PySphLab: a software for calculation of electromagnetic properties of spheroid particles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications · Thermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. A.A. Kochanovskij, Aerosol optics: light absorption and scattering by particles in the atmosphere (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2008)
2. C. Tomasi, S. Fuzzi, A. Kokhanovsky, Atmospheric aerosols: life cycles and effects on air quality and climate (Wiley-VCH, Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany, 2017)10.1002/9783527336449 ↗
3. O. Kemppinen, J.C. Laning, R.D. Mersmann et al., Imaging atmospheric aerosol particles from a UAV with digital holography. Sci. Rep. 10, 16085 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72411-x10.1038/s41598-020-72411-x ↗
4. T. Gric, E.U. Rafailov, On the study of ellipsoidal nanowire metamaterials for biomedical applications. Opt. Quantum Electron. 55, 993 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-023-05369-510.1007/s11082-023-05369-5 ↗
5. J.D. Keener, K.J. Chalut, J.W. Pyhtila, A. Wax, Application of Mie theory to determine the structure of spheroidal scatterers in biological materials. Opt. Lett. 32, 1326 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.32.00132610.1364/OL.32.001326 ↗
6. H. Chen-Chen, S. Pérez-Hoyos, A. Sánchez-Lavega, Dust particle size, shape and optical depth during the 2018/MY34 martian global dust storm retrieved by MSL Curiosity rover navigation cameras. Icarus 354, 114021 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2020.11402110.1016/j.icarus.2020.114021 ↗
7. S. Höfer, H. Mutschke, T.G. Mayerhöfer, Effects of anisotropy on absorption cross-section spectra of medium-sized spheroidal corundum particles. Astron. Astrophys. A87. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/20203893110.1051/0004-6361/202038931 ↗
8. Q. Xie, H. Zhang, Y. Wan et al., Characteristics of light scattering by smoke particles based on spheroid models. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 107, 72–78 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2007.01.05910.1016/j.jqsrt.2007.01.059 ↗
9. B.S. Hensley, B.T. Draine, The Astrodust + PAH Model: A Unified Description of the Extinction, Emission, and Polarization from Dust in the Diffuse Interstellar Medium. Astrophys. J. 948, 55 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acc4c210.3847/1538-4357/acc4c2 ↗
10. J. Duan, Y. Qu, Q. Fu et al., Polarized light transmission characteristics in a smoky ellipsoidal particle medium. Appl. Opt. 62, 2510 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.48085710.1364/AO.480857 ↗
11. L. Wang, D. Liu, Evaluation of non-spherical particle models for mineral dust in multi-wavelength polarization lidar applications: comparison of spheroid, super-ellipsoid, and irregular-hexagonal models. Remote Sens. 17, 3804 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs1723380410.3390/rs17233804 ↗
12. P.C. Waterman, Matrix formulation of electromagnetic scattering. Proc. IEEE 53, 805–812 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1965.405810.1109/PROC.1965.4058 ↗
13. P.C. Waterman, Symmetry, Unitarity, and Geometry in Electromagnetic Scattering. Phys. Rev. D 3, 825–839 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.3.82510.1103/PhysRevD.3.825 ↗
14. B.T. Draine, P.J. Flatau, Discrete-Dipole Approximation For Scattering Calculations. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 1491 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.11.00149110.1364/JOSAA.11.001491 ↗
15. B.T. Draine, P.J. Flatau, Discrete-dipole approximation for periodic targets: theory and tests. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 25, 2693 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.25.00269310.1364/JOSAA.25.002693 ↗
16. A. Taflove, S.C. Hagness, Computational electrodynamics: the finite-difference time-domain method, 3rd ed. (Artech House, Boston, Mass., 2010)
17. J.N. Reddy, An introduction to the finite element method, 3. ed., internat. ed., [Nachdr.]. (McGraw-Hill, Boston, 2009)
18. G.-R. Liu, S.S. Quek, The finite element method: a practical course, 2nd edition. (Butterworth-Heinemann, Amsterdam Oxford, 2014)
19. J. Ding, P. Yang, Lorenz-Mie theory-type solution for light scattering by spheroids with small-to-large size parameters and aspect ratios. Opt. Express. 31, 40937 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.50541610.1364/OE.505416 ↗
20. D.J. Wielaard, M.I. Mishchenko, A. Macke, B.E. Carlson, Improved T-matrix computations for large, nonabsorbing and weakly absorbing nonspherical particles and comparison with geometrical-optics approximation. Appl. Opt. 36, 4305 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.36.00430510.1364/AO.36.004305 ↗
21. M.I. Mishchenko, L.D. Travis, D.W. Mackowski, T-matrix computations of light scattering by nonspherical particles: A review. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 55, 535–575 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4073(96)00002-710.1016/0022-4073(96)00002-7 ↗
22. M.I. Mishchenko, L.D. Travis, Capabilities and limitations of a current fortran implementation of the T-matrix method for randomly oriented, rotationally symmetric scatterers. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 60, 309–324 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4073(98)00008-910.1016/S0022-4073(98)00008-9 ↗
23. B. Vandenbroucke, M. Baes, P. Camps, CosTuuM: Polarized Thermal Dust Emission by Magnetically Oriented Spheroidal Grains. Astron. J. 160, 55 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ab9cbd10.3847/1538-3881/ab9cbd ↗
24. W.R.C. Somerville, B. Auguié, E.C. Le Ru, Smarties: user-friendly codes for fast and accurate calculations of light scattering by spheroids. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 174, 39–55 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.01.00510.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.01.005 ↗
25. D. Ma, P. Tuersun, L. Cheng et al., Pymielab_V1.0: a software for calculating the light scattering and absorption of spherical particles. Heliyon 8, e11469 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e1146910.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11469 ↗
26. L. Jiang, P. Tuersun, D. Ma et al., Pymultilab: a software for calculation of electromagnetic properties of multilayered spherical particles. Plasmonics 20, 4393–4404 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-024-02581-110.1007/s11468-024-02581-1 ↗
27. L. Tognolatti, C. Ponti, M. Santarsiero, G. Schettini, An efficient computational technique for the electromagnetic scattering by prolate spheroids. Mathematics 10, 1761 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/math1010176110.3390/math10101761 ↗
28. A.A. Shcherbakov, Calculation of the electromagnetic scattering by non-spherical particles based on the volume integral equation in the spherical wave function basis. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 231, 102–114 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2019.04.02210.1016/j.jqsrt.2019.04.022 ↗
29. S. Hu, L. Liu, T. Gao, Q. Zeng, Design and Validation of the Invariant Imbedded T-Matrix Scattering Model for Atmospheric Particles with Arbitrary Shapes. Appl. Sci-BASEL. 9, 4423 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/app920442310.3390/app9204423 ↗
30. V. Schmidt, T. Wriedt, The T-matrix for particle with arbitrary permittivity tensor and parallelization of the computational code. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 113, 1712–1718 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2012.04.00310.1016/j.jqsrt.2012.04.003 ↗
31. J. Zhao, S. Hu, X. Liu, S. Li, The computational optimization of the invariant imbedding T matrix method for the particles with N-fold symmetry. Remote Sens. 14, 4061 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs1416406110.3390/rs14164061 ↗
32. M.I. Mishchenko, L.D. Travis, A. Lacis, Scattering, absorption, and emission of light by small particles, 1. publ. (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2002)
33. J.A. Stratton, L.J. Chu, Diffraction theory of electromagnetic waves. Phys. Rev. 56, 99–107 (1939). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.56.9910.1103/PhysRev.56.99 ↗
34. M.N. Polyanskiy, Refractiveindex.info database of optical constants. Sci. Data. 11, 94–112 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02898-210.1038/s41597-023-02898-2 ↗
35. A.B. Stilgoe, T.A. Nieminen, H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, Computational toolbox for scattering of focused light from flattened or elongated particles using spheroidal wavefunctions. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 331, 109267 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2024.10926710.1016/j.jqsrt.2024.109267 ↗
36. D. Beutel, I. Fernandez-Corbaton, C. Rockstuhl, Treams – a T-matrix-based scattering code for nanophotonics. Comput. Phys. Commun. 297, 109076 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2023.10907610.1016/j.cpc.2023.109076 ↗
37. A. Egel, K.M. Czajkowski, D. Theobald et al., SMUTHI: a python package for the simulation of light scattering by multiple particles near or between planar interfaces. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 273, 107846 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.10784610.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107846 ↗
38. L. Porta, (2023) Why and How to Translate Scientific code from MATLAB to Python: A Guide for Researchers. https://neuroinformatics.dev/blog/matlab_to_python.html
39. P. Jurica, OMPC: an open-source MATLAB®-to-python compiler. Front. Neuroinformatics. 3, 1–9 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.11.005.200910.3389/neuro.11.005.2009 ↗
40. L. Wang, M. Hasanzadeh Kafshgari, M. Meunier, Optical properties and applications of plasmonic-metal nanoparticles. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 2005400 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20200540010.1002/adfm.202005400 ↗
41. W. Wu, Z. Wu, T. Yu et al., Recent progress on magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, surface functional strategies and biomedical applications. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 16, 023501 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/1468-6996/16/2/02350110.1088/1468-6996/16/2/023501 ↗
42. S.M. Dizaj, F. Lotfipour, M. Barzegar-Jalali et al., Antimicrobial activity of the metals and metal oxide nanoparticles. Materials Science and Engineering: C 44, 278–284 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.08.03110.1016/j.msec.2014.08.031 ↗
43. I. Khan, K. Saeed, I. Khan, Nanoparticles: properties, applications and toxicities. Arab. J. Chem. 12, 908–931 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2017.05.01110.1016/j.arabjc.2017.05.011 ↗
44. M.A. Garcia, Surface plasmons in metallic nanoparticles: fundamentals and applications. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 45, 389501 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/45/38/38950110.1088/0022-3727/45/38/389501 ↗
45. G. Prieto, H. Tueysuez, N. Duyckaerts et al., Hollow Nano- and Microstructures as Catalysts. Chem. Rev. 116, 14056–14119 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0037410.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00374 ↗
46. H. Jia, C.C. Tsoi, A.E. Abed et al., Metallic plasmonic nanostructure arrays for enhanced solar photocatalysis. Laser Photonics Rev. 17, 2200700 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.20220070010.1002/lpor.202200700 ↗
47. P.B. Johnson, R.W. Christy, Optical constants of the noble metals. Phys. Rev. B 6, 4370–4379 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.6.437010.1103/PhysRevB.6.4370 ↗
48. F. Cheng, P.-H. Su, J. Choi et al., Epitaxial Growth of Atomically Smooth Aluminum on Silicon and Its Intrinsic Optical Properties. ACS Nano. 10, 9852–9860 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.6b0555610.1021/acsnano.6b05556 ↗
49. H.-J. Hagemann, W. Gudat, C. Kunz, Optical constants from the far infrared to the x-ray region: Mg, Al, Cu, Ag, Au, Bi, C, and Al2O3. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 65, 742 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.65.00074210.1364/JOSA.65.000742 ↗
50. R. Boyack, Le E.C. Ru, Investigation of particle shape and size effects in SERS using T-matrix calculations. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 11, 7398–7405 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1039/b905645a10.1039/b905645a ↗
51. D. Rioux, S. Vallières, S. Besner et al., An Analytic Model for the Dielectric Function of Au, Ag, and their Alloys. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2, 176–182 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.20130045710.1002/adom.201300457 ↗