journal article·2026-08Open access

Load-dependent hardness prediction for materials using machine learning

Madhubanti Mukherjee, Rampi Ramprasad, Harikrishna Sahu

Applied Physics A· Volume 132· Issue 8

Abstract

Abstract Superhard materials are critical for wear-resistant and high-stress applications. Conventional approaches correlating hardness with elastic moduli derived from DFT calculations enable rapid screening but overlook the strong load dependence of hardness. In this work, machine learning (ML) models were developed using a large, curated dataset of load-dependent experimental Vickers hardness (H $$_v$$ ) measurements. Moderate correlation was observed between experimental and DFT-based H $$_v$$ values, whereas a single-task ML model trained solely on experimental data outperformed multi-task models that combined experimental and computed data. The superior performance of the single-task model highlights that explicit inclusion of indentation load, along with compositional, electronic, and structural descriptors, is essential and sufficient for accurate hardness prediction, beyond what can be achieved using DFT-accessible bulk and shear moduli alone (or in tandem with experimental data). Specifically, the single-task Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) yields a train-test root mean squared error (RMSE) in a range of 2.73-2.90/3.16-3.91 GPa and $$R^2$$ in a range of 0.96-0.95/0.94-0.91 across five random splits of train and test sets. These results emphasize the importance of high-quality experimental data and explicit inclusion of measurement conditions, particularly load, in the development of reliable hardness prediction models.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research · Metal Alloys Wear and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. R.B. Kaner, J.J. Gilman, S.H. Tolbert, Designing superhard materials. Science 308(5726), 1268–1269 (2005)10.1126/science.1109830 ↗
2. F. Gao, X. Qin, L. Wang, Y. He, G. Sun, L. Hou, W. Wang, Prediction of new superhard boron-rich compounds. J. Phys. Chem. B 109(31), 14892–14895 (2005)10.1021/jp052547b ↗
3. Z. Zhao, B. Xu, Y. Tian, Recent advances in superhard materials. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 46(1), 383–406 (2016)10.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-031649 ↗
4. M.T. Yeung, R. Mohammadi, R.B. Kaner, Ultraincompressible, superhard materials. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 46, 465–485 (2016)10.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-032148 ↗
5. A.G. Kvashnin, Z. Allahyari, A.R. Oganov, Computational discovery of hard and superhard materials. J. Appl. Phys. 126(4), 040901 (2019)10.1063/1.5109782 ↗
6. X. Jiang, J. Zhao, X. Jiang, Correlation between hardness and elastic moduli of the covalent crystals. Comput. Mater. Sci. 50(7), 2287–2290 (2011)10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.01.043 ↗
7. A. Šimůnek, J. Vackář, Hardness of covalent and ionic crystals: first-principle calculations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 085501 (2006)10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.085501 ↗
8. F. Gao, J. He, E. Wu, S. Liu, D. Yu, D. Li, S. Zhang, Y. Tian, Hardness of covalent crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 015502 (2003)10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.015502 ↗
9. A.M. Tehrani, J. Brgoch, Hard and superhard materials: a computational perspective. J. Solid State Chem. 271, 47–58 (2019)10.1016/j.jssc.2018.10.048 ↗
10. M. De Jong, W. Chen, R. Notestine, K. Persson, G. Ceder, A. Jain, M. Asta, A. Gamst, A statistical learning framework for materials science: application to elastic moduli of k-nary inorganic polycrystalline compounds. Sci. Rep. 6(1), 34256 (2016)10.1038/srep34256 ↗
11. O. Isayev, C. Oses, C. Toher, E. Gossett, S. Curtarolo, A. Tropsha, Universal fragment descriptors for predicting properties of inorganic crystals. Nat. Commun. 8(1), 15679 (2017)10.1038/ncomms15679 ↗
12. A. Mansouri Tehrani, A.O. Oliynyk, M. Parry, Z. Rizvi, S. Couper, F. Lin, L. Miyagi, T.D. Sparks, J. Brgoch, Machine learning directed search for ultraincompressible, superhard materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140(31), 9844–9853 (2018)10.1021/jacs.8b02717 ↗
13. P. Avery, X. Wang, C. Oses, E. Gossett, D.M. Proserpio, C. Toher, S. Curtarolo, E. Zurek, Predicting superhard materials via a machine learning informed evolutionary structure search. NPJ Comput. Mater. 5(1), 89 (2019)10.1038/s41524-019-0226-8 ↗
14. W.-C. Chen, J.N. Schmidt, D. Yan, Y.K. Vohra, C.-C. Chen, Machine learning and evolutionary prediction of superhard bcn compounds. NPJ Comput. Mater. 7(1), 114 (2021)10.1038/s41524-021-00585-7 ↗
15. M. Mukherjee, H. Sahu, M.D. Losego, W.R. Gutekunst, R. Ramprasad, Informatics-driven design of superhard b–c–o compounds. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 16, 10372–10379 (2024)10.1021/acsami.3c18105 ↗
16. Z. Zhang, A. Mansouri Tehrani, A.O. Oliynyk, B. Day, J. Brgoch, Finding the next superhard material through ensemble learning. Adv. Mater. 33, 2005112 (2021)10.1002/adma.202005112 ↗
17. J.C. Hickey, J. Brgoch, The limits of proxy-guided superhard materials screening. Chem. Mater. 34, 10003–10010 (2022)10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c02390 ↗
18. R. Jaafreh, Y.S. Kang, J.-G. Kim, K. Hamad, Machine learning guided discovery of super-hard high entropy ceramics. Mater. Lett. 306, 130899 (2022)10.1016/j.matlet.2021.130899 ↗
19. S.P. Ong, W.D. Richards, A. Jain, G. Hautier, M. Kocher, S. Cholia, D. Gunter, V.L. Chevrier, K.A. Persson, G. Ceder, Python materials genomics (pymatgen): A robust, open-source python library for materials analysis. Comput. Mater. Sci. 68, 314–319 (2013)10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.028 ↗
20. Inc. Matmerize, PolymRize™: An informatics platform for polymer property prediction and design using machine learning (2025). https://polymrize.matmerize.com/
21. X.-Q. Chen, H. Niu, D. Li, Y. Li, Modeling hardness of polycrystalline materials and bulk metallic glasses. Intermetallics 19, 1275–1281 (2011)10.1016/j.intermet.2011.03.026 ↗
22. X. Jiang, J. Zhao, X. Jiang, Correlation between hardness and elastic moduli of the covalent crystals. Comput. Mater. Sci. 50(7), 2287–2290 (2011)10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.01.043 ↗
23. D.M. Teter, Computational alchemy: The search for new superhard materials. MRS Bull. 23, 22–27 (1998)10.1557/S0883769400031420 ↗
24. A. Jain, S.P. Ong, G. Hautier, W. Chen, W.D. Richards, S. Dacek, S. Cholia, D. Gunter, D. Skinner, G. Ceder, K.A. Persson, Commentary: The materials project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 1, 011002 (2013)10.1063/1.4812323 ↗
25. M. De Jong, W. Chen, T. Angsten, A. Jain, R. Notestine, A. Gamst, M. Sluiter, C. Krishna Ande, S. Van Der Zwaag, J.J. Plata et al., Charting the complete elastic properties of inorganic crystalline compounds. Sci. Data 2(1), 150009 (2015)10.1038/sdata.2015.9 ↗
26. E. Williams, Hooke’s law and the concept of the elastic limit. Ann. Sci. 12(1), 74–83 (1956)10.1080/00033795600200056 ↗
27. H. Lan, T. Venkatesh, On the relationships between hardness and the elastic and plastic properties of isotropic power-law hardening materials. Philos. Mag. 94(1), 35–55 (2014)10.1080/14786435.2013.839889 ↗
28. V. Gorban, M. Lugovyi, D. Verbylo, Determination of material hardness characteristics at the elastic limit by instrumented indentation. Strength Mater. 57(3), 567–572 (2025)10.1007/s11223-025-00789-y ↗