journal article·2026-08

Possibility of storage of molecular hydrogen in GeTe monolayer

Jabed Aktar Khan, Sulagna Ghosh, Palash Nath, Dirtha Sanyal

Applied Physics A· Volume 132· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · Advanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices · Phase-change materials and chalcogenides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (73)

Show source-provided references
1. A. Züttel, Hydrogen storage method. Sci. Nat. 91(4), 157–172 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-004-0516-x10.1007/s00114-004-0516-x ↗
2. L. Schlapbach, A. Züttel, Hydrogen-storage materials for mobile applications. Nature. 414(6861), 353–358 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/3510463410.1038/35104634 ↗
3. J.Q. Li, J.C. Li, K. Park, S.J. Jang, J.T. Kwon, An analysis on the compressed hydrogen storage system for the fast-filling process of hydrogen gas at the pressure of 82 MPa. Energies. 14(9), 2635 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/en1409263510.3390/en14092635 ↗
4. X. Li, X. Yang, H. Xue, H. Pang, Q. Xu, Metal-organic frameworks as a platform for clean energy applications. Energy Chem. 2(2), 100027 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enchem.2020.10002710.1016/j.enchem.2020.100027 ↗
5. L. Lv, L. Jain, G. Yang, Z. Ma, L. Xu, X. He, X. Han, W. Liu, Hydrogen storage performance of LaNi3.95 Al0.75Co0.3 alloy with different preparation methods. Progress Nat. Science: Mater. Int. 32(2), 206–214 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2022.02.00110.1016/j.pnsc.2022.02.001 ↗
6. M.V. Kalinina, M.Y. Arsent’ev, S.V. Balabanov, Study of hydrogen adsorption on a monolayer TiS3 decorated with Mg cations. Glass Phys. Chem. 47(3), 270–275 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S108765962103004410.1134/S1087659621030044 ↗
7. Z. Ao, S.X. Dou, Z. Xu, Q. Jiang, G. Wang, Hydrogen storage in porous graphene with Al decoration. J. Hydrogen Energy. 39(28), 16244–16251 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.01.04410.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.01.044 ↗
8. M.D. Ganji, S.M.H. Khan, Z.A. Tabar, Theoretical insight into hydrogen adsorption onto graphene: a first-principles B3LYP-D3 study. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17(4), 2504–2511 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CP04399E10.1039/C4CP04399E ↗
9. B.A. Baraiya, N.N. Som, V. Mankad, G. Wu, J. Wang, P.K. Jha, Nitrogen-decorated borophene: an empowering contestant for hydrogen storage. Appl. Surf. Sci. 527, 146852 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14685210.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146852 ↗
10. Y.D. Chen, S. Yu, W.H. Zhao, S.F. Li, X.M. Duan, A potential material for hydrogen storage: a Li decorated graphitic-CN monolayer. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 13473–13477 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cp01145a10.1039/c8cp01145a ↗
11. S. Wang, Y. Du, W. Liao, Z. Sun, Hydrogen adsorption, dissociation and diffusion on two-dimensional Ti2C monolayer. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 42(44), 27214–27219 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.09.11110.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.09.111 ↗
12. E.W.K. Koh, C.H. Chiu, Y.K. Lim, Y.W. Zhang, H. Pan, Hydrogen adsorption on and diffusion through MoS2 monolayer: First-principles study. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 37(19), 14323–14328 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.07.06910.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.07.069 ↗
13. H. Si, L.J. Peng, J.R. Morris, B.C. Pan, Theoretical prediction of hydrogen storage on ZnO sheet. J. Phys. Chem. C 115(18), 9053–9058 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp111394v10.1021/jp111394v ↗
14. H. Shi, H. Yuan, Z. Li, W. Wang, Z. Li, X. Shao, Low-temperature heterolytic adsorption of H2 on ZnO (101$$\:\stackrel{-}{0}$$) surface. J. Phys. Chem. C 123(21), 13283–13287 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0144710.1021/acs.jpcc.9b01447 ↗
15. K.R.S. Chandra Kumar, S.K. Ghosh, Alkali-metal-induced enhancement of hydrogen adsorption in C60 fullerene: an ab initio study. Nano Lett. 8(1), 13–19 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl071456i10.1021/nl071456i ↗
16. D. Chhetri, B. Chettri, N. Sharma et al., DFT Study of Structural, Electronic, and Adsorption Properties of MoS2 Monolayer Functionalized with Sc and Hf. J. Electron. Mater. 55, 4509–4527 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-026-12779-010.1007/s11664-026-12779-0 ↗
17. S. Ghosh, P. Nath, S. Moshat, D. Sanyal, Theoretical calculation on adsorption of molecular hydrogen in monolayer ZnO. J. Appl. Phys. 134(15), 155001 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.015691610.1063/5.0156916 ↗
18. S. Ghosh, P. Nath, S. Moshat, D. Sanyal, Adsorption and evolution of hydrogen molecules on hexagonal boron nitride monolayer: a combined DFT and kinetic Monte-Carlo simulations study. Phys. Scr. 99(4), 045913 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad2e6110.1088/1402-4896/ad2e61 ↗
19. S. Ghosh, P. Nath, M.D. Sarkar, D. Sanyal, An ab initio study on the adsorption of hydrogen molecules over tin sulphide monolayer. Appl. Phys. A 131(10), 773 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-025-08871-710.1007/s00339-025-08871-7 ↗
20. W. Ju, M. Li, J. Chen, T. Li, X. Wang, D. Kang, H. Li, B. Zhao, Strong Rashba effect induced by mechanical strain in the GeTe monolayer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 124(14), 142402 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.018873610.1063/5.0188736 ↗
21. M. Qiao, Y. Chen, Y. Wang, Y. Li, The germanium telluride monolayer: a two dimensional semiconductor with high carrier mobility for photocatalytic water splitting. J. Mater. Chem. A 6(9), 4119–4125 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA10360C10.1039/C7TA10360C ↗
22. B. Marfoua, Y.S. Lim, J. Hong, High thermoelectric performance of two-dimensional α-GeTe bilayer. Energy. 211, 118693 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.11869310.1016/j.energy.2020.118693 ↗
23. U.D. Wdowik, K. Parlinski, S. Rols, T. Chatterji, Soft-phonon mediated structural phase transition in GeTe. Phys. Rev. B 89(22), 224306 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.89.22430610.1103/PhysRevB.89.224306 ↗
24. W. Wan, C. Liu, W. Xiao, Y. Yao, Promising ferroelectricity in 2D group IV tellurides: A first-principles study. Appl. Phys. Lett. 111(13), 132904 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.499617110.1063/1.4996171 ↗
25. T. Chattopadhyay et al., Neutron diffraction study on the structural phase transition in GeTe. J. Phys. C Solid State Phys. 20(10), 1431 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/20/10/01210.1088/0022-3719/20/10/012 ↗
26. D. Zhang, S. Hu, Y. Sun, X. Liu, H. Wang, Y. Chen, Y. Ni, XTe (X = Ge, Sn, Pb) monolayers: Promising thermoelectric materials with ultralow lattice thermal conductivity and high-power factor. ES Energy Environ. 10, 59–65 (2020). https://doi.org/10.30919/esee8c93410.30919/esee8c934 ↗
27. L. Xu, M. Yang, S.J. Wang, Y.P. Feng, Electronic and optical properties of the monolayer group-IV monochalcogenides MX (M = Ge, Sn; X = S, Se, Te). Phys. Rev. B 95(23), 235434 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.23543410.1103/PhysRevB.95.235434 ↗
28. Y. Guo, S. Zhou, Y. Bai et al., Oxidation resistance of monolayer group-IV monochalcogenides. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 9(13), 12013–12020 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b1678610.1021/acsami.6b16786 ↗
29. Z. Zhang, C. Peng, S. Song et al., Characterization of Cu doping on GeTe for phase change memory application. J. Appl. Phys. 114(24), 244311 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.485175710.1063/1.4851757 ↗
30. X. Zhang, Y. Chen, Z. Yang, First principles study of the gas sensing 2D GeTe: atomic, electronic and transport properties. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 51(34), 345304 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aad45a10.1088/1361-6463/aad45a ↗
31. G.J. Kresse, D. Joubert, From ultra-soft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59(3), 1758–1775 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
32. P.E. Blo¨chl, Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
33. G. Kresse, J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter. 47, 558–561 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.47.55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
34. G. Kresse, J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal-amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium. Phys. Rev. B 49, 14251–14214 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.49.1425110.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251 ↗
35. G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller, Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6(1), 15–50 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
36. G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
37. H.J. Monkhorst, J.D. Pack, Special points for Brillouinzone integrations. Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.13.518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
38. S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, H. Krieg, A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 132(15), 154104 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.338234410.1063/1.3382344 ↗
39. S. Grimme, Semi empirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long range dispersion correction. J. Comput. Chem. 27(15), 1787–1799 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.2049510.1002/jcc.20495 ↗
40. H. Zhang, W.X. Li, First-principles investigation of surface and subsurface H adsorption on Ir (111). J. Phys. Chem. C 113(51), 21361–21367 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp907486610.1021/jp9074866 ↗
41. C.R. Hsing, C. Cheng, J.P. Chou, C.M. Chang, C.M. Wei, Van der Waals interaction in a boron nitride bilayer. New. J. Phys. 16(11), 113015 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/16/11/11301510.1088/1367-2630/16/11/113015 ↗
42. R.F.W. Bader, A quantum theory of molecular structure and its applications. Chem. Rev. 91(5), 893–928 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00005a01310.1021/cr00005a013 ↗
43. J.P. Perdew, K. Burke, Ernzerhof, generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
44. A.D. Becke, K.E. Edgecombe, A simple measure of electron localization in atomic and molecular systems. J. Chem. Phys. 92(9), 5397–5403 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.45851710.1063/1.458517 ↗
45. M.D. Sarkar, S. Ghosh et al., First-principles study of robust half-metallic ferromagnetism and electronic structure of the Heusler compounds Co2–xCrxMnGe. Phys. Scr. 100, 015963 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad9b5810.1088/1402-4896/ad9b58 ↗
46. A. Kumar, N. Vyas, A.K. Ojha, Hydrogen storage in magnesium decorated boron clusters (Mg2Bn, n = 4–14): a density functional theory study. Int. J. Hydrog Energy. 45(23), 12961–12971 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.03.01810.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.03.018 ↗
47. D.T. Gillespie, A general method for numerically simulating the stochastic time evolution of coupled chemical reactions. J. Comput. Phys. 22(4), 403–434 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(76)90041-310.1016/0021-9991(76)90041-3 ↗
48. M. Andersen, C. Panosetti, K. Reuter, A practical guide to surface kinetic Monte Carlo simulations. Front. Chem. 7, 202 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2019.0020210.3389/fchem.2019.00202 ↗
49. A. Chatterjee, D.G. Vlachos, An overview of spatial microscopic and accelerated kinetic Monte Carlo methods. J. Comput. Aided Mater. Des. 14(2), 253–308 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10820-006-9042-910.1007/s10820-006-9042-9 ↗
50. X. Zhang, K.H. Jin, J. Mao, M. Zhao, Z. Liu, F. Liu, Prediction of intrinsic topological superconductivity in Mn-doped GeTe monolayer from first-principles. Comput. Mater. 7, 44 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-021-00511-x10.1038/s41524-021-00511-x ↗
51. P. Zhang, F. Zhao, P. Long et al., Sonication-assisted liquid-phase exfoliated alpha-GeTe: a two-dimensional material with high Fe 3 + sensitivity. Nanoscale. 10(34), 15989–15997 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NR03091J10.1039/C8NR03091J ↗
52. F. Zhao, Y. Feng, W. Feng, Germanium-based monoelemental and binary two-dimensional materials: Theoretical and experimental investigations and promising applications. Info Mat. 4, e12365 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/inf2.1236510.1002/inf2.12365 ↗
53. Y. Han, An evaluation for geometries, formation enthalpies, and dissociation energies of diatomic and triatomic (C, H, N, O), NO3, and HNO3 molecules from the PAW DFT method with PBE and optB88-vdW functional. AIP Adv. 12(12), 125009 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.011737810.1063/5.0117378 ↗
54. K.P. Huber, G. Herzberg, Constants of diatomic molecules,Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure, (Springer, Boston, MA, 1979), 8–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0961-2_210.1007/978-1-4757-0961-2_2 ↗
55. W. Zhang, Q. Du, L. Zhang, Tunable electronic and optical properties of gas molecules adsorbed monolayer graphitic ZnO: implications for gas sensor and environment monitoring. J. Appl. Phys. 122(24), 244304 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.500640710.1063/1.5006407 ↗
56. G. Henkelman, A. Arnaldsson, H. Jonsson, A fast and robust algorithm for Bader decomposition of charge density. Comput. Mater. Sci. 36(3), 354–360 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2005.04.01010.1016/j.commatsci.2005.04.010 ↗
57. A. Kajal, K. Kumar et al., Surface chemistry-driven CO2 activation and conversion on V2C Mxenes. Sci. Rep. 15, 38384 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-22339-x10.1038/s41598-025-22339-x ↗
58. K. Kumar, A. Dhasmana, A.K. Mishra et al., CO2 activation on metal and no metal doped goldene sheets: A DFT study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 714, 164509 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2025.16450910.1016/j.apsusc.2025.164509 ↗
59. K. Kumar, A. Dhasmana, A.K. Mishra et al., DFT study of CO2 activation on pristine and vacancy- containing 2D-GeC monolayers. Chem. Phys. Mater. 5, 50–57 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chphma.2025.06.00210.1016/j.chphma.2025.06.002 ↗
60. A.S. Kharb, K. Kumar, A.K. Mishra et al., Selective NO gas sensing over TiVCO2 MXene: A realistic computational prediction. Nano Express. 6, 025009 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-959X/adda6910.1088/2632-959X/adda69 ↗
61. K. Kumar, D. Thakur, R. Sharma et al., First-principles study of CO2 activation on pristine and defected XO2 (X = Pd, Pt) monolayers. J. Mole Graph Model. 143, 109273 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmgm.2025.10927310.1016/j.jmgm.2025.109273 ↗
62. A.D. Becke, K.E. Edgecombe, A simple measure of electron localization in atomic and molecular systems. J. Chem. Phys. 92(9), 5397–5403 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.45851710.1063/1.458517 ↗
63. M.S. Jyothi, V. Nagarajan, R. Chandiramouli, Adsorption attributes of methyl naphthalene and naphthalene on P-Germanane sheets – a DFT outlook. Struct. Chem. 35(5), 1387–1397 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-024-02285-610.1007/s11224-024-02285-6 ↗
64. V. Nagarajan, R. Bhuvaneswari, R. Chandiramouli, Sensing studies of acenaphthene and acenaphthylene molecules using penta-graphene sheets – A DFT outlook. Comput. Theor. Chem. 1230, 114391 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comptc.2023.11439110.1016/j.comptc.2023.114391 ↗
65. V. Nagarajan, R. Kavitha, R. Chandiramouli, Furan and dioxin adsorption studies on beta helical phosphorene-a DFT study. J. Mole Liquids. 438, 128705 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2025.12870510.1016/j.molliq.2025.128705 ↗
66. M.S. Jyothi, V. Nagarajan et al., β-Silicon germanane nanosheets as potential sensor for greenhouse gases hexafluoroethane and nitrogen trifluoride based on first-principles study. Chem. Phys. 607, 113185 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2026.11318510.1016/j.chemphys.2026.113185 ↗
67. N. Janani, R. Chandiramouli et al., Sensing attributes of β-arsenene nanosheets towards acetaldehyde and acrolein vapours-A first-principles study. Comp. Theo Chem. 1261, 115846 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comptc.2026.11584610.1016/j.comptc.2026.115846 ↗
68. V.M. Haripriyaa, V. Nagarajan et al., Comparative analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon adsorption on pristine and aluminium-doped β- antimonene nanosheets: a DFT perspective. Micro Nanostruct. 216, 208738 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micrna.2026.20873810.1016/j.micrna.2026.208738 ↗
69. J. Sing, G. Sing, S.K. Tripathi et al., First principle calculation of GeTe and Ge2TeSe monolayers: Structurlectronic and thermoelectric properties. Mater. Today: Proc. 45(6), 5439–5443 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.11710.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.117 ↗
70. D. Zhang, Z. Zhou, H. Wang, Z. Yang, C. Liu, Tunable electric properties of bilayer α-GeTe with different interlayer distances and external electric fields. Nano Res. Lett. 13, 400 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-018-2813-x10.1186/s11671-018-2813-x ↗
71. X. Zhang, F. Zhao, Y. Wang, X. Liang, Z. Zhang, Y. Feng, Y. Li, L. Tang, W. Feng, Two dimensional GeTe: air stability and photocatalytic performance for hydrogen evolution. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 12(33), 37108–37115 (2020). https://pubs.acs.org/doi/https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c0869910.1021/acsami.0c08699 ↗
72. S. Wang, Pd-doped GeTe monolayer as a promising gas scavenger upon H2, CO and C2H2 in oil-immersed transformers: a first-principles study. Comp. Theo Chem. 1256, 115615 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comptc.2025.11561510.1016/j.comptc.2025.115615 ↗
73. J.A. Khan et al., H2 adsorption over GeO2 monolayer: a theoretical study. J. Mater. Sci: Mater. Eng. 20, 119 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40712-025-00335-310.1186/s40712-025-00335-3 ↗