Show source-provided references
4. Prediction of the axial bearing capacity of piles by SPT-based and numerical design methods
5. Laboratory model tests on consolidation performance of soil column with drained-timber rod
10.1155/2021/6698894 ↗6. ASTM (2008). American Society for Testing and Materials—ASTM D4945-08 Standard Test Method for High-Strain Dynamic Testing of Deep Foundations, ASTM.
7. Schmertmann, J. (1978). Guidelines for Cone Penetration Test: Performance and Design.
9. Methods for Estimating the Load Bearing Capacity of Pile Foundation Using the Results of Penetration Tests—Case Study of Road Viaduct Foundation
10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.839 ↗10. Birid, K.C. (2018). Evaluation of Ultimate Pile Compression Capacity from Static Pile Load Test Results. International Congress and Exhibition “Sustainable Civil Infrastructures: Innovative Infrastructure Geotechnology”, Springer.
10.1007/978-3-319-61642-1_1 ↗11. Pile-Soil Stress Ratio and Settlement of Composite Foundation Bidirectionally Reinforced by Piles and Geosynthetics under Embankment Load
10.1155/2021/5575878 ↗12. Tang, Y., Huang, S., and Tao, J. (2020). Geo-Congress 2020, ASCE. GSP 320 121.
14. Comparative study on prediction of axial bearing capacity of driven piles in granular materials
15. Lopes, F.R., and Laprovitera, H. (1988, January 7–10). Prediction of the Bearing Capacity of Bored Piles from Dynamic Penetration Tests. Proceedings of the 1st International Geoteclmical Seminar on Deep Foundations on Bored and Auger Piles, Ghent, Belgium.
16. Decourt, L. (, 1995). Prediction of load-settlement relationships for foundations on the basis of the SPT. Proceedings of the Ciclo de Conferencias Internationale, Leonardo Zeevaert, UNAM, Mexico City, Mexico.
17. Pham, T.A., Ly, H.-B., Tran, V.Q., Van Giap, L., Vu, H.-L.T., and Duong, H.-A.T. (2020). Prediction of Pile Axial Bearing Capacity Using Artificial Neural Network and Random Forest. Appl. Sci., 10.
10.3390/app10051871 ↗18. Probabilistic evaluation of CPT-based seismic soil liquefaction potential: Towards the integration of interpretive structural modeling and bayesian belief network
10.3934/mbe.2021454 ↗19. Ahmad, M., Tang, X.-W., Ahmad, F., and Jamal, A. (2018). Assessment of Soil Liquefaction Potential in Kamra, Pakistan. Sustainability, 10.
10.3390/su10114223 ↗20. Ahmad, M., Al-Shayea, N.A., Tang, X.-W., Jamal, A., Al-Ahmadi, H.M., and Ahmad, F. (2020). Predicting the Pillar Stability of Underground Mines with Random Trees and C4.5 Decision Trees. Appl. Sci., 10.
10.3390/app10186486 ↗21. Liu, Q., Cao, Y., and Wang, C. (2019, January 15–17). Prediction of Ultimate Axial Load-Carrying Capacity for Driven Piles Using Machine Learning Methods. Proceedings of the 3rd Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Conference, Chengdu, China.
10.1109/ITNEC.2019.8729429 ↗22. Ahmad, M., Ahmad, F., Wróblewski, P., Al-Mansob, R.A., Olczak, P., Kamiński, P., Safdar, M., and Rai, P. (2021). Prediction of Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations on Cohesionless Soils: A Gaussian Process Regression Approach. Appl. Sci., 11.
10.3390/app112110317 ↗23. Liang, W., Luo, S., Zhao, G., and Wu, H. (2020). Predicting hard rock pillar stability using GBDT, XGBoost, and LightGBM algorithms. Mathematics, 8.
10.3390/math8050765 ↗24. Development of artificial intelligence models for the prediction of Compression Coefficient of soil: An application of Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.061 ↗25. Ahmad, M., Tang, X.-W., Qiu, J.-N., and Ahmad, F. (2019). Evaluating Seismic Soil Liquefaction Potential Using Bayesian Belief Network and C4.5 Decision Tree Approaches. Appl. Sci., 9.
10.3390/app9204226 ↗26. Ahmad, M., Kamiński, P., Olczak, P., Alam, M., Iqbal, M., Ahmad, F., Sasui, S., and Khan, B. (2021). Development of Prediction Models for Shear Strength of Rockfill Material Using Machine Learning Techniques. Appl. Sci., 11.
10.3390/app11136167 ↗27. Ahmad, M., Hu, J.-L., Hadzima-Nyarko, M., Ahmad, F., Tang, X.-W., Rahman, Z., Nawaz, A., and Abrar, M. (2021). Rockburst Hazard Prediction in Underground Projects Using Two Intelligent Classification Techniques: A Comparative Study. Symmetry, 13.
10.3390/sym13040632 ↗28. Ahmad, M., Hu, J.-L., Ahmad, F., Tang, X.-W., Amjad, M., Iqbal, M., Asim, M., and Farooq, A. (2021). Supervised Learning Methods for Modeling Concrete Compressive Strength Prediction at High Temperature. Materials, 14.
10.3390/ma14081983 ↗32. Intelligent computing for modeling axial capacity of pile foundations
10.1139/T09-094 ↗35. Artificial intelligence techniques for the design and analysis of deep foundations
38. Pham, T.A., Tran, V.Q., Vu, H.L.T., and Ly, H.B. (2020). Design deep neural network architecture using a genetic algorithm for estimation of pile bearing capacity. PLoS ONE, 15.
10.1371/journal.pone.0243030 ↗41. Binary logistic regression versus stochastic gradient boosted decision trees in assessing landslide susceptibility for multiple-occurring landslide events: Application to the 2009 storm event in Messina (Sicily, southern Italy)
10.1007/s11069-015-1915-3 ↗44. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA.
10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗45. Ke, G., Meng, Q., Finley, T., Wang, T., Chen, W., Ma, W., Ye, Q., and Liu, T.-Y. (2017, January 4–9). LightGBM: A Highly Efficient Gradient Boosting Decision Tree. Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Long Beach, CA, USA.
47. Modeling of transport demand—Analyzing, calculating, and forecasting transport demand
48. Susceptibility assessment of earthquake-induced landslides using Bayesian network: A case study in Beichuan, China
10.1016/j.cageo.2011.09.011 ↗49. Kaggle (2021, December 02). Your Machine Learning and Data Science Community. Available online: https://www.kaggle.com/.
51. Trees vs Neurons: Comparison between random forest and ANN for high-resolution prediction of building energy consumption
10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.04.038 ↗52. Freund, Y., and Schapire, R.E. (1996, January 3–6). Experiments with a New Boosting Algorithm. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning, Bari, Italy.
54. Seo, D.K., Kim, Y.H., Eo, Y.D., Park, W.Y., and Park, H.C. (2017). Generation of Radiometric, Phenological Normalized Image Based on Random Forest Regression for Change Detection. Remote Sens., 9.
10.3390/rs9111163 ↗56. Hsu, C.W., Chang, C.C., and Lin, C.J. (2003). A Practical Guide to Support Vector Classification, National Taiwan University. Available online: http//www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin.
60. Uslan, V., and Seker, H. (2013, January 3–7). Support Vector-Based Takagi-Sugeno Fuzzy System for the Prediction of Binding Affinity of Peptides. Proceedings of the 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Osaka, Japan.
10.1109/EMBC.2013.6610437 ↗62. Amirkiyaei, V., and Ghasemi, E. (2020). Stability assessment of slopes subjected to circular-type failure using tree-based models. Int. J. Geotech. Eng., 1862538.
10.1080/19386362.2020.1862538 ↗63. Predicting intact rock strength for mechanical excavation using multivariate statistics, artificial neural networks, and regression trees
10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.02.003 ↗65. Quantifying hourly suspended sediment load using data mining models: Case study of a glacierized Andean catchment in Chile
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.10.015 ↗67. A hierarchical analysis for rock engineering using artificial neural networks
10.1007/BF01045717 ↗68. Prediction of ground vibration due to quarry blasting based on gene expression programming: A new model for peak particle velocity prediction
10.1007/s13762-016-0979-2 ↗69. A new design of evolutionary hybrid optimization of SVR model in predicting the blast-induced ground vibration
10.1007/s00366-019-00895-x ↗73. Prediction of Interpreted Failure Loads of Rock-Socketed Piles in Mumbai Region using Hybrid Artificial Neural Networks with Genetic Algorithm