journal article·2026-05Open access

Physics-based inverse modelling of dichroic glass: machine learning emulation of the lycurgus cup

Emre Burak Ertuş

Applied Physics A· Volume 132· Issue 5

Abstract

Abstract The Lycurgus Cup is a fourth-century Roman cage cup that exhibits striking dichroism — appearing opaque green in reflected light and translucent red in transmission — arising from Au–Ag alloy nanoparticles embedded in soda-lime-silica glass matrix. Despite extensive analytical characterization, a quantitative computational framework linking microstructural parameters to the macroscopic dichroic appearance remains elusive. This work establishes a surrogate-assisted inverse design pipeline by integrating Mie electrodynamics, two-layer Monte Carlo photon transport, and CIEDE2000 perceptual color optimization to identify physically plausible glass compositions that reproduce the characteristic optical signature of the cup. A nine-parameter forward model incorporating nanoparticle plasmonic absorption, Fe 2 O 3 ionic absorption, phase-separated silica droplet scattering, and heterogeneous layer structure was coupled with a Histogram-Based Gradient Boosting emulator (R 2 = 0.955, spectral MAE = 0.004) trained on 2,000 Monte Carlo simulations with PCA-compressed spectral outputs. The trained emulator reduced per-evaluation cost from minutes to milliseconds, enabling exhaustive exploration of over 215,000 candidate compositions within a practical timeframe. The optimized composition (Au 15 Ag 85 nanoparticles, diameter 83 nm, volume fraction ~ 10 − 5 , in 2.2 mm glass with 0.56 wt% Fe 2 O 3 ) produced a red-to-green transmission ratio of 11.5 upon high-fidelity Monte Carlo validation (50,000 photons, 3 seeds averaged), with the reflected color matching the target olive-green within ΔE₀₀ = 12.0 under D65 illumination. The Pareto analysis revealed that only 0.05% of the sampled parameter space simultaneously achieved ΔE₀₀ < 15 for both transmission and reflection, quantifying the extremely narrow feasible composition window and offering insight into the historical rarity of successful dichroic glass production. The framework is applicable to the inverse design of engineered nanocomposite optical materials beyond the archaeological context.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis · Phase-change materials and chalcogenides · Pigment Synthesis and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. I. Freestone, N. Meeks, M. Sax, C. Higgitt, The Lycurgus Cup — A Roman nanotechnology. Gold. Bull. 40, 270–277 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0321559910.1007/BF03215599 ↗
2. D.J. Barber, I.C. Freestone, An investigation of the origin of the colour of the Lycurgus Cup by analytical transmission electron microscopy. Archaeometry. 32, 33–45 (1990)10.1111/j.1475-4754.1990.tb01079.x ↗
3. D. Whitehouse, Roman Dichroic Glass: Two Contemporary Descriptions? J. Glass Stud. 31, 119–121 (1989)
4. C. Höpken, A Dichroic Bottle Fragment from Dülük Baba Tepesi, Turkey. J. Glass Stud. 57, 292–295 (2015)
5. F.E. Wagner, S. Haslbeck, L. Stievano, S. Calogero, Q.A. Pankhurst, K.-P. Martinek, Before striking gold in gold-ruby glass. Nature. 407, 691–692 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/3503766110.1038/35037661 ↗
6. U. Kreibig, M. Vollmer, Optical Properties of Metal Clusters (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)
7. D. Rioux, S. Vallières, S. Besner, P. Muñoz, E. Mazur, M. Meunier, An Analytic Model for the Dielectric Function of Au, Ag, and their Alloys. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2, 176–182 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.20130045710.1002/adom.201300457 ↗
8. C.F. Bohren, D.R. Huffman, Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles (Wiley, 2008)
9. G. Mie, Beiträge zur Optik trüber Medien, speziell kolloidaler Metallösungen. Ann. Phys. 330, 377–445 (1908). https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.1908330030210.1002/andp.19083300302 ↗
10. I.C. Freestone, The Provenance of Ancient Glass through Compositional Analysis, MRS Online Proc. Libr. 852 (2004) 188–201. https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-852-OO8.110.1557/PROC-852-OO8.1 ↗
11. D. Barchiesi, Lycurgus Cup: inverse problem using photographs for characterization of matter. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 32, 1544–1555 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.32.00154410.1364/JOSAA.32.001544 ↗
12. L. Kool, F. Dekker, A. Bunschoten, G.J. Smales, B.R. Pauw, A.H. Velders, V. Saggiomo, Gold and silver dichroic nanocomposite in the quest for 3D printing the Lycurgus cup. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 11, 16–23 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.11.210.3762/bjnano.11.2 ↗
13. E.G. Wrigglesworth, J.H. Johnston, Mie theory and the dichroic effect for spherical gold nanoparticles: an experimental approach. Nanoscale Adv. 3, 3530–3536 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/D1NA00148E10.1039/D1NA00148E ↗
14. Y. Zhang, X. Xu, Predictions of glass transition onset temperature of chalcogenide glass Ge Se1–. J. Phys. Chem. Solids. 159, 110246 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2021.11024610.1016/j.jpcs.2021.110246 ↗
15. Y. Zhang, X. Xu, Predicting AsxSe{1-x} glass transition onset temperature. Int. J. Thermophys. 41, 149 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-020-02734-410.1007/s10765-020-02734-4 ↗
16. Y. Zhang, X. Xu, Machine learning glass transition temperature of polyacrylamides using quantum chemical descriptors. Polym. Chem. 12, 843–851 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/D0PY01581D10.1039/D0PY01581D ↗
17. I.C. Freestone, Roman Glass. Encycl. Glass Sci. Technol. Hist. Cult., Wiley, Ltd, 2021: 1261–1271. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118801017.ch10.310.1002/9781118801017.ch10.3 ↗
18. I.C. Freestone, The Archaeometry of Glass. Handb. Archaeol. Sci. 885–910 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119592112.ch4410.1002/9781119592112.ch44 ↗
19. R.H. Brill, The chemistry of the Lycurgus Cup, in: Proc. Seventh Int. Congr., Glass, I.C.G, Brussels, 1965: p. 223
20. P.B. Johnson, R.W. Christy, Optical Constants of the Noble Metals. Phys. Rev. B 6, 4370–4379 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.6.437010.1103/PhysRevB.6.4370 ↗
21. M.N. Polyanskiy, Refractiveindex.info database of optical constants. Sci. Data. 11, 94 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02898-210.1038/s41597-023-02898-2 ↗
22. M. Rubin, Optical properties of soda lime silica glasses. Sol Energy Mater. 12, 275–288 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1633(85)90052-810.1016/0165-1633(85)90052-8 ↗
23. A. Drozdov, M. Andreev, M. Kozlov, D. Petukhov, S. Klimonsky, C. Pettinari, Lycurgus cup: the nature of dichroism in a replica glass having similar composition. J. Cult. Herit. 51, 71–78 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2021.07.00210.1016/j.culher.2021.07.002 ↗
24. I. Veksler, Phase Equilibria and Phase Diagrams in Oxide Systems. Encycl. Glass Sci. Technol. Hist. Cult., John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2021: 529–543. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118801017.ch5.210.1002/9781118801017.ch5.2 ↗
25. Sellmeier, Zur Erklärung der abnormen Farbenfolge im Spectrum einiger Substanzen. Ann. Phys. 219 (1871) 272–282. https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.1871219061210.1002/andp.18712190612 ↗
26. K. Nassau, The fifteen causes of color: The physics and chemistry of color. Color. Res. Appl. 12, 4–26 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1002/col.508012010510.1002/col.5080120105 ↗
27. R.H. Doremus, G.H. Sigel, Glass Science, Phys. Today 47 (1994) 63–63. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.280875210.1063/1.2808752 ↗
28. J.E. Shelby, Introduction to Glass Science and Technology, 3rd Edition, Royal Society of Chemistry, 202010.1039/9781839169229 ↗
29. L. Wang, S.L. Jacques, L. Zheng, MCML—Monte Carlo modeling of light transport in multi-layered tissues. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 47, 131–146 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2607(95)01640-F10.1016/0169-2607(95)01640-F ↗
30. U.M. Noebauer, S.A. Sim, Monte Carlo radiative transfer. Living Rev. Comput. Astrophys. 5, 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41115-019-0004-910.1007/s41115-019-0004-9 ↗
31. M.D. McKay, R.J. Beckman, W.J. Conover, Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code. Technometrics. 21, 239–245 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1979.1048975510.1080/00401706.1979.10489755 ↗
32. P. Geurts, D. Ernst, L. Wehenkel, Extremely randomized trees. Mach. Learn. 63, 3–42 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-006-6226-110.1007/s10994-006-6226-1 ↗
33. L. Breiman, R. Forests, Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101093340432410.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
34. G. Ke, Q. Meng, T. Finley, T. Wang, W. Chen, W. Ma, Q. Ye, T.-Y. Liu, LightGBM: A Highly Efficient Gradient Boosting Decision Tree, in: Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., Curran Associates, Inc., 2017: pp. 1–30
35. P.R. Wiecha, A. Arbouet, C. Girard, O.L. Muskens, Deep learning in nano-photonics: inverse design and beyond. Photonics Res. 9, B182 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.41596010.1364/PRJ.415960 ↗
36. G. Sharma, W. Wu, E.N. Dalal, The CIEDE2000 color-difference formula: Implementation notes, supplementary test data, and mathematical observations. Color. Res. Appl. 30, 21–30 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1002/col.2007010.1002/col.20070 ↗
37. P. Green, Colorimetry and Colour Difference. Fundam. Appl. Colour Eng., John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2023: 27–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119827214.ch210.1002/9781119827214.ch2 ↗
38. G. Wyszecki, W.S. Stiles, Color Science: Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulae (Wiley, 2000)
39. V. Thurairethinam, G. Savini, G. Hawkins, P. Chioetto, Extreme broadband dichroics: Monte Carlo transmission line modeling for astronomical spectroscopy. J. Astron. Telesc Instrum. Syst. 10 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JATIS.10.1.01800510.1117/1.JATIS.10.1.018005 ↗
40. S. Prahl, miepython: Pure python calculation of Mie scattering, (2026). https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.794926310.5281/ZENODO.7949263 ↗
41. O. Kramer, Scikit-Learn, in Mach. Learn. Evol. Strateg, ed. by O. Kramer (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016), pp. 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33383-0_510.1007/978-3-319-33383-0_5 ↗
42. T. Mansencal, M. Mauderer, M. Parsons, N. Shaw, K. Wheatley, S. Cooper, J.D. Vandenberg, L. Canavan, K. Crowson, O. Lev, K. Leinweber, S. Sharma, T.J. Sobotka, D. Moritz, M. Pppp, C. Rane, P. Eswaramoorthy, J. Mertic, B. Pearlstine, M. Leonhardt, O. Niemitalo, M. Szymanski, M. Schambach, S. Huang, M. Wei, N. Joywardhan, O. Wagih, P. Redman, J. Goldstone, S. Hill, J. Smith, F. Savoir, G. Saxena, S. Chopra, I. Sibiryakov, T. Gates, G. Pal, N. Tessore, A. Pierre, F.-X. Thomas, S. Srinivasan, T. Downs, K. Rusching, X. Chen, B. Herb, T.A. Caswell, L. Collod, Colour 0.4.4, (2023). https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.1039632910.5281/ZENODO.10396329 ↗
43. E. Petryayeva, U.J. Krull, Localized surface plasmon resonance: Nanostructures, bioassays and biosensing—A review. Anal. Chim. Acta. 706, 8–24 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2011.08.02010.1016/j.aca.2011.08.020 ↗
44. J.H. Friedman, Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Ann. Stat. 29 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/101320345110.1214/aos/1013203451 ↗
45. Y. Zhang, X. Xu, Machine learning glass transition temperature of polymers. Heliyon. 6, e05055 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e0505510.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05055 ↗
46. Y. Zhang, X. Xu, Machine learning glass transition temperature of styrenic random copolymers. J. Mol. Graph Model. 103, 107796 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmgm.2020.10779610.1016/j.jmgm.2020.107796 ↗
47. Y. Zhang, X. Xu, Machine learning glass transition temperature of polymethacrylates. Mol. Cryst. Liq Cryst. 730, 9–22 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/15421406.2021.194634810.1080/15421406.2021.1946348 ↗
48. S. Wu, B. Huang, Y. Wu, Z. Meng, S. Zhang, Reflection and transmission two-way structural colors. Nanoscale. 12, 11460–11467 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NR00405G10.1039/D0NR00405G ↗
49. C. Dahmen, G. von Plessen, Optical Effects of Metallic Nanoparticles. Aust J. Chem. 60, 447–456 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1071/CH0647310.1071/CH06473 ↗