journal article·2020-06-29Open access

Towards a Better Understanding of Transfer Learning for Medical Imaging: A Case Study

Laith Alzubaidi, Mohammed A. Fadhel, Omran Al-Shamma, Jinglan Zhang, J. Santamaría, Ye Duan, Sameer R. Oleiwi

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 13

Abstract

One of the main challenges of employing deep learning models in the field of medicine is a lack of training data due to difficulty in collecting and labeling data, which needs to be performed by experts. To overcome this drawback, transfer learning (TL) has been utilized to solve several medical imaging tasks using pre-trained state-of-the-art models from the ImageNet dataset. However, there are primary divergences in data features, sizes, and task characteristics between the natural image classification and the targeted medical imaging tasks. Therefore, TL can slightly improve performance if the source domain is completely different from the target domain. In this paper, we explore the benefit of TL from the same and different domains of the target tasks. To do so, we designed a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) model that integrates three ideas including traditional and parallel convolutional layers and residual connections along with global average pooling. We trained the proposed model against several scenarios. We utilized the same and different domain TL with the diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) classification task and with the animal classification task. We have empirically shown that the source of TL from the same domain can significantly improve the performance considering a reduced number of images in the same domain of the target dataset. The proposed model with the DFU dataset achieved F1-score value of 86.6% when trained from scratch, 89.4% with TL from a different domain of the targeted dataset, and 97.6% with TL from the same domain of the targeted dataset.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management · COVID-19 diagnosis using AI · AI in cancer detection

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Science & Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia

Al-Nidhal Campus, University of Information Technology & Communications, Baghdad 00964, Iraq

College of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Sumer, Thi Qar 64005, Iraq

Department of Computer Science, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain

Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA

Nursing College, Muthanna University, Muthanna 76218, Iraq

References (75)

Show source-provided references
1. Risk assessment of patients with diabetes for foot ulcers according to risk classification consensus of International Working Group on Diabetic Foot (IWGDF)
2. Trends in prevalence of diabetes in Asian countries10.4239/wjd.v3.i6.110 ↗
3. Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 203010.1016/j.diabres.2009.10.007 ↗
4. IDF diabetes atlas: Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2011 and 203010.1016/j.diabres.2011.10.029 ↗
5. Nurses’ role in diabetic foot prevention and care; a review10.1186/2251-6581-11-24 ↗
6. Diabetic foot ulcers: Part II. Management10.1016/j.jaad.2013.07.048 ↗
7. Treatment for diabetic foot ulcers10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67699-4 ↗
8. Epidemiology of diabetic foot
9. Epidemiology of diabetic foot problems10.1016/S0248-8663(08)73949-3 ↗
10. Epidemiology of diabetic foot problems and predictive factors for limb loss10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2007.04.004 ↗
11. Prevalence of diabetic foot ulcer and its associated risk factors among diabetic patients in Jordan
12. Prevention of diabetic foot ulcer
13. Assessment and treatment of diabetic foot ulcer10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01534.x ↗
14. Diabetic foot ulcers—Effects on quality of life, costs, and mortality and the role of standard wound care and advanced-care therapies in healing: A review
15. Automatic detection of diabetic foot complications with infrared thermography by asymmetric analysis10.1117/1.JBO.20.2.026003 ↗
16. Diagnostic values for skin temperature assessment to detect diabetes-related foot complications10.1089/dia.2014.0052 ↗
17. Area determination of diabetic foot ulcer images using a cascaded two-stage SVM-based classification10.1109/TBME.2016.2632522 ↗
18. Goyal, M., Yap, M.H., Reeves, N.D., Rajbhandari, S., and Spragg, J. (2017, January 5–8). Fully convolutional networks for diabetic foot ulcer segmentation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), Banff, AB, Canada.10.1109/SMC.2017.8122675 ↗
19. Enhanced assessment of the wound-healing process by accurate multiview tissue classification10.1109/TMI.2010.2077739 ↗
20. Kolesnik, M., and Fexa, A. (2005, January 28–30). Multi-dimensional color histograms for segmentation of wounds in images. Proceedings of the International Conference Image Analysis and Recognition, Toronto, ON, Canada.10.1007/11559573_123 ↗
21. Kolesnik, M., and Fexa, A. (2006, January 7–9). How robust is the SVM wound segmentation?. Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Signal Processing Symposium-NORSIG, Reykjavik, Iceland.10.1109/NORSIG.2006.275274 ↗
22. Binary tissue classification on wound images with neural networks and bayesian classifiers10.1109/TMI.2009.2033595 ↗
23. Deep learning10.1038/nature14539 ↗
24. Bajwa, M.N., Muta, K., Malik, M.I., Siddiqui, S.A., Braun, S.A., Homey, B., Dengel, A., and Ahmed, S. (2020). Computer-aided diagnosis of skin diseases using deep neural networks. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10072488 ↗
25. Alzubaidi, L., Fadhel, M.A., Al-Shamma, O., Zhang, J., and Duan, Y. (2020). Deep learning models for classification of red blood cells in microscopy images to aid in sickle cell anemia diagnosis. Electronics, 9.10.3390/electronics9030427 ↗
26. Luján-García, J.E., Yáñez-Márquez, C., Villuendas-Rey, Y., and Camacho-Nieto, O. (2020). A transfer learning method for pneumonia classification and visualization. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10082908 ↗
27. Alzubaidi, L., Al-Shamma, O., Fadhel, M.A., Zhang, J., and Duan, Y. (2020). Optimizing the performance of breast cancer classification by employing the same domain transfer learning from hybrid deep convolutional neural network model. Electronics, 9.10.3390/electronics9030445 ↗
28. Goyal, M., Reeves, N.D., Davison, A.K., Rajbhandari, S., Spragg, J., and Yap, M.H. (2018). DFUNET: Convolutional neural networks for diabetic foot ulcer classification. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. Intell., 1–12.10.1109/SMC.2017.8122675 ↗
29. DFU_QUTNet: Diabetic foot ulcer classification using novel deep convolutional neural network10.1007/s11042-019-07820-w ↗
30. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Hinton, G.E. (2012, January 3–6). ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Lake Tahoe, NV, USA.
31. Wang, J., Yang, J., Yu, K., Lv, F., Huang, T., and Gong, Y. (2010, January 13–18). Locality-constrained linear coding for image classification. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2010.5540018 ↗
32. Rasheed, N., Khan, S.A., and Khalid, A. (2014, January 13–16). Tracking and abnormal behavior detection in video surveillance using optical flow and neural networks. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops, Victoria, BC, Canada.10.1109/WAINA.2014.18 ↗
33. 3D traffic scene understanding from movable platforms10.1109/TPAMI.2013.185 ↗
34. Object tracking benchmark10.1109/TPAMI.2014.2388226 ↗
35. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016, January 27–30). Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
36. Distance metric learning for large margin nearest neighbor classification
37. Simonyan, K., and Zisserman, A. (2014). Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv.
38. Fung, G., Mangasarian, O.L., and Shavlik, J. (2002). Knowledge-based support vector machine classifiers. The Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation (NIPS 2002), MIT Press.10.1137/1.9781611972726.15 ↗
39. Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., and Rabinovich, A. (2015, January 7–12). Going deeper with convolutions. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Boston, MA, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298594 ↗
40. Simonyan, K., Vedaldi, A., and Zisserman, A. (2014, January 14–16). Deep inside convolutional networks: Visualising image classification models and saliency maps. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations Workshop, Banff, AB, Canada.
41. Zeiler, M.D., and Fergus, R. (2014, January 6–12). Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, Zurich, Switzerland.10.1007/978-3-319-10590-1_53 ↗
42. Learning deep architectures for AI10.1561/2200000006 ↗
43. Cireşan, D., Meier, U., and Schmidhuber, J. (2012, January 16–21). Multi-column deep neural networks for image classification. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Providence, RI, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2012.6248110 ↗
44. Deep convolutional neural networks for image classification: A comprehensive review10.1162/neco_a_00990 ↗
45. Guo, J., Zhang, S., and Li, J. (2016, January 19–22). Hash learning with convolutional neural networks for semantic based image retrieval. Proceedings of the Pacific-Asia Conference Knowledge Discovery Data Mining, Auckland, New Zealand.10.1007/978-3-319-31753-3_19 ↗
46. Region-based convolutional networks for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation10.1109/TPAMI.2015.2437384 ↗
47. Image recognition with deep neural networks in presence of noise—Dealing with and taking advantage of distortions10.3233/ICA-170551 ↗
48. Shang, W., Sohn, K., Almeida, D., and Lee, H. (2016, January 19–24). Understanding and improving convolutional neural networks via concatenated rectified linear units. Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), New York, NY, USA.
49. Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting
50. Ioffe, S., and Szegedy, C. (2015, January 6–11). Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. Proceedings of the International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning, Lille, France.
51. Deep convolutional network based on pyramid architecture10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2860785 ↗
52. Targ, S., Almeida, D., and Lyman, K. (2016). ResNet in ResNet: Generalizing residual architectures. arXiv.
53. Zagoruyko, S., and Komodakis, N. (2016). Wide residual networks. arXiv.10.5244/C.30.87 ↗
54. Veit, A., Wilber, M.J., and Belongie, S. (2016, January 5–10). Residual networks behave like ensembles of relatively shallow networks. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Barcelona, Spain.
55. Szegedy, C., Ioffe, S., Vanhoucke, V., and Alemi, A. (2017, January 4–9). Inception-v4 Inception-ResNet and the impact of residual connections on learning. Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1609/aaai.v31i1.11231 ↗
56. Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., Shlens, J., and Wojna, Z. (2016, January 27–30). Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.308 ↗
57. Larsson, G., Maire, M., and Shakhnarovich, G. (2016). FractalNet: Ultra-Deep Neural Networks Without Residuals. arXiv.
58. Zhao, L., Wang, J., Li, X., Tu, Z., and Zeng, W. (2016). On the connection of deep fusion to ensembling. arXiv.
59. Wang, J., Wei, Z., Zhang, T., and Zeng, W. (2016). Deeply-fused nets. arXiv.
60. Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.J., Li, K., and Fei-Fei, L. (2009, January 20–25). ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Miami, FL, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206848 ↗
61. Deep convolutional neural networks for computer-aided detection: CNN architectures, dataset characteristics and transfer learning10.1109/TMI.2016.2528162 ↗
62. Tan, C., Sun, F., Kong, T., Zhang, W., Yang, C., and Liu, C. (2018, January 4–7). A survey on deep transfer learning. Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, Rhodes, Greece.10.1007/978-3-030-01424-7_27 ↗
63. A survey on image data augmentation for deep learning10.1186/s40537-019-0197-0 ↗
64. Transfer learning for activity recognition: A survey10.1007/s10115-013-0665-3 ↗
65. Transfer learning for pedestrian detection10.1016/j.neucom.2011.12.043 ↗
66. Raghu, M., Zhang, C., Kleinberg, J., and Bengio, S. (2019, January 8–14). Transfusion: Understanding transfer learning for medical imaging. Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
67. (2020, January 15). Animals. Available online: https://www.kaggle.com/alessiocorrado99/animals10#translate.py.
68. (2020, January 15). Wounds. Available online: https://github.com/produvia/deep-learning-for-wound-care.
69. (2020, January 15). Clinical Skin Disease. Available online: https://medicine.uiowa.edu/dermatology/education/clinical-skin-disease-images.
70. Codella, N., Rotemberg, V., Tschandl, P., Celebi, M.E., Dusza, S., Gutman, D., Helba, B., Kalloo, A., Liopyris, K., and Marchetti, M. (2019). A Skin lesion analysis toward melanoma detection 2018: A challenge hosted by the international skin imaging collaboration (ISIC). arXiv.
71. Combalia, M., Codella, N.C., Rotemberg, V., Helba, B., Vilaplana, V., Reiter, O., Carrera, C., Barreiro, A., Halpern, A.C., and Puig, S. (2019). BCN20000: Dermoscopic lesions in the wild. arXiv.
72. (2020, January 22). Animals1. Available online: https://www.kaggle.com/nafisur/dogs-vs-cats.
73. (2020, January 22). Animals2. Available online: https://www.kaggle.com/gpiosenka/100-bird-species.
74. (2020, January 22). Animals3. Available online: https://www.kaggle.com/navneetsurana/animaldataset.
75. Lin, M., Chen, Q., and Yan, S. (2013). Network in network. arXiv.