Analysis and minimization of temperature-induced adsorption effects caused by 3 Å molecular sieves in diffusion-cooled carbon dioxide (CO2) lasers
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The operational stability and performance of diffusion-cooled CO₂ lasers, crucial for generating extreme ultraviolet (EUV) radiation for microchip production, depend critically on maintaining a constant gas composition and pressure within the resonator. Conventional zeolitic 3 Å molecular sieves are frequently employed for the drying of laser gas; however, they have a tendency to adsorb both water (H₂O) and the laser-active component, CO₂. Furthermore, they cause undesirable temperature-dependent gas pressure fluctuations resulting from the adsorption or desorption of gas molecules under changing external conditions, making them unsuitable for use in long-term operations that require high accuracy. The situation becomes problematic for all negative pressure or vacuum systems requiring high pressure accuracy, that need to be transported for example to a customer, or that do not have a service life under operating or cleanroom conditions. The study examines a previously uninvestigated approach by systematically comparing conventional potassium-ion (K⁺)-exchanged 3 Å LTA molecular sieves with specially manufactured caesium-ion (Cs⁺)-exchanged 3 Å LTA sieves, aiming to suppress temperature-dependent gas composition fluctuations while preserving efficient H₂O removal. Thermal desorption analyses and long-term pressure monitoring indicate that Cs⁺-exchanged sieves exhibit markedly reduced CO₂ adsorption and desorption dynamics, resulting in significantly improved gas pressure stability against ambient temperature changes. Furthermore, integrating engineering controls such as isolating valves can further minimize pressure fluctuations. These results demonstrate that the combination of optimized molecular sieve material and proactive system design enables reliable, high-stability operation of CO₂ lasers under changing environmental conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Laser Design and Applications · Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics · Spectroscopy and Laser Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. J. Miyazaki, A. Yen, EUV Lithography Technology for High-volume Production of Semiconductor Devices. J. Photopol Sci. Technol. 32, 195–201 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2494/photopolymer.32.19510.2494/photopolymer.32.195 ↗
2. D.-K. Yang, D. Wang, Q.-S. Huang, Y. Song, J. Wu, W.-X. Li, Z.-S. Wang, X.-H. Tang, H.-X. Xu, S. Liu, C.-Q. Gui, The development of laser-produced plasma EUV light source, Chip 1 (2022) 100019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chip.2022.10001910.1016/j.chip.2022.100019 ↗
3. Y. Tao, M.S. Tillack, S. Yuspeh, R.A. Burdt, N.M. Shaikh, N. Amin, F. Najmabadi, Interaction of a $\hbox{CO}2$ Laser Pulse With Tin-Based Plasma for an Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography Source. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 38, 714–718 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2009.203437910.1109/TPS.2009.2034379 ↗
4. K. Nowak, T. Ohta, T. Suganuma, J. Fujimoto, H. Mizoguchi, A. Sumitani, A. Endo, CO2 laser drives extreme ultraviolet nano-lithography — second life of mature laser technology. Opto-Electron. Rev. 21 (2013). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11772-013-0109-310.2478/s11772-013-0109-3 ↗
5. H. Hokazono, M. Obara, K. Midorikawa, H. Tashiro, Theoretical operational life study of the closed-cycle transversely excited atmospheric CO2 laser. J. Appl. Phys. 69, 6850–6868 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.34767510.1063/1.347675 ↗
6. J. Deile, Power scaling of high brightness multi-kilowatt coaxial CO2 lasers: Power scaling of high brightness multi-kilowatt coaxial CO2 lasers
7. R. Malz, U. Haubenreisser, Use of zeolites for the stabilization of CO 2 partial pressure in sealed-off CO 2 waveguide lasers. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 24, 1060–1064 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/24/7/00410.1088/0022-3727/24/7/004 ↗
8. G. Reiss, Die Verwendung von Molekularsieb-Zeolithe in der Adsorptionstechnik. Period Polytech. Chem. Eng. 19(1-2), 137–164 (1975)
9. S. Wang, Y. Wang, Y. Kuang, S. Xu, S. Gao, L. Liu, H. Niu, P. Xiao, B. Huang, Adsorption behaviour of molecular sieve and activated carbon for CO2 adsorption at cold temperatures. Carb Neutrality. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43979-022-00017-510.1007/s43979-022-00017-5 ↗
10. C. Xu, W. Wei, Y. He, Enhanced hydrogen separation performance of Linde Type-A zeolite molecular sieving membrane by cesium ion exchange. Mater. Lett. 324, 132680 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2022.13268010.1016/j.matlet.2022.132680 ↗
11. J.M. Kolle, M. Fayaz, A. Sayari, Understanding the Effect of Water on CO2 Adsorption. Chem. Rev. 121, 7280–7345 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0076210.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00762 ↗
12. E. Gabruś, J. Nastaj, P. Tabero, T. Aleksandrzak, Experimental studies on 3A and 4A zeolite molecular sieves regeneration in TSA process: Aliphatic alcohols dewatering–water desorption. Chem. Eng. J. 259, 232–242 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.07.10810.1016/j.cej.2014.07.108 ↗
13. T. Finke, J. Serafińczuk, R. Köhler, W. Viöl, Achieving long-term gas pressure stability in diffusion-cooled carbon dioxide (CO2) lasers by minimizing CO2 adsorption from 3Å molecular sieves with optimized cesium exchange rates. Appl. Phys. A 131 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-025-08350-z10.1007/s00339-025-08350-z ↗
14. R. Bai, X. Song, W. Yan, J. Yu, Low-energy adsorptive separation by zeolites. Natl. Sci. Rev. 9, nwac064 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwac06410.1093/nsr/nwac064 ↗
15. T. Montanari, G. Busca, On the mechanism of adsorption and separation of CO2 on LTA zeolites: An IR investigation. Vib. Spectrosc. 46, 45–51 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vibspec.2007.09.00110.1016/j.vibspec.2007.09.001 ↗
16. R.V. Siriwardane, M.-S. Shen, E.P. Fisher, J.A. Poston, Adsorption of CO 2 on Molecular Sieves and Activated Carbon. Energy Fuels. 15, 279–284 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1021/ef000241s10.1021/ef000241s ↗
17. G. Jajko, P. Kozyra, J.J. Gutiérrez-Sevillano, W. Makowski, S. Calero, Carbon Dioxide Capture Enhanced by Pre-Adsorption of Water and Methanol in UiO-66, Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse. Germany). 27, 14653–14659 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.20210218110.1002/chem.202102181 ↗
18. J. van Kampen, J. Boon, M. van Sint, Annaland, Steam adsorption on molecular sieve 3A for sorption enhanced reaction processes. Adsorption. 27, 577–589 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-020-00283-810.1007/s10450-020-00283-8 ↗
19. C. Reichl, D. Lager, G. Englmair, B. Zettl, M. Popovac, Fluid dynamics simulations for an open-sorption heat storage drum reactor based on thermophysical kinetics and experimental observations. Appl. Therm. Eng. 107, 994–1007 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.06.11910.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.06.119 ↗
20. J. Jänchen, K. Schumann, E. Thrun, A. Brandt, B. Unger, U. Hellwig, Preparation, hydrothermal stability and thermal adsorption storage properties of binderless zeolite beads. Int. J. Low-Carbon Tech. 7, 275–279 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlct/cts03710.1093/ijlct/cts037 ↗
21. A. Lombardi, N. Faginas-Lago, L. Pacifici, G. Grossi, Energy transfer upon collision of selectively excited CO2 molecules: State-to-state cross sections and probabilities for modeling of atmospheres and gaseous flows. J. Chem. Phys. 143, 34307 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.492688010.1063/1.4926880 ↗
22. N. Andric, P. Jenny, Molecular dynamics investigation of energy transfer during gas-surface collisions. Phys. Fluids. 077104 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.503778310.1063/1.5037783 ↗
23. R. Lin, A. Ladshaw, Y. Nan, J. Liu, S. Yiacoumi, C. Tsouris, D.W. DePaoli, L.L. Tavlarides, Isotherms for Water Adsorption on Molecular Sieve 3A: Influence of Cation Composition. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 54, 10442–10448 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b0141110.1021/acs.iecr.5b01411 ↗
24. K. Narang, K. Fodor, A. Kaiser, F. Akhtar, Optimized cesium and potassium ion-exchanged zeolites A and X granules for biogas upgrading. RSC Adv. 8, 37277–37285 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ra08004f10.1039/c8ra08004f ↗