journal article·2026-06

Structure-transport relationships in graphenated carbon nanotubes with hierarchical foliates for fundamental electrochemical applications

Yusnita Yusuf, Ismayadi Ismail, Emre Gür, Farah Nabilah Shafie, Ikhwan Syafiq Mohd Noor, Nurnilamsari Shamshurim

Applied Physics A· Volume 132· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Graphenated carbon nanotubes (g-CNTs) provide a strategic solution to overcome the intrinsic charge- transport limitations of conventional carbon nanotube (CNT) electrodes by integrating one-dimensional nanotube backbones with two-dimensional graphene edge architectures. Here, we report a synthesis structure transport property study of lightweight g-CNT aerogels fabricated via floating catalyst chemical vapor deposition (FCCVD), where the precursor injection rate is used as a single, scalable parameter to control graphenation. A reduced injection rate promotes the in-situ growth of crumpled graphene foliates on CNT sidewalls, yielding a hierarchical three-dimensional network, while higher injection rates favour smooth, graphitic CNTs. Structural characterization reveals that g-CNTs exhibit increased disorder and reduced long-range graphitic order, evidenced by a broadened (002) XRD reflection (FWHM ≈ 1.30°) and higher Raman disorder ratios (ID/IG ≈ 1.13) relative to CNTs. Despite this disorder, g-CNTs display nearly double the bulk electrical conductivity (3.24 Scm⁻¹ vs. 1.64 Scm⁻¹), highlighting the role of graphene-mediated junction engineering rather than crystallinity alone. Rheological and morphological analyses further show that graphene foliates enhance interparticle connectivity, dispersion stability, and processability. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy reveals that graphenation fundamentally reconfigures a junction-limited CNT network into a hybrid percolation system with parallel relaxation pathways. Notably, both junction and charge-transfer resistances are minimized at an optimal electrode thickness of 150 μm. Cyclic voltammetry independently validates the functional outcome of this transport optimization, with g-CNT electrodes delivering a four-fold higher specific capacitance and exhibiting a sharp maximum in areal capacitance (0.491 mF cm⁻²) precisely at the thickness corresponding to the impedance minimum. Our findings suggest that FCCVD-controlled graphenation utilizes structural disorder to facilitate kinetically efficient transport pathways. These results offer valuable insights for the design of advanced hierarchical carbon electrodes, suggesting that electrochemical performance is governed more by engineered connectivity than by simple surface area maximization.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Graphene research and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. A. Bianco, Y. Chen, E. Frackowiak, M. Holzinger et al., Carbon science perspective in 2020: current research and future challenges. Carbon 161, 373–391 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.01.05510.1016/j.carbon.2020.01.055 ↗
2. M. Salanne, B. Rotenberg, K. Naoi et al., Efficient storage mechanisms for building better supercapacitors. Nat. Energy 1, 1–10 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.7010.1038/nenergy.2016.70 ↗
3. L. Chai, R. Li, Y. Sun et al., MOF-derived carbon‐based materials for energy‐related applications. Adv. Mater. 37, 2413658 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20241365810.1002/adma.202413658 ↗
4. H. Shao, Y.C. Wu, Z. Lin et al., Nanoporous carbon for electrochemical capacitive energy storage. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49, 3005–3039 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0cs00059k10.1039/d0cs00059k ↗
5. H. Liu, T. Zhan, C. Li, S. Zhao, Y. An, X. Sun, K. Wang, X. Zhang, Y. Ma, Recent progress of pitch-based carbon materials for electrochemical energy storage. Chem. Eng. J. 502, 157861 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.15786110.1016/j.cej.2024.157861 ↗
6. S.A. Bhawani, A. Tariq, A. Moheman, Z. Ngaini, (2019) Chap. 5 - Functionalized Graphene Nanocomposites for Water Treatment. In: Jawaid M, Bouhfid R, Kacem Qaiss A el (eds) Functionalized Graphene Nanocomposites and their Derivatives. Elsevier, pp 91–10710.1016/B978-0-12-814548-7.00005-2 ↗
7. N. Florien, S. Gupta, R. Poria et al., Structure and Electrochemical Properties of Graphene, Derivatives, and Its Nanocomposites, in Electrochemical Exfoliation of Graphene and Its Derivatives: Commercial Applications, ed. by R. Khan, N. Kumar, M.A. Sadique, A. Parihar (Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, 2024), pp. 113–13610.1007/978-981-97-2128-3_4 ↗
8. G.A. Tafete, G. Thothadri, M.K. Abera, A review on carbon nanotube-based composites for electrocatalyst applications. Fullerenes Nanotub. Carbon Nanostruct. 30, 1075–1083 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/1536383X.2022.202827810.1080/1536383X.2022.2028278 ↗
9. R. Dubey, D. Dutta, A. Sarkar, P. Chattopadhyay, Functionalized carbon nanotubes: synthesis, properties and applications in water purification, drug delivery, and material and biomedical sciences. Nanoscale Adv. 3, 5722–5744 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d1na00293g10.1039/d1na00293g ↗
10. Y. Yusuf, S. Shafie, I. Ismail et al., Highly conductive graphenated-carbon nanotubes sheet with graphene foliates for counter electrode application in dye-sensitized solar cells. Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology 31, 1325–1333 (2023). https://doi.org/10.47836/pjst.31.3.1210.47836/pjst.31.3.12 ↗
11. Y. Yusuf, S. Shafie, I. Ismail et al., A Comparative Study of Graphenated-Carbon Nanotubes Cotton and Carbon Nanotubes as Catalyst for Counter Electrode in Dye-sensitized Solar Cells. Malaysian J. Microscopy. 17, 162–174 (2021)
12. I. Ismail, S. Mamat, N.L. Adnan et al., Novel 3-dimensional cotton-like graphenated-carbon nanotubes synthesized via floating catalyst chemical vapour deposition method for potential gas-sensing applications. Journals of Nanomaterials 2019, 1–10 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/571718010.1155/2019/5717180 ↗
13. B.R. Stoner, A.S. Raut, B. Brown et al., Graphenated carbon nanotubes for enhanced electrochemical double layer capacitor performance. Appl Phys Lett 99, 183104 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.365751410.1063/1.3657514 ↗
14. S.M. Ubnoske, A.S. Raut, C.B. Parker et al., Role of nanocrystalline domain size on the electrochemical double-layer capacitance of high edge density carbon nanostructures. MRS Communications 5, 285–290 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1557/mrc.2015.1310.1557/mrc.2015.13 ↗
15. M. Etesami, M.T. Nguyen, T. Yonezawa et al., 3D carbon nanotubes-graphene hybrids for energy conversion and storage applications. Chemical Engineering Journal 446, 137190 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.13719010.1016/j.cej.2022.137190 ↗
16. P.A. Henry, A.S. Raut, S.M. Ubnoske et al., Enhanced electron transfer kinetics through hybrid graphene-carbon nanotube films. Electrochemistry Communications 48, 103–106 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2014.08.02410.1016/j.elecom.2014.08.024 ↗
17. W.T. Wahyuni, S.A. Hasnawati Ta’alia, A.Y. Akbar et al., Electrochemical sensors based on the composite of reduced graphene oxide and a multiwalled carbon nanotube-modified glassy carbon electrode for simultaneous detection of hydroquinone, dopamine, and uric acid. RSC Adv. 14, 27999–28016 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ra05537c10.1039/d4ra05537c ↗
18. Z. Xiong, L. Shen, J. Long et al., Ultrahigh concentration exfoliation and aqueous dispersion of few-layer graphene by excluded volume effect. Nat. Commun. 15, 10807 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-55131-y10.1038/s41467-024-55131-y ↗
19. K.J. Hughes, K.A. Iyer, R.E. Bird et al., Review of carbon nanotube research and development: Materials and emerging applications. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 7, 18695–18713 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.4c0272110.1021/acsanm.4c02721 ↗
20. M. Pimpilova, A brief review on methods and materials for electrode modification: Electroanalytical applications towards biologically relevant compounds. Discov. Electrochem. 1, 12 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44373-024-00012-810.1007/s44373-024-00012-8 ↗
21. Y. Zhong, K. Deng, J. Zheng et al., One-step growth of the interconnected carbon nanotubes/graphene hybrids from cuttlebone-derived bi-functional catalyst for lithium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 149, 205–213 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2022.11.03510.1016/j.jmst.2022.11.035 ↗
22. R. Zhao, N. Sun, B. Xu, Recent advances in heterostructured carbon materials as anodes for sodium-ion batteries. Small Struct. 2, 2100132 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/sstr.20210013210.1002/sstr.202100132 ↗
23. M. Etesami, M.T. Nguyen, T. Yonezawa et al., 3D carbon nanotubes-graphene hybrids for energy conversion and storage applications. Chem. Eng. J. 446, 137190 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.13719010.1016/j.cej.2022.137190 ↗
24. P.A. Henry, A.S. Raut, S.M. Ubnoske et al., Enhanced electron transfer kinetics through hybrid graphene-carbon nanotube films. Electrochem. Commun. 48, 103–106 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2014.08.02410.1016/j.elecom.2014.08.024 ↗
25. W. Choi, J. Park, J. Jung et al., Raman spectroscopic image analysis on micropatterned graphene. Micro Nano Lett. 8, 362–365 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1049/mnl.2013.016010.1049/mnl.2013.0160 ↗
26. M. Pimpilova, A brief review on methods and materials for electrode modification: electroanalytical applications towards biologically relevant compounds. Discover Electrochemistry 1, 12 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44373-024-00012-810.1007/s44373-024-00012-8 ↗
27. K.J. Hughes, K.A. Iyer, R.E. Bird et al., Review of carbon nanotube research and development: materials and emerging applications. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 7, 18695–18713 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.4c0272110.1021/acsanm.4c02721 ↗
28. L.L. Theng, I. Yahya, M.F. Mohamad Taib, M.A. Mohamed, Electrical and structural characterization of graphene carbon nanotubes hybrids (GCH) structures. ASM Journal 12, 83–89 (2019)
29. C.B. Parker, A.S. Raut, B. Brown et al., Three-dimensional arrays of graphenated carbon nanotubes. J. Mater. Res. 27, 1046–1053 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2012.4310.1557/jmr.2012.43 ↗
30. J. Ren, R.P. Ren, Y.K. Lv, A flexible 3D graphene@ CNT@ MoS2 hybrid foam anode for high-performance lithium-ion battery. Chem. Eng. J. 353, 419–424 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.07.13910.1016/j.cej.2018.07.139 ↗
31. A. Islam, B. Mukherjee, M. Sribalaji et al., Role of hybrid reinforcement of carbon nanotubes and graphene nanoplatelets on the electrical conductivity of plasma sprayed alumina coating. Ceram. Int. 44, 4508–4511 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.12.02110.1016/j.ceramint.2017.12.021 ↗
32. S. Lepak-Kuc, K.Z. Milowska, S. Boncel et al., Highly conductive doped hybrid carbon nanotube-graphene wires. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 33207–33220 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b0819810.1021/acsami.9b08198 ↗
33. L. Yue, G. Pircheraghi, S. Monemian, I. ManasZloczower, Epoxy composites with carbon nanotubes and graphene nanoplatelets – dispersion and synergy effects. Carbon N Y 78, 268–278 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2014.07.00310.1016/j.carbon.2014.07.003 ↗
34. F. Farooq, A. Akbar, R. Khushnood et al., Experimental investigation of hybrid carbon nanotubes and graphite nanoplatelets on rheology, shrinkage, mechanical, and microstructure of SCCM. Materials 13, 230 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1301023010.3390/ma13010230 ↗
35. M. Abedi, R. Fangueiro, A. Correia, An effective method for hybrid CNT/GNP dispersion and its effects on the mechanical, microstructural, thermal, and electrical properties of multifunctional cementitious composites. J. Nanomater. 1, 6749150 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/674915010.1155/2020/6749150 ↗
36. M. Lu, J. Liao, P. Gulgunje et al., Rheological behavior and fiber spinning of polyacrylonitrile (PAN)/carbon nanotube (CNT) dispersions at high CNT loading. Polymer 215, 123369 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2020.12336910.1016/j.polymer.2020.123369 ↗
37. R. Arrigo, G. Malucelli, Rheological behavior of polymer/carbon nanotube composites: an overview. Materials 13, 2771 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1312277110.3390/ma13122771 ↗
38. S. Yaqoob, Z. Ali, S. Ali, A. D’Amore, Polystyrene–carbon nanotube composites: interaction mechanisms, preparation methods, structure, and rheological properties—a review. Physchem 5, 14 (2025)10.3390/physchem5020014 ↗
39. Z. Chen, T. Lv, Y. Yao et al., Three-dimensional seamless graphene/carbon nanotube hybrids for multifunctional energy storage. J. Mater. Chem. Mater. 7, 24792–24799 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TA01503A10.1039/C9TA01503A ↗
40. J. Zhang, T. Li, X. Li et al., A key role of inner-cation-π interaction in adsorption of Pb(II) on carbon nanotubes: experimental and DFT studies. J. Hazard. Mater. 412, 125187 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.12518710.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125187 ↗
41. F. Haghighatju, H. Rafsanjani, F. Esmaeilzadeh, Estimation of the dimension of micropores and mesopores in single walled carbon nanotubes using the method Horvath–Kawazoe, Saito and Foley and BJH equations. Micro. Nano. Lett. 12, 1–5 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1049/mnl.2016.030610.1049/mnl.2016.0306 ↗
42. J. Li, J. Tang, J. Yuan et al., Porous carbon nanotube/graphene composites for high-performance supercapacitors. Chem. Phys. Lett. 693, 60–65 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2018.06.01010.1016/j.cplett.2018.06.010 ↗
43. H.N. Yang, Y.D. Ko, W.J. Kim, 3-D structured Pt/rGO-polyethyleneimine-functionalized MWCNTs prepared with different mass ratio of rGO and MWCNT for proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 43, 4439–4447 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.06.15510.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.06.155 ↗
44. Y. Suzuki, M. Ishida, K. Hata, T. Ohba, Sequential N2 adsorption by the nanopore entrance filling scheme in nanopores of carbon nanotubes. Langmuir 39, 15431–15440 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c0211310.1021/acs.langmuir.3c02113 ↗
45. B. Abreu, M. Rocha, M. Nunes, E.F. Marques, Carbon nanotube/graphene nanocomposites built via surfactant-mediated colloid assembly as metal-free catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction. J. Mater. Sci. 56, 19512–19527 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-05957-810.1007/s10853-021-05957-8 ↗
46. S. Wang, L. Liang, S. Chen, Tensile strength and toughness of carbon nanotube-graphene foam composite materials and the corresponding microscopic influence mechanism. Mater. Des. 237, 112529 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2024.11200410.1016/j.matdes.2024.112004 ↗
47. P. Kowalczyk, A.V. Neimark, S. Furmaniak et al., Graphene-domain theory for high-surface-area nanoporous carbons: beyond the BET method. Carbon 245, 120737 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2025.12073710.1016/j.carbon.2025.120737 ↗
48. B. Hirschorn, M.E. Orazem, B. Tribollet et al., Determination of effective capacitance and film thickness from constant-phase-element parameters. Electrochim. Acta 55, 6218–6227 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2009.10.06510.1016/j.electacta.2009.10.065 ↗
49. B.-A. Mei, O. Munteshari, J. Lau et al., Physical interpretations of Nyquist plots for EDLC electrodes and devices. J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 194–206 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b1058210.1021/acs.jpcc.7b10582 ↗