journal article·2022-01-24Open access

Fertilization and Soil Microbial Community: A Review

Lucian Constantin Dincă, Paola Grenni, Cristian Onet, Aurelia Onet

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 3

Abstract

The present paper reviews the most recent advances regarding the effects of chemical and organic fertilizers on soil microbial communities. Based on the results from the articles considered, some details are presented on how the use of various types of fertilizers affects the composition and activity of soil microbial communities. Soil microbes have different responses to fertilization based on differences in the total carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) contents in the soil, along with soil moisture and the presence of plant species. These articles show that the use of chemical fertilizers changes the abundance of microbial populations and stimulates their growth thanks to the nutrient supply added. Overall, however, the data revealed that chemical fertilizers have no significant influence on the richness and diversity of the bacteria and fungi. Instead, the abundance of individual bacterial or fungal species was sensitive to fertilization and was mainly attributed to the changes in the soil chemical properties induced by chemical or organic fertilization. Among the negative effects of chemical fertilization, the decrease in enzymatic activity has been highlighted by several papers, especially in soils that have received the largest amounts of fertilizers together with losses in organic matter.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics · Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis · Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry “Marin Dracea”, 13 Closca, 500035 Brasov, Romania

Water Research Institute, National Research Council, Via Salaria km 29.300, Monterotondo Scalo, 00015 Rome, Italy

Faculty of Environmental Protection, University of Oradea, 26, Gen. Magheru Street, 410087 Oradea, Romania

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Global land use changes are four times greater than previously estimated10.1038/s41467-021-22702-2 ↗
2. FAO (2021, November 10). The World Bank Data, Food and Agriculture Organization. Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/AG.LND.AGRI.K2.
3. ISO (2015). ISO 8157:2015, Fertilizers and Soil Conditioners, ISO. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/59567.html.
4. Thapa, S., Bhandari, A., Ghimire, R., Xue, Q., Kidwaro, F., Ghatrehsamani, S., Maharjan, B., and Goodwin, M. (2021). Managing Micronutrients for Improving Soil Fertility, Health, and Soybean Yield. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su132111766 ↗
5. New technologies reduce greenhouse gas emissions from nitrogenous fertilizer in China10.1073/pnas.1210447110 ↗
6. Aftalion, F. (2007). Industrial Catalysis: A Practical Guide. Kent and Riegel’s Handbook of Industrial Chemistry and Biotechnology, Springer.
7. Sparks, D.L. (2014). Phosphorus: Its efficient use in agriculture. Advances in Agronomy, Elsevier.
8. Hillel, D. (2005). Fertilizers and fertilization. Encyclopedia of Soils in the Environment, Elsevier.10.1016/B0-12-348530-4/00447-1 ↗
9. Revitalization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for sustainable development in agriculture10.1016/j.micres.2017.08.016 ↗
10. Dasgupta, D., Kumar, K., Miglani, R., Mishra, R., Panda, A.K., and Bisht, S.S. (2021). Microbial biofertilizers: Recent trends and future outlook. Recent Advancement in Microbial Biotechnology, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-822098-6.00001-X ↗
11. Singh, D., Thapa, S., Geat, N., Mehriya, M.L., and Rajawat, M.V.S. (2021). Biofertilizers: Mechanisms and application. Biofertilizers, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-821667-5.00024-5 ↗
12. FAO (2017). World Fertilizer Trends and Outlook to 2020, Summary Report, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available online: https://www.fao.org/3/i6895e/i6895e.pdf.
13. Greenhouse gas emissions from synthetic nitrogen manufacture and fertilization for main upland crops in China10.1186/s13021-019-0133-9 ↗
14. Fertilizers and nitrate pollution of surface and ground water: An increasingly pervasive global problem10.1007/s42452-021-04521-8 ↗
15. Lawrencia, D., Wong, S.K., Low, D.Y.S., Goh, B.H., Goh, J.K., Ruktanonchai, U.R., Soottitantawat, A., Lee, L.H., and Tang, S.Y. (2021). Controlled Release Fertilizers: A Review on Coating Materials and Mechanism of Release. Plants, 10.10.3390/plants10020238 ↗
16. Effects of biological nitrification inhibitors on nitrogen use efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions in agricultural soils: A review10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112338 ↗
17. Trenkel, M.E. (1997). Improved Fertilizer Use Efficiency. Controlled-Release and Stabilized Fertilizers in Agriculture, International Fertilizer Industry Association.
18. Byrne, M.P., Tobin, J.T., Forrestal, P.J., Danaher, M., Nkwonta, C.G., Richards, K., Cummins, E., Hogan, S.A., and O’Callaghan, T.F. (2020). Urease and Nitrification Inhibitors—As Mitigation Tools for Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Sustainable Dairy Systems: A Review. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12156018 ↗
19. Improving phosphorus use efficiency in agriculture: Opportunities for breeding10.1007/s10681-015-1572-3 ↗
20. Bhattacharya, A. (2019). Changing Environmental Condition and Phosphorus-Use Efficiency in Plants, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-816209-5.00005-2 ↗
21. Exploring phosphorus fertilizers and fertilization strategies for improved human and environmental health10.1007/s00374-019-01430-2 ↗
22. Rusinamhodzi, L. (2020). Ecosystem services in sustainable food systems: Operational definition, concepts, and applications. The Role of Ecosystem Services in Sustainable Food Systems, Academic Press.
23. Interactions between N, P and K fertilizers affect the environment and the yield and quality of satsumas
24. The potassium paradox: Implications for soil fertility, crop production and human health10.1017/S1742170513000318 ↗
25. Biological indicators for evaluating soil quality improvement in a soil degraded by erosion processes10.1007/s11368-018-02236-9 ↗
26. Singh, R.L., and Mondal, S. (2018). Sustainable Agriculture and Food Security. Biotechnology for Sustainable Agriculture, Woodhead Publishing.10.1016/B978-0-12-812160-3.00011-8 ↗
27. Lewu, F.B., Volova, T., Thomas, S., and Rakhimol, K.R. (2021). Controlled Release Fertilizers for Sustainable Agriculture, Elsevier.
28. Hydrothermal production of algal biochar for environmental and fertilizer applications: A review10.1007/s10311-020-01139-x ↗
29. Benefits and limitations of biochar amendment in agricultural soils: A review10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.082 ↗
30. Effect of biochar on soil structure-review10.15414/afz.2018.21.01.11-19 ↗
31. Biofertilizers in agriculture: An overview on concepts, strategies and effects on soil microorganisms10.1016/bs.agron.2020.02.001 ↗
32. Biofertilizers: An ecofriendly technology for nutrient recycling and environmental sustainability
33. Agricultural utilization of biosolids: A review on potential effects on soil and plant grown10.1016/j.wasman.2017.03.002 ↗
34. Pepper, I.L., Brooks, J.P., and Gerba, C.P. (2019). Land Application of Organic Residuals: Municipal Biosolids and Animal Manures. Environmental and Pollution Science, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-814719-1.00023-9 ↗
35. Biosurfactants-Types, Sources and Applications10.3923/jm.2015.181.192 ↗
36. Biosurfactants in agriculture10.1007/s00253-012-4641-8 ↗
37. Tsipa, A., Stylianou, K., Papalli, M., Papageorgiou, E., Kyriakou, L., Rigopoulos, I., Ioannou, I., and Pinakoulaki, E. (2021). Iron-Stimulated Production and Antimicrobial Potential of a Novel Biosurfactant Produced by a Drilling Waste-Degrading Pseudomonas citronellolis Strain. Processes, 9.10.3390/pr9040686 ↗
38. Sparks, D.L. (2017). Current Approaches and Future Trends in Compost Quality Criteria for Agronomic, Environmental, and Human Health Benefits. Advances in Agronomy, Academic Press.
39. (2019). Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 laying down rules on the making available on the market of EU fertilising products and amending Regulations (EC) No 1069/2009 and (EC) No 1107/2009 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2003/2003. Off. J. Eur. Union, L 170/1, 1–114. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019R1009.
40. EC (2010). COM(2010)235 final-Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on Future Steps in Bio-Waste Management in the European Union, EC. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52010DC0235.
41. Organic fertilizer as a vehicle for the entry of microplastic into the environment10.1126/sciadv.aap8060 ↗
42. Visca, A., Barra Caracciolo, A., Grenni, P., Patrolecco, L., Rauseo, J., Massini, G., Miritana, V.M., and Spataro, F. (2021). Anaerobic digestion and removal of sulfamethoxazole, enrofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and their antibiotic resistance genes in a full-scale biogas plant. Antibiotics, 10.10.3390/antibiotics10050502 ↗
43. Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in anaerobic digesters and predicted concentrations in agroecosystems10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113891 ↗
44. Overview of Animal Manure Management for Beef, Pig, and Poultry Farms in France10.3389/fsufs.2018.00036 ↗
45. Environmental Fate of Antibiotics and Resistance Genes in Livestock Waste and Digestate from Biogas Plants
46. Effects of Sulfamethoxazole on the Microbial Community Dynamics During the Anaerobic Digestion Process10.3389/fmicb.2020.537783 ↗
47. Rayne, N., and Aula, L. (2020). Livestock Manure and the Impacts on Soil Health: A Review. Soil Syst., 4.10.3390/soilsystems4040064 ↗
48. Optimizing the vermicomposting of organic wastes amended with inorganic materials for production of nutrient-rich organic fertilizers: A review10.1007/s11356-018-1328-4 ↗
49. A review on vermicomposting of organic wastes10.1002/ep.12100 ↗
50. Sulaiman, I.S.C., and Mohamad, A. (2020). The Use of Vermiwash and Vermicompost Extract in Plant Disease and Pest Control. Natural Remedies for Pest, Disease and Weed Control, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-819304-4.00016-6 ↗
51. Singhania, R., Agarwal, R., Kumar, R., and Sukumaran, R. (2018). Vermicomposting: A Green Technology for Organic Waste Management. Waste to Wealth. Energy, Environment, and Sustainability, Springer.10.1007/978-981-10-7431-8 ↗
52. FAO, ITPS, GSBI, and SCBD, EC (2020). State of Knowledge of Soil Biodiversity–Status, Challenges and Potentialities. Summary for Policy Makers, FAO. Available online: https://www.fao.org/3/cb1928en/cb1928en.pdf.
53. Belowground microbiota and the health of tree crops10.3389/fmicb.2018.01006 ↗
54. Rodríguez-Cruz, M., and Sánchez-Martín, M. (2021). Bio-remediation of soil ecosystems from triazine herbicides. Pesticides in Soils: Occurrence, Fate, Control and Remediation, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-90546-0 ↗
55. More Than the Sum of Its Parts: Microbiome Biodiversity as a Driver of Plant Growth and Soil Health10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110617-062605 ↗
56. Biological Indices for Soil Quality Evaluation: Perspectives and Limitations10.1002/ldr.2262 ↗
57. Soil microbial biomass: A key soil driver in management of ecosystem functioning10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.373 ↗
58. Microbial indicators for soil quality10.1007/s00374-017-1248-3 ↗
59. Soil health and sustainability: Managing the biotic component of soil quality10.1016/S0929-1393(00)00067-6 ↗
60. Soil Quality: A Concept, Definition, and Framework for Evaluation10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100010001x ↗
61. Distinct soil microbial diversity under long-term organic and conventional farming10.1038/ismej.2014.210 ↗
62. Bioorganic fertilizer maintains a more stable soil microbiome than chemical fertilizer for monocropping10.1007/s00374-017-1216-y ↗
63. Effects of common oak (Quercus robur L.) defolition on the soil properties of an oak forest in Western Plain of Romania10.15287/afr.2016.544 ↗
64. FAO (2021). Keep Soil Alive, Protect Soil Biodiversity–Global Symposium on Soil Biodiversity 19–22 April 2021. Proceedings, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available online: https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/cb6005en.
65. EU (2021). COM(2021) 699 Final, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions EU Soil Strategy for 2030 Reaping the Benefits of Healthy Soils for People, Food, Nature and Climate, EU. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52021DC0699.
66. Evaluation of the Soil Properties Variability in Relation to Different Crop Types
67. Burns, R.G., and Dick, R.P. (2002). Enzyme activities and microbiological and biochemical processes in soil. Enzymes in the Environment: Activity, Ecology and Applications, Marcel Dekker.
68. Soil enzyme activity: A brief history and biochemistry as a basis for appropriate interpretations and meta-analysis10.1007/s00374-017-1245-6 ↗
69. Methodological Guidance for a Quality Review Article10.1093/geront/gny123 ↗
70. Effect of different fertilizers on the microbial activity and productivity of soil under potato cultivation
71. Soil microbial biomass, dehydrogenase activity, bacterial community structure in response to long-term fertilizer management10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.05.031 ↗
72. Long-term effects of organic farming on fungal and bacterial residues in relation to microbial energy metabolism10.1007/s00374-009-0433-4 ↗
73. Influence of long-term fertilisation and crop rotation on changes in fungal and bacterial residues in a tropical rice-field soil10.1007/s00374-013-0779-5 ↗
74. Supplementing chemical fertilizer with an organic component increases soil biological function and quality10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.07.009 ↗
75. Effects of Long-Term Combined Application of Organic and Mineral Fertilizers on Microbial Biomass, Soil Enzyme Activities and Soil Fertility10.1016/S1671-2927(08)60074-7 ↗
76. Mineral vs. Organic Amendments: Microbial Community Structure, Activity and Abundance of Agriculturally Relevant Microbes Are Driven by Long-Term Fertilization Strategies10.3389/fmicb.2016.01446 ↗
77. Long-term effects of mineral fertilizers on soil microorganisms–A review10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.03.023 ↗
78. Fifteen-Year Application of Manure and Chemical Fertilizers Differently Impacts Soil ARGs and Microbial Community Structure10.3389/fmicb.2020.00062 ↗
79. Effect of Long-Term Fertilization on Ammonia-Oxidizing Microorganisms and Nitrification in Brown Soil of Northeast China10.3389/fmicb.2020.622454 ↗
80. A new index to assess soil quality and sustainability of wheat-based cropping systems10.1007/s00374-005-0857-4 ↗
81. Populations and biomass carbon in paddy field soil10.3923/ja.2010.102.110 ↗
82. Effects of long-term application of chemical and organic fertilizers on the abundance of microbial communities involved in the nitrogen cycle10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.06.010 ↗
83. Cui, J., Yuan, X., Zhang, Q., Zhou, J., Lin, K., Xu, J., Zeng, Y., Wu, Y., Cheng, L., and Zeng, Q. (2021). Nutrient availability is a dominant predictor of soil bacterial and fungal community composition after nitrogen addition in subtropical acidic forests. PLoS ONE, 16.10.1371/journal.pone.0246263 ↗
84. Balanced fertilization over four decades has sustained soil microbial communities and improved soil fertility and rice productivity in red paddy soil10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148664 ↗
85. Organic matter-microbial biomass relationships in field experiments under tropical conditions: Effects of inorganic fertilization and organic amendments10.1016/0038-0717(92)90056-4 ↗
86. Distinct responses of soil bacterial and fungal communities to changes in fertilization regime and crop rotation10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.01.010 ↗
87. Plant and soil fungal but not soil bacterial communities are linked in long-term fertilized grassland10.1038/srep23680 ↗
88. Rhizosphere soil properties, microbial community, and enzyme activities: Short-term responses to partial substitution of chemical fertilizer with organic manure10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113650 ↗
89. Relationship between plants and soil microbial communities in fertilized grasslands10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.03.008 ↗
90. Influence of long-term fertilization on soil microbial biomass, dehydrogenase activity, and bacterial and fungal community structure in a brown soil of northeast China10.1007/s13213-014-0889-9 ↗
91. Soil organic carbon dynamics under long-term fertilizations in arable land of northern China10.5194/bg-7-409-2010 ↗
92. Sparks, D.L. (1997). Long-Term Trends of Corn Yield and Soil Organic Matter in Different Crop Sequences and Soil Fertility Treatments on the Morrow Plots. Advances in Agronomy, Academic Press.
93. Guo, Z., Han, J., Li, J., Xu, Y., and Wang, X. (2019). Effects of long-term fertilization on soil organic carbon mineralization and microbial community structure. PLoS ONE, 14.10.1371/journal.pone.0216006 ↗
94. Functional Soil Organic Matter Fractions, Microbial Community, and Enzyme Activities in a Mollisol Under 35 Years Manure and Mineral Fertilization10.1007/s42729-019-00047-6 ↗
95. Response of soil organic matter fractions and composition of microbial community to long-term organic and mineral fertilization10.1007/s00374-017-1189-x ↗
96. The contribution of soil organic matter fractions to carbon and nitrogen mineralization and microbial community size and structure10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.02.007 ↗
97. Long-term fertilization regimes drive the abundance and composition of N-cycling-related prokaryotic groups via soil particle-size differentiation10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.10.015 ↗
98. Biological and chemical properties of arable soils affected by long-term organic and inorganic fertilizer applications10.1007/s003740050556 ↗
99. Seasonal and fertilizer effects on the organic cycle and microbial biomass in a hill country soil under pasture10.1071/SR9920383 ↗
100. Effects of pasture improvement and intensive cultivation on microbial biomass, enzyme activities, and composition and size of earthworm populations10.1007/BF00336320 ↗