ChatGPT Challenges Blended Learning Methodologies in Engineering Education: A Case Study in Mathematics
Source abstract
Abstract
This research aims to explore the potential impact of the ChatGPT on b-learning methodologies in engineering education, specifically in mathematics. The study focuses on how the use of these artificial intelligence tools can affect the acquisition of critical thinking, problem-solving, and group work skills among students. The research also analyzes the students’ perception of the reliability, usefulness, and importance of these tools in academia. The study collected data through a survey of 110 students enrolled in a Mathematics I course in BEng Aerospace Engineering where a blended methodology, including flipped teaching, escape room gamification, problem-solving, and laboratory sessions and exams with a computer algebraic system were used. The data collected were analyzed using statistical methods and tests for significance. Results indicate students have quickly adopted ChatGPT tool, exhibiting high confidence in their responses (3.4/5) and general usage in the learning process (3.61/5), alongside a positive evaluation. However, concerns arose regarding the potential impact on developing lateral competencies essential for future engineers (2.8/5). The study concludes that the use of ChatGPT in blended learning methodologies poses new challenges for education in engineering, which requires the adaptation of teaching strategies and methodologies to ensure the development of essential skills for future engineers.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Educational Games and Gamification · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · AI in Service Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Departamento de Matemática Aplicada, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain
Instituto de Diseño y Fabricación, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain
Funding
Technical University of Valencia (UPV)
References (83)
Show source-provided references
1. (2023, March 26). OpenAI. Available online: https://openai.com/.
2. ChatGPT in Research: Balancing Ethics, Transparency and Advancement10.1016/j.neuroscience.2023.02.008 ↗
3. ChatGPT and the rise of generative AI: Threat to academic integrity?10.1016/j.jrt.2023.100060 ↗
4. An era of ChatGPT as a significant futuristic support tool: A study on features, abilities, and challenges10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100089 ↗
5. (2023, March 26). Rytr. Available online: https://rytr.me/.
6. (2023, March 26). Jasper. Available online: https://www.jasper.ai.
7. (2023, March 26). CopyAI. Available online: https://www.copy.ai/?via=start.
8. (2023, March 26). Writesonic. Available online: https://writesonic.com/?via=sign-up-now.
9. (2023, March 26). Kafkai. Available online: https://kafkai.com.
10. (2023, March 26). Copysmith. Available online: https://app.copysmith.ai.
11. (2023, March 26). Article Forge. Available online: https://www.articleforge.com/.
12. Klang, E., and Levy-Mendelovich, S. Evaluation of OpenAI’s large language model as a new tool for writing papers in the field of thrombosis and hemostasis, J. Thromb. Haemost., in press.
13. Gilat, R., and Cole, B.J. How Will Artificial Intelligence Affect Scientific Writing, Reviewing and Editing? The Future is Here…, Arthrosc. J. Arthrosc. Relat. Surg., in press.
14. Alser, M., and Waisberg, E. (2023). Concerns with the usage of ChatGPT in Academia and Medicine: A viewpoint. Am. J. Med. Open, 100036.10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100036 ↗
15. How Does ChatGPT Perform on the United States Medical Licensing Examination? The Implications of Large Language Models for Medical Education and Knowledge Assessment10.2196/45312 ↗
16. ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?
17. Kung, T.H., Cheatham, M., Medenilla, A., Sillos, C., De Leon, L., Elepaño, C., Madriaga, M., Aggabao, R., Diaz-Candido, G., and Maningo, J. (2023). Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. PLoS Digit. Health, 2.10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198 ↗
18. Shen, Y., Heacock, L., Elias, J., Hentel, K.D., Reig, B., Shih, G., and Moy, L. ChatGPT and other large language models are double-edged swords, Radiology, in press.
19. Chen, T.J. (J. Chin. Med. Assoc., 2023). ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence applications speed up scientific writing, J. Chin. Med. Assoc., in press.10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000900 ↗
20. Mhlanga, D. (2023). Open AI in Education, the Responsible and Ethical Use of ChatGPT Towards Lifelong Learning. SSRN, Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4354422.10.2139/ssrn.4354422 ↗
21. Sallam, M. (2023). ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns. Healthcare, 11.10.3390/healthcare11060887 ↗
22. Performing Effective Research Using ChatGPT10.17010/ijcs/2022/v7/i6/172619 ↗
23. Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790 ↗
24. (2023, May 02). European Ministers of Education. Available online: www.ehea.info/cid100210/ministerial-conference-bologna-1999.htm.
25. Chen, L., Tang, X.-J., Liu, Q., and Zhang, X. (2023). Self-directed learning: Alternative for traditional classroom learning in undergraduate ophthalmic education during the COVID-19 pandemic in China. Heliyon, e15632.10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15632 ↗
26. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on elementary school education in Japan10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100239 ↗
27. Assessing the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Nursing Education: A National Study of Prelicensure RN Programs10.1016/S2155-8256(23)00041-8 ↗
28. The Effect of COVID-19 on Education10.1016/j.pcl.2021.05.009 ↗
29. Sánchez Ruiz, L.M., Moll-López, S., Moraño-Fernández, J.A., and Llobregat-Gómez, N. (2021). B-Learning and Technology: Enablers for University Education Resilience. An Experience Case under COVID-19 in Spain. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13063532 ↗
30. Facilitating flexible learning by replacing classroom time with an online learning environment: A systematic review of blended learning in higher education10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100394 ↗
31. Blended learning vs. traditional teaching: The potential of a novel teaching strategy in nursing education—A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103354 ↗
32. Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review10.1016/j.edurev.2017.06.001 ↗
33. What do we mean by blended learning?10.1007/s11528-019-00375-5 ↗
34. Blended, flipped, and hybrid learning
35. Assessing the effectiveness of a hybrid-flipped model of learning on fluid mechanics instruction: Overall course performance, homework, and far- and near-transfer of learning10.1080/03043797.2016.1218826 ↗
36. Developing a framework for sustainable growth of flexible learning opportunities10.1080/23752696.2018.1564879 ↗
37. The choice of reduced seat time in a blended course10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.006 ↗
38. Comparing student success between developmental math courses offered online, blended, and face-to-face
39. It’s not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.006 ↗
40. A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied10.1007/s12528-013-9077-3 ↗
41. Blended learning: The new normal and emerging technologies10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5 ↗
42. The impact of blended teaching on knowledge, satisfaction, and self-directed learning in nursing undergraduates: A randomized, controlled trial10.5480/10-459 ↗
43. Achievement and satisfaction in blended learning versus traditional general health course designs
44. Sánchez-Ruiz, L.M., Moll-López, S., Moraño-Fernández, J.A., and Roselló, D. (2021). Dynamical Continuous Discrete Assessment of Competencies Achievement: An Approach to Continuous Assessment. Mathematics, 9.10.3390/math9172082 ↗
45. An empirical investigation into the role of enjoyment, computer anxiety, computer self-efficacy and Internet experience in influencing the students’ intention to use e-learning: A case study from Saudi Arabian governmental universities
46. Why are faculty members not teaching blended courses? Insights from faculty members10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.011 ↗
47. Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence, and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.009 ↗
48. Lessons learned from the hybrid course project
49. The Effect of the Flipped Classroom Model on Teaching Clinical Practice Skills10.1016/j.jen.2022.09.005 ↗
50. Flipped classroom – A student perspective of an innovative teaching method during the times of pandemic10.1016/j.edumed.2022.100790 ↗
51. Effectiveness of flipped classroom in nursing education: A systematic review of systematic and integrative reviews10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104327 ↗
52. Flipped classroom and a new hybrid “Teach the Airway Teacher” course: An innovative development in airway teaching?10.1016/j.tacc.2022.01.005 ↗
53. A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.004 ↗
54. An update to the systematic literature review of empirical evidence of the impacts and outcomes of computer games and serious games10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.003 ↗
55. A systematic literature review of games-based learning empirical evidence in primary education10.1016/j.compedu.2016.09.001 ↗
56. Bybee, R.W. (2013). The Case for STEM Education: Challenges and Opportunities, NSTA Press.
57. Las emociones en la enseñanza de las ciencias/Emotions in science teaching
58. Successful implementation of user-centered game based learning in higher education: An example from civil engineering10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.026 ↗
59. Menon, D., and Romero, M. (2020). Global Perspectives on Gameful and Playful Teaching and Learning, IGI Global.
60. Nonscientific university students training in general science using an active-learning merged pedagogy: Gamification in a flipped classroom10.3390/educsci9040297 ↗
61. Ross, R., and Bell, C. (2019, January 20–23). Turning the classroom into an escape room with decoder hardware to increase student engagement. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Conference on Games (CoG), London, UK.10.1109/CIG.2019.8848020 ↗
62. Exit for success. Gamifying science and technology for university students using escape-room. A preliminary approach10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04340 ↗
63. Examining the Use of an Educational Escape Room for Teaching Programming in a Higher Education Setting10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2902976 ↗
64. Charlo, J.C.P. (2020). Educational Escape Rooms as a Tool for Horizontal Mathematization: Learning Process Evidence. Educ. Sci., 10.10.3390/educsci10090213 ↗
65. Evaluating an Educational Escape Room Conducted Remotely for Teaching Software Engineering10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3044380 ↗
66. Zhang, F., Doroudian, A., Kaufman, D., Hausknecht, S., Jeremic, J., and Owens, H. (2017). Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Applications, Services and Contexts, Proceedings of the Third International Conference, ITAP 2017, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 9–14 July 2017, Springer.
67. Nicholson, S. (2016). Ask why: Creating a better player experience through environmental storytelling and consistency in escape room design. Meaningful Play, 521–556. Available online: https://scottnicholson.com/pubs/askwhy.pdf.
68. CrashEd—A live immersive, learning experience embedding STEM subjects in a realistic, interactive crime scene10.3402/rlt.v24.30089 ↗
69. Sánchez-Ruiz, L.M., López-Alfonso, S., Moll-López, S., Moraño-Fernández, J.A., and Vega-Fleitas, E. (2022). Educational Digital Escape Rooms Footprint on Students’ Feelings: A Case Study within Aerospace Engineering. Information, 13.10.3390/info13100478 ↗
70. A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes
71. (2023, March 26). Typeform. Available online: https://www.typeform.com.
72. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples)10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591 ↗
73. (2023, April 04). RPG Maker MZ Software. Available online: https://www.rpgmakerweb.com/products/rpg-maker-mz.
74. (2023, April 04). Wolfram Mathematica. Available online: https://www.wolfram.com/mathematica/.
75. (2023, April 04). Wolfram Alpha. Available online: https://www.wolframalpha.com/.
76. (2023, May 05). Nube de Palabras. Available online: https://www.nubedepalabras.es/.
77. Lo, C.K. (2023). What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature. Educ. Sci., 13.10.3390/educsci13040410 ↗
78. Frieder, S., Pinchetti, L., Griffiths, R.R., Salvatori, T., Lukasiewicz, T., Petersen, P.C., Chevalier, A., and Berner, J. (2023). Mathematical Capabilities of ChatGPT. arXiv.
79. Geerling, W., Mateer, G.D., Wooten, J., and Damodaran, N. (2023). Is ChatGPT Smarter than a Student in Principles of Economics?. SSRN, 4356034. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4356034.
80. Mogali, S.R. Initial Impressions of ChatGPT for Anatomy Education, Anat. Sci. Educ., in press.
81. Newton, P.M. (2023). ChatGPT Performance on MCQ-based Exams. EdArXiv.10.35542/osf.io/sytu3 ↗
82. Jalil, S., Rafi, S., LaToza, T.D., Moran, K., and Lam, W. (2023). ChatGPT and Software Testing Education: Promises & Perils. arXiv.10.1109/ICSTW58534.2023.00078 ↗
83. A Conversation on Artificial Intelligence, Chatbots, and Plagiarism in Higher Education10.1007/s12195-022-00754-8 ↗