Fabrication of a CuO-based gas sensor with high selectivity, sensitivity, and stability for n-butanol detection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. M. Vistak, O. Sushynskyi et al., Sensing of carbon monoxide with porous Al₂O₃ intercalated with Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles-doped liquid crystal. Sens. Actuators Phys. 235, 165–170 (2015)10.1016/j.sna.2015.10.001 ↗
2. C. Lourenço, C. Turner, Breath analysis in disease diagnosis: methodological considerations and applications. Metabolites. 4, 465–498 (2014)10.3390/metabo4020465 ↗
3. I. Nardi-Agmon, N. Peled, Exhaled breath analysis for the early detection of lung cancer: Recent developments and future prospects. Lung Cancer (Auckl). 8, 31–38 (2017)
4. M. Karunagaran, P. Ramani, S. Gheena, R. Abilasha, R. Hannah, Volatile organic compounds in human breath. Indian J. Dent. Res. 33, 100–104 (2022)10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_493_20 ↗
5. S.W. Harshman, B.A. Geier, A.V. Qualley, L.A. Drummond, L.E. Flory, M. Fan, R.L. Pitsch, C.C. Grigsby, J.B. Phillips, J.A. Martin, Exhaled isoprene for monitoring recovery from acute hypoxic stress. J. Breath. Res. 11, 047111 (2017)10.1088/1752-7163/aa927d ↗
6. D. Guo, D. Zhang, L. Zhang, G. Lu, Non-invasive blood glucose monitoring for diabetics by means of breath signal analysis. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 173, 106–113 (2012)10.1016/j.snb.2012.06.025 ↗
7. K.W. Kao, M.C. Hsu, H.Y. Chang, S. Gwo, J.A. Yeh, A sub-ppm acetone gas sensor for diabetes detection using 10 nm thick ultrathin InN FETs. Sensors. 12, 7157–7168 (2012)10.3390/s120607157 ↗
8. C. Wang, P. Sahay, Breath analysis using laser spectroscopic techniques: breath biomarkers, spectral fingerprints, and detection limits. Sensors. 9, 8230–8262 (2009)10.3390/s91008230 ↗
9. I. Bayrakli, O. Ozturk, H. Akman, Investigation of acetone, butanol and carbon dioxide as new breath biomarkers for convenient and noninvasive diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Biomed. Chromatogr. 30, 1890–1899 (2016)10.1002/bmc.3757 ↗
10. A. Mirzaei, S.G. Leonardi, G. Neri, Detection of hazardous volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by metal oxide nanostructures-based gas sensors: A review. Ceram. Int. 42, 15119–15141 (2016)10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.06.145 ↗
11. H.H. Technion, Sensors for breath testing: from nanomaterials to comprehensive disease sensors for breath testing: From nanomaterials to comprehensive disease detection. Acc. Chem. Res. 47, 66–76 (2014)10.1021/ar400070m ↗
12. A. Amann, M. Ligor et al., Analysis of exhaled breath for screening of lung cancer patients, memom-Mag. Eur. Med. Oncol. 3, 106–112 (2010)
13. J.W. Yoon, J.H. Lee, Toward breath analysis on a chip for disease diagnosis using semiconductor-based chemiresistors: Recent progress and future perspectives. Lab. Chip. 17, 3537–3557 (2017)10.1039/C7LC00810D ↗
14. S. Kulkarni, R. Ghosh, A simple approach for sensing and accurate prediction of multiple organic vapors by sensors based on CuO nanowires, Sens. Actuators B Chem. 335, 129701 (2021)10.1016/j.snb.2021.129701 ↗
15. Y.M. Jo, K. Lim, H.J. Choi, J.W. Yoon, S.Y. Kim, J.H. Lee, 2D metal-organic framework derived co-loading of Co₃O₄ and PdO nanocatalysts on In₂O₃ hollow spheres for tailored design of high-performance breath acetone sensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 325, 128821 (2020)10.1016/j.snb.2020.128821 ↗
16. Q. Duan, W. Zhang et al., W-CeO₂ nanospheres gas sensor array for accurate and selective H₂S detection in exhaled breath. Chem. Eng. J. 479, 147748 (2024)10.1016/j.cej.2023.147748 ↗
17. Z. Wu, Z. Chen et al., A high-performance room-temperature NH₃ gas sensor based on WO₃/TiO₂ nanocrystals decorated with Pt NPs. RSC Adv. 14, 12225–12234 (2024)10.1039/D4RA00881B ↗
18. B. Han, J. Wang, W. Yang, X. Chen, H. Wang, J. Chen, C. Zhang, J. Sun, X. Wei, Hydrothermal synthesis of flower-like In₂O₃ as a chemiresistive isoprene sensor for breath analysis. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 309, 127788 (2020)10.1016/j.snb.2020.127788 ↗
19. D. Barreca, E. Comini, A. Gasparotto, C. Maccato, G. Sberveglieri, E. Tondello, Chemical vapor deposition of copper oxide films and entangled quasi-1D nanoarchitectures as innovative gas sensors, Sens. Actuators B Chem. 141, 270–275 (2009)10.1016/j.snb.2009.05.038 ↗
20. D. Li, C. Yang, X. Zhao, J. Fan, Sensitizing effect of montmorillonite on the gas sensing property of CuO particles to n-butanol. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 299, 116978 (2024)10.1016/j.mseb.2023.116978 ↗
21. G. Peng, S. Wu, J.E. Ellis, X. Xu, G. Xu, C. Yu, A. Star, Single-walled carbon nanotubes templated CuO networks for gas sensing. J. Mater. Chem. C 4, 6575–6580 (2016)10.1039/C6TC01722C ↗
22. X.H. Vu, N.H. Minh et al., Acetone sensing properties of CuO nanowalls synthesized via oxidation of Cu foil in aqueous NH₄OH. Vacuum. 150, 129–135 (2018)10.1016/j.vacuum.2018.01.030 ↗
23. M. Liu, Y. Ding et al., Layered Ti₃C₂Tx MXene/CuO spindles composites for NH₃ detection at room-temperature. J. Alloys Compd. 938, 168563 (2023)10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.168563 ↗
24. W. Geng, Z. Ma et al., Morphology-dependent gas sensing properties of CuO microstructures self-assembled from nanorods. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 325, 128775 (2020)10.1016/j.snb.2020.128775 ↗
25. D. Li, Y. Tang, D. Ao, X. Xiang, S. Wang, X. Zu, Ultra-highly sensitive and selective H₂S gas sensor based on CuO with sub-ppb detection limit. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 44, 3985–3992 (2019)10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.12.083 ↗
26. T. Bhowmick, S. Nag, S.B. Majumder, Understanding the ethanol and acetone sensing behaviour of CuO thin films through elements of gas diffusion theory. Mater. Chem. Phys. 262, 124286 (2021)10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.124286 ↗
27. S. Yu, X. Jia, J. Yang, S. Wang, Y. Li, H. Song, Highly sensitive ethanol gas sensor based on CuO/ZnSnO₃ heterojunction composites. Mater. Lett. 291, 12953 (2021)10.1016/j.matlet.2021.129531 ↗
28. H. Khan, K. Malook, M. Shah, Highly selective and sensitive ammonia sensor using polypyrrole/V₂O₅ composites. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 28, 13873–13879 (2017)10.1007/s10854-017-7235-5 ↗
29. S.M. Pourmortazavi, M. Rahimi-Nasrabadi, F. Ahmadi, M.R. Ganjali, CuCO₃ and CuO nanoparticles; facile preparation and evaluation as photocatalysts. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 29, 9442–9451 (2018)10.1007/s10854-018-8977-4 ↗
30. D. Stoilova, V. Koleva, V. Vassileva, Infrared study of some synthetic phases of malachite (Cu₂(OH)₂CO₃)-hydrozincite (Zn₅(OH)₆(CO₃)₂) series, Spectrochim. Acta A: Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 58, 2051–2059 (2002)10.1016/S1386-1425(01)00677-1 ↗
31. T.X. Wang, S.H. Xu, F.X. Yang, Green synthesis of CuO nanoflakes from CuCO₃·Cu(OH)₂ powder and H₂O₂ aqueous solution. Powder Technol. 228, 128–130 (2012)10.1016/j.powtec.2012.05.007 ↗
32. Y. Xu, C. Wang, D. Chen, X. Jiao, Fabrication and characterization of novel nanostructured copper oxide films via a facile solution route. Mater. Lett. 64, 249–251 (2010)10.1016/j.matlet.2009.10.046 ↗
33. B.T. Sone, A. Diallo, X.G. Fuku, A. Gurib-Fakim, M. Maaza, Biosynthesized CuO nano-platelets: Physical properties & enhanced thermal conductivity nanofluidics. Arab. J. Chem. 13, 160–170 (2020)10.1016/j.arabjc.2017.03.004 ↗
34. S.R. Bhosale, S.A. Ghatage, P.N. Wahane, R.R. Bhosale, K.S. Jagadhane, D.N. Patil, P.V. Anbhule, Formation of CuO nanostructures via chemical route for biomedical applications. Chem. Phys. Lett. 808, 140122 (2022)10.1016/j.cplett.2022.140122 ↗
35. P. Gao, D. Liu, Facile synthesis of copper oxide nanostructures and their application in non-enzymatic hydrogen peroxide sensing, Sens. Actuators B Chem. 208, 346–354 (2015)10.1016/j.snb.2014.11.051 ↗
36. M. Sajjad, I. Ullah, M.I. Khan, J. Khan, M.Y. Khan, M.T. Qureshi, Structural and optical properties of pure and copper doped zinc oxide nanoparticles. Result Phys. 9, 1301–1309 (2018)10.1016/j.rinp.2018.04.010 ↗
37. A. Cagliani, D.M.A. Mackenzie, L.K. Tschammer et al., Large-area nanopatterned graphene for ultrasensitive gas sensing. Nano Res. 7, 743–754 (2014)10.1007/s12274-014-0435-x ↗
38. M.B. Mobarak, M.S. Hossain, F. Chowdhury, S. Ahmed, Synthesis and characterization of CuO nanoparticles utilizing waste fish scale and exploitation of XRD peak profile analysis for approximating the structural parameters. Arab. J. Chem. 15, 104117 (2022)10.1016/j.arabjc.2022.104117 ↗
39. S. Xu, Y. Xu, H. Zhao, R. Xu, Y. Lei, Sensitive gas-sensing by creating adsorption active sites: coating an SnO₂ layer on triangle arrays. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 10, 29092–29099 (2018)10.1021/acsami.8b08078 ↗
40. F.Y. Zeng, Z.Y. Sui, S. Liu, H.P. Liang, H.H. Zhan, B.H. Han, Nitrogen-doped carbon aerogels with high surface area for supercapacitors and gas adsorption. Mater. Today Commun. 16, 1–7 (2018)10.1016/j.mtcomm.2018.03.015 ↗
41. H. Chen, H. Chen, J. Chen, J. Chen, M. Song, Gas sensors based on semiconductor metal oxides fabricated by electrospinning: A review. Sensors. 24, 2962 (2024)10.3390/s24102962 ↗
42. D. Wu, Q. Zhang, M. Tao, LSDA + U study of cupric oxide: Electronic structure and native point defects. Phys. Rev. B 73, 1–6 (2006)10.1103/PhysRevB.73.235206 ↗
43. B. Saruhan, R.L. Fomekong, S. Nahirniak, Review: Influences of semiconductor metal oxide properties on gas sensing characteristics. Front. Sensors 2, 657931 (2021)
44. C. Yang, X. Su, F. Xiao, J. Jian, J. Wang, Gas sensing properties of CuO nanorods synthesized by a microwave-assisted hydrothermal method, Sens. Actuators B Chem. 158, 299–303 (2011)10.1016/j.snb.2011.06.024 ↗
45. L. Liao, M. Zheng, Z. Zhang, B. Yan, X. Chang, G. Ji, Z. Shen, T. Wu, J. Cao, H. Zhang, H. Gong, J. Cao, T. Yu, The characterization and application of p-type semiconducting mesoporous carbon nanofibers. Carbon. 47, 1841–1845 (2009)10.1016/j.carbon.2009.03.029 ↗
46. B.P. Dhonge, S.S. Ray, B. Mwakikunga, Electronic to protonic conduction switching in Cu₂O nanostructured porous films: the effect of humidity exposure. RSC Adv. 7, 21703–21712 (2017)10.1039/C7RA00383H ↗
47. NIST/EPA/NIH Mass Spectral, Library (NIST 20) with NIST MS Search Program, Version 2.4 (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2020)
48. M.T. Stauffer (ed.), Calibration and Validation of Analytical Methods-A Sampling of Current Approaches, InTech; 201810.5772/intechopen.69918 ↗
49. M. Xie, S. Chen, W. Wu, L. Wu, Y. Zhao, B. Chen, H. Pan, Highly sensitive and selective gas sensors based on NiO/MnO₂@NiO nanosheets to detect allyl mercaptan gas released by humans under psychological stress, Sens. Actuators B Chem. 368, 132137 (2022)
50. J. Burgués, C. Jiménez-Soto, S. Marco, Estimation of the limit of detection in semiconductor gas sensors through linearized calibration models. Anal. Chim. Acta. 1013, 13–25 (2018)10.1016/j.aca.2018.01.062 ↗
51. H. Khan, K. Malook, M. Shah, Highly selective and sensitive response of polypyrrole–MnO₂ based composites towards ammonia gas. J. Mater. Sci. : Mater. Electron. 29, 9090 (2018)
52. K. Malook, H. Khan, M. Ali, Ihsan-Ul-Haque, Investigation of room temperature humidity sensing performance of mesoporous CuO particles. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 113, 105021 (2020)10.1016/j.mssp.2020.105021 ↗
53. K. Akhtar, I.U. Haq, K. Malook, Gas sensing properties of semiconducting copper oxide nanospheroids. Powder Technol. 283, 505–511 (2015)10.1016/j.powtec.2015.06.023 ↗
54. K. Malook, M. Khan, M. Shah, U. Haque, A. Ahmad, Fabrication of Au-decorated V₂O₅ based sensor for ultra-trace level detection of ammonia in an environment resembling human exhaled breath. J. Alloys Compd. 1010, 177089 (2025)10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.177089 ↗
55. M.S. Barbosa, P.H. Suman, J.J. Kim, H.L. Tuller, J.A. Varela, M.O. Orlandi, Gas sensor properties of Ag- and Pd-decorated SnO₂ micro-disks to NO₂, H₂ and CO: Catalyst enhanced sensor response and selectivity. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 239, 253–261 (2017)10.1016/j.snb.2016.07.157 ↗