Gamma-assisted engineering of cellulose nanocrystals from cannabis stem fiber for high-efficiency UV-shielding PLA/CNC–TiO2 transparent films
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. H. Althues, J. Henle, S. Kaskel, Functional inorganic nanofillers for transparent polymers. Chem. Soc. Rev. 36, 1454–1465 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1039/B608177K10.1039/B608177K ↗
2. S. Li, M.M. Lin, M.S. Toprak et al., Nanocomposites of polymer and inorganic nanoparticles. Nano Rev. 1, 5214 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3402/nano.v1i0.521410.3402/nano.v1i0.5214 ↗
3. J. Shojaeiarani, D.S. Bajwa, C. Ryan et al., Renewable biocomposites from industrial crops. Ind. Crops Prod. 183, 114904 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.1149010.1016/j.indcrop.2022.11490 ↗
4. D. Rasselet, A. Ruellan, A. Guinault et al., Oxidative degradation of polylactide (PLA) and its effects on physical and mechanical properties. Eur. Polym. J. 50, 109–116 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.10.01110.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.10.011 ↗
5. M. Narayanan, S. Loganathan, R.B. Valapa et al., UV protective polylactic acid/rosin films for sustainable packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 99, 37–45 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.01.15210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.01.152 ↗
6. Y. Cao, P. Xu, P. Lv et al., Excellent UV resistance of polylactide by interfacial stereocomplexation with double-shell-structured TiO₂. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 12, 49090–49100 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c1442310.1021/acsami.0c14423 ↗
7. S. Roy, P. Majumder, T.S. Mahapatra, UV-shielding efficiency of polymer/ZnO nanocomposites: recent developments and prospects. J. Vinyl Addit. Technol. 32, 456–483 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1002/vnl.7005010.1002/vnl.70050 ↗
8. X. Li, R. Zhao, Y. Zhai et al., UV-shielding and photocatalytic properties of ZnO–CeO₂–TiO₂ composite. Asian J. Chem. 26, 4566–4570 (2014). https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2014.1611010.14233/ajchem.2014.16110 ↗
9. G. Al, D. Aydemir, N. Ayrılmış et al., Biopolymer-based eco-friendly coatings reinforced with lignin nanoparticles for engineered wood panels. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 352, 151008 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2026.15100810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2026.151008 ↗
10. N.D. Bikiaris, I. Koumentakou, C. Samiotaki et al., Recent advances in poly(lactic acid) nanocomposites: incorporation of various nanofillers and their properties and applications. Polymers. 15, 1196 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1505119610.3390/polym15051196 ↗
11. O. Gordobil, I. Egüés, R. Llano-Ponte et al., Physicochemical properties of PLA–lignin blends. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 108, 330–338 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.01.00210.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.01.002 ↗
12. W. Ouyang, Y. Huang, H. Luo et al., Poly(lactic acid) blended with cellulolytic enzyme lignin: mechanical, thermal, and morphology evaluation. J. Polym. Environ. 20, 1–9 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-011-0359-410.1007/s10924-011-0359-4 ↗
13. S.A. Jose, N. Cowan, M. Davidson et al., A comprehensive review on cellulose nanofibers and composites. Nanomaterials. 15, 356 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1505035610.3390/nano15050356 ↗
14. J.A. Sirviö, M. Visanko, J.P. Heiskanen et al., UV-absorbing cellulose nanocrystals as functional reinforcing fillers. J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 6368–6375 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA00900J10.1039/C6TA00900J ↗
15. C. Xu, B. Li, S. Sundarrajan. et al., Sustainable nanocellulose-based electrospinning: Unlocking advanced materials for future technologies. Mater. Today. 87, 151–175 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2025.04.00610.1016/j.mattod.2025.04.006 ↗
16. Z. Aiping, Y. Somia, A. Hussain et al., Bifunctional cellulose nanocrystal tailoring star-chain structure to detect heat-dissipation and microplastic migration mechanism for PLA-based automotive film. Chem. Eng. J. 522, 168054 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2025.16805410.1016/j.cej.2025.168054 ↗
17. N.M.F. Hakimi, S.H. Lee, W.C. Lum et al., Surface modified nanocellulose and its reinforcement in rubber nanocomposites: a review. Polymers. 13, 3241 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1319324110.3390/polym13193241 ↗
18. A. Sinclair, X. Zhou, S. Tangpong et al., High-performance rubber nanocomposites reinforced by cellulose nanofibers. ACS Omega. 4, 13189–13199 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b0131310.1021/acsomega.9b01313 ↗
19. H. Nasution, H. Harahap, M.T.A. Fath et al., Tensile properties of sago starch biocomposites reinforced with nanocrystalline cellulose. IOP Conf. Ser. : Mater. Sci. Eng. 505, 012118 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/505/1/01211810.1088/1757-899X/505/1/012118 ↗
20. W. Tappanawatch, P. Prapainainar, P. Saeoui et al., Effect of gamma radiation on cellulose nanocrystal composites. Key Eng. Mater. 772, 13–18 (2018). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.772.1310.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.772.13 ↗
21. D. Shahdan, R.S. Chen, F.D. Zailan et al., γ-radiation for improved reinforcement in rubber nanocomposites. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 218, 111550 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.11155010.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.111550 ↗
22. S. Boopasiri, P. Sae-Oui, N. Roamcharern et al., PLA/ZnO nanocomposite films with enhanced UV-shielding. Food Packag Shelf Life. 38, 101102 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2023.10110210.1016/j.fpsl.2023.101102 ↗
23. I. Elfaleh, F. Abbassi, M. Habibi et al., Natural fiber composites: an eco-friendly alternative. Results Eng. 19, 101271 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.10127110.1016/j.rineng.2023.101271 ↗
24. El M. Achaby, Z. Kassab, A. Barakat et al., Alfa fibers for cellulose nanocrystals extraction. Ind. Crops Prod. 112, 499–510 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.12.04910.1016/j.indcrop.2017.12.049 ↗
25. O. Somseemee, P. Sae-Oui, C. Siriwong, Reinforcement of cellulose nanofibrils in rubber composites. Ind. Crops Prod. 171, 113881 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.11388110.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113881 ↗
26. P. Criado, C. Fraschini, M. Jamshidian et al., Gamma-irradiation of cellulose nanocrystals. Cellulose. 24, 2111–2124 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1241-x10.1007/s10570-017-1241-x ↗
27. R. List, L. Gonzalez-Lopez, A. Ashfaq et al., Ionizing radiation-induced degradation of cellulose. Polymers. 15, 4483 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1523448310.3390/polym15234483 ↗
28. I. Ogura, A. Moriyama, Y. Iizumi et al., Effect of gamma irradiation on cellulose nanofibers. J. Wood Sci. 71, 37 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s10086-025-02215-y10.1186/s10086-025-02215-y ↗
29. Y. Liu, J. Chen, X. Wu et al., Effects of γ-irradiation on microcrystalline cellulose. RSC Adv. 5, 34353–34363 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra03300d10.1039/c5ra03300d ↗
30. J. C, Xu, B. Yu., Li et al., Designing amphiphilic phase change cellulose nanofiber via carboxylic groups assisted grafting for fog water harvesting. Chem. Eng. J. 509, 161285 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2025.16128510.1016/j.cej.2025.161285 ↗
31. F. Whba, F. Mohamed, M.I. Idris et al., Effect of gamma irradiation on cellulose nanocrystals. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 56, 1803–1812 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2023.12.03710.1016/j.net.2023.12.037 ↗
32. M.Z.A.M. Jamil, F. Mohamed, N.R.A.M. Rosli et al., Gamma irradiation of gadolinium nanoparticles. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 165, 108407 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.10840710.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.108407 ↗
33. C. Xu, J. Yu, B. Li et al., Designing mechanically robust one-component nanocomposites via hyperbranched cellulose nanofibril grafted vegetable oil polymers. Carbohydr. Polym. 352, 123131 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2024.12313110.1016/j.carbpol.2024.123131 ↗
34. E. Fortunati, M. Peltzer, I. Armentano et al., Effects of modified cellulose nanocrystals on PLA nanocomposites. Carbohydr. Polym. 90, 948–956 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.06.02510.1016/j.carbpol.2012.06.025 ↗
35. E. Vatansever, D. Arslan, D.S. Sarul et al., Effects of molecular weight and crystallizability of polylactide on the cellulose nanocrystal dispersion quality in their nanocomposites. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 154, 276–290 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.03.11510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.03.115 ↗
36. M. Kaseem, K. Hamad, Z.U. Rehman, Advances in PLA/TiO2 composites. Materials. 12, 3659 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1222365910.3390/ma12223659 ↗
37. Y. Li, J. Zhang, C. Zhan et al., TiO2/CNC nanocomposites for photoreduction. Carbohydr. Polym. 233, 115838 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11583810.1016/j.carbpol.2020.115838 ↗
38. R. Nie, S. Yassin., H. Abdalkarim et al., Enzyme-programmed cellulose nanocrystal interfaces: Regulating degradation microenvironment and plant growth of polylactic acid films. J. Hazard. Mater. 507, 141695 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2026.14169510.1016/j.jhazmat.2026.141695 ↗
39. Y. Xu, M.A.A. Schoonen, Energy band positions of semiconducting minerals. Am. Mineral. 85, 543–556 (2000). https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2000-041610.2138/am-2000-0416 ↗
40. Y. Habibi, Advances in nanocellulose modification. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 1519–1542 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CS60204D10.1039/C3CS60204D ↗
41. P.J.P. Espitia, N.F.F. Soares, J.S.R. Coimbra et al., Zinc oxide nanoparticles in packaging. Food Bioprocess. Technol. 5, 1447–1464 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-012-0797-610.1007/s11947-012-0797-6 ↗