journal article·2022-01-25Open access

The Role of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) in Mitigating Plant’s Environmental Stresses

Marco Vocciante, Martina Grifoni, Danilo Fusini, Gianniantonio Petruzzelli, Elisabetta Franchi

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 3

Abstract

Phytoremediation is a cost-effective and sustainable technology used to clean up pollutants from soils and waters through the use of plant species. Indeed, plants are naturally capable of absorbing metals and degrading organic molecules. However, in several cases, the presence of contaminants causes plant suffering and limited growth. In such situations, thanks to the production of specific root exudates, plants can engage the most suitable bacteria able to support their growth according to the particular environmental stress. These plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) may facilitate plant growth and development with several beneficial effects, even more evident when plants are grown in critical environmental conditions, such as the presence of toxic contaminants. For instance, PGPR may alleviate metal phytotoxicity by altering metal bioavailability in soil and increasing metal translocation within the plant. Since many of the PGPR are also hydrocarbon oxidizers, they are also able to support and enhance plant biodegradation activity. Besides, PGPR in agriculture can be an excellent support to counter the devastating effects of abiotic stress, such as excessive salinity and drought, replacing expensive inorganic fertilizers that hurt the environment. A better and in-depth understanding of the function and interactions of plants and associated microorganisms directly in the matrix of interest, especially in the presence of persistent contamination, could provide new opportunities for phytoremediation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity · Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance · Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry, Università degli Studi di Genova, Via Dodecaneso 31, 16146 Genova, Italy

Institute of Research on Terrestrial Ecosystems, National Council of Research, Via Moruzzi 1, 56124 Pisa, Italy

Eni S.p.A., Decarbonization & Environmental R&D, Via Maritano 26, 20097 San Donato Mil.se, Italy

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Removal and recovery of heavy metals from tannery sludge subjected to plasma pyro-gasification process10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123166 ↗
2. Vocciante, M., and Meshalkin, V. (2020). An accurate inverse model for the detection of leaks in sealed landfills. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12145598 ↗
3. Eco-friendly and cost-effective strategies for metals recovery from printed circuit boards10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.055 ↗
4. Duarte, A.C., Cachada, A., and Rocha-Santos, T.A.P. (2018). Soil and pollution: An introduction to the main issues. Soil Pollution: From Monitoring to Remediation, Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-849873-6.00001-7 ↗
5. Recent advances on nano-adsorbents and nanomembranes for the remediation of water10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129051 ↗
6. Removal of polyethylene glycols from wastewater: A comparison of different approaches10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129725 ↗
7. Alberti, S., Basciu, I., Vocciante, M., and Ferretti, M. (2021). Experimental and physico-chemical comparison of ZnO nanoparticles’ activity for photocatalytic applications in wastewater treatment. Catalysts, 11.10.3390/catal11060678 ↗
8. Bismuth oxide-related photocatalysts in green nanotechnology: A critical analysis10.1007/s11705-018-1744-5 ↗
9. A review on heavy metals contamination in soil: Effects, sources, and remediation techniques10.1080/15320383.2019.1592108 ↗
10. Soil remediation technologies towards green remediation strategies
11. Improved remediation processes through cost-effective estimation of soil properties from surface measurements10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.168 ↗
12. Petroleum-contaminated sites: Decision framework for selecting remediation technologies10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.05.115 ↗
13. Nature based solutions for contaminated land remediation and brownfield redevelopment in cities: A review10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.347 ↗
14. Vocciante, M., Dovì, V.G., and Ferro, S. (2021). Sustainability in electroKinetic remediation processes: A critical analysis. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13020770 ↗
15. New trends in the synthesis of nanoparticles by green methods
16. An eco-friendly process for zerovalent bismuth nanoparticles synthesis10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.011 ↗
17. Enhancements in phytoremediation technology: Environmental assessment including different options of biomass disposal and comparison with a consolidated approach10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.104 ↗
18. CO2 footprint analysis of consolidated and innovative technologies in remediation activities10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126723 ↗
19. Pedron, F., Grifoni, M., Barbafieri, M., Petruzzelli, G., Rosellini, I., Franchi, E., Bagatin, R., and Vocciante, M. (2017). Applicability of a Freundlich-like model for plant uptake at an industrial contaminated site with a high variable arsenic concentration. Environments, 4.10.3390/environments4040067 ↗
20. Pietrini, I., Grifoni, M., Franchi, E., Cardaci, A., Pedron, F., Barbafieri, M., Petruzzelli, G., and Vocciante, M. (2021). Enhanced lead phytoextraction by endophytes from indigenous plants. Soil Syst., 5.10.3390/soilsystems5030055 ↗
21. Dealing with complex contamination: A novel approach with a combined bio-phytoremediation strategy and effective analytical techniques10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112381 ↗
22. Pedron, F., Grifoni, M., Barbafieri, M., Petruzzelli, G., Franchi, E., Samà, C., Gila, L., Zanardi, S., Palmery, S., and Proto, A. (2021). New light on phytoremediation: The use of luminescent solar concentrators. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11041923 ↗
23. Towards an enhanced understanding of plant-microbiome interactions to improve phytoremediation: Engineering the metaorganism10.3389/fmicb.2016.00341 ↗
24. Phytoremediation of contaminated soils and groundwater: Lessons from the field10.1007/s11356-009-0213-6 ↗
25. The role of plant-associated bacteria in the mobilization and phytoextraction of trace elements in contaminated soils10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.01.012 ↗
26. Systems biology of plant-microbiome interactions10.1016/j.molp.2019.05.006 ↗
27. Root exudates: From plant to rhizosphere and beyond10.1007/s00299-019-02447-5 ↗
28. Rhizoremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons: A model system for plant microbiome manipulation10.1111/1751-7915.13303 ↗
29. Rhizobacterial Community Assembly Patterns Vary Between Crop Species10.3389/fmicb.2019.00581 ↗
30. Guo, B., Zhang, Y., Li, S., Lai, T., Yang, L., Chen, J., and Ding, W. (2016). Extract from Maize (Zea mays L.): Antibacterial activity of DIMBOA and its derivatives against Ralstonia solanacearum. Molecules, 21.10.3390/molecules21101397 ↗
31. Feed your friends: Do plant exudates shape the root microbiome?10.1016/j.tplants.2017.09.003 ↗
32. Santoyo, G., Urtis-Flores, C.A., Loeza-Lara, P.D., Orozco-Mosqueda, M.D.C., and Glick, B.R. (2021). Rhizosphere colonization determinants by Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR). Biology, 10.10.3390/biology10060475 ↗
33. Interkingdom signaling in plant-rhizomicrobiome interactions for sustainable agriculture10.1016/j.micres.2020.126589 ↗
34. Differential responses of soil bacteria, fungi, archaea and protists to plant species richness and plant functional group identity10.1111/mec.14175 ↗
35. Elucidating bacterial gene functions in the plant microbiome10.1016/j.chom.2018.09.005 ↗
36. Bacterial seed endophytes: Genera, vertical transmission and interaction with plants10.1111/1758-2229.12181 ↗
37. Cadmium-induced and transgenerational changes in the cultivable and total seed endophytic community of Arabidopsis thaliana10.1111/plb.12415 ↗
38. Stable isotope probing and metagenomics highlight the effect of plants on uncultured phenanthrene-degrading bacterial consortium in polluted soil10.1038/s41396-019-0394-z ↗
39. Plant Identity Shaped Rhizospheric Microbial Communities More Strongly Than Bacterial Bioaugmentation in Petroleum Hydrocarbon-Polluted Sediments10.3389/fmicb.2019.02144 ↗
40. Microbial expression profiles in the rhizosphere of willows depend on soil contamination10.1038/ismej.2013.163 ↗
41. Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory10.1086/283244 ↗
42. Plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes10.1016/j.micres.2015.11.008 ↗
43. The interaction between plants and bacteria in the remediation of petroleum hydrocarbons: An environmental perspective10.3389/fmicb.2016.01836 ↗
44. Rohrbacher, F., and St-Arnaud, M. (2016). Root exudation: The ecological driver of hydrocarbon rhizoremediation. Agronomy, 6.10.3390/agronomy6010019 ↗
45. The role of Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria in metal phytoremediation10.1016/bs.ampbs.2017.04.001 ↗
46. Endophyte traits relevant to stress tolerance, resource use and habitat of origin predict effects on host plants10.1111/nph.15504 ↗
47. van Elsas, J.D., Trevors, J.T., Jansson, J.K., and Nannipieri, P. (2006). Plant-associated bacteria lifestyle and molecular interactions. Modern Soil Microbiology, CRC Press. [2nd ed.].10.1201/9781420015201 ↗
48. Pankievicz, V.C.S., Irving, T.B., Maia, L.G.S., and Ané, J. (2019). Are we there yet? The long walk towards the development of efficient symbiotic associations between nitrogen-fixing bacteria and non-leguminous crops. BMC Biol., 17.10.1186/s12915-019-0710-0 ↗
49. Microbial phosphorus solubilization and its potential for use in sustainable agriculture10.3389/fmicb.2017.00971 ↗
50. Indole-3-acetic acid biosynthesis and its regulation in plant-associated bacteria10.1007/s00253-020-10869-5 ↗
51. Pavlů, J., Novák, J., Koukalová, V., Luklová, M., Brzobohatý, B., and Černý, M. (2018). Cytokinin at the crossroads of abiotic stress signalling Pathways. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 19.10.3390/ijms19082450 ↗
52. ACC Deaminase Producing Bacteria with Multifarious plant growth promoting traits alleviates salinity stress in french bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) Plants10.3389/fmicb.2019.01506 ↗
53. Bacterial siderophores efficiently provide iron to iron-starved tomato plants in hydroponics culture10.1007/s10482-013-9954-9 ↗
54. Mechanisms of action of plant growth promoting bacteria10.1007/s11274-017-2364-9 ↗
55. Chemistry and biology of siderophores10.1039/b906679a ↗
56. Microbial siderophores and their potential applications: A review10.1007/s11356-015-4294-0 ↗
57. Beneficial role of bacterial endophytes in heavy metal phytoremediation10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.02.047 ↗
58. Prospects and applications of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria to mitigate soil metal contamination: A review10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.125823 ↗
59. Phosphorus dynamics: From soil to plant10.1104/pp.111.175232 ↗
60. A subcompatible rhizobium strain reveals infection duality in Lotus10.1093/jxb/erz057 ↗
62. Nitrogen Fixing Azotobacter Species as Potential Soil Biological Enhancers for Crop Nutrition and Yield Stability10.3389/fmicb.2021.628379 ↗
63. Singh, D., Singh, H., and Prabha, R. (2017). Soil–Plant–Microbe Interactions: Use of Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria for Plant Growth and Development in Sugarcane. Plant-Microbe Interactions in Agro-Ecological Perspectives, Springer.10.1007/978-981-10-6593-4 ↗
64. Plant cell wall remodelling in the rhizobium–legume symbiosis10.1080/07352680490480734 ↗
65. Luo, J., Zhou, J.J., and Zhang, J.Z. (2018). Aux/IAA gene family in plants: Molecular structure, regulation, and function. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 19.10.3390/ijms19010259 ↗
66. Using plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) to improve plant growth10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.07.019 ↗
67. Hönig, M., Plíhalová, L., Husičková, A., Nisler, J., and Doležal, K. (2018). Role of cytokinins in senescence, antioxidant defence and photosynthesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 19.10.3390/ijms19124045 ↗
68. The makings of a gradient: Spatiotemporal distribution of gibberellins in plant development10.1016/j.pbi.2018.08.001 ↗
69. Elucidation of gibberellin biosynthesis in bacteria reveals convergent evolution10.1038/nchembio.2232 ↗
70. Bacteria with ACC deaminase can promote plant growth and help to feed the world10.1016/j.micres.2013.09.009 ↗
71. ACC deaminase in plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB): An efficient mechanism to counter salt stress in crops10.1016/j.micres.2020.126439 ↗
72. Using soil bacteria to facilitate phytoremediation10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.02.001 ↗
73. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: Mechanism and current prospective10.4172/2471-2728.1000155 ↗
74. Plant-Growth promotion and biocontrol properties of three Streptomyces spp. isolates to control bacterial rice pathogens10.3389/fmicb.2019.00290 ↗
75. Pseudomonas fluorescens F113 mutant with enhanced competitive colonization ability and improved biocontrol activity against fungal root pathogens10.1128/AEM.00320-11 ↗
76. Isolation and biochemical characterization of Plant Growth Promoting (PGP) bacteria colonizing the rhizosphere of Tef crop during the seedling stage10.29328/journal.jpsp.1001027 ↗
77. The role of microorganisms in bioremediation—A Review10.17352/ojeb.000007 ↗
78. Bioaugmentation and biostimulation strategies to improve the effectivenesss of bioremediation processes10.1007/s10532-010-9394-4 ↗
79. Effects of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on phytoremediation of phenanthrene contaminated sodic soil10.1080/10406638.2019.1639063 ↗
80. Nie, M., Wang, Y., Yu, J., Xiao, M., Jiang, J., Fang, C., Chen, J., and Li, B. (2011). Understanding plant-microbe interactions for phytoremediation of petroleum-polluted soil. PLoS ONE, 6.10.1371/journal.pone.0017961 ↗
81. Exploiting hydrocarbon-degrader indigenous bacteria for bioremediation and phytoremediation of a multi-contaminated soil10.1002/ceat.201500573 ↗
82. Bacterial endophytes isolated from plants in natural oil seep soils with chronic hydrocarbon contamination10.3389/fmicb.2016.00755 ↗
83. Biosurfactant production and hydrocarbon degradation activity of endophytic bacteria isolated from Chelidonium majus L.10.1186/s12934-018-1017-5 ↗
84. DalCorso, G., Fasani, E., Manara, A., Visioli, G., and Furini, A. (2019). Heavy metal pollutions: State of the art and innovation in phytoremediation. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 20.10.3390/ijms20143412 ↗
85. Alleviation of heavy metal stress in plants and remediation of soil by rhizosphere microorganisms10.3389/fmicb.2017.01706 ↗
86. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria enhance the growth and Cd uptake of Sedum plumbizincicola in a Cd-contaminated soil10.1007/s11368-015-1067-9 ↗
87. Effect of Cd-tolerant plant growth-promoting rhizobium on plant growth and Cd uptake by Lolium multiflorum Lam. and Glycine max (L.) Merr. in Cd-contaminated soil10.1007/s11104-013-1952-1 ↗
88. Phytomanagement of Cd-contaminated soils using maize (Zea mays L.) assisted by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria10.1007/s11356-014-2848-1 ↗
89. Impact of co-inoculation with plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria and rhizobium on the biochemical responses of alfalfa-soil system in copper contaminated soil10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.10.016 ↗
90. Co-inoculation effect of rhizobia and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on common bean growth in a low phosphorus soil10.3389/fpls.2017.00141 ↗
91. Raklami, A., Oufdou, K., Tahiri, A.I., Mateos-Naranjo, E., Navarro-Torre, S., Rodríguez-Llorente, I.D., Meddich, A., Redondo-Gómez, S., and Pajuelo, E. (2019). Safe Cultivation of Medicago sativa in metal-polluted soils from semi-arid regions assisted by heat- and metallo-resistant PGPR. Microorganisms, 7.10.3390/microorganisms7070212 ↗
92. Significance of diazotrophic plant growth-promoting Herbaspirillum sp. GW103 on phytoextraction of Pb and Zn by Zea mays L.10.1007/s11356-016-8066-2 ↗
93. The effect of Cu-resistant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and EDTA on phytoremediation efficiency of plants in a Cu-contaminated soil10.1007/s11356-019-06334-0 ↗
94. Effects of plant growth-promoting bacteria on EDTA-assisted phytostabilization of heavy metals in a contaminated calcareous soil10.1007/s10653-019-00422-3 ↗
95. Singh, H.B., Sarma, B.K., and Keswani, C. (2017). Phytoremediation and the key role of PGPR. Advances in PGPR Research, CABI.10.1079/9781786390325.0000 ↗
96. Improved arsenic phytoextraction by combined use of mobilizing chemicals and autochthonous soil bacteria10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.242 ↗
97. Phytoremediation of heavy metals assisted by plant growth promoting (PGP) bacteria: A review10.1016/j.envexpbot.2015.05.001 ↗
98. The influence of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in plant tolerance to abiotic stress: A survival strategy10.1007/s00253-018-9214-z ↗
99. Morphological assessment of water stressed sugarcane: A comparison of waterlogged and drought affected crop10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.02.007 ↗
100. Drought-tolerant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria associated with foxtail millet in a semi-arid agroecosystem and their potential in alleviating drought stress10.3389/fmicb.2017.02580 ↗