DataVXApplied Physics APaper
journal article·2026-07

A coupled finite element analysis and parametric study of tube forming by electromagnetic compression and expansion

Ilhem Boutana, Mohamed Rachid Mekideche, Oussama Cheriet, Oussama Kouissem

Applied Physics A· Volume 132· Issue 7
Publisher page
Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Electromagnetic Effects on Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. V. Psyk, D. Risch, B.L. Kinsey, A.E. Tekkaya, M. Kleiner, Electromagnetic forming–a review. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 211(5), 787–829 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.12.01210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.12.012 ↗
2. I. Boutana, M.R. Mekideche, Numerical investigation of thickness-driven formability in high-speed electromagnetic sheet forming. in 2025 2nd IEEE International Conference on Electronic Engineering and Information Systems (EEISS), (IEEE, 2025), pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/EEISS65394.2025.11085721.10.1109/EEISS65394.2025.11085721 ↗
3. I. Boutana, O. Cheriet, O. Kouissem, Innovative numerical analysis of electromagnetic tube compression for lightweight material applications. in 2025 First International Conference on Mechanical and Electrical Engineering for Green Energy Technologies (MEEGET), ( IEEE, 2025), pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/MEEGET65999.2025.11512259.10.1109/MEEGET65999.2025.11512259 ↗
4. S. Chen, D. Cai, W. Wei, L. Yang, H. Jiang, J. Cui, G. Li, Modeling and analysis for electrohydraulic forming of the variable cross-section tube with an auxiliary hole. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 142(1), 93–106 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-025-17014-410.1007/s00170-025-17014-4 ↗
5. X. Cui, J. Mo, J. Li, J. Zhao, Y. Zhu, L. Huang, Z. Li, K. Zhong, Electromagnetic incremental forming (EMIF): a novel aluminum alloy sheet and tube forming technology. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 214(2), 409–427 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.05.02410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.05.024 ↗
6. I. Boutana, M.R. Mekideche, Finite element model analyzing dynamical behavior of sheet electromagnetic forming. in 2009 6th International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals and Devices, (IEEE, 2009), pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/SSD.2009.4956684.10.1109/SSD.2009.4956684 ↗
7. D. Luca, Environmentally friendly processings by electromagnetic forming in automotive industry. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 17(1), 155–163 (2018)10.30638/eemj.2018.017 ↗
8. J. Li, L. Li, M. Wan, H. Yu, L. Liu, Innovation applications of electromagnetic forming and its fundamental problems. Proc. Manuf. 15, 14–30 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.16510.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.165 ↗
9. C. Wang, Y. Ding, T. Wu, Z. Li, C. Hu, Z. Wang, Y. Zhou, X. Lin, W. Zhang, J. Xu, Ionic double-network hydrogels for integrated electromagnetic shielding and self-powered sensing in wearable electronics. Adv. Sci. 12(37), 09115 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.20250911510.1002/advs.202509115 ↗
10. Z. Li, A. Abu-Siada, H. Zhu, C. Jiang, H. Ni, L. Qiu, H. Liu, Study on the efficiency of simultaneous tube compression and expansion electromagnetic forming. IEEE Access. 9, 30035–30042 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.305995110.1109/ACCESS.2021.3059951 ↗
11. Y. Haiping, L. Chunfeng, D. Jianghua, Sequential coupling simulation for electromagnetic-mechanical tube compression by finite element analysis. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209(2), 707–713 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.02.06110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.02.061 ↗
12. D.-K. Min, D.-W. Kim, A finite-element analysis of the electromagnetic tube-compression process. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 38(1–2), 29–40 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-0136(93)90183-710.1016/0924-0136(93)90183-7 ↗
13. W. Dahao, Z. Zhenyu, P. Fei, S. Xiaoming, C. Xiaohui, F. Jinxiu, Numerical simulation and experimental study on axial compression electromagnetic bulging of aluminum alloy tube. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 133(7), 3477–3493 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-13997-810.1007/s00170-024-13997-8 ↗
14. V. Psyk, M. Linnemann, M. Henkel, V. Kräusel, Numerical and experimental analysis of struts joined by electromagnetic forming for aircraft applications. Materials Research Proceedings. 41, (2024). https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644903131-15310.21741/9781644903131-153 ↗
15. N. Thirupathi, L. Kumar, S.D. Kore, Numerical modelling of the electromagnetic forming of seamless steel tube compression processes. Int. J. Comput. Mater. Sci. Surf. Eng. 12(1), 1–13 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCMSSE.2024.13900710.1504/IJCMSSE.2024.139007 ↗
16. I. Boutana, M.R. Mekideche, Exploring electromagnetic tube expansion based on field concentrator: An analytical model and numerical study. J. Microwaves, Optoelectron. Electromagn. Appl. 23(04), 2024280065 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-10742024v23i428006510.1590/2179-10742024v23i4280065 ↗
17. G. Bartels, W. Schätzing, H.-P. Scheibe, M. Leone, Comparison of two different simulation algorithms for the electromagnetic tube compression. Int.J. Mater. Form. 2, 693–696 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-009-0620-810.1007/s12289-009-0620-8 ↗
18. Y. Haiping, L. Chunfeng, Effects of current frequency on electromagnetic tube compression. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209(2), 1053–1059 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.03.01110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.03.011 ↗
19. I. Boutana, A numerical investigation and process optimization of magnetic pulse welding for similar and dissimilar materials. Continuum Mech. Thermodyn. 37(5), 76 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00161-025-01409-510.1007/s00161-025-01409-5 ↗
20. D. Kumar, S.D. Kore, A. Nandy, Experimental investigation of Cu-SS electromagnetically assisted adhesive tube-to-tube joining: Its advantages over electromagnetic crimping. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 109, 102908 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.10290810.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.102908 ↗
21. R.S. Eisenberg, Kirchhoff’s current law: A derivation from Maxwell’s equations. Computation. 13(8), 200 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/computation1308020010.3390/computation13080200 ↗
22. C. Hernandez, A. Maranon, I. Ashcroft, J. Casas-Rodriguez, A computational determination of the Cowper-symonds parameters from a single Taylor test. Appl. Math. Model. 37(7), 4698–4708 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.10.01010.1016/j.apm.2012.10.010 ↗
23. M. Woo, J. Kim, Inverse parameter estimation to predict material parameters of the Cowper-symonds constitutive equation in electrohydraulic forming process. J. Eng. Math. 132(1), 8 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-021-10175-710.1007/s10665-021-10175-7 ↗
24. M.A. Siddiqui, Numerical modelling and simulation of electromagnetic forming process. PhD thesis, (Strasbourg, 2009)
25. D. Gayakwad, M.K. Dargar, P.K. Sharma, R. Rana et al., A review on electromagnetic forming process. Proc. Mater. Sci. 6, 520–527 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.06610.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.066 ↗
26. X. Cui, J. Mo, F. Han, 3D multi-physics field simulation of electromagnetic tube forming. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 59, 521–529 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3540-y10.1007/s00170-011-3540-y ↗
27. H. Suzuki, H. Negishi, Y. Yokouchi, M. Murata, Free expansion of tube under magnetic pressure. J. Jpn. Soc. Technol. Plasticity. 27(310), 1254–1260 (1986)
28. H.E. Haratmeh, A.F. Arezoodar, M. Farzin, Numerical and experimental investigation of inward tube electromagnetic forming. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 88, 1175–1185 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8826-710.1007/s00170-016-8826-7 ↗
29. L. Zhong, L. Chunfeng, Simulation of electromagnetic tube bulging based on loose coupling method. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 19(4), 566–569 (2006)10.3901/CJME.2006.04.566 ↗
30. T. Ueda, L. Helfen, T.F. Morgeneyer, In situ laminography study of three-dimensional individual void shape evolution at crack initiation and comparison with Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman-type simulations. Acta Mater. 78, 254–270 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.06.02910.1016/j.actamat.2014.06.029 ↗
31. H. Wu, X. Zhuang, W. Zhang, Z. Zhao, Anisotropic Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman model considering the anisotropic void behaviors. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 248, 108229 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.10822910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108229 ↗
32. M. Butuc, J. Gracio, A.B. Da Rocha, A theoretical study on forming limit diagrams prediction. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 142(3), 714–724 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00813-610.1016/S0924-0136(03)00813-6 ↗
33. J.M. Allwood, D.R. Shouler, Generalised forming limit diagrams showing increased forming limits with non-planar stress states. Int. J. Plast 25(7), 1207–1230 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2008.11.00110.1016/j.ijplas.2008.11.001 ↗
34. I. Boutana, M.E. Boussalem, A. Laouira, S. Bouferroum, 3D modelling of the mechanical behaviour of magnetic forming systems. Bull Electr Eng Inf. 11(4), 1807–1817 (2022). https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v11i4.362810.11591/eei.v11i4.3628 ↗
35. A. Sharma, A.K. Agrawal, A bibliographic review of electromagnetic pulsed welding and forming technology. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series C , 1–11 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-025-01301-w10.1007/s40032-025-01301-w ↗
36. I. Boutana, A. Bousba, Y.N. Benhadj, Numerical modeling of industrial parts manufacturing using electromagnetic hemming process. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 133, 1943–1959 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-13869-110.1007/s00170-024-13869-1 ↗
37. H. Yu, R. Li, S. Han, X. Wang, X. Ding, X. Xie, Incremental electromagnetic forming of stainless steel spiral-grooved tubes. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 136(11), 4803–4813 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-025-15117-610.1007/s00170-025-15117-6 ↗
38. M. Kanakaraj, M. Arul Prasanna, I. Gerald Christopher Raj, Performance optimization of solar-energized electric vehicles using coupled inductor Relift boost converter. Scientific Reports. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38342-910.1038/s41598-026-38342-9 ↗
39. Y. Zhang, H. Liu, J. Liu, W. Wang, Y. Bian, P. Chen, H. Yang, J. Hao, R. Geng, Multi objective optimization of forming quality and wear resistance in cross-scale Nano/Micro-WC reinforced AlCoCrFeNi2. 1 high entropy alloy composite coatings in laser cladding. Intermetallics 193, 109281 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intermet.2026.10928110.1016/j.intermet.2026.109281 ↗
40. M.S. Surya, J.P. Srivastava, S.P. Maddula, Effect of nano-reinforcement particles on mechanical and tribological characteristics of composite materials: An in-depth review. J. Bio-and Tribo-Corrosion. 12(1), 9 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40735-025-01063-z10.1007/s40735-025-01063-z ↗
41. R. Mishra, A. Rajak, A hybrid experimental and numerical analysis of tailored seam single and double clinched joint using the electromagnetic forming process. J. Manuf. Process. 168, 470–484 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2026.04.04810.1016/j.jmapro.2026.04.048 ↗