2010 8th IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops), Mannheim, Germany.10.1109/PERCOMW.2010.5470520 ↗
47. Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010 ↗
48. Mellouk, A., Hoceini, S., and Tran, H.A. (2013, January 18–20). Quality of experience vs. quality of service: Application for a CDN Architecture. Proceedings of the 2013 21st International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM), Primosten, Croatia.10.1109/SoftCOM.2013.6671898 ↗
49. A Service-Oriented Structure Model of Internet of Things
50. Cho, K., Lee, M., Park, K., Kwon, T.T., Choi, Y., and Pack, S. (2012, January 25–30). Wave: Popularity-based and collaborative in-network caching for content-oriented networks. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), Orlando, FL, USA.10.1109/INFCOMW.2012.6193512 ↗
51. Nam, Y., Lee, C., Kang, S., and Park, J. (2015, January 28–30). Synchronization among CDN edge severs using P2P networking. Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), Cheju-do, Korea.10.1109/ICTC.2015.7354586 ↗
52. An economic replica placement mechanism for streaming content distribution in Hybrid CDN-P2P networks10.1016/j.comcom.2014.06.007 ↗
53. A Secure IoT Management Architecture Based on Information-Centric Networking10.1016/j.jnca.2016.01.016 ↗
54. Design and implementation of a WLAN/CDMA2000 interworking architecture10.1109/MCOM.2003.1244928 ↗
55. Interworking architecture between 3GPP and WLAN systems10.1109/MCOM.2003.1244926 ↗
56. Interworking techniques and architectures for WLAN/3G integration toward 4G mobile data networks10.1109/MWC.2004.1308950 ↗
57. Enabling direct connectivity between heterogeneous objects in the internet of things through a network-service-oriented architecture
58. (2017, October 14). Internet of Things-Architecture IoT-A Deliverable D1. 3–Updated Reference Model for IoT v1. 5. Available online: http://www.meet-iot.eu/deliverables-IOTA/D1_3.pdf.
59. Network Address Translation for Inbound Connections in Paradigm of Private Network
60. Mayer, K., and Fritsche, W. (2006, January 30–31). IP-enabled wireless sensor networks and their integration into the internet. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Integrated Internet Ad-Hoc and Sensor Networks, Nice, France.10.1145/1142680.1142687 ↗
61. Vilalta, R., Mayoral, A., Pubill, D., Casellas, R., Martínez, R., Serra, J., Verikoukis, C., and Muñoz, R. (2016, January 20–24). End-to-End SDN orchestration of IoT services using an SDN/NFV-enabled edge node. Proceedings of the 2016 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC), Anaheim, CA, USA.10.1364/OFC.2016.W2A.42 ↗
62. Volkov, A., Khakimov, A., Muthanna, A., Kirichek, R., Vladyko, A., and Koucheryavy, A. (2017, January 21–23). Interaction of the IoT Traffic Generated by a Smart City Segment with SDN Core Network. Proceedings of the International Conference on Wired/Wireless Internet Communication, St. Petersburg, Russia.10.1007/978-3-319-61382-6_10 ↗
63. Service-oriented network virtualization architecture for internet of things10.1109/CC.2016.7582308 ↗
64. Network function virtualization: State-of-the-art and research challenges10.1109/COMST.2015.2477041 ↗
65. European Technical Standards Institute (2014). Network Functions Virtualisation—Network Operator Perspectives on Industry Progress, European Technical Standards Institute.
66. Internet of Things–New security and privacy challenges10.1016/j.clsr.2009.11.008 ↗
67. Wurm, J., Hoang, K., Arias, O., Sadeghi, A.R., and Jin, Y. (2016, January 25–28). Security analysis on consumer and industrial iot devices. Proceedings of the 2016 21st Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC), Macao, China.10.1109/ASPDAC.2016.7428064 ↗
68. Datta, S.K., Bonnet, C., and Nikaein, N. (2014, January 6–8). An IoT gateway centric architecture to provide novel M2M services. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT), Seoul, Korea.10.1109/WF-IoT.2014.6803221 ↗
69. Zachariah, T., Klugman, N., Campbell, B., Adkins, J., Jackson, N., and Dutta, P. (2015, January 12–13). The internet of things has a gateway problem. Proceedings of the 16th International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, Santa Fe, NM, USA.10.1145/2699343.2699344 ↗
70. Design and implementation of heterogeneous IOT gateway based on dynamic priority scheduling algorithm10.1177/0142331214527600 ↗
71. Guoqiang, S., Yanming, C., Chao, Z., and Yanxu, Z. (2013, January 20–23). Design and Implementation of a Smart IoT Gateway. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom), 2013 IEEE and Internet of Things (iThings/CPSCom), Beijing, China.10.1109/GreenCom-iThings-CPSCom.2013.130 ↗
72. An IoT Multi-Interface Gateway for Building a Smart Space
73. Datta, S.K., and Bonnet, C. (2014, January 1–3). Smart M2M gateway based architecture for M2M device and Endpoint management. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things (iThings), and Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom), and Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (CPSCom), Taipei, Taiwan.10.1109/iThings.2014.18 ↗
74. Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., and Chen, J. (2016). SDNPS: A Load-Balanced Topic-Based Publish/Subscribe System in Software-Defined Networking. Appl. Sci., 6.10.3390/app6040091 ↗
75. Lantz, B., Heller, B., and McKeown, N. (2010, January 20–21). A network in a laptop: Rapid prototyping for software-defined networks. Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks, Monterey, CA, USA.10.1145/1868447.1868466 ↗
76. OpenFlow: Enabling innovation in campus networks10.1145/1355734.1355746 ↗
77. Reitblatt, M., Canini, M., Guha, A., and Foster, N. (2013, January 12–16). FatTire: Declarative fault tolerance for software-defined networks. Proceedings of the second ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Hot topics in software defined networking, New York, NY, USA.10.1145/2491185.2491187 ↗
78. Maturing of OpenFlow and software-defined networking through deployments10.1016/j.bjp.2013.10.011 ↗
79. A Survey of software-defined networking: Past, present, and future of programmable networks
80. Yang, F., Hughes, D., Matthys, N., and Man, K.L. (2016, January 25–28). The PnP Web Tag: A plug-and-play programming model for connecting IoT devices to the web of things. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Asia Pacific Conference on Circuits and Systems (APCCAS), Jeju, Korea.10.1109/APCCAS.2016.7804000 ↗
81. Houyou, A.M., and Huth, H.P. (2011, January 1–3). Internet of Things at Work: Enabling Plug-and-Work in Automation Networks. Proceedings of Embedded World Conference 2011, Nuremberg, Germany.
82. Baron, L., Klacza, R., Rahman, M.Y., Scognamiglio, C., Friedman, T., Fdida, S., and Saint-Marcel, F. (2016, January 10–15). OneLab: On-demand deployment of IoT over IPv6 Infrastructure as a service for IEEE INFOCOM community. Proceedings of the IEEE Infocom 2016 Live/Video Demonstration, San Francisco, CA, USA.
83. Mulligan, G. (2016). IPv6 for IoT and gateway. Internet of Things and Data Analytics Handbook, John Wiley Sons.10.1002/9781119173601.ch11 ↗
84. (2017, October 14). Transmission of IPv6 Packets over Digital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunications (DECT) Ultra Low Energy (ULE). Available online: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8105.
85. IPv6 Addressing Strategies for IoT10.1109/JSEN.2013.2259691 ↗
86. Enabling IoT interoperability through opportunistic smartphone-based mobile gateways10.1016/j.jnca.2016.10.013 ↗
87. Weightless SIG (2014). Weightless SIG for M2M and Internet of Things (IoT), Weightless SIG.
88. A new internet of things group search optimizer10.1002/dac.2891 ↗
89. Analysis, design and simulation of Internet of Things routing algorithm based on ant colony optimization10.1002/dac.3174 ↗
90. The internet of things: A security point of view10.1108/IntR-07-2014-0173 ↗
91. Lyu, M., Sherratt, D., Sivanathan, A., Gharakheili, H.H., Radford, A., and Sivaraman, V. (2017, January 18–20). Quantifying the reflective DDoS attack capability of household IoT devices. Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Security and Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks, Boston, MA, USA.10.1145/3098243.3098264 ↗
92. Doukas, C., Maglogiannis, I., Koufi, V., Malamateniou, F., and Vassilacopoulos, G. (2012, January 11–13). Enabling data protection through PKI encryption in IoT m-Health devices. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Bioinformatics & Bioengineering (BIBE), Larnaca, Cyprus.10.1109/BIBE.2012.6399701 ↗
93. Certificateless Searchable Public Key Encryption Scheme for Industrial Internet of Things
94. Lee, J.Y., Lin, W.C., and Huang, Y.H. (2014, January 7–10). A lightweight authentication protocol for Internet of Things. Proceedings of the 2014 International Symposium on Next-Generation MISCs (ISNE), Taoyuan, Taiwan.10.1109/ISNE.2014.6839375 ↗
95. Yoon, S., Park, H., and Yoo, H.S. (2015). Security issues on smarthome in IOT environment. Computer Science and Its Applications, Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-45402-2_97 ↗
96. (2017, October 14). Privacy of Big Data in the Internet of Things Era. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.8339.
97. A survey on trust management for Internet of Things10.1016/j.jnca.2014.01.014 ↗
98. Anonymous authentication for privacy-preserving IoT target-driven applications10.1016/j.cose.2013.05.007 ↗
99. Bernabe, J.B., Hernández, J.L., Moreno, M.V., and Gomez, A.F.S. (2014). Privacy-preserving security framework for a social-aware internet of things. Ubiquitous Computing and Ambient Intelligence. Personalisation and User Adapted Services, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-13102-3_67 ↗
100. Quevedo, J., Corujo, D., and Aguiar, R. (2014, January 8–12). A case for ICN usage in IoT environments. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), Austin, TX, USA.10.1109/GLOCOM.2014.7037227 ↗