Quantifying selective pulsed laser cleaning and residual contamination in paper artifacts by ATR spectroscopy
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Pulsed laser cleaning of cultural heritage materials requires removing unwanted deposits from fragile substrates without inducing collateral damage. This study explores femtosecond (fs) laser cleaning of cellulose-based historical papers through a combined experimental and modeling approach. Paper samples, prepared with traditional Turkish-Ottoman sizings (alum–egg, corn starch, wheat starch) and subjected to artificial aging, were contaminated with graphite and graphite–kaolinite mixtures to replicate historical soiling. Fs laser treatments were performed within the experimentally verified safe fluence range of 0.39–0.78 J/cm 2 , and the cleaning effects were monitored using Attenuated Total Reflectance Fourier Transform Infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy. The measurements demonstrated effective removal of graphite and partial reduction of kaolinite, while confirming the preservation of cellulose and sizing features. Burnished samples exhibited lower cleaning efficiency due to deeper contaminant embedding. Beyond these experiments, we introduce, for the first time in the context of paper conservation, the integration of ATR-FTIR spectroscopy with exponential saturation and decay models. This approach enables a quantitative assessment of both cleaning efficiency and residual contamination while providing predictive insight into fluence thresholds extending beyond the experimentally tested range. Overall, the combined experimental–modeling methodology establishes a robust framework for defining safe and effective fs laser cleaning parameters, offering new opportunities for the quantitative optimization of paper artifact conservation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Laser Material Processing Techniques · Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma · Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. S. Zervos, I. Alexopoulou, Paper conservation methods: a literature review. Cellulose 22, 2859–2897 (2015)10.1007/s10570-015-0699-7 ↗
2. F. Di Turo, The chemistry behind paper restoration: diagnostic techniques and cutting-edge innovation. ChemTexts 11, 7 (2025)10.1007/s40828-025-00203-9 ↗
3. J.F. Asmus, C.G. Murphy, W.H. Munk, Studies on the interaction of laser radiation with art artefacts. Proc. SPIE 41, 19–27 (1973)10.1117/12.953831 ↗
4. P. Boonrat, M. Dickinson, M. Cooper, Initial investigation into the effect of varying parameters in using an Er:YAG laser for the removal of brass-based overpaint from an oil-gilded frame. J. Inst. Conserv. 43, 1–13 (2020)10.1080/19455224.2019.1706592 ↗
5. J.M. Larson, M. Cooper, S. Sportun, Developments in the application of laser technology for conservation. Stud. Conserv. 45(sup1), 107–110 (2000)10.1179/sic.2000.45.Supplement-1.107 ↗
6. T. Ersoy, T. Tunay, M. Uguryol, G. Mavili, S. Akturk, Femtosecond laser cleaning of historical paper with sizing. J. Cult. Herit. 15, 259–265 (2013)
7. M. Bertasa, C. Korenberg, Successes and challenges in laser cleaning metal artefacts: a review. J. Cult. Herit. 53, 100–117 (2022)10.1016/j.culher.2021.10.010 ↗
8. C. Chillè, G. Rossignoli, T. Nagasawa, I. Osticioli, J. Agresti, S. Siano, D. Ciofini, Laser cleaning of artificially soiled cotton fabric: assessment of surface chemical effects. J. Cult. Herit. 62, 15–24 (2023)
9. A. Zanini, L. Bartoli, The laser as a tool for the cleaning of cultural heritage. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 364, 012078 (2018)10.1088/1757-899X/364/1/012078 ↗
10. P. Rudolph, F. Ligterink, J. Pedersoli et al., Laser-induced alteration of contaminated papers. Appl. Phys. A 79, 941–944 (2004)10.1007/s00339-004-2574-5 ↗
11. E. Zekou, I. Tsilikas, E. Chatzitheodoridis, A.A. Serafetinides, Laser paper cleaning: the method of cleaning historical books. Proc. SPIE 10226, 1022605 (2017)10.1117/12.2262426 ↗
12. J. Brand, A. Wain, A.V. Rode, S. Madden, L. Rapp, Towards safe and effective femtosecond laser cleaning for the preservation of historic monuments. Appl. Phys. A 129, 246 (2023)10.1007/s00339-023-06455-x ↗
13. P. Pouli, in Laser Cleaning on Stonework: Principles, Case Studies, and Future Prospects, eds. By F. Gherardi, P.N. Maravelaki Conserving Stone Heritage. Cultural Heritage Science (Springer, Cham, 2022).10.1007/978-3-030-82942-1_3 ↗
14. P. Pouli, M. Oujja, M. Castillejo, Practical issues in laser cleaning of stone and painted artefacts: optimisation procedures and side effects. Appl. Phys. A 106, 447–464 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-011-6696-210.1007/s00339-011-6696-2 ↗
15. S. Siano, J. Agresti, I. Cacciari et al., Laser cleaning in conservation of stone, metal, and painted artifacts: state of the art and new insights on the use of the Nd:YAG lasers. Appl. Phys. A 106, 419–446 (2012)10.1007/s00339-011-6690-8 ↗
16. P. Pouli, K. Melessanaki, V. Tornari, E. Bernikola, G. Filippidis, D. Anglos, C. Fotakis, An integrated approach to the study and preservation of paintings using laser light technology: diagnosis, analysis and cleaning, in Science and Art: The Painted Surface. (Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 2014), pp.287–31310.1039/9781839161957-00287 ↗
17. S. Pentzien, A. Conradi, R. Koter, J. Krüger, Cleaning of artificially soiled paper using nanosecond, picosecond, and femtosecond laser pulses. Appl. Phys. A 101, 441–446 (2010)10.1007/s00339-010-5809-7 ↗
18. J. Kolar, M. Strlič, S. Pentzien, W. Kautek, Near-UV, visible and IR pulsed laser light interaction with cellulose. Appl. Phys. A 71, 87–90 (2000)10.1007/PL00021097 ↗
19. P. Rudolph, F.J. Ligterink, J.L. Pedersoli Jr., M. van Bommel, J. Bos, H.A. Aziz, J.B.G.A. Havermans, H. Scholten, D. Schipper, W. Kautek, Characterization of laser-treated paper. Appl. Phys. A 79, 181–186 (2004)10.1007/s00339-004-2650-x ↗
20. D. Thickett, B. Pretzel, FTIR surface analysis for conservation. Heritage Sci. 8, 5 (2020)10.1186/s40494-020-0349-8 ↗
21. G.-L. Liu, S.G. Kazarian, Recent advances and applications to cultural heritage using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy and ATR-FTIR spectroscopic imaging. Analyst 147, 1777 (2022)10.1039/D2AN00005A ↗
22. W.M. Bundy, J.N. Ishley, Kaolin in paper filling and coating. Appl. Clay Sci. 5, 397–420 (1991)10.1016/0169-1317(91)90015-2 ↗
23. M.A. Hubbe, J.J. Pawlak, A.A. Koukoulas, Paper’s appearance: a review. BioResources 3(2), 627–665 (2008)10.15376/biores.3.2.627-665 ↗
24. C.Y. Boynukara, M. Uguryol, G. Mavili, S. Akturk, An investigation of the cleaning performances of femtosecond and nanosecond laser pulses for artificially soiled papers with sizing. Appl. Phys. A 127, 275 (2021)10.1007/s00339-021-04437-5 ↗
25. R.F. Tester, W.R. Morrison, Swelling and gelatinization of cereal starches. Cereal Chem. 67, 558–563 (1990)
26. J. Jane, Structural features of starch granules part II. J. Appl. Glycosci. 56, 105–112 (2009)10.5458/jag.56.105 ↗
27. T. Smausz, B. Kondász, T. Gera, T. Ajtai, N. Utry, M. Pintér, G. Kiss-Albert, J. Budai, Z. Bozóki, G. Szabó, B. Hopp, Determination of UV–visible–NIR absorption coefficient of graphite bulk using direct and indirect methods. Appl. Phys. A 123, 633 (2017)10.1007/s00339-017-1249-y ↗
28. J.D. Lindberg, M.S. Smith, Visible and near infrared absorption coefficients of Kaolinite and related clays. Am. Mineral. 59, 274–279 (1974)