journal article·2020-08-14Open access

Augmented Reality: A Systematic Review of Its Benefits and Challenges in E-learning Contexts

Nouf Matar Alzahrani

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 16

Abstract

Augmented reality (AR) has received increasing attention in the research literature as a fundamental pedagogical tool that can enhance learning at most educational levels. In academic contexts, this technology permits the superimposing of three-dimensional images onto the real environment. Although AR has been found to enhance learning in the academic environment, no systematic review of it has been conducted to identify, evaluate, and summarize empirical findings on its advantages and challenges in e-learning contexts. Hence, a systematic review of the research literature was conducted on the use of AR in e-learning contexts, with a focus on the key benefits and challenges related to its adoption and implementation. Electronic searches on databases, including Springer, Science Direct, EBSCO, and Google Scholar, were performed to retrieve relevant journal articles; 28 studies were included after they were screened using the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The key benefits of using AR in e-learning included support of kinesthetic (tactile) learning, collaborative learning, distance/remote learning, learner-centered learning, and creative learning. Studies also reported that AR enhanced students’ engagement, motivation, attention/focus, interactivity, verbal participation, concentration, knowledge retention, and spatial abilities, as well as information accessibility. The findings suggest that challenges associated with AR in e-learning include information and cognitive overload, lack of experience in using the technology, resistance from teachers, complex technology, costly technology, and technical issues, such as connectivity problems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Augmented Reality Applications · Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts · Mobile Learning in Education

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Computer Science and Information Technology, Albaha University, Albaha 42331, Saudi Arabia

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. Rhodes, C., Weaver, J., and Watkins, M. (2017, January 4–6). Criminology as an augmented reality: A multi-purpose e-learning platform to support student understanding of applied criminology. Proceedings of the HEA Annual Conference 2017: Generation TEF: Teaching in the Spotlight, Manchester, UK.
2. Augmented reality and pedestrian navigation through its implementation in m-learning and e-learning: Evaluation of an educational program in Chile10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.003 ↗
3. The use of mobile learning in science: A systematic review10.1007/s10956-015-9597-x ↗
4. Shen, V.R. (2020). Development of a Game-Based e-Learning System with Augmented Reality for Improving Students’ Learning Performance. Int. J. Eng. Educ., 2.10.14710/ijee.2.1.1-10 ↗
5. 3D GIS-based interactive registration mechanism for outdoor augmented reality system10.1016/j.eswa.2016.01.037 ↗
6. Augmented reality as E-learning tool in primary schools’ education: Barriers to teachers’ adoption10.3991/ijet.v12i02.6158 ↗
7. Le, H., and Nguyen, M. (2020). An Online Platform for Enhancing Learning Experiences with Web-Based Augmented Reality and Pictorial Bar Code. Augmented Reality in Education, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-42156-4_3 ↗
8. Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002 ↗
9. Galati, F., Bigliardi, B., Deiana, A., Filippelli, S., and Petroni, A. (2019). Pros and cons of augmented reality in education. Edulearn19 Proceedings, IATED.10.21125/edulearn.2019.2264 ↗
10. Recent advances in augmented reality10.1109/38.963459 ↗
11. Carmigniani, J., and Furht, B. (2011). Augmented reality: An overview. Handbook of Augmented Reality, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-0064-6_1 ↗
12. Introduction to augmented reality
13. Dutta, K. (2020, July 13). Augmented Reality for E-Learning. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/.../304078112_Augmented_Reality_for_E-Learning.
14. Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024 ↗
15. Liu, W., Cheok, A.D., Mei-Ling, C.L., and Theng, Y.L. (2007, January 19–21). Mixed reality classroom: Learning from entertainment. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Digital Interactive media in Entertainment and Arts, Perth, Western Australia.10.1145/1306813.1306833 ↗
16. Son, N.D. (2019). The Application of Web-3D and Augmented Reality in E-learning to Improve the Effectiveness of Arts Teaching in Vietnam, EasyChair. No. 1675.
17. Camilleri, V., and Montebello, M. (2020, August 09). ARieL: Augmented Reality in interactive e-Learning. Available online: shorturl.at/ouyFU.
18. An interactive augmented reality system for learning anatomy structure
19. Augmented Reality in E-Learning System
20. Albayrak, M., Altıntaş, V., Sümen, A.M., and Şener, G. (2020, July 22). Robotics Education Based on Augmented Reality in Primary Schools. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309134652_Robotics_Education_Based_on_Augmented_Reality_in_Primary_Schools.
21. Alimisis, D. (2009). Constructionism and robotics in education. Teacher Education on Robotic-Enhanced Constructivist Pedagogical Methods, AACE.
22. Parhizkar, B., Obeidy, W.K., Chowdhury, S.A., Gebril, Z.M., Ngan, M.N.A., and Lashkari, A.H. (2012, January 10–12). Android mobile augmented reality application based on different learning theories for primary school children. Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems, Tangier, Morocco.10.1109/ICMCS.2012.6320114 ↗
23. Robotic training to bridge school students with engineering10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.271 ↗
24. Makhataeva, Z., and Varol, H.A. (2020). Augmented Reality for Robotics: A Review. Robotics, 9.10.3390/robotics9020021 ↗
25. Augmented-reality integrated robotics in neurosurgery: Are we there yet?10.3171/2017.2.FOCUS177 ↗
26. Clinical application of navigation surgery using augmented reality in the abdominal field10.1007/s00595-014-0946-9 ↗
27. Robots Can Teach Students With Intellectual Disabilities: Educational Benefits of Using Robotic and Augmented Reality Applications10.1109/MRA.2018.2868865 ↗
28. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses for abstracts: Best practice for reporting abstracts of systematic reviews in Endodontology10.1111/iej.13118 ↗
29. Attractiveness of augmented reality to consumers10.1080/09537325.2019.1603368 ↗
30. Evaluating virtual reality and augmented reality training for industrial maintenance and assembly tasks10.1080/10494820.2013.815221 ↗
31. Augmented reality app for calculus: A proposal for the development of spatial visualization10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.251 ↗
32. Augmented reality app for calculus: A proposal for the development of spatial visualization10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.251 ↗
33. Ryan, C., Hesselgreaves, H., Wu, O., Paul, J., Dixon-Hughes, J., and Moss, J.G. (2018). Protocol for a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient experiences of central venous access devices in anti-cancer treatment. Syst. Rev., 7.10.1186/s13643-018-0721-x ↗
34. Vázquez, C., Xia, L., Aikawa, T., and Maes, P. (2018, January 9–13). Words in motion: Kinesthetic language learning in virtual reality. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 18th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), Mumbai, India.10.1109/ICALT.2018.00069 ↗
35. Can Aikido Help With the Comprehension of Physics? A First Step towards the Design of Intelligent Psychomotor Systems for STEAM Kinesthetic Learning Scenarios10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2957947 ↗
36. Iqbal, M.Z., Mangina, E., and Campbell, A.G. (2019, January 10–18). Exploring the use of Augmented Reality in a Kinesthetic Learning Application Integrated with an Intelligent Virtual Embodied Agent. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct), Beijing, China.10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct.2019.00018 ↗
37. Virata, R.O., and Castro, J.D.L. (2019, January 10–13). Augmented reality in science classroom: Perceived effects in education, visualization and information processing. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management and E-Learning, Tokyo, Japan.10.1145/3306500.3306556 ↗
38. Singhal, S., Bagga, S., Goyal, P., and Saxena, V. (2012). Augmented chemistry: Interactive education system. Int. J. Comput. Appl., 49.10.5120/7700-1041 ↗
39. Augmented reality in education: Current technologies and the potential for education10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.654 ↗
40. Giraudeau, P., Olry, A., Roo, J.S., Fleck, S., Bertolo, D., Vivian, R., and Hachet, M. (2019, January 10). CARDS: A Mixed-Reality System for Collaborative Learning at School. Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces, At Deajon, Korea.10.1145/3343055.3359721 ↗
41. Augmented reality to promote collaborative and autonomous learning in higher education10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.093 ↗
42. Effects of formative assessment in an augmented reality approach to conducting ubiquitous learning activities for architecture courses10.1007/s10209-017-0588-y ↗
43. Augmenting the learning experience in primary and secondary school education: A systematic review of recent trends in augmented reality game-based learning10.1007/s10055-018-0347-2 ↗
44. The pedagogical potential of augmented reality apps
45. Deng, L., Tian, J., Cornwell, C., Phillips, V., Chen, L., and Alsuwaida, A. (2019, January 26–31). Towards an Augmented Reality-Based Mobile Math Learning Game System. Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Orlando, FL, USA.10.1007/978-3-030-23525-3_28 ↗
46. Educational Technology and Its Contributions in Students’ Focus and Attention Regarding Augmented Reality Environments and the Use of Sensors10.1177/0735633119854033 ↗
47. Benefits of augmented reality in educational environments-a systematic literature review
48. Niu, B., Liu, C., Liu, J., Deng, Y., Wan, Q., and Ma, N. (2019, January 27–31). Impacts of Different Types of Scaffolding on Academic Performance, Cognitive Load and Satisfaction in Scientific Inquiry Activities Based on Augmented Reality. Proceedings of the 2019 Eighth International Conference on Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT), Biloxi, MS, USA.10.1109/EITT.2019.00053 ↗
49. Outdoor natural science learning with an RFID-supported immersive ubiquitous learning environment
50. Augmented versus virtual reality in education: An exploratory study examining science knowledge retention when using augmented reality/virtual reality Mobile applications10.1089/cyber.2018.0150 ↗
51. Vate-U-Lan, P. (2012, January 9–13). An augmented reality 3d pop-up book: The development of a multimedia project for English language teaching. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, Melbourne, Australia.10.1109/ICME.2012.79 ↗
52. Interactive learning media innovation: Utilization of augmented reality and pop-up book to improve user’s learning autonomy
53. Law, L., Hafiz, M., Kwong, T., and Wong, E. (2020). Enhancing SPOC-Flipped Classroom Learning by Using Student-Centred Mobile Learning Tools. Emerging Technologies and Pedagogies in the Curriculum, Springer.10.1007/978-981-15-0618-5_19 ↗
54. Impacts of integrating the repertory grid into an augmented reality-based learning design on students’ learning achievements, cognitive load and degree of satisfaction10.1080/10494820.2017.1294608 ↗
55. Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning10.1007/s10956-008-9119-1 ↗
56. Chang, Y.J., Chen, C.H., Huang, W.T., and Huang, W.S. (2011, January 11–15). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of English learning using augmented reality. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, Barcelona, Spain.
57. Alien Contact!: Exploring teacher implementation of an augmented reality curricular unit
58. Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality in Education. Myth or Reality?10.3991/ijet.v14i03.9289 ↗
59. Gibbon, D.C., Zavesky, E., Renger, B.S., Shahraray, B., and Begeja, L. (2020). Context-based Object Location via Augmented Reality Device. (No. 10,650,239), US Google Patent, Available online: https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/99/b3/62/1143ff2022708a/US10650239.pdf.
60. Nguyen, M., Lai, M.P., Le, H., and Yan, W.Q. (2019, January 12–15). A Web-based Augmented Reality Plat-form using Pictorial QR Code for Educational Purposes and beyond. Proceedings of the 25th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, Parramatta, NSW, Australia.10.1145/3359996.3364793 ↗