Deep and Meaningful E-Learning with Social Virtual Reality Environments in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review
Source abstract
Abstract
Deep and meaningful learning (DML) in distant education should be an essential outcome of quality education. In this literature review, we focus on e-learning effectiveness along with the factors and conditions leading to DML when using social virtual reality environments (SVREs) in distance mode higher education (HE). Hence, a systematic literature review was conducted summarizing the findings from thirty-three empirical studies in HE between 2004 (appearance of VR) and 2019 (before coronavirus appearance). We searched for the cognitive, social, and affective aspects of DML in a research framework and studied their weight in SVREs. The findings suggest that the use of SVREs can provide authentic, simulated, cognitively challenging experiences in engaging, motivating environments for open-ended social and collaborative interactions and intentional, personalized learning. Furthermore, the findings indicate that educators and SVRE designers need to place more emphasis on the socio-cultural semiotics and emotional aspects of e-learning and ethical issues such as privacy and security. The mediating factors for DML in SVREs were accumulated and classified in the resultant Blended Model for Deep and Meaningful e-learning in SVREs. Improvement recommendations include meaningful contexts, purposeful activation, learner agency, intrinsic emotional engagement, holistic social integration, and meticulous user obstacle removal.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts · Online and Blended Learning · Impact of Technology on Adolescents
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Natural Sciences, University of Patras, GR-2504 Patras, Greece
Faculty of Information Technology, University of Jyväskylä, FI-40014 Jyväskylä, Finland
Faculty of Education and Culture, Tampere University, FI-33100 Tampere, Finland
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X ↗
2. Hartnett, M. (2016). The Importance of Motivation in Online Learning. Motivation in Online Education, Springer.10.1007/978-981-10-0700-2 ↗
3. Emotional obstacles for e-learning—A user psychological analysis
4. An overview of the history of learning theory10.1111/ejed.12265 ↗
5. On Qualitative Differences in Learning—II Outcome as a Function of the Learner’s Conception of the Task10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02304.x ↗
6. Mystakidis, S. (2019). Motivation Enhanced Deep and Meaningful Learning with Social Virtual Reality. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Jyväskylä].
7. Ohlsson, S. (2011). Deep Learning: How the Mind Overrides Experience, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511780295 ↗
8. Measuring the quality of e-learning10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00777.x ↗
9. Valtanen, J., Berki, E., Kampylis, P., and Theodorakopoulou, M. (2008, January 22–25). Manifold Thinking And Distributed Problem-Based Learning: Is There Potential For ICT Support?. Proceedings of the e-Learning’08 Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
10. Deep and surface learning in problem-based learning: A review of the literature10.1007/s10459-015-9645-6 ↗
11. In Defense of Verbal Learning10.1111/j.1741-5446.1961.tb00038.x ↗
12. Howland, J.L., Jonassen, D.H., and Marra, R.M. (2011). Meaningful Learning with Technology, Pearson. [4th ed.].
13. Learning in Communities of Inquiry: A Review of the Literature
14. Fink, L.D. (2003). Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses, Jossey-Bass.
15. Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6 ↗
16. The Patras Blended Strategy Model for Deep and Meaningful Learning in Quality Life-Long Distance Education10.34190/JEL.17.2.01 ↗
17. Uhomoibhi, J., Dewar, E., Georgiadou, E., Linecar, P., Marchbank, P., Ross, M., and Staples, G. (2020, January 16). Challenges of Rapid Migration to Fully Virtual Education in the Age of the Coronavirus Pandemic: Experiences from Across the World. Proceedings of the 25th Annual INSPIRE Conference, Online.
18. Transitioning from Emergency Remote Learning to Deep Online Learning Experiences in Geography Education
19. Learning in the age of SARS-COV-2: A quantitative study of learners’ performance in the age of emergency remote teaching10.1016/j.caeo.2020.100016 ↗
20. Interest, Learning, and Motivation10.1080/00461520.1991.9653136 ↗
21. Intrinsic Versus Extrinsic Motivation: An Approach/Avoidance Reformulation10.1023/A:1009009219144 ↗
22. Motivational Profiles of Adult Learners10.1177/0741713616669588 ↗
23. Can Anyone Offer any Words of Encouragement?” Online Dialogue as a Support Mechanism for Preservice Teachers
24. Design of Virtual Learning Environments for Deep Learning
25. Social presence and motivation in a three-dimensional virtual world: An explanatory study10.14742/ajet.425 ↗
26. Virtual Team Work: Group Decision Making in 3D Virtual Environments10.1177/0093650213509667 ↗
27. Teaching and learning in Second Life: Using the Community of Inquiry (CoI) model to support online instruction with graduate students in instructional technology10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.12.003 ↗
28. Use of three-dimensional (3-D) immersive virtual worlds in K-12 and higher education settings: A review of the research10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00900.x ↗
29. A meta-analytic examination of the instructional effectiveness of computer-based simulation games10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01190.x ↗
30. Educational virtual environments: A ten-year review of empirical research (1999–2009)10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.020 ↗
31. Use of Second Life in K-12 and Higher Education: A Review of Research
32. Review of Virtual Environment Studies on Social and Group Phenomena10.1177/1046496410388946 ↗
33. A taxonomy of virtual worlds usage in education10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01263.x ↗
34. Second Life in education: A review of publications from its launch to 201110.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01334.x ↗
35. A Decade of Research on the Use of Three-Dimensional Virtual Worlds in Health Care: A Systematic Literature Review10.2196/jmir.3097 ↗
36. The Components of Effective Teacher Training in the Use of Three-Dimensional Immersive Virtual Worlds for Learning and Instruction Purposes: A Literature Review
37. Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students’ learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.033 ↗
38. 3D virtual learning environments in education: A meta-review10.1007/s12564-016-9467-0 ↗
39. Exploring the educational potential of three-dimensional multi-user virtual worlds for STEM education: A mixed-method systematic literature review10.1007/s10639-016-9537-2 ↗
40. Learning activities as enactments of learning affordances in MUVEs: A review-based classification10.1007/s10639-018-9690-x ↗
41. A systematic review of research about game-based learning in virtual worlds10.3897/jucs.2020.054 ↗
42. What’s the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education
43. What Makes the Difference? A Practical Analysis of Research on the Effectiveness of Distance Education10.1177/016146810510700812 ↗
44. Second Life in higher education: Assessing the potential for and the barriers to deploying virtual worlds in learning and teaching10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00952.x ↗
45. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G., and The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med., 6.10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 ↗
46. Kitchenham, B.A. (2004). Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews—Technical Report TR/SE-0401, Keele University.
47. Songkram, N., Chootongchai, S., Khlaisang, J., and Koraneekij, P. (2019). Education 3.0 system to enhance twenty-first century skills for higher education learners in Thailand. Interact. Learn. Environ., 1–17.10.1080/10494820.2019.1592197 ↗
48. Grivokostopoulou, F., Kovas, K., and Perikos, I. (2020). The Effectiveness of Embodied Pedagogical Agents and Their Impact on Students Learning in Virtual Worlds. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10051739 ↗
49. Fragkaki, M., Mystakidis, S., Hatzilygeroudis, I., Kovas, K., Palkova, Z., Salah, Z., Hamed, G., Khalilia, W.M., and Ewais, A. (2020, January 6–8). Tpack instructional design model in virtual reality for deeper learning in science and higher education: From “apathy” to “empathy”. Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (EDULEARN20), Palma, Spain.10.21125/edulearn.2020.0943 ↗
50. Mystakidis, S. (2020, January 15–17). Distance Education Gamification in Social Virtual Reality: A Case Study on Student Engagement. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications (IISA 2020), Piraeus, Greece.10.1109/IISA50023.2020.9284417 ↗
51. Relative status of journal and conference publications in computer science10.1145/1839676.1839701 ↗
52. Reexamining the role of conference papers in scholarly communication10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199505)46:4<299::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-0 ↗
53. Interaction with Educational Games in Hybrid Virtual Worlds10.1177/0047239518757986 ↗
54. Place presence, social presence, co-presence, and satisfaction in virtual worlds10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.024 ↗
55. Fostering collaborative learning in Second Life: Metaphors and affordances10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.021 ↗
56. The effects of collaborative models in second life on French learning10.1007/s11423-015-9379-4 ↗
57. Fostering argumentative knowledge construction through enactive role play in Second Life10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.009 ↗
58. Future Game Developers within a Virtual World: Learner Archetypes and Team Leader Attributes
59. Mystakidis, S., Berki, E., and Valtanen, J. (2017, January 3–5). Toward Successfully Integrating Mini Learning Games into Social Virtual Reality Environments—Recommendations for Improving Open and Distance Learning. Proceedings of the 9th Annual International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (EDULEARN17), Barcelona, Spain.10.21125/edulearn.2017.1203 ↗
60. Learning in the zone: A social constructivist framework for distance education in a 3-dimensional virtual world10.1080/10494820600909157 ↗
61. Stiubiener, I., Barbosa, W., Kamienski, C.A., and Schweitzer, C.M. (2011, January 12–15). Using Virtual Worlds in distance learning environments. Proceedings of the 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Rapid City, SD, USA.10.1109/FIE.2011.6142822 ↗
62. Creswell, J.W. (2014). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, Pearson Education. [4th ed.].
63. Meltzoff, J. (2007). Critical Thinking about Research, American Psychological Association.
64. Evidence-Based Practice: Critical Appraisal of Qualitative Evidence10.1177/1078390309338733 ↗
65. Turnbull, S. (2018). A Guide to UK League Tables in Higher Education, Higher Education Policy Institute.
66. Three-dimensional virtual worlds and distance learning: Two case studies of Active Worlds as a medium for distance education10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00477.x ↗
67. Teaching Marketing Through a Micro-Economy in Virtual Reality10.1177/0273475311420236 ↗
68. A collaborative working environment for small group meetings in Second Life10.1186/2193-1801-2-281 ↗
69. On the value of Second Life for students’ engagement in blended and online courses: A comparative study from the Higher Education in Greece10.1007/s10639-013-9294-4 ↗
70. Evaluation of Learning Efficiency and Efficacy in a Multi-User Virtual Environment10.1080/21532974.2010.10784659 ↗
71. Instructional and Design Elements That Support Effective Use of Virtual Worlds: What Graduate Student Work Reveals about Second Life
72. Game-like language learning in 3-D virtual environments10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.001 ↗
73. Language learning in Second Life: American and Turkish Students’ Experiences
74. Virtual Engineering Sciences Learning Lab: Giving STEM Education a Second Life10.1109/TLT.2015.2419253 ↗
75. Learning in a Virtual World: Experience with Using Second Life for Medical Education10.2196/jmir.1337 ↗
76. Second Life as a support element for learning electronic related subjects: A real case10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.019 ↗
77. SLurtles: Supporting constructionist learning in Second Life10.1016/j.compedu.2012.08.005 ↗
78. Really Engaging Accounting: Second Life™ as a Learning Platform10.2308/iace.2010.25.3.361 ↗
79. Mystakidis, S., Berki, E., and Valtanen, J. (2017, January 3–5). Designing and implementing a big open online course by using a 3d virtual immersive environment—Lessons learned. Proceedings of the 9th Annual International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (EDULEARN17), Barcelona, Spain.10.21125/edulearn.2017.0487 ↗
80. The role of emotions and task significance in Virtual Education10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.03.002 ↗
81. Learning by teaching with virtual peers and the effects of technological design choices on learning10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.005 ↗
82. Learning effects of an experimental EFL program in Second Life10.1007/s11423-012-9259-0 ↗
83. Using virtual online simulations in Second Life® to engage undergraduate psychology students with employability issues10.1111/bjet.12307 ↗
84. Students’ Evaluation of a Virtual World for Procedural Training in a Tertiary-Education Course
85. Vrellis, I., Avouris, N., and Mikropoulos, T.A. (2016). Learning outcome, presence and satisfaction from a science activity in Second Life. Australas. J. Educ. Technol., 32.10.14742/ajet.2164 ↗
86. Exploring the meaningful learning of students in second life
87. Learning in 3-D multiuser virtual environments: Exploring the use of unique 3-D attributes for online problem-based learning10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00941.x ↗
88. The influence of computer self-efficacy, metacognitive self-regulation and self-esteem on student engagement in online learning programs: Evidence from the virtual world of Second Life10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.048 ↗
89. Virtual Worlds and Course Dialogue10.1080/08923647.2012.655053 ↗
90. Developing simulations in multi-user virtual environments to enhance healthcare education10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01057.x ↗
91. Learner perceptions and recall of small group discussions within 2D and 3D collaborative environments10.14742/ajet.778 ↗
92. Collaboration modality, cognitive load, and science inquiry learning in virtual inquiry environments10.1007/s11423-010-9152-7 ↗
93. Interacting through avatars: Virtual worlds as a context for online education10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.007 ↗
94. Institutional boundaries and trust of virtual teams in collaborative design: An experimental study in a virtual world environment10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.051 ↗
95. Ozonur, M., Yanpar Yelken, T., and Sancar Tokmak, H. (2018). Social presence and motivation in online environments: Second Life versus the Enocta Learning Management System/Adobe Connect. Australas. J. Educ. Technol., 34.10.14742/ajet.3128 ↗
96. Socialisation for learning at a distance in a 3-D multi-user virtual environment10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00962.x ↗
97. Getting the Mix Right Again: An Updated and Theoretical Rationale for Interaction
98. Conceptions of learning and knowledge in higher education: Relationships with study behaviour and influences of learning environments10.1016/j.ijer.2005.08.009 ↗
99. Implementing the liquid curriculum: The impact of virtual world learning on higher education10.1080/1475939X.2014.959454 ↗
100. Keith Sawyer, R. (2006). Knowledge Building: Theory, Pedagogy, and Technology. The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, Cambridge University Press.